Beaufort: the last of the Plantagenets

Who is a current British duke whose surname is that of another ducal title, but whose ancestors’ surname was the one that is now the title of the current dukedom? Confused? What British dukes are royal yet not royal? Peers fifth in precedence amongst English non-royal dukes? The dukes of Beaufort. Whose house gave its name to a sport that since 1992 has been part of the Olympic Games? And also so closely connected to hounds and horses?

The Beaufort Hunt at Badminton

The Beaufort title was created in 1682 at a time when King Charles II was concerned with extending the ‘majesty’ of the Stuart bloodline by raising all those with this blood, legitimate or not, to a status above the rest of the nobility. He did this by making use of the then still rare ducal title, notably for his (or his brother’s) illegitimate offspring (Richmond, Saint Albans, Grafton, Berwick and so on). But the duke of Beaufort was not a Stuart, nor was he a Tudor—his family was a curious holdover from the dynasty that had ruled England in the Middle Ages: the Plantagenets. But choosing a ‘surname’ was tricky: Plantagenet was perhaps too obvious, and while Beaufort had been used by this family in the 15th century, when they were dukes of Somerset, by the 16th century their (illegitimate) descendants used the name Somerset instead. Meanwhile, the Somerset ducal title itself was now already in use by another family, the Seymours. It is confusing indeed! So instead of Beaufort dukes of Somerset, we will now have Somerset dukes of Beaufort. An even further twist enters the picture when considering that Beaufort itself was a place in France, one that had not been held by any English family since the 14th century, and had instead become a completely separate dukedom, held first by the illegitimate offspring of King Henry IV, Bourbon-Vendôme, then by one of the grandest aristocratic families in France, Luxembourg-Montmorency. So in the eighteenth century, it was possible for an English Duke of Beaufort to travel to France and meet another Duke of Beaufort. What’s more, if these two dukes journeyed to Brussels, they might even have met a third Duke of Beaufort (-Spontin), a Belgian title which took its name from a castle in the Ardennes.

The 18th-century English dukes of Beaufort were proud to claim a direct patrilineal link to the Plantagenets, and continued to do so into the 21st century—at least until science reared its ugly head. During the DNA testing of the remains of the last Plantagenet king, Richard III, in 2014, scientists announced that there had been a ‘genetic disconnect’ somewhere in the 18th century—ie, somebody lied about paternity at some point. But at least culturally and socially, the dukes of Beaufort of today represent the last of the Plantagenet dynasty in England. And as a ducal family in general, they have certainly been able to maintain this semi-royal status, as one of the wealthiest landowners in the United Kingdom with their own recognised livery—blue and buff—in the world of hunting and horse racing, and a palatial residence and near princely status in the counties of the southwest—Gloucestershire and Herefordshire—and across the border into Monmouthshire in South Wales.

Beaufort Hunt blue and buff

The Beaufort story starts in France, where a small, but apparently beautiful, fortress in southern Champagne was called the ‘bellum forte’ or beau fort. This formed the core of a lordship from at least the 10th century, and was held by the powerful noble Broyes family who controlled much of this region on behalf of the Counts of Champagne. It was inherited by the Counts of Rethel (from northern Champagne) in about 1200, then was sold in 1270 to Blanche of Artois, wife of the Count of Champagne. Blanche’s second husband (from 1275) was Prince Edmund of England (known as ‘Crouchback’), the younger brother of King Edward I. Edmund was also Earl of Lancaster, so the association of Beaufort with the House of Lancaster began, as Blanche took the lordship as part of her widow’s dowry and transferred it to the children of her second marriage: her third son, John, was specifically called Lord of Beaufort, but when he died in 1317 it returned to the general pool of Lancastrian possessions. The 4th Earl of Lancaster, Henry, was raised to the rank of Duke in 1351, and his two daughters included Beaufort in their dowries, notably the second daughter, another Blanche, who in 1359 married John of Gaunt, a younger son of King Edward III who was re-created Duke of Lancaster in 1362.

the village of Montmorency-Beaufort in Champagne

By this time the Hundred Years War was raging in France and possessions of English royals were confiscated by the French Crown. Sources conflict at this point, as some say the castle and lordship of Beaufort was confiscated by King Charles V in 1369, while others claim that John of Gaunt’s children by his mistress Katherine Swynford were born in Beaufort, or at least the eldest, John, in about 1372, explaining why they were given ‘de Beaufort’ as a surname. More informed sources consider this unlikely.

John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster and Lord of Beaufort, receives a letter

We’ll turn to the children of Katherine Swynford, and their unique status, next, but first we can finish the French side of this story. The seigneurie of Beaufort, now a property of the French crown, was given out numerous times to various supporters over the next two centuries: to the Duke of Burgundy, to the Duke of Nemours, to Charles of Anjou; in 1477 it was elevated to the status of a county for a royal councillor, Thierry de Lenoncourt, then retained this status when restored to the Duke of Nemours. It was given in 1507 to the King’s cousin, Gaston de Foix, then to the latter’s sister, the Queen of Aragon, Germaine de Foix. And on and on to various French aristocrats at the Valois court.

In 1554, the family of Luxembourg-Brienne (who owned much of this area of Champagne) ceded the seigneurie of Beaufort to François de Clèves, Duke of Nevers (who was also Count of Rethel, so that Champenois link remained), whose daughter Catherine, Duchess of Guise, sold it to Gabrielle d’Estrées, the famous mistress of King Henry IV, in 1597. The county of Beaufort was then legally joined to several adjacent lordships and erected into a duchy-peerage for ‘la Belle’ Gabrielle and for her son, César de Bourbon, born three years before. César was at the same time created Duke of Vendôme (the old Bourbon patrimony), and in 1599 inherited everything from his mother upon her untimely death (some say just before King Henry married her, which would have made Vendôme the dauphin of France—but that’s another story). In time, while César’s first son became Duke of Vendôme, his second son François was ‘advanced’ by the King to the rank of Duke of Beaufort so that he could make use of its peerage to take a seat in the Parlement of Paris. Beaufort was a famously popular rebel leader during the civil war known as the Fronde, given the nickname ‘Roi des Halles’ (King of the Marketplace’), then reconciled with the monarchy and served as a commander in the armies of Louis XIV. This over-the-top colourful figure died leading a heroic if foolhardy charge against impregnable Ottoman defences at Candia in Crete in June 1669—his body was never recovered.

François de Bourbon-Vendôme, Duc de Beaufort, by Jean Nocret, one of my absolute most favourite paintings

The ducal title passed back to the Vendôme family; the last duke, Louis-Joseph de Bourbon, then sold it in 1688 to Charles-François de Montmorency-Luxembourg, son of the Marshal de Luxembourg. In 1689 Beaufort was re-erected as a duchy-peerage, but this time taking the name Montmorency. This was due to the fact that the Montmorency family no longer owned the lordship of that name (having been confiscated by the Crown in the 1630s); it also consolidated this family’s landholdings in the region of Champagne, as their other duchy (known as ‘Luxembourg’ or ‘Piney’) was literally next door to Beaufort. The dukes of Montmorency (Beaufort) remained prominent at the court of France throughout the 18th and 19th centuries. The village and the remains of its ancient beau fort took on the name Montmorency, which it kept until 1919, when it was renamed Montmorency-Beaufort.

Returning to the English Beauforts, we can look at one of those fascinating medieval personages who continued to blend the English court with life on the Continent. Catherine de Roët was the daughter of a knight from Hainaut in the Low Countries, who came to England in the suite of Philippa of Hainault, wife of Edward III, in 1328. She was later placed in the household of Blanche of Lancaster, wife of John of Gaunt (the King’s third son) and was given the responsibility of looking after their daughters, especially following the Duchess of Lancaster’s death in 1368. Catherine (or Katherine) was at this time married to Hugh Swynford, one of the knights in John of Gaunt’s retinue. It was also about this time that her sister Philippa married another courtier in Queen Philippa’s household, the poet Geoffrey Chaucer. Katherine became the mistress of John of Gaunt (remarried in 1371 to the Infanta Constance of Castile). Four children were born in the next decade: John, Henry, Joan and Thomas.

Katherine Swynford, from her tomb

Katherine Swynford continued to serve as a lady-in-waiting in the household of the new Duchess of Lancaster, and later in that of Mary of Bohun, married to John of Gaunt’s son Henry of Bolingbroke in 1381. Finally, in 1396, the Duke married his former mistress and obtained a papal bull retrospectively legitimising his and Katherine’s children, giving them the name ‘Beaufort’. But why? It seems strange to me to choose a fairly obscure lordship in Champagne that was no longer part of the Lancaster landholdings. Tudor historians dismiss the idea that it was named for the lordship of Beaufort in Anjou, but this would make more sense to me, since Anjou was in fact the historic place of origin for the Plantagenet dynasty, and Beaufort castle, part of the dowry of John of Gaunt’s ancestress, Queen Isabella of Angoulême (wife of John I), continued to be fought over, frequently, in the Hundred Years War. The County of Anjou had been lost to the Plantagenets in the first years of the 13th century, but it was always a place deemed worthy of re-conquest by the English monarchs, so the naming a child ‘Beaufort’ would have more symbolic value.

John of Gaunt’s nephew, King Richard II, confirmed the legitimacy of these Beaufort children with an act in Parliament in 1397. But a few years later, in 1407—Bolingbroke having overthrown his cousin Richard and crowned himself as Henry IV—another legal confirmation was made of his half-siblings’ legitimacy, but this time with the added clause ‘excepta dignitate regali’. This meant that although his half-siblings were legitimate and thus able to legally inherit property (and had any social stain removed from their bastardy), they could not inherit the throne of England, the ‘royal dignity’. The exact validity of this proclamation has been debated by historians for centuries—for example suggesting it was never formally presented to Parliament, so invalid as law—notably because part of the claims of the Tudor dynasty to the throne depended on the status of their Beaufort ancestors.

John de Beaufort, Earl of Somerset, with his wife and her first husband, Canterbury Cathedral

Richard II had already loaded down his cousins with titles and royal offices. The eldest, John de Beaufort, was created Earl of Somerset in 1397 shortly after the formal legitimisation, and given the offices of Lieutenant of Aquitaine and Warden of the Cinque Ports. He was even married to the King’s niece, Margaret Holland, daughter of the Earl of Kent. Later that same year, John was elevated further to Marquess of Dorset, only the second time this title had appeared in England. The second son, Henry, was named Bishop of Lincoln. Their sister Joan was honoured by the King raising her husband, Ralph Neville of Raby, to an earldom (Westmoreland), also in 1397. But when Henry IV took the throne in 1399, he deprived his half brother of his offices and the title Marquess of Dorset (with the King apparently pronouncing that “the name of marquess is a strange name in this realm”). He remained Earl of Somerset, however, and in 1404 was appointed Constable of England. His brother Bishop Henry was transferred from Lincoln to Winchester, and served for a year as Henry IV’s Lord Chancellor (1403-04).

Where did these early Beauforts live? They were initially raised in their mother’s house at Kettlethorpe in Lincolnshire (and thus close to the bishopric where second son Henry would initially be established). By the 1390s, John was given several manors in Somerset, which would in a sense form his earldom—lands formerly held by the Montague earls of Salisbury in the southern part of the county, near Yeovil. He and his brothers were also given lordships and manors in Northamptonshire, Derbyshire, Norfolk and elsewhere.

But in terms of a family seat, this might best be considered to be Corfe Castle in Dorset (so again connected to one of the main family titles). This was a royal castle, built initially by William the Conqueror and one of the earliest stone castles in England. It was frequently used as a residence for royal hostages and like the other main royal castle-prison, the Tower of London, was usually whitewashed giving the central tower a unique white appearance as it guarded a pass through the white chalk hills of Dorset. The Earl of Somerset was named Constable of Corfe Castle in 1407, and the family would be based here for the next half-century. The castle remained in royal hands until 1572 when Elizabeth I sold it to Christopher Hatton, whose heirs sold it in 1635 to the Bankes family. The Bankes were royalists who held this castle against Parliamentary forces longer than any in southern England, but ultimately were pushed out in 1645 and the castle’s defences ‘slighted’ (made indefensible). The family recovered the property, but left it a ruin for the next three-hundred years; in 1981 they gave it to the National Trust which undertook major renovations in 2008.

Corfe Castle, Dorset, today

Not far to the north in Dorset, the Beauforts patronised an important collegiate church, Wimborne Minster, built by the Anglo-Saxons in the 8th century, and burial place of King Aethelred I. It was rebuilt by the Normans in the 11th century. The 1st Earl’s son, the 1st Duke of Somerset, would be buried here in 1444, and his grand-daughter, Lady Margaret Beaufort (mother of Henry VII), would build a family chapel here.

Wimborne Minster, Dorset

Meanwhile, in London, the family had power bases notably at the episcopal residence of the bishops of Winchester, Winchester Palace, in Southwark on the south bank of the Thames (which at that time, extraordinarily was within the diocese of Winchester). This great palace was built in the 12th century and survived until the 18th century when it was divided up into tenements and storehouses, then mostly burned down in 1814. Across the river, the Beauforts acquired a mansion in the City of London known as Cold Harbour (or Coldharbour or Harborough), located on a street of aristocratic mansions known as Upper Thames Street, near today’s Cannon Street tube station. It had once belonged to Alice Perrers, mistress of Edward III but was confiscated when she was disgraced and exiled in 1376. It was given to the Duke of Exeter whose niece Margaret Holland was married to John de Beaufort, and they took over the house from about 1401. It was later a favoured residence of Lady Margaret Beaufort during the reign of Henry VII. Coldharbour Mansion was later owned by the earls of Shrewsbury and was destroyed in the Great Fire of London of 1666.

Winchester Palace, Southwark, London
a sketch of what Cold Harbour might have looked like

By 1410, the 1st Earl of Somerset was well established, with lands and residences all over southern England. But he died suddenly in March of that year, aged only about 35. His son Henry became 2nd Earl, but was still in the nursery, aged 9. So Henry, Bishop of Winchester, became head of the Beaufort family. By the end of the reign of Henry V, he was one of the most powerful men in the Kingdom, serving again as Lord Chancellor (essentially head of government) in 1413-17, and then for the infant King Henry VI in 1424-26. Beaufort had also been named as one of the leaders of the Regency Council for the infant king in 1422, and when he retired as Chancellor was named a Cardinal (1426) and Papal Legate for Germany, Hungary and Bohemia (1427). With this latter charge he led an army in Bohemia against the Hussite heretics, but was badly defeated at Tachov. Cardinal Beaufort remained at the centres of power in England in the 1430s-40s, but now as just one of Henry VI’s many feuding advisors—he once again played a prominent role in arranging the King’s marriage with the King of France’s niece, Margaret of Anjou, in 1445, then died in 1447. This marriage brought the Beauforts a powerful ally at court, but in the long run much enmity from those who sought to undermine the Queen’s power over her husband and later son.

Cardinal Beaufort in Winchester Cathedral

Meanwhile, the youngest Beaufort son, Thomas, had come of age: Henry IV had created him Earl of Dorset in 1412, and revived his older brother’s appointment as Lieutenant of Aquitaine. Dorset too had a stint as Chancellor of England (1410-12). In the next reign, Henry V made him Duke of Exeter, in 1416—the title held previously by the family of his sister-in-law, Margaret Holland (and re-created for them later)—and kept him close during his re-conquest of Normandy, 1418-19. The King named him ‘Count of Harcourt’ to encourage a sense of ownership in the old Norman dominions (which included the powerful stronghold of Harcourt). The Duke of Exeter was also a member of the regency council for Henry VI in 1422 and died in 1426, leaving no living children from his marriage to Margaret Neville of Hornby.

The Beaufort family thrived in the reign of Henry VI. The children of John, 1st Earl of Somerset, were a virtual second royal family, and at times came close to usurping that place entirely—something that caused the strong rivalry with the House of York and led in part to the Wars of the Roses. Henry Beaufort, the 2nd Earl of Somerset, had died as a teenager at the siege of Rouen in 1418, so it was his brother John who led the family in this reign. In 1421, he and younger brother Thomas went to France with their royal cousin Henry V. They fought at the Battle of Baugé, and both were captured. John remained in captivity for 17 years, and Thomas for six. When he was released, Thomas was created ‘Count of Perche’, with a similar design as above to inspire him to re-take that French county, while the youngest brother Edmund was created ‘Count of Mortain’ in Normandy. None of these titles (Harcourt, Perche, Mortain) were recognised by the French king. Thomas was killed in 1431 at the siege of Louviers, when Edmund took over command of the English army, and made a name for himself re-capturing the important port of Harfleur and delivering the besieged city of Calais. Meanwhile their sister Joan married the King of Scots, James I, who had been in captivity in England for nearly two decades—James was released upon their marriage in 1424 and he and Joan Beaufort returned to Scotland where she played an important political role for the next twenty years.

Joan de Beaufort, Queen of Scots

When the 3rd Earl of Somerset was finally released in 1438, he returned to England and was given command again in France, as Captain-General of Aquitaine and Admiral of the English navy. He proved to be a poor commander and presided over the loss of much of Aquitaine. Nevertheless, in August 1443 he was created Duke of Somerset and Earl of Kendal, and led another campaign to France, this time disastrously losing the English hold on Normandy. By this point, Henry VI had failed to establish himself as a powerful monarch, and his royal cousin the Duke of York’s influence was rising. The 1st Duke of Somerset died in May 1444, after only eight months of being a duke (though there are some indications he’d been named a duke as early as 1438). He left behind a widow, Margaret Beauchamp of Bletsoe, and an infant daughter, Margaret Beaufort, future progenitrix of the Tudor dynasty.

John Beaufort, 1st Duke of Somerset, Wimborne Minster

The Duke of Somerset’s brother Edmund, meanwhile, had been given a re-creation of the Earldom of Dorset in 1442—still based in its stronghold at Corfe Castle—then promoted to his father’s old ‘strange’ title, Marquess of Dorset. In 1444, he was named Lord Lieutenant of France, supplementing his brother’s near complete control there. When John Beaufort died in 1445, Edmund replaced him as 2nd Duke of Somerset (though formally not re-created until 1448). He forced the Duke of York out as supreme commander in France, and, allied with Queen Margaret of Anjou, functioned essentially as Henry VI’s prime minister from June 1450. He acted as godfather to the Prince of Wales at his baptism in 1453, and strongly hinted that he should be named the child’s heir and head of the House of Lancaster. The 2nd Duke of Somerset was no more successful in war than his brother had been, however—he was forced to surrender the Norman capital of Rouen, then lost all of Normandy by 1450, and the remaining strongholds in Aquitaine by 1453. In April 1454 the Duke of York ousted him from government and imprisoned him in the Tower of London (and spread rumours that the Prince of Wales was actually Somerset’s son), until the King regained his senses at the end of the year and released him. By the spring of 1455, however, England was at war with itself, and Somerset was killed by Yorkist forces at the Battle of Saint Albans.

Edmund Beaufort, 2nd Duke of Somerset, in Rouen

The pretensions of the House of Beaufort that clashed so intensely with the House of York can be seen visually in their coat-of-arms: the golden lions of England quartered with the lilies of France, made different to the royal arms of England by a border of alternating blue and silver (known in heraldry as a ‘bordure compony’). These arms were supported by one of the most curious of heraldic animals: the ‘Beaufort yale’. A yale was a mythical beast, like an antelope but with tusks and horns that could swivel in any direction. Under the Tudors it became one of the ‘king’s beasts’ and can be seen in statue form today in front of Hampton Court Palace.

Arms of Lady Margaret Beaufort at St John’s College, Cambridge, with the Beaufort yales, the red rose of Lancaster and other family symbols
the Beaufort Yale

There were now two Dowager Duchesses of Somerset, both with Beauchamp as a surname (though from different branches). Duchess Margaret looked after her daughter Margaret by agreeing to her swift marriage in November 1455 (though she was only 12) to King Henry VI’s half-brother (who was already her legal guardian), Edmund Tudor, Earl of Richmond. Duchess Eleanor (daughter of the Earl of Warwick) was left with three sons and five daughters. In 1458, in an attempt at reconciliation, it was agreed by the Royal Council that the Duke of York should pay the widowed Duchess Eleanor and her children an annual pension of five thousand marks as compensation for the death of the their father. The eldest son, Henry, had just turned twenty and was now 3rd Duke of Somerset. He became the hope of the House of Lancaster, with the King slipping increasingly into madness and the Prince of Wales still a child. In 1459, Somerset was sent with a force to take the fortress of Calais from the Earl of Warwick, Richard Neville—his cousin via his great-aunt Joan and his cousin-in-law via his mother. Back in England, the Duke of Somerset was initially successful in battle, at Wakefield in 1460, then at the second Battle of Saint Albans in 1461. But a few weeks later he lost the Battle of Towton, and fled to France as York proclaimed himself king as Edward IV. Somerset’s titles were attainted by Parliament in December, but he was pardoned in 1463 and restored to his lands and titles. He nevertheless re-joined the forces of Queen Margaret in rebellion against Edward IV, but was defeated at Hexham in Northumberland in May 1464—he was captured by Yorkist forces and executed on the spot.

Brother Edmund now became 4th Duke of Somerset. He had lived in France since 1461, attempting to rally the French king to Margaret of Anjou’s cause. He was only recognised as duke by the Lancastrians since the title was once more attainted in May 1464. He returned with Queen Margaret to England in 1470, and was captured and executed after the Battle of Tewkesbury in May 1471. His brother John, known as the Earl of Dorset (again only recognised by Lancastrians) was also killed at Tewkesbury.

execution of the 4th Duke of Somerset, Tewkesbury, 1471

All that remained now of the House of Beaufort, so powerful just two decades before, was the Dowager Duchess Margaret; her daughter Margaret, Dowager Countess of Richmond, aka Lady Henry Stafford (her first husband Edmund Tudor had died in 1456, and Stafford would soon follow, later in 1471); the latter’s young son, Henry Tudor, living abroad at the court of the Duke of Brittany; and five married Beaufort women. The eldest of these, Eleanor, was the widow of the powerful Earl of Ormond—her daughters from a second marriage became major heiresses and took many of the Beaufort estates into the houses of Carey and Percy in the Tudor era. Anne married into the Paston family, famous for the ‘Paston Letters’ which are an invaluable source for students of the late 15th century; while Margaret was widow of the Earl of Stafford, elder brother of Sir Henry Stafford—making it a little confusing to have two Lady Margaret Beaufort Staffords. The more famous of these Lady Margarets was of course the mother of King Henry VII and the all-seeing dowager-grandmother until a few months into the reign of Henry VIII.

Lady Margaret Beaufort, with arms and portcullis symbol behind her, and the red rose of Lancaster above her

Lady Margaret Beaufort has featured prominently and with great vigour in recent television dramas about the early Tudors, and has been in archaeological news as well, with the rediscovery in December 2023 of the location of the ‘lost Tudor palace’ of Collyweston. The manor of Collyweston, in the northwestern corner of Northamptonshire (not far from Stamford, in Lincolnshire), was built in the early 15th century and granted to Margaret by her son shortly after his accession in 1485. She enlarged the house and arranged its terraced gardens in about 1500, and notably hosted the court in 1503 as part of the send-off arranged for her grand-daughter, Princess Margaret, on her way to marry the King of Scots. After Margaret’s death in 1509, Henry VIII gave it to his natural son, Henry FitzRoy, and later in the century it was given to Princess Elizabeth by her brother Edward VI, but not visited often. By the end of the century, it was leased to the Cecil family (whose seat, Burghley House was not far away), and though it was sold by James I to a royal servant in the 1620s and mostly dismantled in the 1640s, the estate once again passed to the Cecils, earls of Exeter by the end of the 18th century. By this point, almost all traces of the original house were gone.

the dig at Collyweston

This was the end of the powerful Beauforts of Somerset. But not the end of the House of Beaufort. The 3rd Duke of Somerset had a son, Charles Somerset, born of a relationship with Joan Hill in about 1460. In 1492, he made an excellent marriage, to Elizabeth Herbert, daughter of the Earl of Pembroke and heiress of his title Baron Herbert and of the chief seats of that family, Raglan Castle and Caldicot Castle, both in Monmouthshire in southeast Wales (see the Herbert family, dukes of Powis). The new Baron Herbert thus bore the arms of Beaufort, ‘bruised’ with a silver ‘baton sinister’ indicating his illegitimate birth, and overall the escutcheon of the Herberts, three silver lions on a divided red and blue shield. Adding to their already unique ‘Beaufort Yale’, the Somerset family arms had two other rather strange supporters which they picked up from the Herberts: a green wyvern on one side, a fairly common Welsh beast, and a curious silver panther with spots of various colours and bursts of flame coming out of its mouth and ears. Heraldic experts of the 19th century puzzled over this magical panther, equating it possibly to those seen on the continent in the Middle Ages, which were also spotted and had flames coming out of their mouth, thinking it might refer to ancient Greek texts that said that panthers had very sweet-smelling breath, which made all other animals—except the evil dragon—approach it, thus being a symbol of the sweetness of Christ. This panther is seen as one of the supporters of the royal arms under Henry VI, so perhaps it came to the Beauforts from there. The Somerset family would keep the division of the coat of arms between Beaufort and Herbert until the 1620s, when the latter was dropped.

arms of the Marquess of Worcester showing Beaufort and Herbert at top, Woodville and Russel on bottom, with supporters: a panther on left and a wyvern on right

Of the major estates gained by the Somerset-Herbert marriage, the seat of the family became Raglan Castle. Raglan had long been an important Norman border fortress between the English county of Hereford and the untamed wilds of South Wales. Built soon after the Conquest, it was held by the Bloet family for two centuries until it was purchased in 1432 by a Welsh nobleman on the rise, William ap Thomas, who rebuilt the castle to more modern fortification standards. His son William took the surname Herbert, supported the Yorkist cause, and was created Baron Herbert of Raglan in 1461 and Earl of Pembroke in 1468. He had greatly expanded Raglan as befitted his new status, but was suddenly executed in 1469 after falling out with the Earl of Warwick. He had married his son and heir to the Queen’s sister, Mary Wydville, but this was not enough to recover favour, and ultimately the 2nd Earl of Pembroke had to surrender his father’s earldom to the Crown. When he died in 1491, he left an orphan, Elizabeth Herbert, who married Charles Somerset and in a way joined together Lancastrian and Yorkist factions—a very good Tudor precedent.

Raglan Castle

Raglan Castle remained the seat of the Somerset-Herberts in the 16th century and was developed as a great aristocratic seat with art collections and a renowned library. After the Civil War, the republican government of the 1650s decided to ‘slight’ it (like Corfe, above), and after the restoration of the monarchy, the family decided not to rebuild it—instead they focused on Badminton (below). In the mid-18th century the Somersets decided to slow the decay of the ruin and turned it into a tourist site; it was fixed up a bit in the 19th century, and the great hall given temporary roof for entertainments and a royal visit. In 1938 Raglan was donated to the Commission of Works, which since the 1980s is called Cadw, the Welsh equivalent of English Heritage. It remains one of the great wonders of medieval castle building in the UK.

Near to Raglan Castle is Saint Cadoc Church, which became a burial site for the Somerset family. Initially built by the medieval de Clares—powerful lords of this area between England and Wales, it was expanded in the early modern period by the Herberts and Somersets, notably with the addition of the Beaufort Chapel in the mid-16th century. The church was restored by the 8th Duke of Beaufort in the 1860s, and a Lady Chapel added. By this point, however, the main family burial area had shifted to Badminton.

Saint Cadoc’s Church, Raglan

The other main Herbert castle inherited by the Somersets was Caldicot in Monmouthshire. Based on the coast of the Seven estuary, it guarded roads to south Wales, and had initially been built by the Norman representative of the Crown here, the Sheriff of Gloucester, in the 1070s. The Bohun family, earls of Hereford, built a more extensive castle in the 1150s, and when their family estates were divided between two members of the royal family (Thomas of Woodstock and Henry of Bolingbroke) it entered the royal domain, but was given to the Herberts as stewards. The Somersets did not use Caldicot Castle much, and by the 18th century it was a ruin. Sold in 1857 to the Cobb family, who restored parts of it, it was held by them until sold to Chepstow District Council in 1964, and opened as a museum.

Caldecot Castle in the 18th century

Charles Somerset’s title to these Herbert estates was confirmed when he was called to Parliament as Baron Herbert of Raglan, Chepstow, and Gower in 1506. Then in 1514, Henry VIII raised his cousin in rank to Earl of Worcester and Lord Chamberlain of the Household. This last post meant it was he who was responsible for making much of the arrangements of the famous Field of the Cloth of Gold in 1520. By then Elizabeth Herbert had died, so the Earl re-married, Elizabeth West then Eleanor Sutton of Dudley, firmly tying his family to the rising ‘new men’ of the Tudor era.

Charles Somerset, 1st Earl of Worcester, with the white staff of the Lord Chamberlain

His son Henry, 2nd Earl of Worcester, added to the family’s lands in Monmouthshire by obtaining the newly dissolved Tintern Abbey in the Wye Valley. Unlike some of his peers, he did not modify the buildings of this ancient Cistercian monastery to form a new country house, but stripped the building for parts (notably the lead roof) and let the rest fall to ruin—it became one of the most ‘romantic’ ruins in England, celebrated in poetry and music.

Tintern Abbey ruins

The 2nd Earl’s marriage in 1514 is quite interesting: Margaret Courtenay, daughter of the Earl of Devon and of Princess Catherine of York, brought not just the usual noble dowry, but added still more Plantagenet blood to the Somerset clan. But they had no children (though some genealogists say his eldest daughter Lucy was Catherine’s daughter, and took her Plantagenet blood to marriage to John Neville, 4th Baron Latimer, step-son of Queen Katherine Parr), and his second marriage, in 1527, to Elizabeth Browne, was less illustrious, though she had a Neville mother who herself had a Beaufort great-grandmother. There’s always a connection, and remember how twitchy the Tudors were about anybody with Plantagenet blood…

The 2nd Earl of Worcester was followed by his son, William, 3rd Earl, a supporter of Jane Grey—he survived her downfall and lived into the 1580s, and married two fairly insignificant women, thus ruffling no feathers. A younger son, Thomas Somerset, made more waves: a fervent Catholic, he had been a servant of Bishop Gardiner in the reign of Mary I, and was imprisoned for more than 25 years in the reign of Elizabeth I—the last stint (from 1585) for complicity in the plot of Mary, Queen of Scots. He died in the Tower in 1586.

William, 3rd Earl of Worcester

The 4th Earl of Worcester rose to prominence again in the reign of James VI and I. He had got to know James VI of Scotland in the 1590s when he was sent to his court as an emissary of Elizabeth I. Once in England, James named his distant cousin (via Lady Margaret Beaufort) Earl Marshal, one of the most important positions at court, though after 1604 he had to share the office with six (later four) other courtiers as the King decided to put it ‘in commission’ to spread out the honour. In 1606, Worcester was created Keeper of the Great Park, an area southwest of London around the Tudor hunting lodge of Nonsuch. Here Worcester built his own house, Worcester Park House, which only stayed in the family a short time: it was bought during the Civil War by Col. Thomas Pride, and passed through various hands across the centuries before burning to the ground in 1948—hardly a trace remains.

Worcester Park in 1828

In 1616, the 4th Earl rose to his highest position as Lord Privy Seal, an office he held for nearly ten years. He died in 1628 leaving two sons and a daughter who, in keeping with the theme of ‘Plantagenet blood’ in this blog, inherited a double dollop more from their mother, Lady Elizabeth Hastings, daughter of the Earl of Huntington and Catherine Pole—both of whom were descended from Plantagenet kings.

Edward, 4th Earl of Worcester

The 5th Earl of Worcester, Henry Somerset (known as ‘Lord Herbert’ as the heir) was not just someone with a lot of royal blood; he was also a Catholic. But he was one of the richest peers in England and Wales and a firm supporter of King Charles I to whom he lent a lot of money with which to raise a Royalist army. For this he was rewarded with an upgrade: the title Marquess of Worcester in 1642. He hosted the King at Raglan in June-September 1645, then surrendered the castle to Parliamentary forces in late 1646. He died in custody later that same year.

Henry Somerset, 1st Marquess of Worcester

The younger son, Thomas, was also a favourite at the court of James I. He had been one of those English lords sent north of the border to announce the death of Elizabeth I in 1603, and when his father was named Earl Marshal in 1603, he was named Master of the Horse to Queen Anne of Denmark. In 1616 he married an Irish noblewoman, and in 1626 was given an Irish title, Viscount Somerset of Cashel. But he died in 1651 with no children. His sister was also a famous royalist: Blanche, Baroness Arundell of Wardour is known for having valiantly defended her home, Wardour Castle, in Wiltshire, in May 1643, with only 25 men and her maids holding out for a week against over a thousand Parliamentary troops.

The next generation saw another two sons: Edward became 2nd Marquess of Worcester, while his brother Thomas became a Catholic priest and a leader of the English Church abroad, as a nuncio for Pope Clement IX sent to England. He died in 1678 in Dunkirk. Meanwhile, the 2nd Marquess (while still ‘Lord Herbert’) raised a force of Welsh troops in 1643 to support the King and was created Earl of Glamorgan and Baron Beaufort of Caldecote in his own right. These troops were almost immediately abandoned however, and he was sent by the King to Ireland, where he worked—as a Catholic, and having an Irish wife—to negotiate an alliance with the Irish Catholic Confederates. He was accused, however, by the Royalists of granting too many concessions to the Irish, so he ended up joining them in their rebellion. He fled to France by 1645, then attempted return to England in 1653 but was caught and held for a year in the Tower of London. Restored to his honours by Charles II in the 1660s, he nonetheless preferred to stay away from court, working instead in his ‘laboratory’ where he developed some interesting engineering devices: a proto-steam engine, a hydraulic machine for irrigation, and more.

Edward, 2nd Marquess of Worcester

The 2nd Marquess had married twice, both to Catholics: Lady Elizabeth Dormer and Lady Margaret O’Brien. By his first wife he had a son, Henry (next), and two daughters: Anne was married to a Howard and was mother to the restored line of dukes of Norfolk; while Elizabeth re-connected her family to the Herberts in its junior line (the earls of Powis). These families were the apex of the Catholic nobility in Britain. Nevertheless they retained favour with the Stuarts, but did not cross the line when other Catholic nobles supported James II in 1688. So close was the family to the royal family that in 1646, Henry had been considered for marriage to the King’s daughter, Princess Elizabeth. But Henry went into exile and Elizabeth died in 1650. While abroad, he renounced Catholicism and became ‘acceptable’ to Lord Cromwell, and was elected as simple ‘Mr Herbert’ as an MP for Breconshire in 1654. He was involved in a royalist plot in July 1659, and was sent to the Tower until November. He was then sent by Parliament to Breda in the Netherlands as part of the delegation inviting Charles II back to England in May 1660. At the Restoration, Lord Herbert was appointed Lord Lieutenant of Gloucestershire, as well as for Herefordshire and Monmouthshire. The family estates were restored to him, not to his father. He continued to sit in Parliament (now as MP for Monmouthshire) until he succeeded as 3rd Marquess of Worcester in 1667.

At this point, the 3rd Marquess of Worcester started to develop a new seat for the family, Badminton, acquired from his cousin, Elizabeth Somerset (daughter of the Irish Viscount). The old manor in south Gloucestershire had been purchased by the 4th Earl of Worcester in 1612, and his son the Viscount started modernising it in the 1620s. The 3rd Marquess relocated here from Raglan, and already by 1663 was able to entertain the King and Queen here—over the next three hundred years, Badminton would serve as a nearly royal residence for this nearly royal family. The household at Badminton in the late 17th century, for example, was described as ‘princely’, with over 200 members of staff.

Badminton House, Gloucestershire. by Canaletto, 1749

In the 1670s, the Marquess of Worcester was appointed Lord President of Wales and the Marches, which allowed him to exercise some of these semi-royal prerogatives on behalf of his distant cousin King Charles II. He built Great Castle House atop the old Monmouth Castle, 1673, as the seat for his office as Lord President. This building was later given over to the local judiciary, and later became a school, then regimental headquarters and now a museum.

As a Catholic, however, the Marquess of Worcester was drawn into some of the scandals of the time—he was accused of being involved in the Popish Plot, but nothing came of it, and was opposed to Parliament’s attempts to block the succession to the throne of the King’s Catholic brother James. In 1682, the King rewarded him by elevating him further in rank with by creating him Duke of Beaufort. He then served as one of the chief mourners for Charles II in February 1685 and bore the Queen’s crown at the coronation that followed in April. James II appointed the new duke Gentleman of the Bedchamber, and he was dispatched to the southwest during Monmouth’s Rebellion that summer, keeping the city of Bristol loyal to the Crown. He did this again in late 1688 as William of Orange’s troops were arriving just a bit to the south of Bristol in the Glorious Revolution. The Duke of Beaufort did not, however, go into exile like other supporters of James II, but he did support the idea of naming William III as regent, not king, in the Spring of 1689. Nevertheless, he did accept the decision made by Parliament, swore the oath to the new King and Queen, and received them at Badminton in September 1690.

Henry Somerset, 1st Duke of Beaufort, in Garter Robes

Yet the 1st Duke of Beaufort was still suspected of disloyalty in the later 1690s, and even accused of being involved in a Jacobite plot in 1696. He increasingly stayed away from court and preferred to live at Beaufort House in Chelsea. Here his wife, Duchess Mary (born Mary Capell, sister of the 1st Earl of Essex), was becoming known as a gardener and collector. This house had been built by Thomas More in 1520 and was forfeit to the Crown upon his arrest in 1534. It was then given out as a London residence to various men like the French ambassador or ministerial families like the Paulets or the Cecils, and later court favourites like the Earl of Middlesex and the Duke of Buckingham. In 1677 it was acquired by the Marquess of Worcester from the Earl of Bristol. Chelsea was still an area of large gardens in the seventeenth century, and Beaufort’s neighbour was the famous collector, Sir Hans Sloane, who bought Beaufort House in 1737, and demolished it in 1739 to expand his own gardens. Only the name ‘Beaufort Street’ remains in the area.

Beaufort House, Chelsea, and its gardens

The 1st Duke of Beaufort died in 1700 and was buried in Beaufort Chapel in Saint George’s, Windsor, and later was moved to St Michael and All Angels church in Badminton, built in 1785. In addition to work done at Badminton, the Duke also developed another family property in this era: Troy House, a former property of the Herberts of Troy (an estate just south of the town of Monmouth), was restored in 1681-82 as a wedding present for his son and heir, Charles (known as the Earl of Glamorgan until his father’s elevation to the dukedom, then Marquess of Worcester). Troy House remained the residence for the heir to the dukedom until 1899 when it was sold, alongside many of the family’s Welsh estates, to nuns who created a convent school. It remained as such until the 1980s, and today sits as a mostly abandoned ruin, with developers struggling with local planning regulations to develop it into flats.

Troy House and Monmouthshire, 1672
Troy House in about 1900

The 1st Duke of Beaufort was succeeded in 1700 by his grandson, Henry, since his eldest son Charles had died two years before. The 2nd Duke began the family’s long tradition of steady but fairly unremarkable service as Tory politicians in the 18th century. He married three times but left only two sons when he died in 1714. Henry, 3rd Duke Beaufort, spent a much longer time as duke, but was known mostly for social and cultural affairs rather than politics. He commissioned the Badminton Cabinet, for example, a set of exquisite wooden drawers made in Florence that sold in 2004 for 19 million pounds (to the Prince of Liechtenstein), making it the most expensive piece of furniture in the world. His other connection to the art world was through the marriage of his illegitimate daughter, Margaret Burr, to the painter Thomas Gainsborough (though this didn’t occur till the year after the Duke’s death). In a divorce trial scandal of 1742 the Duke did have to prove publicly that he could have an erection in order to disprove his estranged wife’s claims of impotence. A year later he was involved in an international scandal in which Jacobite peers were discovered to be encouraging the French government to support an uprising in favour of the exiled Stuarts, but he died in February 1745 before things really heated up.

Charles, 4th Duke of Beaufort

The 3rd Duke’s brother, Charles, now the 4th Duke of Beaufort, was more directly involved in the Jacobite rising known as The ’45—he even hosted a secret visit of Bonnie Prince Charlie to London in September 1750—but the government never pursued him. He died in 1756, but in his short time as duke had contributed to the a significant makeover of the family estates. Badminton was given a new Palladian style in the 1740s, celebrated in grandiose paintings of the house and grounds by Canaletto, the famous Venetian artist the Duke brought to England. The Duke also added Worcester Lodge at the edge of the Park: a unique building with an elevated dining room over a grand archway, under a domed painted ceiling.

Worcester Lodge, Badminton

In time, Badminton House became synonymous with horse racing and fox hunting, but also gave its name to the sport badminton. The game was supposedly invented by the Beaufort children in a particularly harsh winter in the 1860s, when they found they could play indoors with a soft shuttlecock that would not damage the walls or the priceless Classical sculptures in the main entrance hall. Or was it a game imported from India, and only made popular in England? In other sports, the Badminton Horse Trials have been held on the estate since 1949, and the Beaufort Hunt is still one of the two most prominent in the United Kingdom. In terms of the house itself, although Badminton House is one of those rare great country houses that remains completely private and not open to the public, we can see many of its interiors in television series filmed there, most recently Bridgerton.

a recent fashion shoot in the original badminton court, the Badminton Great Hall

Aside from the contributions to the build-up of Badminton House in the 1740s, the 4th Duke also added an interesting title to the family’s collections, though his marriage to Elizabeth Berkeley, sister of Norborne, Baron Botetourt. Their son, Henry, 5th Duke of Beaufort, inherited the barony of Botetourt a few months before his death in 1803. Baron Botetourt was one of the last colonial governors of Virginia, and though his time in office was short (1768-70), his legacy was great. A new county in the western part of the colony was named for him in 1770, as was an endowed award at the College of William & Mary in Williamsburg, the colonial capital where he died and was buried in the crypt of Wren Chapel. A statue of Lord Botetourt has stood in front of the Wren Building since then (off and on), and is a much-revered symbol of the College. Years later, the small ensemble of the William & Mary Choir was named the Botetourt Chamber Singers, and when the Choir travelled to Europe in May-June 1993 (as written about by me in a previous blog post), we visited Badminton to commemorate this Botetourt link and were privileged to have a private tour conducted by the 11th Duchess of Beaufort herself. By this point, however, the title ‘Baron Botetourt’ was in fact in abeyance, since the 10th Duke had no children. The title had originally been created in 1305 for the Botetourt family, and passed to a cadet of the powerful Berkeley family of Gloucestershire by marriage in the 1350s, but was in abeyance from 1406. Norborne Berkeley, an MP for South Gloucestershire, in royal favour as a Groom of the Bedchamber to George III, was able to pull the barony out of abeyance for himself in 1764, but when he died in 1770 with no children, it went into abeyance again.

Lord Botetourt’s statue in front of the Wren Building, College of William & Mary, Virginia

Lord Botetourt left not just the claims to this ancient barony to the Beauforts, but a beautiful house, Stoke Park. The Berkeleys had been lords of the manor of Stoke Gifford, a village to the north of the city of Bristol, since the 1330s. Sir Richard Berkeley had built a house upon a hill here in the 1550s, and this was significantly rebuilt by Norborne Berkeley in 1760. It became the dower house for successive generations of the Beaufort family until it was converted into a hospital for the mentally handicapped in 1909. The hospital was closed in the 1980s and sold for development—but was used for teaching rooms by the University of the West of England until 2003. Since then it has been converted into flats, but the estate of Stoke Park remains an extremely popular public park run by the city of Bristol.

Stoke Park, outside Bristol

The 5th Duke of Beaufort was only twelve when he succeeded. As he came of age in the 1770s he took on the family’s traditional roles in the Welsh borders, as Lord Lieutenant of Monmouthshire, then of Brecknockshire, deeper into Wales. He was also colonel of the Monmouth and Brecon militia. At court he was Master of the Horse to Queen Charlotte. After his death in 1803, his roles in Wales were taken over by his eldest son, Henry Charles, 6th Duke, who added a third lord lieutenancy, of Gloucestershire, in 1810. He was also Warden of the Forest of Dean. Henry Charles had previously served as a Tory MP (1788-1803), but stayed away from politics once he became a peer.

Henry, 5th Duke of Beaufort

His younger brothers and nephews were more active in military and colonial affairs: his brother Lord Charles was Governor of Cape Colony, 1814-26, whose son became a Lieutenant-General in South Africa and Commander-in-Chief of the Bombay Army, 1855-60; his nephew Arthur was a Lieutenant-General and eventually Governor of Gibraltar, 1876-78; and his youngest brother, Lord Fitzroy (the 9th son of the 5th Duke!), was a Field Marshal and Commander of British troops in the Crimean War. Following an initial success at Alma, his reputation to posterity was memorialised after a terrible defeat at the Battle of Balaclava in October 1854 in the epic poem ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’, by Tennyson. Lord Fitzroy, a soldier since the Napoleonic Wars—famously losing an arm at Waterloo—had been created Baron Raglan of Raglan in 1852; his aide-de-camp, Lord Calthorpe, interestingly, bore the unusual first name Somerset, as his mother was Lady Charlotte Somerset, Raglan’s younger sister. His health broken the failed attempts to take the city of Sebastopol, Lord Raglan died in Crimea in June 1855. He established a junior line of the Somerset family, with a seat at Cefntilla Court in Llandenny (in Monmouthshire). The family (and title) still exists, though they sold Cefntilla in 2015.

Lord Fitzroy Somerset, Baron Raglan, about 1840
Cefntilla Court, Monmouthshire

Both sons of the 6th Duke, Henry and Granville (named for his mother Charlotte Leveson-Gower’s family) were Tory MPs, the former in the 1810s-20s, the latter in the 1830s-40s (and he became a Privy Councillor and member of the Cabinet). The 7th Duke had married Lady Georgiana Fitzroy, another interesting link between two ‘illegitimate’ branches of the British royal family (he a Plantagenet, she a Stuart). They bought a house in London in 1840, on Arlington Street in St James’s Square, expanded it and renamed it Beaufort House. But though he spent lavishly on it, this house was not a family possession for long, sold to the Duke of Hamilton in 1852 a year before the Duke’s death.

Beaufort House, now known as Wimborne House, from Green Park

The next duke (the 8th) was named Henry Charles, but was known as Charles; in the same way, all of his sons were named Henry, but went by their second names—names usually reflected a dynastic identity in the Middle Ages, and in the spirit of the 19th-century revived passion for all things medieval, this family revived its links with their medieval origins: the Henrician kings of the House of Lancaster. The 8th Duke was, as the family always was, a Tory, and served in the Earl of Derby’s government as Master of the Horse (1858-59 and again 1866-68). This office was by now mostly political, nothing to do with the sovereign’s horses. But he was heavily involved in sports: from 1885 he published the first of 28 volumes of books about sports known as the Badminton Library (the last appearing three years before his death, in 1896; though another five volumes appeared in the next two decades). He was still one of the greatest landowners in the UK, with over 50,000 acres in Monmouthshire and Gloucestershire, where, like his ancestors, he served as Lord Lieutenant for the Crown.

Henry, 8th Duke of Beaufort

The eldest of his four ‘Henry’ sons (Henry Adelbert, Henry Richard, Henry Arthur and Henry Edward) was a fairly staid late Victorian and succeeded as the 9th Duke in 1899. His two brothers, however, made waves as prominent lords who scandalised society through their sexual behaviour. Lord Richard Somerset, Comptroller of the Royal Household in the 1870s, had to leave the country due to his love for a teenage boy. He lived in Florence until his death in 1932, and published poetry now identified with the school of late Victorian poets known as the ‘Uranians’. Lord Arthur, an equerry of the Prince of Wales, was involved in the even more high-profile ‘Cleveland Street Scandal’, 1889, in which several socially prominent men were identified as having encounters with male prostitutes—when questioned, Lord Arthur apparently pointed a finger at a much higher ranking figure, possibly the Prince of Wales’ son Prince Albert Victor (‘Prince Eddy’), so the investigation was rapidly hushed up. Somerset resigned his posts at court and in the army and also went abroad to avoid arrest, spending the rest of his life with a male companion in France (d. 1926).

Caricature of Lord Arthur Somerset

The 9th Duke had a son, Henry Hugh, who became the 10th Duke of Beaufort in 1924. He was Master of the Horse for four sovereigns, between 1936 and 1978—the office had now ceased to be political and was now purely ceremonial, but certainly horse related. It was he who founded the Badminton Horse Trials in the 1940s, and was known for much his life simply as ‘Master’. The 10th Duke was, for good or ill, one of the world’s experts on foxes and fox hunting, as Master of the Beaufort Hunt. He was also President of the British Olympic Association from 1949 to 1966. Ceremonially, in addition to accompanying the sovereign at events like Trooping of the Colour, the Duke represented the Crown as Lord Lieutenant of Gloucestershire (from 1931), as well as the City of Bristol. His relationship with the royal family was always extremely close, not just due to shared love of the countryside, but due to his marriage in 1923 to Lady Mary Cambridge, the former Princess Mary of Teck, the niece of Queen Mary. Many stories are told of the Queen staying at Badminton during World War II and bringing with her truckloads of luggage (and reputedly ‘lifting’ certain Beaufort heirlooms to which she took a fancy).

Henry, 10th Duke of Somerset, and his wife, born Princess Mary of Teck

When the 10th Duke died in 1984, Queen Elizabeth II attended his funeral. But he and Duchess Mary had no children. His sister’s grandson eventually inherited the Herbert barony in 2002, and in 2015 the Botetourt barony was split amongst her various descendants. But the dukedom, being a male only title, and the Badminton estate (entailed with the dukedom), passed to Mr David Somerset, already in his fifties, a great-grandson of the disgraced Lord Richard. He had been invited by his distant cousin to live at Badminton many years before, so the succession was smooth. As 11th Duke of Beaufort, he became President of the British Horse Society, and continued to lead the Beaufort Hunt which brought him into frequent conflict with hunt saboteurs. (there are some great photos of his life here: https://www.tatler.com/gallery/duke-of-beaufort-death-gallery). It was his wife, the former Lady Caroline Thynne (daughter of the Marquess of Bath) whom I met in the summer of 1993 (and wrote about here). I also had the pleasure of hosting their daughter, the historian Lady Anne Somerset, at a conference I organised in Oxford shortly after the publication of her celebrated biography of Queen Anne (published 2012).

David Somerset, 11th Duke of Beaufort
the 11th Duchess of Beaufort in 1993 taken by one of my choir friends

Henry, 12th Duke of Beaufort, took over from his father in 2017. The estate is still enormous (about 52,000 acres). He is also known as singer-songwriter ‘Harry Beaufort’, and both his marriages reflect connections with the world of the arts: the first to actress Tracy Ward (granddaughter of the Earl of Dudley; sister of actress Rachel Ward; today an environmental campaigner as Tracy Worcester, her married name before her divorce), and the second to Georgia Powell daughter of a film director and granddaughter of a novelist. The Duke has a son, Henry, Marquess of Worcester, and a grandson, Henry, Earl of Glamorgan (b. 2021)—so despite the claims of the DNA ‘disjuncture’ the Plantagenets will still reign supreme for the next generations, at least in their horsey corner of Gloucestershire.

the 9th Duke of Beaufort on horseback

Dukes of Beaufort-Spontin: Belgians who went Bohemian

On the northern edge of the deep forested valleys of the Ardennes in what is now eastern Belgium was an ancient fortress overlooking a bend in the River Meuse, not far from the town of Huy between Namur and Liège. It seems to have had an attractive aspect so was called the bellum forte or Beaufort. The castle is long gone, destroyed by troops moving through the area in about 1430, but its ruins have been dated to the early 11th century. It is thought that the noble family called Beaufort took its name from the castle and early on split into multiple branches. One of these became counts of Beaufort in the 17th century then merged with another local family in the 18th century to become Liedekerke-Beaufort; another became the dukes of Beaufort-Spontin from 1782.

ruins of the Castle of Beaufort in the Ardennes, Belgium

These are not the only dukes of Beaufort in European history. The most famous, dukes in England since 1682, are based in Gloucestershire and derive their name from a castle in Champagne that was held by the dukes of Lancaster in the 14th century. This same castle also gave its name to a dukedom of Beaufort that was given to the mistress of King Henry IV, Gabrielle d’Estrées, and her son, César de Bourbon-Vendôme, in 1598. A post about this Beaufort will follow separately later this summer.

The medieval lords of Beaufort in the Ardennes were vassals of the prince-bishops of Liège. Liège was a semi-independent principality within the Holy Roman Empire that stretched along the length of the Meuse, sandwiched between the territories of the counts of Namur and dukes of Brabant on one side, and the dukes of Luxemburg and Limburg on the other. In about 1260, the Beaufort family was granted another fief by Emperor Henry VII (from Luxemburg): Spontin, a bit further to the southwest, deeper into the Ardennes. This castle was situated in the border zone between the principality of Liège and the county of Namur, so there was frequent military action. The château and estates later (the early 16th century) passed into the hands of the family of Glymes de Florennes, who then (the late 18th century) passed it back to the family Beaufort-Spontin once more (see below). The 16th-century owners had transformed the medieval fortress of Spontin into a more comfortable residence, which was later given to the younger daughter of the 1st Duke of Beaufort-Spontin as part of her dowry, when the Duke’s interests shifted more towards Austria and Bohemia. Today Spontin Castle is held privately, not open to the public.

Spontin Castle

In the early 15th century, one branch of the Beaufort-Spontin line settled further upriver on the Meuse, near Dinant in the southernmost parts of the principality of Liège, on a riverbend dominated by huge rocks, 100 meters high, where they built a castle called Freÿr. Today this castle is one of the most exceptional tourist sites of Wallonia, boasting terraced walled gardens and the oldest orangerie in the Low Countries, from the early 18th century. The Count of Namur, rival to the Bishop of Liège in this region, gave the castle to Jean de Rochefort-Orjol in 1378; Jean’s grand-daughter Marie married Jacques de Beaufort in 1410 and took the castle with her into marriage. A century and a half later, French troops destroyed the medieval castle at Freÿr, so a new castle was built in what is now called ‘Renaissance Mosane’ (for the Meuse) style. Three large wings were added in the 17th century, but one was removed in the 18th century to add an elaborate gate to create an enclosed space. The terraced gardens were added in the 1760s.

Château of Freÿr on the River Meuse

At the Castle of Freÿr in 1675, delegates from France and Spain met to negotiate a deal for trade along the River Meuse, with Louis XIV himself as a guest. According to the castle website, this meeting was where coffee was served for the first time in the region, so the treaty is sometimes called the ‘Coffee Treaty’. As with Spontin, when the family interests shifted to Austria in the early 19th century, Freÿr Castle and its estates were left to a daughter, Herénégilde and through her it eventually passed to the barons Bonaert, who still own it today.

In the early 18th century the Southern Netherlands passed from Spanish to Austrian rule. In 1746, as a reward for his family’s continued loyalty to the Habsburgs, Count Charles-Albert de Beaufort-Spontin (1713-1753) was created Marquis de Beaufort-Spontin, with rank and honours equivalent to the princes of the Empire. He was also titled Marquis de Courcelles and Beauraing, for other estates he held in Wallonia. In 1747 he married Countess Marie-Marguerite de Glymes, heiress of another major noble family in these parts, owners of the Château of Florennes. This ancient castle had also been a fief of the prince-bishops of Liège, held by the Rumigny-Florennes family until the late 13th century, when it passed by marriage to younger son of the Duke of Lorraine, Thibaut, Lord of Neufchâteau. Thibaut then succeeded as Duke of Lorraine himself in 1302, and Florennes remained a northern territorial outpost of this family, rulers of a duchy just to the south of the Ardennes, until 1556. Then it passed to the Lords of Glymes, illegitimate descendants of the medieval dukes of Brabant, until it was inherited by the Beaufort-Spontin in 1771.They lost the castle during the French Revolutionary wars when that conflict spilled into the Southern Netherlands, but recovered it afterwards during the establishment of the Kingdom of Belgium. Sold in 1893, the Château de Florennes became a Jesuit college in the 20th century, and since the 1950s a seminary for girls.

Château of Florennes

The son of the first Marquis de Beaufort-Spontin, Frédéric-August (1751-1817), became a chamberlain of the Empress Maria Theresa in 1775, represented in the Austrian Netherlands by her brother-in-law, Charles-Alexandre of Lorraine. After Maria Theresa died and was succeeded by her son Emperor Joseph II, Beaufort-Spontin was raised again in rank in 1782, this time to the fairly unusual (in the Low Countries) rank of duke. Why were dukedoms rare here? The disparate provinces that today make up the Kingdom of Belgium (Flanders, Brabant, Namur, etc) were collected together by the dukes of Burgundy in the 14th and 15th centuries, then governed by the kings of Spain in the 16th and 17th, and since the king of Spain’s formal legal title in these provinces remained no higher than duke, the Habsburgs did not elevate many of their subjects to this rank (though they did create a number of princes, like Ligne or Croÿ or Merode). After 1713, Austria took over administration of the region from Spain, and set about creating new titles for families that stayed loyal (as opposed to those who had supported a French takeover) during the War of Spanish Succession. The Beaufort-Spontin family were thus created counts in 1713. Other fiefs they accumulated in the Southern Netherlands included the county of Noyelles and the viscounty of Audenbourg in Flanders (the former now in France); and the Imperial ‘Free Barony’ of Hosden near Huy—this last one was one of those fascinating micro-principalities that owed no feudal loyalty to anybody but the Holy Roman Emperor himself. It is also interesting since, as a ‘German-style’ fief, it was divided between a number of heirs: the Duke of Beaufort-Spontin in fact only held ¼ of the barony and only ¼ of its ‘sovereignty’.

Frédéric-August, 1st Duke of Beaufort-Spontin

The first Duke of Beaufort-Spontin earned his elevated rank due to his personal links with Emperor Joseph II, the large amount of land he had inherited from both his father’s and his mother’s lineages that made him one of the greatest vassals of the Habsburgs in the Low Countries, and perhaps also due to the impending marriage with the sister of a prominent Spanish aristocrat and politician, the Duke of the Infantado, First Minister of King Carlos III. Beaufort-Spontin’s ducal title was not like others that existed within the Holy Roman Empire, like Brunswick or Saxony; the Austrian Netherlands had slightly different rules to the neighbouring provinces of the Empire, granting him neither any degree of semi-sovereignty within his estates, nor the rank of duke and duchess for all members of the family—only the head of the family and his wife enjoyed this rank, while all others were styled count or countess. In 1789, the 1st Duke was further honoured with the rank of ‘imperial count’, thus solidifying his family’s position within the nobiliary system of the Holy Roman Empire. During the wars of the French Revolution, Frédéric-August was appointed chamberlain to Archduke Charles, a son of Emperor Leopold II, and the last Governor-General of the Austrian Netherlands, 1793-94, before these lands were conquered by France and incorporated first into the French Republic. Beaufort-Spontin served as Grand Marshal of the Archduke’s court in Brussels.

The Duke’s first wife Leopoldina Alvarez de Toledo died in 1792. There had been a son, Pierre, who was heir presumptive to the vast succession of his Spanish grandfather, the Duke of the Infantado (and another five dukedoms and two principalities, in Spain, Naples and Sardinia), but he died before he reached age ten. This grand inheritance thus passed to his eldest sister, Marie-Françoise, who married the Duke of Osuna. Beaufort-Spontin still needed a male heir, so he married for a second time, 1807, Ernestine von Starhemberg, from one of the leading families of the Austrian court in Vienna. A son and heir was born in 1809, Frédéric-Louis. Having been deemed an émigré and thus an enemy of the French Empire, the Duke travelled to Paris to attempt to keep his lands from being confiscated. Napoleon tried to incorporate him into his imperial court, as he had with other Belgian princes, Arenberg and Merode, but Beaufort-Spontin would not forego his loyalty to Vienna, his lands remained confiscated, and he departed once more for Vienna.

But the 1st Duke of Beaufort-Spontin’s career was only just about to reach its pinnacle. After Napoleon’s armies were defeated in 1814, the European Great Powers met to decide what should happen to the former Austrian Netherlands. Present at the Congress of Vienna, the Duke was a vocal advocate for keeping the southern provinces separate, rather than merge them with the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Such was his pre-eminent position, while decisions were being debated, he was named temporary Governor-General of the Southern Netherlands, from February to March 1814—the last person to ever hold this post. The southern provinces were in fact soon incorporated into the new Kingdom of the United Netherlands, and the Duke became Chamberlain and Grand Marshal of the Court of its first king, William I, in 1816. Beaufort-Spontin died the next year in 1817.

His son Frédéric-Louis became the 2nd Duke at age 8. Raised by their Viennese mother, eventually, both he and his younger brother Alfred (b. 1816) decided to transfer the family interests to the heart of the Habsburg empire, which since 1804 had transformed into the Empire of Austria. This Empire also included the Kingdom of Bohemia where their father had purchased in 1813 the castle and estate of Petschau, which today is called Bečov nad Teplou in Czech.

Schloss Petschau, today’s Bečov nad Teplou in the Czech Republic

Petschau Castle, built in the early 14th century on the Teplá River in the far west of Bohemia, in Karlovy Vary District. It had been built by the lords of Rýzmburk, then passed through the hands of various families into the lords of Questenberk from 1624, then inherited by the Kaunitz family in 1752. After the purchase by the Duke of Beaufort-Spontin, the family rebuilt the old castle in a neo-gothic romantic style and linked it to the baroque château that had been built next door. Bečov was confiscated by the Communists at the end of World War II and was turned into a school, then became the seat of the local historical institute.

The baroque palace of Bečov in front of the old castle

The 2nd Duke died unmarried in 1834. By this point, the family not only lived in their main base at Petschau, they also owned a number of other castles and estates in western Bohemia, and also acquired estates in the province of Lower Austria, on the border with Bohemia, notably the Castle of Weineren (today Weinern), a baroque country house now owned by descendants through a female line. Though most of their ancestral lands in Belgium were now held by female-line cousins (as above), they did retain the Château of Florennes and a grand residence in Brussels, the Hôtel de Beaufort (rue aux Laines, not far from the Royal Palace)—this has, since the 1980s, been redeveloped as a home for the elderly.

Schloss Weinern, Lower Austria
The Hôtel de Beaufort in Brussels

The 2nd Duke’s brother Alfred became 3rd Duke of Beaufort-Spontin. He was close to the Habsburgs as an imperial chamberlain and was a member of the estates of both Bohemia and Lower Austria. His family was even more firmly established within the highest ranks of the nobility of Austria-Hungary in 1876 when he was granted a new title, Prince of Beaufort, with the style ‘Serene Highness’ and a hereditary seat in the Austrian House of Lords.

Alfred, 3rd Duke of Beaufort-Spontin

Duke Alfred also brought to Bohemia an ancient treasure: the Reliquary of Saint Maurus. Maurus was a 6th-century disciple of Saint Benedict. This wooden box containing some of his remains was constructed in the early 13th century and covered in gilded silver plate and gemstones. It was held at the Abbey of Florennes for centuries until it was sacked during the French revolutionary wars. Alfred recovered it and restored it in the 1830s, and in the 1880s moved it to his castle at Pletschau. During the Second World War, the family buried it under the floorboards of the castle’s chapel, where it remained mostly forgotten until excavated by an American businessman with support of the Czech government in the 1980s. Despite protests from the Beaufort family, there has been no question that this precious artifact would leave the Czech Republic, and it has been painstakingly restored and placed on display at Bečov since 2002.

Reliquary of Saint Maurus

Alfred died in 1888 and was succeeded by his son, Friedrich, the 4th Duke of Beaufort-Spontin and 2nd Prince (or Fürst) of Beaufort. Friedrich continued to maintain the family’s links with Belgium through his marriage to a princess from the house of Ligne. He died in Bohemia in 1916 on the eve of the independence of the new state of Czechoslovakia.

The 5th Duke of Beaufort-Spontin, and 3rd Prince of Beaufort, Heinrich (1880-1966) worked as a young man in the Habsburg government in Bohemia; he was part of the progressive circle of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, who, as heir to the Austro-Hungarian thrones had plans to reform the Empire to grant more autonomy to Slavic minorities to keep them loyal to the Habsburgs. As we know, the Archduke never got the chance to put any of his ideas to the test, and as Duke Heinrich aged, he grew more attracted to German nationalism as a counter-force to the Czech nationalism that dominated Czechoslovakia after World War One; by the 1930s, he was a member of the pro-German Sudeten Party and supported the Nazis after their takeover of Sudetenland in 1938/39. His sons fought in the German armies, so when the Second World War concluded, their properties were confiscated, and, unlike some other aristocratic families were not restored in the 1990s.

Duke and Prince Heinrich, as a young man

The 5th Duke of Beaufort-Spontin moved with his family to Austria and died near Graz in 1966. His son Friedrich, the 6th Duke and 4th Prince, headed the house until 1998. The family is still listed amongst the princely houses of Belgium, though the link with their ancestral home is fairly thin. Today the 7th Duke, another Friedrich (b. 1944), the last to be born at Petschau / Bečov, became a professor of medicine (radiology) at Graz University. His younger brother, Count Christian (b. 1947), was Director of the Weapons Collection of the Museum of Applied Arts in Vienna. Both of them made a widely publicised visit to Bečov in July 2018.

brothers Friedrich and Christian von Beaufort-Spontin in 2018

Neither of the brothers has a son, only daughters, so the titles of the House of Beaufort-Spontin will soon be extinguished. They no longer own the Austrian castles on the northern frontier in Lower Austria, but instead live in Styria, outside its capital of Graz, in an old manorhouse called Gallmannsegg, near the town of Kainach. Here they host an annual car festival.

the car show at Gallmannsegg, near Graz, Styria

The arms of Beaufort-Spontin are quartered with those of the Counts of Looz (another powerful feudal dynasty from the region of the principality of Liège), from whom they claimed descent. Behind the shield is a princely mantle and a princely coronet,

(images Wikimedia Commons)

Marshals in France, dukedoms in Italy: Napoleon’s dukes and princes—the one-offs

In June 1790, Revolutionary France abolished the use of titles of nobility. While France was still a kingdom—for now—its Second Order no longer had a hereditary place at the top of society. Legally, there were no more dukes or princes in France. A decade later, in May 1804, First Consul Bonaparte was proclaimed Emperor of the French, and when he was crowned in Notre Dame in December, he needed a court composed of an entourage with noble honours. At first he created an imperial family, with the title ‘prince français’ for his brothers Joseph and Louis and his brother-in-law Joachim Murat, later extended to his other brothers Jérôme and (grudgingly, only at the very end) Lucien, plus his sister Elisa, his adopted son Eugène de Beauharnais, his adopted daughter Stéphanie de Beauharnais, and his uncle, Joseph Fesch. Also granted the rank of prince were those who held one of the Grand Dignities of State: two Arch-Chancellors (Empire and State), an Arch-Treasurer, a Grand Elector, a Grand Constable, a Grand Admiral and a Grand Huntsman. A year later an eighth, the Grand Almoner, was added, and by 1810 there were twelve. In keeping with the still pseudo-meritocratic ideals of the First Empire, these were essentially nobles of service, ie they weren’t inherently noble people, they just filled a specific function at court.

The Army Swears its Loyalty to Napoleon after the Distribution of Eagles, 1810 (by David), the marshals of France are in the centre with their batons of command

Emperor Napoléon realised that soldiers like rewards after winning victories, and the Order of the Legion of Honour was not sufficient for those of highest rank. Bonaparte’s best generals and closest military comrades had already been elevated to the supreme rank of Marshal of the Empire alongside the creation of the imperial princes in 1804. There were fourteen in the first promotion (plus four older generals who were semi-retired). Under the Old Regime, a Marshal of France held an equivalent rank to a duke, so it seemed logical to grant dukedoms to the most successful marshals. But France had abolished titles and fiefs, so at first, the Emperor looked abroad, to new territories being conquered abroad. So in 1806, principalities—sovereign but in vassalage to the Empire of the French—were given to Talleyrand (Minister of Foreign Affairs and Grand Chamberlain), Marshal Bernadotte and Marshal Berthier. These were, respectively, Benevento and Pontecorvo in Italy (both former papal enclaves in the Kingdom of Naples), and Neuchâtel in Switzerland (a former possession of the kings of Prussia). Soon after, in Spring 1807, he began to offer a different kind of title, a ‘victory title’ for those who had won a significant battle (like Danzig, below).

In 1808, the Emperor took another step forward and created a full new hereditary nobility, from princes down to barons, with complete and detailed regulations for heraldry, styles of address, and sums of money required to pass along titles to heirs (for example, 200,000 francs annual income was needed to secure a dukedom). But still, there was reluctance to have these titles reflect French placenames (in fact, Napoleon repeatedly denied a title to Marshal Jourdan, since he wished to be honoured for his victory at Fleurus, 1794—very early in the Revolutionary Wars—which was at that time part of France, though today it is in Belgian Hainaut). So most of these names were drawn from Napoleon’s other kingdom, the Kingdom of Italy, created in March 1805 (or in other subject territories like the kingdoms of Etruria or Naples). Altogether, between 1808 and 1815, there would be four victory princes, ten victory dukes, and twenty ‘duchies-grand fiefs’ (plus those principalities already named above, and three other dukedoms that were ‘anomalous’, including one for the Emperor’s former wife—see Beauharnais-Navarre). Only the ‘grand fiefs’ were attached to specific lands and incomes granted with the title. Of all these Napoleonic dukes and princes, some achieved a sufficient income and passed along their titles to sons, in varying degrees of recognition by the Bourbon royal governments after 1815 (or revived for cousins or other heirs by the restored Bonaparte regime of the Second Empire). Today there is still one principality (Essling), three victory dukedoms (Auerstaedt, Montebello and Albufera), and three regular dukedoms (Feltre, Otrante, Reggio). Most of these will eventually have separate blog posts; this post will focus exclusively on those titles that were awarded then vanished after only one holder (or in some cases two)—some lasting a few years, and in one at least, only a few days.

the elements behind a coat of arms for a marshal-duke of the Empire, with crossed marshal’s batons and a ducal bonnet, and the ribbon of the Order of the Legion of Honour

What is so interesting, to me, about all of these titles, is how they drew on men from all walks of life, and an equally interesting cross-section of women, from highborn ladies to washer women. The most famous names of the First French Empire, Ney, Berthier, Davout, Junot, Suchet, and so on, left families that carried on their ducal titles into the 19th and 20th  centuries. What follows here instead are some of the lesser-known stories of the Napoleonic era, that burned bright and then were extinguished.

We can start with a Corsican, with someone who grew up with Bonaparte himself. Giovan Tomaso Arrighi de Casanova, 1st Duc de Padoue, born in 1778 (so nine years younger than the future emperor), was the Emperor’s cousin via his mother, Letizia Ramolino Buonaparte. The family was noble, like the Bonapartes, with roots in the centre of the island going back to the Middle Ages. Their seat was in Corte, and Joseph Bonaparte was born here. Giovan Tomaso’s father Giacinto was himself a prominent administrator in the revolutionary government—he had been a judge in the Superior Council of Corsica in the 1770s, then representative of the noble estates of Corsica at the court of Versailles in the 1780s. After the Revolution he became an administrator of the northern part of the island, and eventually Prefect of Corsica in 1811. By this point his younger two sons, Antonio and Ambrogio, had been killed in the wars, and his eldest had become a full general, having started his career in the entourage of his cousin Joseph Bonaparte, then served as aide-de-camp of General Berthier in Egypt. Here he earned his reputation as a commander, and he would eventually add a sphinx to his coat of arms. In 1808 he was created duke of Padua (Padoue in French), one of the cities in the Veneto (Venice’s mainland) that had been added to Napoleon’s Kingdom of Italy in 1806. In 1809 the Duc de Padoue was named an inspector-general of the cavalry. During the Hundred Days—when Napoleon returned briefly to power in Spring 1815—he was named Governor of Corsica, and a peer of France, but when the Bourbons were restored for a second time in July, General Arrighi de Casanova was put on the proscribed list and exiled. He lived in Lombardy until 1830s, and even after returning to France he kept a low profile, as a militant Bonapartist, until the tide turned in 1848, and he was elected to the National Assembly. In 1850 he was named Governor of the Invalides, and in 1852, his cousin Napoleon III named him a senator of the Second Empire. He died a year later, at Courson, a château he had acquired southwest of Paris, on the road towards Chartres.

The Duc de Padoue, with the Invalides behind him
Chateau de Courson

The Duc de Padoue had married a woman from the higher aristocracy, Anne-Rose de Montesquiou-Fezensac, from one of the most ancient houses of southwestern France, and they had a son and a daughter. Ernest-Louis, 2nd Duc de Padoue, born the year of the collapse of the First Empire, saw great prominence in the Second. He was named a senator following his father’s death (and his ducal title was confirmed), and a councillor of state. In 1859 he was named Minister of the Interior and a Secretary of State. After the fall of the Second Empire, he returned to his family’s roots, and represented Corsica in the National Assembly, from 1876-81. When the 2nd Duke died in 1888, the title was extinct. His daughter Marie-Adèle could take the family’s wealth to her marriage to the Belgian aristocrat, the Duc de Caraman, but not the title. A cadet branch does remain, and are still prominent in Corsica.

Ernest Arrighi de Casanova, 2nd Duc de Padoue

After the Emperor’s cousin, we can turn to one of his closest confidants, who also became part of the family (distantly), by marriage. René Savary, Duke of Rovigo, played a crucial role in the imperial government as Minister of Police from 1810 to 1814. Son of a brewer from Charleville (on France’s northeast frontier) who had become commander of the nearby fortress of Sedan, René was the youngest of three sons. The elder two lost their lives in French military service, but by then, René had already risen much higher: by 1800 he was General Bonaparte’s preferred aide-de-camp and confidant, leading to his appointment in 1801 as commander of the elite gendarmerie assigned to defend the First Consul personally. The next year Savary married Félicité de Faudoas de Saint-Sulpice, a distant cousin and close friend of Hortense de Beauharnais, Bonaparte’s adopted daughter. They were then both promoted into the top ranks of the imperial hierarchy, he as brigadier general in 1803, and she as lady-in-waiting to the Empress in 1804. He continued to act as preferred aide-de-camp to the Emperor in the glorious campaigns of the next few years. He commanded his own troops at the battle of Ostrolenka in 1807 where he defeated a Russian army. The next year, he was rewarded with a dukedom, based on the small town of Rovigo on the River Po.

René Savary, Duke of Rovigo

The new Duke of Rovigo had some diplomatic missions in 1807 and 1808 (to Russia, to Spain), but this proved not to be his forte. Instead, he was given more to do in the area of intelligence and spies (which he had been involved with for several years already), and replaced the disgraced Fouché as Minister of Police in 1810. He set about cracking down on freedom of the press, but missed signs for a pending coup attempt against the Emperor in 1812, so lost credibility with Napoleon and with the people. He kept his post, however, and was named by the Emperor to the Regency Council in Spring of 1814, to assist Empress Marie-Louise in ruling on behalf of her son Napoleon II. He and his wife accompanied her when she relocated to Blois at the time of the surrender of Paris.

The Duke of Rovigo did not rally to the Bourbons in the First Restoration, and resumed his duties as head of the Gendarmerie under the Hundred Days (though not as Minister of the Police, since Fouché returned to favour). Unlike most of the other dukes created by Napoleon, Rovigo loyally accompanied his master after his second abdication in July 1815, first to Rochefort to catch the ship to England, and then, he hoped, on to Saint Helena—but the British did not allow this. He was not welcomed back in France (where he was condemned to death by the Chamber of Peers), so was taken to a prison in British-held Malta. He was permitted to escape, travelled to the Ottoman Empire but was expelled by the Turks, travelled to Trieste and was arrested by the Austrians. He was also to return to France in 1819 for a second trial, and was acquitted and restored to his former honours. But he was never forgiven by royalists for some of his more shady involvements with espionage, in particular the capture and execution without trial of the King’s cousin the Duke of Enghien. In 1823, Rovigo published a memoir giving his version of these events of 1804; he accused others who were by then in favour with the King, so he was barred from court and once again went abroad. He lived in Rome until the July Revolution, and was then briefly restored to favour, being appointed commander of French troops in Algeria. Like many colonial officials of the era, he had a vision for new westernised extensions of Europe, and built a settlement called Rovigo with schools and hospitals etc, but his brutal repression of the local people left a bad legacy in French North Africa. He soon became ill, returned to France, and died in 1833.

The Duchess of Rovigo lived for another eight years. She and her husband had raised two sons and five daughters. The younger son, Tristan, became a Captain of Spahis in Morocco where he was killed in 1844. The older son, another René Savary, became 2nd Duke of Rovigo, and was a presence in French military and political affairs for the next three decades, but never rose to great prominence—unlike his father he was a strong legitimist, not a Bonapartist. He married twice, once to a woman from County Clare in Ireland, and the second time to the daughter of a surgeon in Geneva. He had a daughter from each marriage, but no son, so when he died in 1875, the duchy of Rovigo became extinct.

Coat of arms of Savary de Rovigo (the stars in chief indicate a title of the French Empire)

Another close companion of Bonaparte (and with an even shorter lifespan for his dukedom—five days—if it was even formally recognised by anyone at all), was the Duke of Ligny, created for General Girard in the days after the defeat at Waterloo. Jean-Baptiste Girard was the son of a merchant-tanner from Provence. At 19 he joined the Army of Italy and took part in Bonaparte’s early smashing successes in Italy then Egypt. By 1799 he was an adjutant-general, then in 1806 promoted to brigadier general. He commanded in the various campaigns in Spain, Russia and Germany, and was taken prisoner at Liegnitz in Silesia in August 1813, and held until the fall of the French Empire the next spring. He immediately rallied to the call of the Emperor in the Hundred Days and was an important element in the French victory over the Prussians at Ligny, 16 June, but he was mortally wounded. Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo on the 18th, yet he named the dying Girard Duke of Ligny on the 21st, and he died five days later. He had married an Italian woman while on campaign in 1799, and there were daughters, but no sons to potentially claim this most ephemeral of dukedoms.

Jean-Baptiste Girard, ephemeral Duc de Ligny

Two other dukedoms held only by a single man were Gaëta and Decrès—neither of these were created for marshals but for members of the administration. The former at least follows the pattern of taking its name from a place in Italy, whereas the second was an anomaly and was simply the surname of its bearer.

Denis Decrès was from a minor noble family in the south of France (de Crès), who had begun his career in the royal navy in the 1780s, mostly in the West Indies. He maintained his naval service under the new regime and by 1798 was a junior admiral, commanding in the eastern Mediterranean, notably at Aboukir. From 1800 he shifted more towards a political career, and was named Maritime Prefect of Lorient, one of the chief naval bases in Brittany, then in 1801 was named Minister of the Navy and the Colonies. He maintained this post for the next thirteen years, despite rising criticism over the Navy’s declining reputation, the failed invasion of Britain in 1802, and the terrible defeat at Trafalgar in 1805. Much more enduringly, he has been criticised for overseeing the re-enslavement of Africans in the colony of Saint-Domingue (Haïti) who had been freed earlier in the revolutionary period. He was promoted to Vice-Admiral in 1804, Count of the Empire in 1808, then Duc Decrès in 1813.

This last promotion may have been due to his joining the extended network of families connected by marriage to the Emperor himself, via his marriage (also in 1813) to Marie-Rose (‘Rosine’) Anthoine de Saint-Joseph, a niece of Julie and Désirée Clary, the wives of Joseph Bonaparte and Marshal Bernadotte respectively (and her sister married Marshal Suchet, Duke of Albufera). Duc Decrès was re-appointed to his ministerial post in the Hundred Days, then retired from public life after Waterloo. He died in his Paris residence in 1820 in a fire set by servants who were trying to rob him. He had no children.

Duc Decrès, Minister of the Navy and Colonies

One of the witnesses of the wedding of Denis Decrès in 1813 was Martin Gaudin, Duc de Gaëte and Minister of Finance. Like his colleague, he held this post continually from 1799 to the fall of the Empire in 1814, and again during the Hundred Days in 1815 (in contrast to other ministers who came and went). The son of a lawyer in the Parlement of Paris, Gaudin had worked in the royal finance and tax administrations in the 1770s-80s. He joined the revolutionary movement in 1789 and was an influential member of the Finance Committee of the Constitutional Assembly that was set up to reorganise the Kingdom. Through the 1790s Gaudin was denounced several times for having royalist leanings, and miraculously survived each time. He earned the favour of First Consul Bonaparte who named him to his post as Minister of Finance the day after his Coup of Brumaire (November 1799). In 1804 he was named Grand Officer of the Legion of Honour, and in 1808 Count of the Empire, then in 1809, Duc de Gaëte, which took its name from the important city in the Kingdom of Naples, Gaeta. Like Decrès he also retired from public life after 1815, but did return to play an important financial role once more in 1820 when he became Governor of the Bank of France, a position he held for fourteen years. He also married, quite late, in 1822, Marie-Anne Summaripa, an aristocrat from the Greek island of Naxos who had been married to a French diplomat in Constantinople. They had no children, so when he died in 1841 the title became extinct. It’s worth noting that there was another Duke of Gaeta created in the 19th century, created in 1870 for Enrico Cialdini, one of the revolutionary soldiers in the Italian Risorgimento. His ducal title also died with him, in 1892.

Martin Gaudin, Duc de Gaëte, Minister of Finance

Unlike the dukes of Padoue, Rovigo or Ligny, young men who rose to prominence alongside General Bonaparte, another one-off duke was an older man, who like Decrès and Gaëte, already had an established career before the Revolution. Marshal Lefebvre, Duke of Danzig, born in 1755, became one of the closest military companions of the younger General Bonaparte. His is an inspiring rags-to-riches tale, popularly retold in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, notably with his wife as the protagonist, a washerwoman from Alsace who rose to be a senior courtier in Paris. François-Joseph Lefebvre was the son of a local military official in a small town in Alsace, who had joined the Royal Guard when he was 18 back in 1773. In 1783, he married Catherine Hübscher, a local washerwoman and barmaid, and together they moved to Paris as he rose through the ranks of the Royal Guard. When the Revolution broke out, Lefebvre at first remained loyal to the Old Regime, defending the royal family at Versailles during the attacks of the autumn of 1789, and even assisting the King’s aged aunts, Adélaïde and Victoire, in their escape from France in Spring 1791.

As the popular story goes, it was soon after, in the summer of 1792, when Catherine Lefebvre took pity on a penniless and friendless Corsican captain, Napoleone Buonaparte, and took care of washing his clothes to help him maintain appearances. How much of this is true and how much is legend will probably never be known. Once the Republic was proclaimed in September 1792, her husband’s star rose swiftly, as a brigadier general from 1793, and division general in 1794, leading troops in actions against Allied armies in the Rhineland. Captain Buonaparte, meanwhile, made his name in late 1793 masterminding the siege of Toulon. In 1799 their fortunes came back together in Paris, and General Lefebvre, who had been named military governor of Paris in March, was a key supporter of General Bonaparte in the Coup of Brumaire in November. Now as First Consul of France, Bonaparte secured the election of his friend as a Senator of the Republic in 1800, then promoted him as Marshal of the Empire in the first round of promotions of 1804.

François-Joseph Lefebvre, Duc de Dantzig

Marshal Lefebvre continued to hold important commands in Germany, and was named Commander of the Imperial Guard, infantry, in 1806. He led this elite unit at Jena in October 1806, then successfully besieged the important Prussian port city of Danzig in March to May 1807. For this he was rewarded in May 1807 with the ‘victory title’ Duke of Danzig (spelled ‘Dantzig’ in French; today’s city of Gdańsk in Polish), and a large sum of cash presented by a grateful emperor in a chocolate box when they met at the nearby abbey of Oliwa. In the following years the Marshal-Duke was sent on commands in Spain, then back to Germany, and led the Old Guard in the Russia campaign of 1812—during which he lost his eldest son, who himself had risen through the ranks, first as his father’s aide-de-camp, then as brigadier general in his own right. One son remained, of an extraordinary thirteen altogether, but he too died a few years later in 1817, still a teenager.

By this point, the new Duchess of Danzig was having to hold her own at court in Paris. The Emperor and his snobbish sisters were apparently repulsed by her coarse manners and language, which she refused to ‘amend’, earning her later the nickname ‘Madame Sans-Gêne’ (‘without embarrassment’) in later plays and films about her life. But as the story goes, the Emperor never forgot their original connection and never sent her away from his court in the Tuileries.

Catherine Hübscher Lefebvre, Duchesse de Dantzig
A scene from the play ‘Madame Sans-Gêne’ (1893)

The Duc de Dantzig remained loyal to the Emperor to the very end in 1814, unlike some of the other marshals, but swiftly acknowledged the restoration of King Louis XVIII and was named a peer of France. He did rejoin Napoleon in the Hundred Days, however, so was excluded from the Chamber of Peers in the second restoration of 1815. His peerage was restored in 1819 but he died a year later. His wife retired to the chateau of Pontault-Combault in Brie (east of Paris), which she and her husband had purchased in 1813 (today it is the Hôtel de Ville of that small town). Here she stayed true to her roots and supported the poor by means of various charities with her now very large fortune. She died in 1835. With no sons to succeed, the dukedom of Danzig was extinct.

the former Chateau de Pontault-Combault

Another of the Emperor’s most loyal courtiers—in fact nicknamed ‘l’ombre de Napoléon’ (‘Napoleon’s shadow’), Duroc, was given a dukedom, but was not a marshal of the Empire. He was amongst the small group of imperial dukes whose titles were granted due to their high positions either politically in the government, or ceremonially and administratively in the imperial court. Duroc was in the latter category as Grand Marshal of the Palace from 1805. As such he was the head of the military household and in charge of palace security, especially at the Tuileries where he acted as governor.

Géraud-Christophe Duroc (or Du Roc) was the son of Claude de Michel du Roc, the younger son in a robe noble family from the south of France who had moved north to Lorraine and became captain in a regiment of dragoons. Claude married late at 48 and finally had a son at 52, and lived to be almost 90, dying in 1809, having added the surname Michel to his forenames, to sound less noble. The son, Géraud-Christophe, born in 1772, came of age at the start of the Revolution, and at first left France as a noble émigré, but after the first major victory of the revolutionary armies at Valmy in 1792, he returned and joined their cause. His friendship with Napoleon started when he served as his aide-de-camp in the Italian campaigns of 1796 and then in Egypt. He was promoted to the rank of brigadier general in 1800, but was also sent abroad by the now First Consul Bonaparte on diplomatic missions. From 1805 he was governor of the Tuileries and Grand Marshal of the Palace, and in 1808 was created Duc de Frioul, which took its name from the region of Friuli in northeast Italy. He continued to accompany the Emperor on most campaigns and was killed at the Battle of Bautzen in Saxony in May 1813. Napoleon wrote later that he felt closest to Duroc, and demonstrated this in an intimate manner by taking the name Duroc as an incognito when he travelled to Rochefort after his abdication in early July 1815 (and reputedly proposed to use the name ‘Colonel Duroc’ if he had been granted exile in Britain, which of course he wasn’t).

Duroc in ceremonial robe for the coronation of 1804 as Grand Marshal of the Palace

Duroc had married in 1802 Marie-des-Neiges Martínez de Hervas, whose father managed a Spanish bank in Paris, and who would later serve as finance minister for Joseph Bonaparte when he was named king of Spain. In 1813, she was given the duchy of Frioul to support herself as a widow, which, as a ‘duché-grand fief’ included lands and revenues granted by the Emperor. She remarried in 1832, another general, Charles Fabvier, and lived—like her father-in-law—to be almost 90. There had been one son, Napoléon-Louis Duroc, who lived for a year (1811-1812), and a daughter, Hortense-Eugénie, who, had she outlived her mother (she died in 1829, aged 17), might have been able to call herself ‘2nd Duchesse de Frioul’, but this is uncertain and would have depended on the goodwill of King Louis XVIII.

A Napoleonic duke who did gain the goodwill of the restored Bourbon king, perhaps too swiftly, was Marshal Augereau, Duc de Castiglione. In contrast to Dantzig or Duroc, this member of the one-off dukes club was never a close friend of Bonaparte, and ended up in disgrace for having abandoned him so quickly in favour of the Bourbon Restoration. Born in 1757 in one of the poorest neighbourhoods of Paris, the faubourg Saint-Marcel, the son of a domestic servant and a fruit seller, Charles-Pierre Augereau, launched a military career as a young man in the French army, but was forced to flee abroad after drawing his sword on an officer. Much of the facts about his subsequent meanderings across Europe are open to question as we only have his own testimony, and he seems to have been prone to exaggeration. He served for some periods in the Prussian army, then in the armies of Naples and Portugal, but also spent time as a fencing master or even a brigand, before returning to France in 1792, inspired by the revolutionary events there. Within a year he was a general, first in the Army of the Pyrenees and then the Army of Italy, where, in August 1796, he led his troops to victory over the Austrians at Castiglione—hence the later name of his ‘victory title’.

General Augereau in Italy 1796

Back in France, General Augereau got involved in politics, supporting the far left, and as elected Deputy representing the Haute-Garonne (the department surrounding the city of Toulouse). But he hesitated in supporting the coup led by his fellow general, Napoleon Bonaparte, in November 1799 (18 Brumaire), then accepted a posting to lead French troops sent north to spread the revolution to the Batavian Republic (the new name for the Dutch Republic). He continued to fall in and out of favour with now First Consul Bonaparte, but was too good of a commander to be dismissed. So he was included in the first promotions to the rank of Marshal of the Empire, in 1804, and held various commands in the campaigns in Germany, Spain and Russia. In 1808 he was given his dukedom of Castiglione, a small town in the Veneto near Lake Garda. He also remarried, a woman of much higher social class. His first wife, Gabriella Grach, had been born in Smyrna (the Greek city now called Izmir), the daughter of a rich merchant (or so he claimed), and eloped with young Augereau while he was serving in Naples. She died in 1806, and the Marshal re-married Adélaïde-Joséphine de Bourlon de Chavange, who was only 19! In 1812, the new Duchess of Castiglione was appointed one of the ladies-in-waiting of the Empress Marie-Louise, thus helping the Duke solidify his ties to Napoleon’s court.

Charles-Pierre Augereau, Duc de Castiglione, as a Marshal of the Empire

But it wasn’t enough, and he defied the Emperor’s orders to keep Lyon loyal in the Spring of 1814, when everything was falling apart; not wishing the destroy the city, he did not pursue the siege. Napoleon criticised him publicly, and in mid-April, Augereau formally denounced the Emperor and declared his loyalty to the restoration of the Bourbons. Louis XVIII made him a peer of France and a knight of Saint-Louis. In the Hundred Days of 1815, however, Augereau expressed willingness to join the Emperor once more, but this time Napoleon rebuffed him and denounced him as a traitor. After the second restoration of the monarchy, the Duke of Castiglione took up his seat in the Chamber of Peers, but died soon after, in 1816, at his Château of La Houssaye in Brie. His wife re-married, a Belgian nobleman, the Count of Sainte-Aldegonde, and returned to active court service herself as an older woman, as a lady-in-waiting to Queen Marie-Amélie from 1831. Marshal Augereau had no children to carry on his ducal title; he had a half-brother, Jean-Pierre, who was also a general, and a baron of the Empire (1811), but he did not inherit the ducal title, and himself had no children.

the Chateau of La Houssaye

An even worse betrayer of Napoleon was Marshal Marmont. Auguste-Frédéric Viesse de Marmont, Duc de Raguse, had come to prominence with Bonaparte when they both served in the artillery at the siege of Toulon in 1793. He became a very successful general of the Republic and marshal of the Empire but became too independent after he was given his own territories to govern in 1811; his sudden alliance with the Bourbons in April 1814 blackened his name for a century in the memory of the French people. Indeed the verb ‘raguser’ was used to mean a base betrayal until the end of the nineteenth century. Nevertheless, he had one of the longest and most interesting careers of any of the Napoleonic dukes.

Unlike several of the other marshal-dukes listed here, Marmont was not a rags to riches story. He was from a noble background. His grandfather Edme Viesse had been a prominent administrative official in northern Burgundy and acquired the fief of Marmont, as well as the office of royal secretary in the Parlement of Besançon which was an ennobling office. His father Nicolas Edme built on this by entering military service (a typical pathway to transform an administrative family into a noble one) but also increasing the family wealth by operating large iron forges on their estates in northern Burgundy. He acquired the fifteenth-century château of Châtillon-sur-Seine, which was renamed Château Marmont.

Chateau de Marmont as it appeared in 1870

Auguste-Frédéric was born in 1774. He rose through the ranks alongside Bonaparte and was named a Brigadier General in 1798 (as a reward for his successful capture of Malta from the British, which enabled the French armies to return safely from the Egypt campaign). Following the Coup of Brumaire (1799), First Consul Bonaparte named him a Councillor of State, and promoted him to Division General after his victory at Marengo over the Austrians. In 1804, he was named General-in-Chief of the Army of Holland, sent to restore order in the French satellite ‘Batavian Republic’. While he was there he erected a curious monument, a great pyramid near Utrecht, and a new town he called ‘Marmontville’. But he was not amongst the first round of promotions as Marshal of the Empire, which irked him—the beginnings perhaps of the breakdown of his relationship with Napoleon. He was also disappointed in 1805 when his plans to invade Britain from Holland failed to come together.

the pyramid built near Utrecht, ‘Marmontberg’ later called the Pyramid of Austerlitz

In 1806, General Marmont was transferred to another sphere of the expanding French Empire, as Governor of Dalmatia, the former Venetian province along the eastern shores of the Adriatic Sea which he secured for Napoleon’s new Kingdom of Italy, and to which he added the Republic of Ragusa (today’s Dubrovnik), ending its 450 years of independence. His title, Duke of Ragusa (or Raguse in French), granted in 1808, was thus one of the ‘grand fiefs’ that was actually quite closely tied to his interests and fortunes (the duchy came with a large annual income of 50,000 francs taken from lands in Dalmatia). Here too he saw some disappointments in the direction of Napoleon’s foreign policies, as he hoped to use his base in the Balkans to launch an invasion of the Ottoman Empire and spread the French Revolution and its values to the peoples of the Near East (much as Napoleon himself had desired to do a decade before in Egypt and Syria), but this was not supported. Another important victory over the Austrians at Znaim in Bohemia, 1809, finally earned him his marshal’s baton, and a promotion to the post of Governor-General of the Illyrian Provinces. This territory, separated from the Kingdom of Italy in 1809, included Dalmatia and Ragusa, but also now included the former Austrian provinces of Carinthia and Carniola. The latter, today’s Slovenia, became the centre of French administration, with its capital at Laibach (now Ljubljana). The Duc de Raguse became virtually an independent ruler here as the French Emperor turned his attentions elsewhere. Some suspected that Raguse had visions of becoming a king in Illyria, having seen the successes of marshals Murat in Naples and Bernadotte in Sweden, and, perhaps to derail these ambitions, he was soon redeployed by Napoleon elsewhere in Europe, first as commander of a French army in Northern Spain in 1811. He was seriously wounded in battle and retired back to France.

Marshal Marmont, Duc de Raguse

Returning to the army in Spring 1813, the Duc de Raguse participated in the major battles of the Germany campaign, and after the French armies were pushed back across the Rhine into France itself at the end of the year, he continued to defend the capital as the Allies advanced little by little towards Paris in the Spring of 1814. At one point in early March he was sharply criticised by Napoleon for executing a strategic retreat, sneering that ‘he had conducted himself like a sub-lieutenant.’ Nevertheless, he continued to fight in the districts east of Paris, and by the end of the month was left in charge of defending Paris. In the face of a much larger Allied force, he signed an armistice on 31 March that allowed the French army to withdraw from the city. This agreement was signed at 2 AM with Russian commanders at the Hôtel de Marmont (also known as the Hôtel de Raguse). This was a large house in the northern edge of the city (near today’s Gare du Nord) built in the 1770s which he had acquired as part of the dowry of his wife Anne-Marie Perregaux, daughter of the rich banker, Jean-Frédéric Perregaux (as this neighbourhood declined, the house was mostly dismantled/refashioned in the 1930s).

Marmont gives the keys to Paris to Tsar Alexander
the appearance today of the Hôtel de Raguse in Paris

The Emperor rejected calls for his abdication by the Allied Powers, so proposed a renewed assault on Paris. The Senate announced the end of his regime on 2 April, and sent out feelers to Marshal Marmont to see if he would carry on fighting or join them. On 5 April he negotiated directly with Austrian and Russian officials and agreed to join his army to theirs; this led to the abdication of Napoleon on the 6th and earned Marmont the lifelong hatred of diehard Bonapartists. Marshals Marmont and Ney went to Compiègne to receive Louis XVIII on 29 April and to formally welcome him back to France.

The restored Louis XVIII created the Duke of Ragusa a peer of France and named him major-general of the newly re-formed Royal Guard. The following Spring, during the Hundred Days, Ragusa did not support the return of the Emperor, but fled with the King to Ghent; nevertheless, in the Second Restoration, the King distrusted his loyalty and he was marginalised. He therefore focused his energies back in Burgundy, developing his family’s forge business at Châtillon. These business ventures were not successful, and he found himself strapped for cash, so he pressed the Austrian government to restore the pension from the estates of Dalmatia that had been created along with his duchy. Perhaps surprisingly, Austria had promised to do this according to the various settlements that ended the Napoleonic empire, so he did in fact receive this money. Nevertheless, it was not enough and he was forced to sell the Château de Marmont in 1826.

But the story of Marshal Marmont, Duke of Ragusa, was not finished. In 1826, the new King, Charles X, relied on the good relations Marmont had established with the Russians back in 1814 and sent him as France’s official representative at the funeral of Tsar Alexander. This renewed royal favour was once more even more strongly demonstrated at the very end of June 1830, when the King appointed him Military Governor of Paris, in an attempt to restore order in the political unrest which in the coming weeks developed into a full insurrection, later termed the ‘July Revolution’. When the King abdicated on 2 August, Marmont went with him, first into exile in Great Britain, and then to Austria, where he again (remarkably) ensured that his Dalmatian pension would still be paid, but turned down an offer of employment in the Austrian army. Curiously, here he spent time with the living remnant of Napoleon’s empire, his son, the Prince Imperial (or ‘Napoleon II’), now called the Duke of Reichstadt. In Vienna his use of the title Duke of Ragusa clashed with political realities, since the Emperor (Francis I) now added this title to his own, as the entire Illyrian coast had been restored to Habsburg rule. Nonetheless, his memoirs, published after his death, prominently used both titles, Marshal Marmont and Duc de Raguse. He settled in Venice in 1838 where he lived mostly forgotten until his death in 1852—the last marshal of the First Empire.

the Marechal-Duc de Raguse as an older man

In the end, this survey reminds us that the link between military leadership and the ducal title—its original purpose—had not been forgotten by the age of Napoleon. Under the Old Regime in France gaining a marshalcy was often the penultimate step towards gaining your family a ducal title, the crowning achievement for any noble house. But like many of the marshals of France under the Old Regime, a life spent in the military often mean long periods of time away from home, and the marital bed, and thus the failure of a family to generate more than just a ‘one-off’ duke.

The Lieven Princes: How minor nobles from the Baltic spread their wings on the currents of Swedish and Russian empires

The Baltic states of Estonia and Latvia were long dominated by German nobles who settled in the wake of conversion crusades led by military orders in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. Over the centuries that followed, they formed a fairly closed set of families, intermarrying and retaining their authority over the local native populations (Estonians, Letts, Semigallians, etc), and occasionally rising to greater power and rank due to service to foreign powers like Russia, Sweden, or Poland-Lithuania. Eventually they lost their dominant position following the first World War, and most were then expelled completely following the second World War and Soviet occupation of the region.

coat of arms of the House of Live, Liewen, Lieven

One family amongst these did claim to have local Baltic rather than German roots, though this may have just been family mythology. In the 1260s, a certain Gert Live (Gerhardus Lyvonis) appears in the records as a vassal of the Archbishop of Riga (today’s capital city of Latvia). The family story was that Gert was a descendant of a local chieftain of the Letts, also called Livs or Livonians, Kaupo, who converted to Christianity in 1186, and travelled to Rome in 1203 to gain support for his position as an independent prince or quasi-king and for the conversion of the Livonian people. The surname Lieven ultimately is said to derive from Live, or ‘the Livonian’. An independent Livonian state run by its own Livonian Brotherhood did not survive very long, however, and by the 1230s was subject to the Teutonic Order who constructed their own Baltic state called Terra Mariana.

The medieval Baltic states

Several generations later, Gert’s descendant Hincke or Heinrich exchanged his lands in Livonia for some further north, in the diocese of Ösel-Wiek, in what is now the western parts of Estonia. This semi-independent diocese is known in Estonian as Saare-Lääne, formed of the island of Saaremaa and the mainland county of Lääne (which means ‘western land’). The new family base was the manor of Parmel, which today is called Liivi—I’m uncertain if the family took its name from this manor or the other way round (it is also the name of the local river). From the 1380s there was a stone fort at Parmel; Heinrich’s family held this manor until 1694 and there are still remnants of the stone building today.

In the fifteenth century the family split into its two main branches: the line of Jürgen of Parmel stayed in the north and ultimately became prominent in Swedish affairs, and rose to the rank of count in the 18th century; while the line of Johan moved south into what is now Latvia and formed what is called the Courland branch, who ultimately entered Russian service and became princes in the 19th century—hence the family’s inclusion in this website.

So we need first to look at the growth of the Swedish Baltic empire. In the 1560s, Jürgen’s son Heinrich sided with a Danish prince, Duke Magnus, who was attempting to erect the northern parts of Estonia and Livonia into an independent kingdom (with Russian support). Magnus was attacked by a coalition of Polish and Swedish forces (the ‘Livonian War’) and ultimately chased out. Sweden took over these territories and Heinrich Live was taken as prisoner to Sweden, his possessions confiscated. The northern parts of the former Terra Mariana became Swedish Estonia, while the southern parts became (eventually) Swedish Livonia. The Swedish Crown would govern these territories—with not insignificant impact on Sweden itself, since Riga was the second largest city in its empire after Stockholm—until they were conquered by the Russians in 1721.

In 1582, Heinrich Live’s son Reinhold swore an oath of loyalty to the Swedish king and regained his father’s lands in Swedish Estonia. He was appointed a noble deputy to the Estonian Landrad (the local estates) in 1599, and became a colonel in the Estonian contingent of the Swedish army. His son, Bernhard, was also part of the Swedish government in Estonia, and married a woman from another local Baltic family (with the wonderful name of Yxkull, or Üxküll), but his grandsons began to integrate more fully into the Swedish court nobility.

Reinhold, who began to use the surname von Liewen (or Liven) was a Captain in the Swedish Royal Life Guards, 1645, and in 1653 was created a baron by Queen Christina, with lands centred on the city of Eksjö in the Swedish county of Småland. Småland is a large but mostly rural province on Sweden’s southeast coast. It was not the richest province in the realm, but Eksjö was conveniently located on trade routes between the north and the south, and the coast and the interior. Eksjö was one of the few territorial baronies to exist in the Kingdom of Sweden—most were simply tied to the family name.

In 1654, Reinhold von Liewen was sent back across the Baltic: he was governor of the island of Ösel and its chief fortress Arensburg Castle (Kuressaare in Estonian). He acquired more lands in Estonia in the parish of Rötel (Ridala in Estonian), not far from their ancestral lands, notably Weissenfeld, or Valgevälja (‘white field’ in Estonian), which also became known as Kiltsi manor (after the name of its former owners). The old castle there had been rebuilt in a Renaissance style in the early 17th century; today only ruins remain.

ruins of Weissenfeld (today in Estonia)

His younger brother Bernhard Otto was also created a Swedish baron in 1653, and also expanded landholdings in Estonia, at Raggafer (Rägavere) further inland, southeast of the capital of Reval (today’s Tallinn). In the 1660s he led the Estonian noble company in the Swedish army and in 1673 was named colonel of the Turku County cavalry regiment—Turku is in southwestern Finland and was an important base of operations for the Swedish empire of the Baltic, of which the Liewens were now at the very centre. He and his older brother formed the two main branches of this now baronial family, the ‘Black Liewen’ and the ‘White Liewen’.

The senior line, ‘Black Liewen’ served at court and in the military, and acquired more lands in Sweden, notably Vik and Bärby in Uppsala County). These were acquired by Baron Bernhard von Liewen, a soldier who had gained experience abroad in France and the Dutch Republic, then returned to Sweden to emerge as a hero in the 1670s war defending Scania against the armies of Denmark. When war broke out between Sweden and Russia, King Charles XII took Baron Liewen with him to Livonia to help him navigate the territory, but he was killed in battle soon after, in 1703.

Bernhard, Baron von Liewen

Vik Castle had been built by the powerful Bielke family in the 15th century, and is considered by many to be the best preserved medieval castle in all of Sweden. Located on the shores of a picturesque lake south of the city of Uppsala, Vik was renovated in a more ‘French’ style in the 17th century, and again by later owners in the 19th century. The Liewens acquired it through marriage to an heiress in 1689; in 1809 it passed by another marriage to the Essen family who owned it until 1912 when they sold it to a banker, who then sold it in 1923 to the local county government—today the county runs it as a conference centre.

Vik Castle, near Uppsala

This branch of the family also continued to maintain its presence in other parts of the Swedish empire, as commanders of the Estonian regiments of the Swedish army, or as governors of military garrison towns in the newer Swedish provinces in northern Germany, such as Wismar in Pomerania. By the end of the 17th century they were marrying noblewomen with surnames from the highest Swedish nobility—Oxenstierna, Bonde, Brahe—and were now being buried in Stockholm, not Reval.

the Swedish version of the Liewen coat of arms

This branch moved more closely into the favour of the royal house in the early 18th century: Baron Carl Gustaf of Vik was named Chamberlain to Duke Carl Friedrich of Holstein-Gottorp, whose mother, Hedvig Sophia of Sweden, was for a time heir to the Swedish throne. Ultimately the Holstein-Gottorp family succeeded to the throne, from 1751, and the von Liewen family benefitted. Carl Gustaf’s widow, Ulrike Juliane Brahe, became Chief Mistress of the Court in 1762, while her son Carl Gustaf II was Marshal of the Court from 1759. Carl Gustaf II had been a chamberlain since the 1740s, and a gentleman in waiting in 1751. The next year, the new king, Adolf Frederick, appointed him a caretaker, as ‘knight of honour’, of his second son, Prince Carl (born 1748, who would later become King Carl XIII). Carl Gustaf was also sent on diplomatic missions, to Hesse and to Russia, and ended his career as Governor of Stockholm County in 1768.

Carl Gustaf von Liewen

The most prominent member of this branch at the Swedish court was Carl Gustaf’s daughter, Ulrika Elisabet, known as ‘Ulla’, who was a Maid of Honour to Queen Lovisa Ulrika from 1764, but became the favourite, and (probable?) mistress, of her husband, King Adolf Frederick. They are rumoured to have had a daughter together, but this is not certain. Perhaps more importantly, she became a well-known leader of an intellectual salon in Stockholm, and was involved in the liberal politics of the reign of King Gustav III, but died relatively young in 1775.

Her brother, Carl Gustaf III, first spend some time commanding the Royal Suédois Regiment in France in the early 1770s, at a time when Sweden and France were renewing friendly ties (against mutual foe Prussia), but returned to be Chamberlain to the Dowager Queen Lovisa Ulrika and then Colonel of the Regiment of Life Guards. He ended his days as a Lieutenant-General and President of the Military Court. When he died in 1809, this branch of the family ended.

The junior branch in Sweden, the ‘White Liewen’ had a much broader spread, with many sons and grandsons forming sub-branches of their own. There were numerous commanders and generals in Swedish service but also in Austrian, French or even Spanish service. Several commanded the Turku regiment in southwest Finland, and there were also a number of commanders of the military fortress at Landskrona in western Scania, built by the Danes in the 16th century to help control water traffic through the Øresund, which separates Scania from the rest of Denmark (Scania became Swedish only after 1658). The Liewens also acquired property in this southern region, for example Lärkesholm a bit further inland (in the northern part of Kristianstad County). As a now more ‘southern’ Swedish family, they frequently commanded the regiment of the County of Kronoberg, just north of Scania in the province of Småland (thus closer to their barony of Eksjö), and they acquired lands in this county too (Malteshom, Silkesnäs).

Of all of these, one branch stood out, founded by Hans Henrik von Liewen, who was a successful military commander, rising to the rank of lieutenant-general in 1714, He was rewarded by being elevated to the rank of count in 1719, and a Councillor of State. Much of this was in recognition of the confidence he gained with the king, Charles XII, when in 1713 he journeyed to the Ottoman Empire to try to convince the warrior king to return to Sweden following his huge defeat by the Russians at Poltava in 1709. Instead he joined the King in his self-imposed exile and built up a friendship; when they both returned Hans Henrik was put in charge of re-constructing Sweden’s navy from its main base at Karlskrona. King Charles died in 1718, so it was actually his sister Queen Ulrika Eleonora who granted the new elevated title. The first Count von Liewen died as a respected member of the Swedish court in 1733.

Both of his sons were prominent in the Swedish army in the decades that followed, but the eldest, Count Hans Henrik ‘the younger’ brought the entire clan to its greatest heights so far. From the mid-1740s he was part of the inner circle of Duke Adolf Frederick of Holstein-Gottorp, who had been elected as heir to the Swedish throne, so when Adolf Frederick became king in 1751, Count von Liewen was favoured. His sister, Henrika Juliana, also became a court favourite, as a maid of honour to the new Crown Princess, Louisa Ulrika of Prussia, and one of her chief confidantes. The six maids of honour of the Crown Princess were known for their beauty and intelligence, and were painted in a curious ‘hen picture’ (Hönstavlan) by Johan Pasch in 1747, with the playful caption: ‘Who is the cursed rooster that would not crow, Hens, in seeing your features and your charms?’ But in 1748, this close confidence with the Crown Princess was apparently broken, and Henrika Juliana is believed to have been the informant that exposed a coup she had planned against those Swedes who wished to limit the power of the monarchy. Later in 1748, Henrika Juliana married and left the court, but she remained politically active, in the ‘Hats’ party who advocated a strong parliament dominated by the nobles, and thus a weak king. She is credited with editing the party’s provocative pamphlet, En ärlig Swensk (‘An Honest Swede’), published in 1755-56, and subsequently denounced by the King in the parliament.

The Hens Picture

Her brother Count Hans Henrik retained royal favour, however, and that same year was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant-General. In 1759 he was sent as Ambassador to Russia, where Adolf Frederick’s nephew, Grand Duke Peter, was preparing to take over as Tsar as heir to Empress Elizabeth. Back in Sweden, Hans Henrik was appointed a Privy Councillor in 1760, then Governor-General of Swedish Pomerania, on the northern coast of Germany, in 1766. He governed there until 1772, then returned to take up a post as Chief Marshal of the Court and Marshal of the Realm for his old friend’s son, now King Gustav III. When he died in 1781, the title of count died too.

Hans Henrik the younger, Count von Liewen

The other, still baronial, branches continued, but declined in prominence in the nineteenth century. Baron Frederik (d. 1875) was a merchant in Linköping, while his cousin Jakob Vilhelm (d. 1858) became a captain in the merchant navy. His grandson, Baron Christian von Liewen, was a sea captain who founded a shipping company in Helsingborg. When he died in 1917, the Swedish branches of the House of Liewen came to an end.

And so we must jump back across the Baltic to Livonia. The branch that was established by Johan Live back in the early 16th century acquired lands in a region known as Vidzeme, today the northern part of Latvia. In 1533 they founded a new town a bit further to the south, in lands governed by the archbishops of Riga, which they named Lievenhof in German (today called Līvāni). In 1631 they were formally admitted into the nobility of Courland (Kurzeme in Latvian), an independent duchy founded in the 1560s by the last Grand Master of the Livonian Order, Gotthard Kettler. This territory, now the far western part of modern Latvia, was nominally a vassal of the Kingdom of Poland-Lithuania, but increasingly came under Russian influence in the 17th and 18th centuries.

In the early eighteenth century, the seat of the family in Courland (now called ‘von Liven’ or ‘Leeuwen’) at was Bersen manor (Bērze in Latvian, or Lieven-Bersen, today called Līvbērze), which had a long grand frontage and a prominent gateway tower that became a symbol of the locality. The gateway and its tower were destroyed by the Soviets when they needed clearer access to the farm after nationalisation, but since 2020 there has been an exciting burst here of archaeology and regeneration of the house and its estate (referred to as ‘Live Manor’).

a historic photo of Bersen (today in Latvia)

Another grand manorhouse built in Courland in the mid-18th century was Dünhof (also called Livens Manor), now Daugmale, on the banks of the Daugava River before it flows into the city of Riga. A few miles away was Baldone Manor (Baldohn), acquired by the family in 1750. Friedrich Georg von Liven (d. 1800) was a Russian army officer who retired to this estate to beautify its parks and gardens, and to establish a resort in its sulphur springs. This resort remained quite popular well into the 20th century, but declined in the 1930s and is now mostly a ruin.

Baldone health spa in the late 18th century

When Courland was incorporated into Russia formally in 1801, the head of this branch of the family (Georg Philipp, d. 1847) was given the title of Count of the Russian Empire. His son, Count Wilhelm Heinrich, born at Dünhof in 1800, made his name as head of the Imperial Division of War Topographers in the 1850s, then was promoted to the highest position back in Livonia, as Governor-General of the Baltic Provinces, based in Riga, from 1861 to 1864, and a member of the Imperial Council of State.

Count Wilhelm Heinrich von Lieven, Governor-General of the Baltic Provinces

But another line of the Courland branch of the von Lieven family rose even higher than the rank of count: the Princes Lieven.

In 1766, a major-general in the Russian army, Baron Otto Heinrich von Lieven, married Baroness Charlotte von Gaugreben. Her family were not originally Baltic Germans, but Westphalian nobles, but one branch (a Catholic branch) had emigrated eastwards to establish themselves in Russian service. Two years after she became a widow in 1781, Charlotte was appointed as governess of the daughters of Grand Duke Paul, son and heir of Empress Catherine II. Her charge was later expanded to include Paul’s younger sons, Grand Duke Nicolas and Grand Duke Michael. Her influence at the court grew as these royal children matured, and formed a bond between the two families that would last generations.

Charlotte, Princess Lieven

In 1794, Charlotte von Lieven was named a lady-in-waiting to Catherine the Great in her last years. In 1799, in the new reign of Emperor Paul I, she and her children were promoted to the rank of Count of the Russian Empire. After the death of Paul I in Spring 1801, the new Emperor (Alexander I) promoted her further, appointing her Mistress of the Household of his wife, Empress Elizabeth Alexeievna. Finally, in 1826, after her former pupil Nicolas had succeeded his brother as Emperor of Russia, she was given the highest honour, princely rank, which was extended to her children as well. She died in 1828 in her apartments in the Winter Palace in Saint Petersburg.

Catherine the Great had also provided the faithful Charlotte von Lieven the use of a grand estate back in Courland, Mesothen (Mežotne in Latvian). Located on a broad bend of the river Lielupe in southern Semigallia, due south of Riga (now near the border with Lithuania), this grand neoclassical building was completely rebuilt from 1797 when Paul I rewarded Charlotte for her past services to his children by granting ownership outright. He also gave her the estate of Tersa on the Volga in the Saratov District; and later she was given more lands in Russia itself, including Baki in the Kostroma district, also on the Volga but much further north, and still more estates back in Courland. By this point Mesothen was a grand palace (its old manor house now became the caretaker’s house), with extensive gardens. The family resided here until 1920, when the new Republic of Latvia nationalised most large estates in a sweeping agrarian reform movement. An agricultural school was established in the 1920s, which persisted in various forms until the 1990s, when it was transferred into the ownership of the state heritage bureau, and in 2001 was opened as a hotel,

Mesothen Palace in Courland

Princess Lieven had four sons and two daughters. Three of the sons married and founded separate lineages of this now Balto-Russian princely house. The eldest son, Carl Christoph, who in 1828 became the 2nd Prince Lieven (the Russians tended to delete the ‘von’), was at first a keen soldier. At 21 he was an aide-de-camp of General Potemkin, and by 1799 was a lieutenant-general and commander of the elite Preobrazhensky Regiment. After the turn of the century, he turned more towards religion and in particular evangelical pietism. He worked to develop the newly re-founded University of Dorpat (today’s Tartu, in Estonia), supporting the adoption of courses in medicine and the natural sciences in particular. Years later he was given an honorary seat in the Russian Academy of Sciences. But in terms of religion, he was one of the founders of the Russian Evangelical Bible Society and President of the Evangelical Lutheran General Consistory, from 1819 to 1821. But in 1826, along with his elevation to princely rank, he was recalled to imperial service in Saint Petersburg, with a seat on the Council of State and a role in the Supreme Criminal Court. In 1828 he was appointed Minister of Education, an interesting nod to his earlier work in the Baltic, but also to his mother’s role as educator of children of the imperial family. In 1833, Carl Christoph retired back to his estates in Courland. He died in 1844 having married twice, both times to daughters of the Baltic German nobility, and fathering five children, whose stories will be picked up below.

Karl, 2nd Prince Lieven

The 2nd Prince’s brother, Prince Christoph Heinrich, was a respected ambassador, first in Berlin then in London, and a participant at the famous Congress of Vienna, 1814-15. But it was his wife, the former Dorothea von Benckendorff, who left a bigger impression in history—in fact, she was one of the most well-known women of her century. The Benckendorffs were a baronial family from the Altmark in Brandenburg, who had moved to Riga in the mid-sixteenth century. Dorothea’s father was a Russian general and Imperial Governor of Livonia. Her mother was Senior Lady-in-Waiting to the Empress Maria Feodorovna (wife of Emperor Paul), and in 1800, the 17-year-old Dorothea was named one of her maids-of-honour. She soon married Christoph von Lieven, and in 1810 he was appointed Ambassador to Berlin, so she accompanied him there, then on to London in 1812. It was here that Princess Lieven (as she was known after 1826) thrived. She became a leader of London’s political and social world, a close friend and confidante to leading statesmen including Lord Castlereagh, Lord Grey, the Duke of Wellington and the Prince of Wales (the future George IV). She is reputed to have had more intimate relations with Lord Palmerston, and even with Metternich, but this may just be gossip. The truth was certainly that by the 1820s people were clamouring to get invitations to her salon or her balls (where she is said to have introduced the waltz to England, or at least of making this shockingly intimate dance respectable and fashionable). More than just a society hostess, Princess Lieven was considered almost as a second ambassador, and was known to be connected in some way to every diplomat and crowned head in Europe. In 1825 she acted as an informal interlocutor between Russia and Great Britain, conveying Alexander I’s thoughts about the growing conflict in the Mediterranean over Greek independence with the Foreign Secretary, George Canning, while they were holidaying at Brighton. She is also credited for getting her friend Palmerston appointed as Foreign Secretary in 1830; but this backfired when he quarrelled with Tsar Alexander in 1834 and the Prince and Princess Lieven were hastily recalled to Russia.

Prince Christoph Lieven, Russian Ambassador to Great Britain

Back at the Russian court, Prince Christoph became governor and tutor to the young Tsarevich Alexander, while Princess Dorothea took up a post as Senior Lady-in-Waiting to Empress Alexandra Feodorovna. But she soon grew tired of Russian life, far from the diplomatic and cultural centres of Western Europe where she had flourished, so she left for Paris—never seeing her husband again before he died in 1839 while on Grand Tour in Rome with the Tsarevich. In Paris, Princess Lieven once again became a social and political force, hosting a salon in her residence in the First Arrondissement, and making friends with key statesmen like François Guizot, Minister for Foreign Affairs for much of the 1840s (and briefly Prime Minister of France). She attempted to act as a mediator once more for Russia, this time with France over the growing conflict in Crimea (1853), but was unable to prevent the outbreak of war. She died in Paris in 1857, leaving behind a vast treasure for historians of diplomacy in the form of letters and diaries, much of which has been published, covering nearly half a century, from the 1810s to the 1850s.

Dorothea, Princess Lieven

The third son of the original Princess Lieven, Johann Georg, also good a good start, as companion to Grand Duke Alexander in his first military campaigns in 1796. He served in all of Russia’s campaigns in the Napoleonic Wars and rose through the ranks to retire in 1815 as a lieutenant-general. He returned to Courland where he purchased an old castle at Cremon (Krimulda in Latvian). This castle had been built by the Livonian Order in the 14th century, and was mostly destroyed in the wars of the early seventeenth century. It would become the seat of the junior branch of the family, to which we’ll return at the end.

Prince Johann, or Ivan Andreievich Lieven

The third generation of Lieven princes was headed by Prince Otto Andreas (also known as Andrei Karlovich), born in 1798. Unlike princely titles in Western Europe, Russian princely titles did not really favour the eldest son in the same way, and with all children being titled prince or princess, so although the genealogist in me wants to call him the ‘3rd Prince Lieven’, this isn’t really accurate. Instead, elder brothers often spent their careers tending the family estates in the countryside, as head of the entail, while younger brothers could forge careers at court or in the military. In this case, Prince Andrei did rise, after an early suspicious involvement with the liberal Decembrist Uprising of 1825 (questioned, but not charged), to the rank of major-general in the army and commander of the Uhlan regiment of the Life Guards, but did retire early and married a cousin (another Princess Charlotte Lieven), to begin producing the next generation of Lievens on their estates in Livonia.

the Russian version of the Lieven coat of arms

The most prominent Lieven prince of this generation, however, was indeed a younger brother, Alexander Friedrich, who started his military career auspiciously as aide-de-camp to the now quite close friend of the family, Tsar Nicolas I, in 1826. In 1844 he was appointed Governor of Taganrog, an important naval city on the Sea of Azov which the Romanov emperors often used as a summer residence. When he retired from active service in 1853, he was promoted to the rank of lieutenant-general and named a Senator of the Russian Empire.

Prince Alexander in turn had two prominent children: Prince Andrei Alexandrovich was Governor of the Moscow District, 1870, then a Councillor of State and Imperial Senator. In 1877 he was appointed Minister for Imperial State Properties, responsible for looking after the imperial estates all across Russia. In 1881 he retired to an estate at Spasskoye, near Moscow and devoted himself to the study of astronomy. Much later in life, a floundering Tsar Nicolas II once again turned to a member of this trusted family, and Prince Andrei was recalled to the State Council in 1910; he remained in government until his death in 1913. His descendants emigrated and founded a branch who emigrated to England and Canada.

Prince Andrei Alexandroch Lieven

Andrei’s sister Princess Helena (or Jelena) continued the family’s tradition of education, and made a name for herself as a pedagogue in Saint Petersburg where she was principal of the prestigious Smolny Institute for Noble Maidens from 1895 to her death in 1917 during the Revolution.

Princess Helena Lieven

The fourth and fifth heads of the Lieven family did not leave much of a mark on history: Prince George and his brother Prince Michael both died within a month of each other in the summer of 1909. The senior position thus passed to a cousin, Prince Alexander Nikolaievich (b. 1876), who lived not at Mesothen (which by this point had been given to a junior branch), but at Senten (Zentene), still in Courland but much further north near the coast, west of Riga. Purchased by this line in 1818, a new palace was constructed here in 1850. They also owned a grand manorhouse in southern Courland called Fockenhof (Bukaišu). When riots broke out following the Revolution of 1905, Fockenhof was destroyed and Prince Alexander emigrated to Germany, where he died in 1919. Following the Latvian agrarian reforms of 1920, his cousin, Prince Nikolai, was allowed to live on at Senten, but as a tenant; nevertheless the government established a sanatorium there and he was gradually pushed out. Zentene Manor now houses a local school.

Fockenhof before its destruction, 1905
Zentene today

Prince Alexander’s son, also called Nikolai, was born in Dresden in 1906. He had no children with his first wife, and in 1949 he married a second time, to a French noblewoman (noble twice over: born into the old house of Bridieu, and adopted by a great-uncle of the Chateaubriand family), who inherited a château in the Rhône valley, in the heart of the Beaujoalais wine region. Their son Prince Alexander (b. 1953) is the current head of the princely house of Lieven (the ‘8th Prince’), and proprietor of the wineries at the Château de Bellevue where one of their best-sellers is named for his mother, Princesse Lieven. They have three sons whose names retain their Russian heritage: Nicolas, Pierre and Dmitri.

Bellevue in southern France
fine wine!

While there were by now many, many members of the Lieven family, one other stands out in this senior branch. Prince Alexander Karl (b. 1860) served in the Russian Imperial Navy and made his name as a brave captain whose vessel broke through enemy lines in the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-05. He was promoted to admiral in 1911 and served as Chief of the Navy’s General Staff in 1912, but died in February 1914 just before the outbreak of war.

Prince Admiral Alexander Karl Lieven, Chief of the Naval Staff

Lastly, we come to the most junior branch of the princely Lievens, the descendants of Prince Johann Georg. In several ways, this became the most prominent branch of the family. Prince Johann’s son, Paul (b. 1821) became an important figure in politics in the Baltic provinces, and then one of the most senior members of the Imperial court in Saint Petersburg. In the 1850s he began to redevelop the castle at Cremon (Krimulda), in a region known as ‘Livonian Switzerland’. Perhaps adhering to this theme, he built two ‘Swiss chalets’ in its parkland that overlooked a romantic gorge of the Gauja river, which runs through this part of Livonia (northeast of Riga). When on a tour of the region, Tsar Alexander II heard of Cremon’s beauty and paid a special visit in 1862. Like the other properties in Latvia owned by this family, it was nationalised in 1920, and turned into a sanatorium. Today it is on the market for nearly 3 million euros.

Cremon (Krimulda)

The same year as the Tsar’s visit, Prince Paul was named Land Marshal of Vidzeme (the region in which Cremon was situated), and a few years later elected to the local Landrat, or parliament. With this platform he became a leader of the liberal party in the Baltics and worked to achieve freedom of religious expression in this part of the Russian Empire—recall that several members of this family were evangelicals. In fact, his wife, Princess Nathalie (born von der Pahlen, yet another of these Baltic German noble houses), was an avid adherent to the evangelical movement, and years later, as a widow, purchased a grand residence in Saint Petersburg (the former Demidov Palace), on fashionable Morskaya Street, where in the 1870s-90s she hosted famous Baptist preachers and convened great gatherings aimed at religious conversion. Sold in 1910 to the Italian Embassy, the building is now part of the Baltisky Bank.

Princess Nathalie Lieven
Lieven Palace in Saint Petersburg (better known as Demidov Palace)

Perhaps charmed by his visit to Cremon Castle in 1862, Tsar Alexander II named Prince Paul as one of his court chamberlains that same year, then in 1866 appointed him a Privy Councillor in 1870, and Master of Ceremonies of the Russian Court. This was a powerful position at court, as it controlled much of the Tsar’s activities and, crucially, access to the Tsar’s person.

Prince Paul Lieven, Grand Master of Ceremonies of the Russian Court

But Paul was not finished building up his estates in Livonia: in 1874, he acquired the ancient ruins of Bauske Castle (Bauska in Latvian), not far from the other family seat of Mesothen Palace in the south of the country, the part of Courland called Semigallia. The site has a long history: the tribal Semigallians built a hill fort here, and later the Livonian Order constructed a stone castle (circa 1450), with a central tower and a prison and several buildings for a garrison. Its purpose was to guard the southern frontier against the grand dukes of Lithuania. When the Livonian Order secularised and became the duchy of Courland for the Kettler family in the mid-16th century, Bauske became one of their main residences, and was used as a meeting place for the local estates. The duke of Courland modernised it in the 1590s, but just over a century later it was blown up by invading Russian forces in 1706. Prince Paul Lieven purchased the ruins and restored the ducal palace (leaving the older medieval fortifications as a romantic ruin). Today it is open for tourism.

Bauske Castle, Courland (now Latvia)

Prince Paul Lieven, Master of Ceremonies, liberal reformer, builder of palaces and gardens, died aged only 60 in 1881, leaving behind his widow Princess Nathalie, and several very young children. The eldest, Anatol, was only 9. He followed in his parents’ footsteps in politics and religion, and in 1900 became a member of the Courland Peasant Affairs Council, and in 1909 chairman of the Council of the Russian Evangelical Union. In 1903, he built a brand new Lieven residence, Pelzen Palace (Pelči) in the far west of Courland, in art nouveau style. Today it is a school.

Pelzen Palace

Prince Anatol served as a cavalry captain during World War I, then became a commander of a Russo-German battlegroup (the Liventsy) in the Latvian War of Independence, 1918-20. Though allied with the Russian ‘White’ armies fighting against the ‘Red’ armies of the Soviets, he also faced pressure to assist in a pro-Imperial Germany takeover of the new Latvian government, which he wouldn’t do. He also forbid his soldiers from fighting against an Estonian army that was seeking to expand that new nation’s territory from the north.

Prince Anatol Lieven

When the war ended and the Latvian Republic secured its independence, Prince Anatol’s estates were nationalised (as we’ve seen already), including the main estate, Mesothen, now called Mežotne in Latvian. The age of the Baltic German nobility had come to an end, but Anatol Lieven did not emigrate like many others. He obtained permission to keep part of the estate and converted it into a brick factory, which he ran successfully for many years until he died in 1937.

Anatol’s younger brother, another Prince Paul, was also a liberal reformer, and long before revolution or nationalisation, had already converted his estate (purchased in 1893), Smilten (Smiltene), in Vidzeme (not far from Cremon/Krimulda), into something productive for the general populace. Trained as an engineer, he developed roads around the estate and built its own short railway line, as well as a power station, a hospital and a sawmill. He divided up the estate into smaller rentable plots for local people. Yet unlike his brother, he did not stay in Latvia to participate in the agricultural reforms of the 1920s; he migrated to Germany in 1919, then to England, where he died in 1963.

Prince Paul in his motorcar
Smiltene manor today

Both Anatol and Paul left descendants, the former in Canada and the latter in England. Paul’s son Alexander Lieven, born in Rostock in northern Germany in 1919, grew up in England, and served as a Captain in the British Army in World War II, then worked in the Foreign Affairs office as a Russian specialist. In the 1960s-70s, he was Head of the Russian and East European Service for the BBC.

Finally, four of the five children of Alexander Lieven (who died in 1988) have all maintained their family’s notoriety, all in very different fields. The eldest, Elena, is a developmental psychologist at Manchester University and the Max Planck Institute in Leipzig. The youngest, Natalie, is a magistrate who in 2019 was appointed a Justice of the High Court of England and Wales, and Dame Commander of the British Empire. Brother Anatol is a prominent journalist and policy analyst specialist on counter-terrorism. While last but not least, is my colleague in the study of the history of monarchy and aristocracy, Professor Dominic Lieven, of Cambridge University, whose many books focus on, what else, Imperial Russia.

Prof. Dominic Lieven

Two Royal Favourites for the Price of One: George Villiers and George Villiers, the Dukes of Buckingham

It is rare for any aristocratic family to place one of its members so high in the court hierarchy as to be known as ‘the royal favourite’, but for one family to produce two in as many generations, and both with the same name—George Villiers, Duke of Buckingham—is really extraordinary.

George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham, by Rubens

Many aristocratic families spend decades rising to the top, and, once achieved, manage to stay there for generations. The Villiers family rose quickly, from provincial gentry to the top of the peerage, then proliferated into a number of different branches, all with titles, and then very nearly petered out altogether. There are only two dukes of Buckingham in the Villiers family, George I and George II. The first features in a new television drama “Mary and George” that portrays the very essence of becoming a royal favourite in early Stuart England, and a cheeky portrayal of the relationship between King James I and one of his greatest male favourites. For the second, a fun portrayal on the small screen can be found in BBC’s “Charles II: the Power and the Passion” from 2003.

There were other dukes of Buckingham. One of the mightiest families of the 15th century, the Staffords, were so titled between 1444 and 1521 when they were cut down by a jealous Henry VIII who feared their Plantagenet blood. Then after the Villiers dukes, the Sheffield family, prominent Yorkshire landowners, were dukes of Buckingham and Normanby from 1703 to 1735. Finally the title was re-created in 1822 for a family who were actually from Buckinghamshire, the Temples of Stowe (though with other inheritances they became the incredibly quintuple-barrelled Temple-Nugent-Brydges-Chandos-Grenville. Their title was extinguished in 1889, and it has not been revived.

Beyond the two Villiers dukes of Buckingham, there were other Villiers royal favourites: one of the most famous royal mistresses in British history, Lady Castlemaine, later Duchess of Cleveland, was born Barbara Villiers. Less well known was her cousin, Elizabeth Villiers, Countess of Orkney, a mistress of William III. Altogether, this is four royal favourites from one family! And there is a fifth…read on!

While the greatest prominence of the Villiers favourites, male and female, diminished by the end of the 17th century, the Villiers family did continue. Overall they obtained four earldoms—Anglesey, Grandison, Jersey and Clarendon—between 1623 and 1776, of which two (Jersey and Clarendon) continue to the present.

To start, the Villiers family appears in records going back to about 1230, as landowners in the area around Brooksby in Leicestershire, the rich agricultural heartland of England’s East Midlands. The claim, as for most English aristocrats, was to be from solidly Norman stock, and certainly ‘de Villiers’ does have a French sound to it (and in fact there are several French noble houses with surnames like Villers, de Ville, or Villars—the latter is a duke’s family, so will get their own blog post), and would mean simply a ‘town dweller’. But it is also possible the name comes from an old Anglo-Saxon word wyler, a trade name for ‘wheelmaker’ (similar to the name Wheeler), and early variants of this family’s name are indeed seen as Vyler. Regardless, they were a solid gentry family for several centuries in the county of Leicester, with a manor house at Brooksby (or Brokesby). The house that is there today was built in the early 17th century, when the family was moving up the social hierarchy. It was extended in the 1890s, and today houses an agricultural college run by the county.

Brooksby Hall, Leicestershire

Sir George Villiers (d. 1609) increased his family’s wealth through sheep farming. He served as High Sherriff of Leicestershire in 1591, and as Knight of the Shire for the county in Parliament, 1604-06. He married twice and had two families: the first wife was connected indirectly to the Zouche family, one of the more prominent noble houses of Leicestershire.

Sir George Villiers, of Brooksby

Sir George’s second, much younger wife, Mary Beaumont, was a member of the extended Beaumont clan, also prominent in Leicesterhire, but not the same Beaumonts who had governed the county as its earls back in the 12th century. The barons Beaumont came from France to England later, after the Norman Conquest, and one of them married a daughter of the Earl of Lancaster, a Plantagenet, meaning that their descendants had a drop of royal blood. Mary Beaumont Villiers, later Countess of Buckingham in her own right, is the bold character played by Julianne Moore in the new television show.

From Sir George’s first marriage came two sons, William and Edward, who would later give rise to the lines of Villiers baronets and three of the four earldoms. From the second, came three more sons, John, George and Christopher. As the television show demonstrates, it was this second son (actually the fourth overall) who would be the making of this family’s fortunes for the century to come.

Young George was placed at court in August 1614 as a Royal Cupbearer to the still fairly new king of England, James I (James VI of Scotland since the 1560s). Rivals to the King’s current favourite, Robert Carr, Earl of Somerset, saw an opportunity to unseat him by placing in the King’s entourage a young man of 21 who was by all accounts, extremely beautiful and also a pleasant conversationalist and skilled dancer. By 1615, he was a regular feature at court, danced in the court masques before the King, and was promoted to the rank of Gentleman of the Bedchamber. Only a year later he was appointed Master of the Horse, one of the most senior posts at court, and one with a lot of close access to the King as he accompanied him any time he went on procession or hunting. He was named Viscount Villiers in 1616, a Knight of the Garter, and Lord-Lieutenant of Buckinghamshire. Only a year later he was promoted again, as Earl of Buckingham, and again in 1618 as Marquess of Buckingham. A marquisate was still a fairly rare title in England, and James was surely reluctant to promote his favourite to a dukedom since there were at that time *no* dukes in England (Somerset and Norfolk had both been removed and would not be restored until later in the century). So it was a bit of a shock when the King announced in May 1623 that he was creating two dukedoms: one for his cousin (Ludovic Stuart, already Duke of Lennox in Scotland), and one for this favourite, the son of a provincial gentry sheep farmer. George was also named Lord Admiral of the Fleet, 1619, and by 1625, Lord Warden of Cinque Ports, a very lucrative office. His coffers were also enriched by his marriage to the daughter of the 6th Earl of Rutland (see the Manners family here), Lady Katherine, who was in her own right 18th Baroness de Ros, with a seat at Helmsley Castle, in North Yorkshire.

Katherine Manners, Duchess of Buckingham

Helmsley was a Norman castle, overlooking the river Rye, and guarded the southern entrance to the Yorkshire Moors. It was held by the Roos or Ros family until 1508, then the Manners until the 6th Earl died in 1632. His seat was at nearby Belvoir Castle, so George and Katherine made Helmsley their seat. Most of the military aspects of the castle were dismantled in the English Civil War of the 1640s, and the rest of it left to decay after a new country house was built next door by new owners in the 18th century.

the ruins of Helmsley Castle, Yorkshire

Meanwhile, George’s brothers were benefitting from his amazing rise. The eldest, Sir William, made a good marriage in 1614 to the daughter of Lord Saye and Sele of Oxfordshire (the same family that much later produced Ralph and Joseph Fiennes), and was given a hereditary baronetcy in 1619, with its seat at Brooksby. He was the Sheriff of Leicestershire and his line maintained the Villiers family’s local influence until its extinction in 1712. Second son Edward was given positions in the government, as Master of the Mint, 1617, and Comptroller of the Court of Wards, 1618. He was later ambassador to the Palatinate and Lord President of Munster, one of the four provinces of Ireland. He married a niece of Oliver, 1st Viscount Grandison who was Lord Deputy (or Viceroy) of Ireland, so their eldest son William inherited lands in Ireland, and succeeded as 2nd Viscount in 1630—this title was in the peerage of Ireland, so it didn’t give him a seat in the English parliament. We will return to him below. Interestingly, of these older half-siblings of the first Duke of Buckingham, Anne Villiers married Sir William Washington, the elder brother of Lawrence Washington, great-great-grandfather of General George Washington.

As for the children of Sir George Villiers’ second marriage, to Mary Beaumont, the eldest, John, was also given prominent positions in the household, as Groom of the Bedchamber and then Master of the Robes, 1616. He was also married to a prominent heiress, Frances Coke, daughter of the Lord Chief Justice, and in 1619 was created Viscount Purbeck (in part to make his new mother-in-law agree to the marriage), and Baron Villiers of Stoke (in Buckinghamshire). It was clear by 1620, however, that he was mentally ill or disabled, and the marriage soon broke down. Viscountess Purbeck was later convicted for adultery. There were no children from the marriage.

Younger brother Christopher (‘Kit’) was created 1st Earl of Anglesey and Baron Villiers of Daventry (in Northamptonshire), also in 1623. Like his brothers, he had been named a Gentleman of the Bedchamber, and took over the role of Master of the Robes from his unfit brother in 1620. Their sister Susan had long been married to William Feilding, another country gentleman, and both of them rose in the court hierarchy as well, created Earl and Countess of Denbigh in 1622. The Countess was soon appointed as a Lady of the Bedchamber to the new wife of King Charles I, Henrietta Maria, and would remain one of the Queen’s closest companions for the rest of her life, accompanying her into exile in France, and even converting to Catholicism (as indeed had done her mother, Mary Beaumont, back in 1620, but that’s another story).

Susan Villiers, Countess of Denbigh

Fetching Henrietta Maria to marry Charles I in 1625 was in fact one of the elements that made the 1st Duke of Buckingham’s name in history—and even in fiction, as his life crossed over into the stories of ‘The Three Musketeers’. By 1623, George was effectively ‘prime minister’ for James I, and, extraordinarily, continued as royal favourite under the new king, Charles I, who succeeded his father in March 1625. Buckingham had grown close to the young Prince of Wales when they travelled together to Spain to attempt to negotiate a marriage with an Infanta; instead they had made the acquaintance of young Princess Henriette-Marie of France when attending a ball in Paris en route to Spain. Their betrothal was announced in December 1624. In the coming years, Buckingham did involve himself frequently in French politics, at first aiding Louis XIII in his war against the Protestants of La Rochelle, then turning around and sending ships and supplies to defend them. He did not however, become the lover of Queen Anne and have to send d’Artagnan racing across northern France to replace her diamonds in order to avoid the menaces of the villain Cardinal Richelieu. In the Dumas book, Milady plots to assassinate the meddling Duke, but is of course foiled.

In reality, the English Parliament was growing increasingly fed up with the Duke of Buckingham’s mismanagement of the war to aid to the French Huguenots, and a botched attempt to capture the rich Spanish port of Cadiz. Parliament had twice attempted to impeach him, but King Charles had rescued him both times by dissolving Parliament. Public opinion was inflamed: the Duke was widely seen as a public enemy. In August 1628, he travelled to Portsmouth to organise another campaign to aid La Rochelle, but was stabbed to death at the Greyhound Inn by a disgruntled army officer.

the Duke of Buckingham as warrior and commander of the English navy (also Rubens)

The Duke’s widow Katherine continued to live with their three young children, Mary, George and Francis (born posthumously), at their very grand residence in London: York House. One of the series of large palatial residences on the Strand, with terraced gardens leading down to wharves and docks on the Thames, York House had originally been the London residence of the bishops of Norwich until it was given to the archbishops of York in 1556. After it was given by the King to George Villiers in the 1620s, the new Duke and Duchess of Buckingham embellished its interiors in the fashionable Italianate style of the early reign of Charles I, of which the only remains we can still see today are the very ornate archway to the Watergate the Duke had constructed on the river—now stranded in the middle of Embankment Gardens. This house remained the seat of the 2nd Duke of Buckingham until he sold it in 1672. It was subsequently dismantled, though street names remained to maintain the family’s presence in London, notably Villiers Street, now next to Charing Cross Station.

York House as depicted in the early 19th century
the water gate as it stands today

The 2nd Duke of Buckingham, the 2nd George, succeeded to his titles at the age of one. He is certainly one of my favourite people from English history in this period: a fighter, a scientist, a politician, a poet, a dandy and a libertine. He was sometimes King Charles II’s best friend and sometimes his worst enemy. His father having died, and his mother re-marrying and moving to Ireland when he was about 6, George and his brother Francis were taken in by the King and Queen, and raised in the royal nursery with princes Charles and James, only a few years younger.

George, 2nd Duke of Buckingham, and Lord Francis Villiers

As a teenager, George fought in the Royalist armies in the English Civil War, then went on tour abroad with his brother. When they returned in 1648, they again joined the fight, and Francis was killed in a skirmish near Kingston in Surrey. George then went into exile with the Prince of Wales in France and the Netherlands, and returned with him for his coronation as Charles II at Scone in Scotland in 1651, and led some of the troops south in the invasion of England. After this failed, he returned with the King to the Netherlands. Here they fell out, over money issues, George’s growing interest in low church Protestantism, and his flirtation with the King’s recently widowed sister, the Princess of Orange. He returned to England in 1657, and, rather strangely, married Mary Fairfax, the daughter of Lord Fairfax, the former commander of Parliamentarian troops and the man to whom his confiscated estates had been given several years before. It seems that George’s move towards low church politics, and Fairfax’s own move towards a reconciliation with the monarchy, met in the middle, and by 1659 both were working for the Restoration.

In 1660, Buckingham reconciled with Charles II when he arrived back in England, and was appointed Gentleman of the Bedchamber and Lord Lieutenant of West Riding of Yorkshire, where he and his wife would ultimately inherit the Fairfax properties, including Nun Appleton on the River Wharfe, south of York. Nun Appleton had been a priory from the 12th century, dissolved in the 1530s, and acquired by the Fairfaxes who built a new house in the 17th century. After Mary, Duchess of Buckingham’s death in 1704, the house was sold; replaced by a Georgian mansion, it passed through many hands and now sits decaying and empty—apparently its owner plans to restore it to the original 17th-century design, but is blocked by regulations protecting the later 18th and 19th-century alterations.

Nun Appleton in the 17th century
Nun Appleton more recently

https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/news/local-news/gallery/inside-yorkshire-stately-home-abandoned-19146862 [article from 2020]

Anyway, George now became part of Charles II’s ‘Merry Gang’ of drinkers and carousers at the Restoration court. Like his father, he was sent to Paris to participate in another marriage between a Stuart and a Bourbon, this time Henrietta Anne and Philippe, Duke of Orléans (Louis XIV’s brother). But as he had in The Hague, Buckingham seems to have overstepped the mark and flirted too openly with the Princess and was soon sent home. Also like his father, this made it into the Three Musketeers tales of Alexander Dumas (in the Vicomte de Bragelonne). Nevertheless, Buckingham remained close to the French king and a persistent advocate of a French alliance against the Dutch. This put him into opposition to the King’s chief minister, the Earl of Clarendon, who, by 1667, Buckingham was powerful enough to bring down and remove from power. Indeed, from 1667 to 1674, the Duke was now Charles II’s unofficial prime minister, or ‘minister-favourite’, and leader of a faction known as the CABAL—taking its name from its five main leaders, including its ‘arch’ in the middle, B for Buckingham. This clique is considered he kernel of Britain’s first formal political parties, and after its disintegration, one of Buckingham’s former protégés from his now vast Yorkshire patronage network, Lord Danby, would become the next great political leader (Thomas Osborne, later created Duke of Leeds).

arms of the 2nd Duke of Buckingham, with ducal coronet, and quarterings for Villiers (upper left), Ros (top centre) and others

But Buckingham was no great statesman. The only official post he held was Master of the Horse—as above, a position of intimacy and trust with the King—and his ties with absolutist France were increasingly uncomfortable, especially after the Secret Treaty of Dover of 1670 was revealed and seriously embarrassed the King. Despite his pro-French views, the Duke was also vehemently pro-toleration and supportive of the rights of non-conformists—this too put him at odds with the general mood of the populace and the Parliament, and again put the King in a difficult position. Matters were not helped by Buckingham’s personal life: like many noblemen of Charles II’s court, he drank and gambled and duelled, usually over a mistress. In 1668, he duelled with the Earl of Shrewsbury, who was mortally wounded—then installed the now widowed Countess of Shrewsbury as his mistress in his new grand suburban residence, at Cliveden. Cliveden House was built in 1666 on a clifftop (earlier spellings of the house are Cliffden) overlooking the River Thames in Buckinghamshire. It had replaced an older hunting lodge built in the 16th century and was a marvel of grand architecture, a tall pavilion over an arcaded terrace built by William Winde. After the Duke’s death, it was purchased by the Earl of Orkney (whose wife was also a Villers), and in the 18th century was leased to Frederick, Prince of Wales (son of George II), who made it one of his favoured residences. Cliveden burned down in 1795, and the estate lay dormant for some time until the house was rebuilt, on an even grander scale in 1824, then burned down again in 1849, and was rebuilt again in 1851 by the Duke of Sutherland. It then passed to the Duke of Westminster who sold it in 1893 to the Astors who made it one of the most fashionable spots for the beau monde in the early decades of the 20th century. Today the estate belongs to the National Trust, but the house itself is leased to a luxury hotel chain.

Cliveden in its original state (c1717)
Cliveden today

In January 1674, Charles II finally acquiesced to demands in Parliament that the Duke of Buckingham be removed from any positions of authority and influence. He was sent away, to live at his Yorkshire estates at Helmsley and Nun Appleton. He began to reform: he attended church, was attentive to his wife, and paid off his debts. Still he meddled in politics, leading a ‘country party’ that was forming in opposition to a more centralist faction in Parliament (the origins of the Whigs and the Tories), and even began making contact directly with Louis XIV over another possible alliance—until he was discovered and threatened with imprisonment in the Tower.

George Villiers, 2nd Duke of Buckingham, as an older man

Buckingham distanced himself from the Whigs by about 1680 (due to their insistence on exclusion of Catholics from government), and reconciled with his old friend the King before the latter died in 1685, and before his own death two years later. His wife the Duchess lived on until 1705, but they had no children; nor did his sister Mary, Duchess of Richmond, who also died in 1685. So the Villiers estates were dispersed.

Mary Fairfax, Duchess of Buckingham

But the age of the Villiers favourites was not quite finished. From 1660 to 1672, the other most dominant person in the life of King Charles II was his mistress Barbara Villiers Palmer, Lady Castlemaine. And following her dismissal, her first cousin Elizabeth Villiers rose to prominence—albeit much less overtly—as a favourite of Charles II’s nephew and (eventual) successor, William III.

Barbara Villiers was the only child of the 2nd Viscount Grandison (above). He died when she was only four, in a battle during the Civil War. The title and estates passed to his brothers, the 3rd and 4th viscounts (founders of later Villiers branches), and young Barbara was left with very little. She was described as one of the most beautiful young women of the age, but had few financial attractions. She did not attract a high-ranking suitor, and in 1659, in seeming desperation, she married a relative nobody, and a Catholic to boot: Roger Palmer, a landowner from the Welsh borders. Barbara and Roger both saw their fortunes tied to a restored monarchy, so went to the Low Countries to meet with the King in the months leading up to the Restoration in Spring 1660. That year he was elected as an MP, and she was selected as the King’s favourite. In 1661, Roger was created Earl of Castlemaine and Baron Limerick (in reference to her father’s Irish titles; and Castle Maine, in County Kerry), which was more mocking than an honour, since an Irish peerage brought no position in England, and the terms of the title’s creation specified that it would pass only to sons born from his marriage to Barbara, not any future wife—in other words, he was an official cuckold, and everyone knew it. The new Countess of Castlemaine was given a position as Lady of the Bedchamber to the new queen, Catherine of Braganza, a humiliation for a pious foreign queen newly arrived and with few friends at this quite anti-Catholic court.

there are many portraits of Barbara Villiers. This is my favourite

Roger and Barbara legally separated in 1662, in part to avoid his attempts to make claims on the children she was giving birth to. These children were at first called Palmer, but later the King formally recognised them and gave them the name FitzRoy (‘son of the king’). At times this was very confusing: the eldest son Charles was at first known as ‘Lord Limerick’ (Roger Palmer’s courtesy title), and was baptised as a Palmer in a Catholic ceremony, only to be re-baptised later as Charles FitzRoy in a Protestant ceremony. Eventually it was clear these children were royal bastards, and the King gave them increasingly grand titles—all three boys were created dukes: of Southampton and Grafton (both in 1675) and of Northumberland (in 1683). These Stuart dukedoms that descend from Charles II (as with the Duke of Saint Albans, written about previously), will have their own blog posts. Only one of these three ducal lineages founded by Barbara Villiers survives today (Grafton).

By the mid-1660s, Lady Castlemaine was a major figure at court, and with significant influence in government as well. In tandem with her Villiers cousin the 2nd Duke of Buckingham, she brought down the King’s old favourite, the Earl of Clarendon, in 1667. But it was Buckingham who then manoeuvred Nell Gwynne into place as the King’s favourite mistress in the following year, seeing his cousin now as a rival instead of an ally. The King granted Barbara financial privileges and several properties, including Nonsuch Palace, as well as the title Baroness Nonsuch.

Nonsuch Palace, as painted in the early 17th century

Nonsuch was a famous Tudor palace, built by Henry VIII in the 1530s amidst hunting grounds in Surrey, south of Hampton Court. Its name suggested that there was ‘no such place’ equal to it. In the 17th century it had been used as part of Queen Anne of Denmark’s jointure and as a hunting lodge for James I and Charles I, and finally as a residence for the Queen Mother, Henrietta Maria, during the Restoration. In a great act of cultural vandalism, Barbara ordered the palace’s dismantling in 1682, and its parts were sold to pay off her mounting debts. Nothing remains.

Barbara Villiers was also created Duchess of Cleveland in her own right in 1670, with the letters patent specifying it would pass to her eldest son, Charles FitzRoy. Cleveland took its name from the region of high peaks (cliffs or ‘cleves’) and dales in north Yorkshire. There had been an earl of Cleveland (Thomas, 4th Baron Wentworth), who was part of the clientele network of the 1st Duke of Buckingham, and his son a close companion of Charles II in exile. The Earl died in 1667 and perhaps the King wished to remember him and his earlier Villiers connections in re-using the title for Barbara in 1670.

The name was also given to her London house, which she acquired from Clarendon’s fall in 1667. Cleveland House, directly behind St. James’s Palace and overlooking Green Park in Westminster, had been built for the Earl of Berkshire (a Howard) in the 1620s, then was the residence of the Earl of Clarendon as First Minister in the 1660s. Barbara expanded and refaced it in the 1670s, but before she died, she sold it to the Egertons, later dukes of Bridgewater. Since then it has been called Bridgewater House, but the address is still Cleveland Row. It was rebuilt in the 1850s, then sold off after World War II—it was used for offices until the 1980s when it once again became a private residence.

Bridgewater House in the 1830s

By about 1672, it was clear that Charles II’s favourites were Nell Gwynne and the newly arrived Louise de Kérouaille. The Duchess of Cleveland lost her position as Lady of the Queen’s Bedchamber due to the Test Act of 1673, since she was a Catholic (having converted back in 1663), and the King sent her away from court. She lived in Paris, 1676-80, then was briefly reconciled with the King before he died in 1685. Her life after that was rather sad, with increasing penury and foolish romantic liaisons, culminating in a marriage of 1705 to Major-General Robert ‘Beau’ Fielding, whom she later had to prosecute for bigamy once she discovered he was already married. She lived her last years in a large brick house in the western London suburb of Chiswick—this ‘Cleveland House’ was later renamed Walpole House for its 18th-century owner, and hosted a prominent school in the 19th century, before being restored as a private house again in the 20th.

Walpole House in Chiswick

Barbara died in 1709. Her long forgotten husband, Roger Palmer, Earl of Castlemaine, had actually risen in favour after the death of Charles II, since, as a Catholic, he was esteemed by the new king, James II. He was named to the Privy Council in 1686, and sent as Ambassador to Rome. After James’ fall, of course, this brief prominence faded, and Castlemaine spent the rest of his life either as a Catholic suspect in the Tower of London, or on his estates on the Welsh borders where he died in 1705. The dukedom of Cleveland passed to Barbara’s son Charles, Duke of Southampton, and to his son, William FitzRoy, who died in 1774. The title was re-created in 1833 for his grand-nephew, William Vane, Earl of Darlington (and so continued until its extinction again in 1891).

Barbara, Duchess of Cleveland, as a clearly depressed older woman

As Barbara Villiers’ star was fading, her cousin Elizabeth’s was rising. Her father, Edward, was the youngest brother of the Viscount Grandison (Barbara’s father), and her mother was Lady Frances Howard, daughter of the Earl of Suffolk. Like all of the family, he was a staunch Royalist and went with Charles II into exile in 1649. During the Restoration, his wife was appointed governess to the King’s nieces, princesses Mary and Anne of York. So when Princess Mary was sent to the Netherlands in 1677 to wed her first cousin, William, Prince of Orange, she was accompanied by some of Sir Edward and Lady Frances Villiers’ daughters, including Elizabeth, to serve as her maids of honour in her court at The Hague. It is uncertain when (or even really if) Elizabeth became a mistress of Mary’s husband William, whose affairs with men were becoming fairly well known, especially his primary favourite, Hans Willem Bentinck (who, incidentally, married Elizabeth’s sister, Anne). When William and Mary became joint King and Queen of England, Scotland and Ireland, Elizabeth Villiers returned to England, and continued to act as a royal favourite—perhaps a ‘beard’ for the King’s relationship with Bentinck? It seems that, after Mary II died in December 1694, William was committed to ‘cleaning house’ to honour his late wife’s memory, and dismissed Elizabeth by rewarding her (a quite traditional way of signalling the end of a royal relationship): he granted her extensive lands in Ireland in 1695 and married her off to one of his military lieutenants, Lord George Hamilton (a younger son of the Duke of Hamilton); the following year they were created Earl and Countess of Orkney. This is the same Orkney who purchased the palatial Cliveden House (above), and so it was yet another Villiers who played grand hostess there in the early Hanoverian era of the 1710s-1720s. She died in 1733, leaving her estates to daughters.

possibly Elizabeth Villiers, possibly by Kneller

The Villiers legacy therefore was carried on by Elizabeth’s brother, Edward. He too was in King William’s favour, and was named Viscount Villiers in 1691, then Earl of Jersey in 1697. He was Master of the Horse to Queen Mary, then Lord Chamberlain to King William. He was sent as Ambassador to The Hague and Paris in the 1690s, crucially representing England at the treaty negotiations at Rijswijk in 1697. He was named one of the King’s secretaries of state in 1699, but didn’t survive long after the King’s death in 1702—Queen Anne dismissing him from all of his posts in 1704. Perhaps this last of the Stuarts had finally had enough of the Villiers family…

Edward Villiers, 1st Earl of Jersey

The Villiers family in the 18th century were thus represented by the last Viscount Grandison (John) who was created Earl Grandison in 1721 (still in the Irish peerage) and given a seat on the Irish Privy Council. When he died in 1766, this branch ended in the male line—the earldom of Grandison was re-created for his daughter and grandson (George Mason, who took the name Villiers in 1771), and the viscountcy passed to his cousin the 3rd Earl of Jersey. This 3rd Earl (William), had built a new county seat at Middleton Stoney, located in the rolling green hills just west of Bicester in Oxfordshire. Middleton Park remained the Jersey seat, rebuilt in the 1930s by the 9th Earl, until it was developed as apartments in the 1970s.

Middleton Stoney in the 1820s

Of subsequent earls of Jersey, the 5th Earl (d. 1859) stands out as a prominent Tory politician in the reigns of William IV and Victoria, as Lord Chamberlain in the 1830s and Master of the Horse in the 1840s (and briefly again in 1852). He added his wife’s mother’s surname, Child, to Villiers in 1819, as heiress of the vast wealth of the Child Bank, and their grand house, Osterley Park, in the western suburbs of London. The 6th Earl married a daughter of Prime Minister Robert Peel, but was only earl for 21 days, before he followed his father to the grave. The 7th Earl of Jersey was Governor of New South Wales in Australia (1890-93), while the 8th Earl re-trenched in the 1920s by selling the Child Bank. Today’s earl, the 10th, is William Child Villiers (b. 1976), whose family home is actually on the island of Jersey (Radier Manor). His heir, Viscount Villiers, is appropriately named called George.

As for the extant junior line, the line of earls of Clarendon (a seemingly ironic title, given the family’s concerted efforts to bring down the great Lord Clarendon in 1667), was founded by Thomas Villiers, second son of the 2nd Earl of Jersey. He was a diplomat, sent to Warsaw, Vienna and Berlin in the 1740s, then a Whig MP (in contrast to his mostly Tory family) in the 1750s-60s, and joining the Government as a member of the Privy Council and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster in the 1770s-80s. In 1752, he married Charlotte Capel, daughter of Jane Hyde, the heiress of Henry Hyde, 4th Earl of Clarendon. Thomas Villiers was thus created Baron Hyde (of Hindon, Wilts.) in 1756, and later Earl of Clarendon in 1776. He built a new family seat, The Grove, near Watford in Hertfordshire (which, like so many of these grand country houses, is now a luxury hotel).

Thomas Villiers, 1st Earl of Clarendon

Of the later earls of Clarendon, the 4th Earl (George Villiers, d. 1870), was the ‘Great Lord Clarendon’, a prominent diplomat and Liberal politician in the reign of Queen Victoria: three times Foreign Secretary, Lord Privy Seal, and like his grandfather the 1st Earl, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster. He also renewed some of his family’s old links with Ireland by serving as Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, 1847-52. In the 20th century, the 6th Earl of Clarendon was Governor-General of South Africa, 1931-37. Today’s 8th Earl (b. 1976) has a son, Edward, known as Lord Hyde.

There was one last royal favourite connected to the Villiers family: Frances Twysden (1753-1821). No stranger to scandal from the moment of her birth, she had been born posthumously to the Right Reverend Philip Twysden (from a Kent family), who, despite being Bishop of Raphoe in the Church of Ireland, was shot dead in 1752 while (allegedly) attempting to rob a stagecoach near London. Just over 17 years later, Frances married George Villiers, 4th Earl of Jersey (d. 1805), a Gentleman of the Bedchamber to King George III. In about 1793, Lady Jersey became the mistress of George, Prince of Wales; in 1794 she was appointed Lady in Waiting to the new Princess of Wales (Caroline of Brunswick), and her husband was subsequently appointed the Prince’s Master of the Horse, making them quite a power couple for—as it was anticipated—the reign soon to come. But George III, though he went mad, did not die until long after Lady Jersey had lost favour, in 1807, when she was dismissed as Lady of the Bedchamber. As fate would have it, there would be no great Villiers royal favourite for this particular royal (this time with the name George) when he became king in 1820.

Frances Villiers, Countess of Jersey

The Farnese: dukes of Parma, Piacenza and Castro

The names Farnese and Parma evoke a number of images from Italian and European history. The ‘Villa Farnese’ embodies the beauty and grace of the Renaissance palaces of the Roman countryside and of one of its chief patrons, the beautiful and graceful Giulia Farnese. The name Parma in contrast, beyond the most immediate associations we now have with ham—and rightly so—will remind English readers of one of the most famous speeches in English history, as the Spanish Armada approached the shores of England in 1588, and Elizabeth I rallied her troops at Tilbury with the cry: “…and think foul scorn that Parma or Spain, or any prince of Europe, should dare to invade the borders of my realm.” This ‘Parma’ was Alessandro Farnese, Duke of Parma, one of the great military leaders of the era.

Paul III appoints his son Duke of Parma, by Ricci (c. 1685)

The real founder of the family’s swift rise to the top of the social hierarchy of 16th-century Europe was Alessandro’s great-grandfather, and Giulia’s brother, another Alessandro Farnese, who became a cardinal in 1493, then in his mid-60s was elected pope (1534) and took the name Paul III. One of the great reforming popes, who launched the Catholic Reformation and the Council of Trent, the Farnese pope had initially been under the patronage of the infamous Borgia pope, Alexander VI—who was Giulia’s lover. But unlike Pope Alexander, Pope Paul was able to achieve something most papal families desired: a sovereign territory in which to permanently plant his family amongst the premier ruling dynasties of Italy.

The first of these semi-independent territories was the duchy of Castro, northwest of Rome in the borderlands between Lazio and Tuscany, created for his illegitimate son in 1537. Far grander was the duchy of Parma, across the Pennines in the province of Emilia, granted to the same son in 1545, and augmented with the neighbouring duchy of Piacenza. The Farnese family could now rival the other ducal families of northern Italy, the Medici, Gonzaga or Este, and they build grand residences in their capital cities to compete with these in genuinely princely splendour. They also constructed grand palaces in Rome and the Roman countryside to maintain their position in the hierarchy of the great aristocratic families of the Eternal City. Though they would eventually lose Castro in 1649, Parma and Piacenza continued to flourish as a small state, and the Farnese art collections grew to become one of the greatest in the world, until the dynasty itself died out in 1731, and its heiress took the inheritance to the Bourbons of Spain by her marriage to King Philip V. After 1748, a new Parma dynasty was born, Bourbon-Parma, which would rule Parma and Piacenza—aside from the major disruption of the Napoleonic era—until the unification of Italy began in 1859. The Farnese dynasty, as dukes and princes, only had a lifespan of about two hundred years, 1537 to 1731, but their legacy lives on in much of the architecture of Parma and Rome, and in the great Farnese art collections now housed primarily in Naples.

The Farnese family had its origins in the hilly lands to the north of Rome in the province of Latium (today’s Lazio) in the valley of the river Fiora which forms part of the boundary with Tuscany. This region features several almost perfectly circular lakes, the calderas of extinct volcanos, notably Lake Bolsena, on which one of the early Farnese residences, the Rocca Farnese in Capodimonte, beautifully sits. Most of the hills in this area are volcanic, and on the top of one of these tufa hillsides rose the castle and village of Farnetum, which gave its name to the Farnese family, sometime in the 10th century. It is suggested that the name comes from a local variety of oak tree known as the farnia. The town of Farnese remains a picturesque walled town. After the lands in Lazio were lost to the eponymous Farnese dynasty, the town and lordship of Farnese passed into the possession of the Chigi family (originally from Siena), who were created princes of Farnese (1658, for the nephew of the Chigi pope, Alexander VII), a title which they still hold today, though the property itself passed to the Torlonia princely family in the late 20th century. These princes will have their own separate blog post.

Capodimonte, the Rocca Farnese on the right (photo Sergio de Ferra)
the walled town of Farnese today (photo WikiRomaWiki)

The earliest ancestors of the family, who claimed, like most grand noble houses of northern Italy, to be descended from ancient Lombard warriors, were condottieri, soldiers for hire, and they made their mark mostly leading pro-Guelph (that is, pro-papal) forces in the 12th and 13th centuries. They were rewarded with papal fiefs in proximity to the village of Farnese, notably Canino and Cellere, which, like Capodimonte, also feature buildings that still bear the family name: the Rocca Farnesiana (in Cellere) and the Castelvecchio dei Farnesi (in Canino). In the hills outside Canino, they acquired a former Benedictine monastery overlooking the river Fiora, the Castello dell’Abbadia, with its treacherous bridge, the Ponte del Diavolo—the ‘Devil’s Bridge’. This castle served as one of the primary residences of the family after they acquired the fief in 1430. Canino was later given as a principality to Lucien Bonaparte, brother of Napoleon, who is buried in the town chapel. The line of Bonaparte princes of Canino and Musignano (a neighbouring village), continued into the 1920s.

Castelvecchio in Canino (foreground)
Rocca Farnesiana in Cellere
Castello dell’Abbadia and the ‘Devil’s Bridge’ (photo NikonZ711)

The most prominent early Farnese condottiero was Piero, who was employed as Captain-General of the Papal Armies, re-asserting Rome’s control over the city of Bologna in 1359, then Captain-General of Florence, leading its army to defeat the great rival Pisa in 1362. His nephew, also called Piero, was Captain-General of the Army of Siena, 1408, and waged a long-term vendetta with the rival noble family in this region, the Orsini. Two of his many sons founded the two main branches of the family, Castro and Latera, each with a duchy in the 16th century. We will return to the line of Latera below. The senior line would be founded by Ranuccio ‘il Vecchio’ on a castle (or castrum, castro) near Farnese and Canino, called Ischia di Castro.

Ischia di Castro

Ranuccio Farnese also acquired the lordship of Montalto (de Castro), which is on the seacoast, and enjoyed the privilege of exporting grain without paying the normal tax to the pope. He too was a condottiero, but was astute enough to accumulate levels of debt (years of back pay) from the papacy instead of cash or fiefs, so that by the 1430s-40s he was himself one of the bankrollers of the papacy (a trick the Medici similarly performed to perfection!). Many of the fiefs he did hold from the papacy were given time limits for repayment, and when the popes did not pay, they became Farnese assets outright. Ranuccio was appointed Captain-General of Papal Armies in 1435, and consolidated his family’s hold over this part of the province of Lazio. He also ended the long and bloody feud with the Orsini by marrying his son Gabriele to Isabella Orsini in 1442. When he died in 1450 he was buried on a family tomb on an island (Bisentina) in Lake Bolsena.

Ranuccio ‘il Vecchio’, painted later as part of the family history frescos
the church of Saints Giacomo & Cristoforo, on the island of Bisentina in Lake Bolsena

Ranuccio’s younger son, Pierluigi, had made a different marriage: to Giovanna Caetani, from one of the leading aristocratic families of Rome, more firmly linking the Farnese to Roman high politics. The eldest of his two sons, Angelo, continued in the family tradition of military service to the papacy, but died before he reached 30, in 1494. By this point, however, a new star had risen for the family, Giulia, ‘la Bella Farnese’. She had been sent by her mother to Rome to be brought into society by the Caetani family and in 1489 was married to another Orsini (Orsino Orsini to be exact). While the details are patchy, it seems that through her new mother-in-law, Adriana de Mila, a cousin of the Borgias, Giulia became acquainted with Cardinal Rodrigo Borgia, and in 1493, when he was elected pope as Alexander VI, she rose to great heights as his mistress, and he installed her in a palace near the Vatican, which she shared—perhaps uncomfortably?—with his daughter Lucrezia. She made sure that her brother, Alessandro, was favoured by the Borgia pope, and he was indeed made a cardinal, in 1493, at 25, and a few years later, Bishop of Montefiascone and Corneto, the local diocese near the Farnese properties in Lazio.

Giulia Farnese, with the Farnese unicorn

Cardinal Farnese was not of course universally praised for his means of securing high church office: he was called ‘the Borgia-in-law’, and much worse. Like a good Roman aristocratic cleric of his day, he took a mistress, Silvia Ruffini, from a Roman noble house, and had four children between 1500 and 1510. His patron Alexander VI died in 1503, but successive popes were unusually generous in legitimising the Cardinal’s children so they could inherit the Farnese lands—especially important since, by 1512, the senior branch founded by Gabriele had died out. The new pope, Julius II, was no fan of the Borgias (or their clients), so perhaps as a means of getting Alessandro away from Rome, he promoted him to the bishopric of Parma, 1509, thus initiating the family’s connections to that city.

Alessandro, Cardinal Farnese, painted by Raphael

The city of Parma had grown up around a crossroads, important since antiquity—and possibly derived its name in antiquity from palma, a circular shield used by local Etruscan warriors. The famous Via Aemilia ran straight through it, connecting east and west, while the Via Claudia ran north and south, connecting Lombardy and the broad Po valley to the Apennine mountain passes into Tuscany and Latium. In fact, the main medieval route taking merchants and pilgrims from France and northwest Europe down to Rome ran through Parma. When Charlemagne and his Frankish lords extended their rule into Italy, they had established a count in the city to guard this important crossroads, and this county of Parma remained (loosely) a part of the Holy Roman Empire, though it later gained a degree of autonomy under its local bishops. The magnificent Cathedral was built in this time (completed about 1100), followed by an even more spectacular Baptistry later in the century, which serves as an important marker of the transition between Romanesque and Gothic architectural styles.

Parma in the 16th century, looking south towards the Apenines
Parma’s medieval cathedral
the baptistry (photo Norbert Nagel)

In the 15th century, Parma lost its independence, and was incorporated into the territories of the Sforza rulers of Milan. By the end of that century it found itself in one of most contested zones of the Italian Wars, fought by French, Imperial/Spanish and Papal armies. Parma was annexed briefly to the Papal States in 1512, then occupied by the French until it was returned again to Papal rule in 1521. Cardinal Farnese’s reign as bishop was in the middle of all this. But by 1524 he was back in Rome, where he became Dean of the College of Cardinals, and in 1534, rather surprisingly, was elected pope, as Paul III. Many electors thought due to his age and infirmity, his papacy would be a short, and they would thus have time to prepare a proper campaign for his successor. But he lived, and thrived, for another fifteen years. He began a campaign of bold activities we now call the Catholic Reformation (or the ‘Counter-Reformation’) right away, for example revising rules of papal governance in 1536, excommunicating Henry VIII in 1538, and approving the founding of the Society of Jesus (the ‘Jesuits’) in1540. Paul III also launched one of the largest reform projects, the Council of Trent, in 1545.

Paul III and his grandsons, by Titian

But from the perspective of dynastic history, Paul III was not a reformer at all. Almost immediately upon becoming pope, he appointed his son, Pier Luigi, as commander of papal armies and Gonfalonier of the Church, and two of his grandsons, both teenagers, as cardinals: another Alessandro Farnese and Guido Ascanio Sforza. He even made a cardinal of his former mistress’s legitimate son (who was, many thought, actually his own son), Tiberio Crispo. But following in the footsteps of previous Renaissance popes, the Farnese pope wanted to create a significant territory that his family could rule as princes and pass on for generations. Pier Luigi, a warrior like his Farnese ancestors, had already made a name for himself—and not necessarily a good one, known for his cruelty and ruthlessness—fighting for Venice and for Emperor Charles V (including the famous sack of Rome in 1527). In 1534, he was given the marquisate of Novara, part of Charles V’s Duchy of Milan. In 1540, Pier Luigi sealed this Imperial alliance by marrying his son, Ottavio, to the Emperor’s illegitimate daughter, Margaret of Austria. Margaret was already the widow (though only 15) of Alessandro de Medici, first Duke of Florence, who had been murdered only three years before. She brought as a dowry the lands of Penna in the Abruzzo and estates she was given by her father in Naples. Pier Luigi tried to solidify this imperial relationship even further by offering his daughter Vittoria to the recently widowed Emperor himself, but Charles declined.

Pier Luigi Farnese, Duke of Castro, Duke of Parma and Piacenza

On the papal side, in 1538, Paul III created a new duchy for Pier Luigi, formed from the various Farnese properties in northern Lazio, and gave it the name Castro. It would reach from Lake Bolsena to the sea, and would be formally a vassal state of the papacy, but de facto an independent state. A brand new capital city was built, called Castro, not far from the old main Farnese towns of Ischia and Canino. The Pope also added the neighbouring duchy of Nepi, which had been initially created for Lucrezia Borgia in 1499. In 1540, he also gave his son the confiscated duchy of Camerino, on the other side of the Apennines near Ancona.

the Duchy of Castro, from a map of 1640 (north is to the left)
the city of Castro

Pope Paul also tried to balance his son’s pro-imperial leanings by sending Pier Luigi’s younger son, Orazio, to the court of François I in France. By the late 1540s it was understood that Orazio would marry the Dauphin’s illegitimate daughter, Diane de France, which he eventually did, with the proviso that he would be a ruling duke himself, not just a second son, by inheriting the Duchy of Castro.

The Pope decided that Orazio’s elder brother Ottavio would be compensated for Castro with something much grander: Parma. While the Emperor was busy dealing with Protestants north of the Alps, Paul III thought he would seize the moment and enfeoff his eldest son with the duchy of Parma, which, as seen above, had only fairly recently become papal territory. He added to it the neighbouring duchy of Piacenza, on the River Po. Like Parma, the city of Piacenza also had ancient roots, as the ‘pleasant place’ or Placentia in Latin. It too had been ruled by Milan in recent centuries, but was annexed to the Papal States in 1521. The gift of these duchies was done in 1545; in exchange, Pier Luigi agreed to give up Camerino and Nepi (and to cede Castro to Orazio). The new duke established himself in the ducal palace in Piacenza by 1546, with plans to build something more permanent in Parma. But he soon revealed himself to be a tyrant, imposing heavy taxes and curtailing the traditional independence of the local nobles and clergy. He swiftly made many enemies.

a map from the erly 19th century that shows Parma (and Piacenza) clearly, in yellow.

At first the Emperor approved of the creation of the twin duchies of Parma and Piacenza, since it would, after all, ultimately benefit his daughter Margaret, who would become a sovereign, not just the wife of a papal bastard. But by 1547, Charles V changed his mind, and thought Parma really ought to belong to the Duchy of Milan after all, so encouraged his governor there, Ferrante Gonzaga, to fan the flames of the unrest Pier Luigi was already creating in his duchies, and to back an assassination coordinated by representatives of the leading noble houses (Pallavicini, Landi and Anguissola). His body was hung outside a window of the palace in Piacenza.

Piacenza, Palazzo Farnese

This started the short War of Parma, 1551-1552, which did not play out as you might have expected. Paul III had initially made peace with Charles V by acquiescing to the loss of Parma and Piacenza in 1547. But his grandson Ottavio, did not, and retook the city by force—supposedly angering his grandfather so much he died of a heart attack in 1549. Ottavio now allied himself with his younger brother’s patron, his father-in-law the King of France (the former Dauphin, now King Henry II), since his natural enemy was the Emperor Charles V—who was of course Ottavio’s father-in-law. This is very confusing! This short war was fought between Henry II of France and Ottavio Farnese on one side, and Charles V and the new pope, Julius III on the other. In the end, Ottavio was restored to Parma and Piazenza (and also succeeded his brother Orazio as duke of Castro when he died suddenly, fighting in a French army in Flanders in 1553), and France became the chief ally and protector of Parma—which it remained (sometimes) for the next century and a half.

Ottavio Farnese, Duke of Parma, Piacenza and Castro

Before moving on firmly to the history of Parma and its dukes, we should stay in Lazio and look at properties—and two more cardinals. The eldest grandson of Pope Paul III, Alessandro, was made a cardinal when he was 14 in 1534. The younger brother Ranuccio was made cardinal at 15 in 1545, and though he held many benefices and administrative offices, and a lucrative commandery as a knight of Malta, he died at 35 before really making his mark.

the gorgeous portrait of young Ranuccio, wearing the cloak of a knight of Malta, by Titian

Alessandro, however, rose right away, first as Vice-Chancellor of the Church (an office he held for over 50 years), then from 1538 as his grandfather’s principal secretary. By the 1540s, he was conducting much of the business and political affairs of the papacy. At first he was also used to solidify the Farnese family ties with the Habsburgs, as Cardinal-Protector of the Holy Roman Empire and of Spain from 1541; in return, Charles V named him Archbishop of Monreale in Sicily. But he also had French interests, as Papal Legate to Avignon from 1541 to 1565 (and he had a French mistress, Claude de Beaune de Semblançay, a lady-in-waiting to Queen Catherine de Medici, and a half-French daughter, Clelia). He sided with his brother in the War of Parma, so lost several of his Imperial benefices, but became instead an important channel of communication between France and Rome (though here too he gradually lost out due to the growing influence in France of Cardinal Ippolito d’Este). His clout rose again in Rome in the 1560s-70s, and he was a serious candidate for the papal throne in the conclaves of 1566 and 1572. As a grand old man, he was Dean of the College of Cardinals, from 1580 until his death in 1589.

Alessandro, Cardinal Farnese

This second Cardinal Farnese’s main legacy are the buildings. He took over the residence in Rome his grandfather had built in the 1520s, the Palazzo Farnese, which he expanded in the 1530s, and laid out the Piazza Farnese. This is still regarded as one of the most beautiful squares in Rome, and, as is fitting for the long-term Franco-Farnese alliance, is now the seat of the French embassy. It was in the 17th century, the home of the huge Farnese art collection, but after the Farnese properties passed to the Bourbons, these were shipped to Naples, where they formed the collection of the new Capodimonte Museum.

Palazzo Farnese in Rome (the Embassy of France) (photo Myrabella)

Across the Tiber, in the more leafy suburb of Trastevere, the Farneses acquired a villa built earlier in the century by the wealthy Chighi banking family. This villa, famous for its Raphael frescos of ancient Greek myths, was renamed the Villa Farnesina. It later was the residence of the Bourbons of Naples when in Rome, but after the unification of Italy in the 1860s it became the residence of the Spanish ambassador. Now it belongs to the state and houses the Accademia dei Lincei.

Villa Farnesina in Rome (photo Jean-Pierre Dalbéra)

Also in Rome, Cardinal Alessandro built a summer house and gardens on the slopes of the Palatine Hill (the Farnese Gardens, built in the 1550s), with different spaces devoted to pleasure or to botanical research. He sponsored the building of the main Jesuit church in Rome, the Gesù (in the 1560s), and chose it as his burial place.

Farnese Gardens in Rome

All over these buildings, you can still see the ubiquitous Farnese lilies (or gigli), which conveniently aligned the family visually with its protector, France (and in inverted colours: blue lilies on gold instead of the French golden lilies on blue). The Farnese coat of arms was also augmented: the papal keys were added in 1545 (a right for any Gonfalonier of the Church), and in 1586, Ottavio’s son Alessandro would add a quartering for Austria-Burgundy, for his mother’s family.

the older Farnese arms, and a unicorn crest
the augmented Farnese arms

Every good Roman cardinal needs a country retreat, so Cardinal Alessandro Farnese rebuilt his grandfather’s villa in the Lazio, not far from his brother’s duchy of Castro. The Villa Farnese at Caprarola, with its famous pentagonal shape and circular courtyard, would become a model of the Roman country house and the showpiece for the family. One of the most famous rooms is the Sala dei Fasti Farnesiani (the ‘Room of Farnese Deeds’), which features a fresco commemorating Cardinal Alessandro’s efforts at bringing peace to Europe by coordinating a meeting between François I and Charles V in 1540. This palace too became part of the unified Italy after 1860, and was selected as the residence of the heir to the throne. Today the villa’s secondary building, the casino or summer house, is the country residence of the President of the Republic of Italy, while the main building houses a museum.

Villa Farnese at Caprarola in the 18th century
Villa Farnese today showing its unique shape (the Casino is about 500 m to the right)
the meeting of Charles V and Francis I, 1540, with Cardinal Farnese (to the Emperor’s left). Note the coats of arms on the canopy include the the eagle of the Empire, the lilies of France, and the Farnese gigli

By the mid-1550s, Ottavio Farnese, 2nd Duke of Parma and Piacenza, settled in to rule his new states. Despite violent beginnings, the next thirty years of his reign was fairly unremarkable. He was moderate and popular. He focused his attentions on creating a ducal capital in Parma, and left Piacenza to his widowed mother, Girolama Orsini, who had been a key asset during the Parma War, using her Roman family connections to smooth relations with the papacy, and governing Castro as regent while her youngest son Orazio was in France. The other most important woman in his life, his wife Margaret, soon departed and became a separate actor in the history of the dynasty: in 1559 she was named Governor-General of the Low Countries by her half-brother, Philip II of Spain, and lived in Brussels for the next eight years, where she tried, unsuccessfully, to keep a lid on the boiling resentment against Spanish rule in the Netherlands. When Philip sent the Duke of Alba to put down the unrest and gave him full powers that undermined those of Margaret of Parma (as Margaret of Austria was now known), she resigned, and retired to her property of L’Aquila in the Abruzzo (part of the Kingdom of Naples).

Margaret of Parma, Governor-General of the Netherlands

Meanwhile, Ottavio set up his residence in Parma in the old Bishop’s Palace—an austere building dating from the 11th century—while he oversaw the development of finer buildings worthy of a ruling dynasty. First he built the Palazzo del Giardino, across the river (also called Parma) from the centre of the city. Starting in about 1560, it was constructed on the site of an old Sforza fortress and surrounded, as its name suggests, by gardens and parklands. The Palazzo del Giardino would be enlarged in the 17th century and again in the 18th century, and its gardens would be developed by Bourbon dukes along French formal lines.

Parma, Palazzo del Giradino

Back across the river, closer to the old medieval core of the city, was a complex of buildings known as the Palazzo della Pilotta, which Ottavio developed in the 1580s, taking its name from the game of pelota, played by Spanish soldiers stationed there. The oldest building, on the river bank, was the Rocchetta, or keep, which was linked by a Corridore to some townhouses that served as the ducal court until a more grand palace was constructed in the next reign.

Palazzo della Pilotta in the 19th century
The Pilotta today, mostly destroyed in World War II (photo Sailko)

Duke Ottavio also patronised churches in Parma, notably the Shrine of Santa Maria della Steccata, named for the picket fence (steccata) which protected a miraculous image of the nursing Virgin from throngs of pilgrims. Here the Duke commissioned new interior frescos and constructed a crypt that would become the Farnese family sepulchre, and later that of the House of Bourbon-Parma (it remains so even today, with the most recent interment in 2010). I was annoyed last summer when I visited Parma and was unable to visit the crypt despite signage suggesting it was in fact open for tourists…

Santa Maria della Steccata, Parma (photo Witold Muratov)

Ottavio and Margaret had only one son, Alessandro, a surviving twin whose brother had lived only a few months in 1545. After Spain agreed to recognise the independence of Parma and Piacenza in 1555, Philip II required the presence of young Alessandro in Spain as a sort of hostage. So while Margaret of Parma was sent to Brussels, Alessandro was sent to Madrid to be raised alongside Philip’s son, Prince Carlos, and Philip’s illegitimate half-brother, Don Juan (all about the same age). Alexander, Prince of Parma, grew to be one of the greatest commanders of the age, and would eventually be sent to the Low Countries to continue in the struggle to retain the loyalty of the rebellious Dutch provinces. In 1565, his semi-royal status was confirmed by his marriage to Maria de Guimarães, daughter of Infante Duarte of Portugal (the youngest son of King Manuel). He commanded three vessels in the important victory over the Turks at Lepanto in 1571, then in 1577 was sent to the Low Countries with an army to support Don Juan, who had been appointed Governor-General the year before. But Don Juan died just a year later, in October 1578, and so Alessandro Farnese replaced him as military commander, while his mother was recalled from her peaceful retirement to act again as Governor-General. The partnership of mother and son proved to be unworkable, however, and she retired once more in 1582, leaving Alessandro as Governor-General himself. He was successful in winning over the southern Catholic nobles who proclaimed their loyalty to Spain in 1579—thus creating in essence the modern nation of Belgium—and became known for his successful sieges, most notably at Antwerp in 1584-85. His greatest fame to English readers, however, came in the following years.

Alessandro, Duke of Parma

In 1586, Alessandro Farnese succeeded as 3rd Duke of Parma and Piacenza. He entrusted these duchies to his teen-aged son Ranuccio—legally old enough to rule, but in need of adult guidance since both his mother and now his grandmother were dead—while he remained to command Spanish forces in the Low Countries. Parma defeated the English troops sent by Queen Elizabeth I to aid the Dutch, and in 1487 secured the port of Sluis in Zealand—ready for an invasion of England once the grand Armada arrived from Spain. Of course, as is well known, the ‘Protestant Wind’ blew the Armada out of the Channel, so no landing was possible. Still hoping to secure victory in the Low Countries, Parma found himself pulled away as Philip II ordered him to France in late 1589 to aid the Catholic League in their defence of the true faith from the usurping claimant king, Henry of Navarre. With Parma’s aid, they did prevent Navarre from taking Paris, and again in Spring 1592 the same for Rouen, but by this point the great commander was getting sick and was pulled back and forth between France and the Netherlands, where the armies of Maurice of Nassau were growing in strength every day. Journeying once more to France in December 1592, he weakened in the border town of Arras and died.

The new duke of Parma and Piacenza (and don’t forget, duke of Castro as well), Ranuccio I, now 23, would have a long and mostly successful reign. As a teenager there was a brief glimpse of a much grander future, for him and for the Farnese dynasty, as he was put forward in 1579 as a successor to the childless uncle of his late mother (she died in 1577), Henry, the Cardinal-King of Portugal. But Philip II of Spain had a strong claim too, and given Parma’s quite strong connections to Spain at this time, when King Henry died in 1580, Ranuccio’s claims were not pressed (though later generations did add the arms of Portugal to the Farnese coat of arms, see above).

Ranuccio I, Duke of Parma

Instead, Ranuccio initiated a fresh wave of building in Parma. He decided to turn the townhouses linked to the Palazzo della Pilotta into a proper ducal palace, which was completed in about 1620. The jewel at its centre was the Teatro Farnese, built in 1618, totally out of wood, with capacity for over 4,000 spectators, and what is considered one of the first permanent proscenium arches in the history of theatre. The rest of the palace complex included a ducal stable, a gallery for the display of the family’s growing art collection, and the Church of Saint Peter. In the eighteenth century, this magnificent palace complex would be augmented further with the addition of the Biblioteca Palatina by the Bourbons. Much of the Pilotta was destroyed by bombs in World War II, but the Theatre and the Library miraculously survived, and the complex now houses two major museums, one of fine art and the other archaeology. He also revitalised the University of Parma.

Teatro Farnese, Parma

Duke Ranuccio was also successful in curtailing the autonomy of some of the Duchy’s major feudal families, notably the Pallavicini and the Landi. From the Sanvitale family, he confiscated the estate at Colorno (in 1612), after a fairly brutal trial and public execution of its chatelaine, Barbara Sanseverino. The palace at Colorno, started by the Correggio family in the fourteenth century, became the chief summer residence of the Farnese dynasty, and would later be rebuilt by Duke Ranuccio II, employing one of the leading architects of the seventeenth century, Ferdinando Galli Bibiena.

Palazzo Colorno (photo Agnul)

Part of the impetus for this great ‘purge’ of 1612, was a reaction to a plot by which the Duke thought that several prominent nobles were conspiring against him, and in particular, encouraging his former mistress to practice witchcraft to ensure he had no male heir. In 1611, the spurned woman, Claudia Colla, was tried and burned at the stake. But it was true he had thus far no children from his wife, Margherita Aldobrandini, the niece of Pope Clement VIII, whom he married in 1600 (granted, she was only 11 when they married). In 1605, he took matters into his own hands and legitimated a son (from a different mistress), Ottavio (b. 1598), and began to raise him as if he were the heir to the duchies. But in 1610, Margherita did have a son, Alessandro, then another, Odoardo, in 1612. So Ottavio was removed from his father’s favour formally in 1618—he rebelled in 1621 and was imprisoned in the Rochetta for the rest of his life (two decades later). Duke Ranuccio hardly survived this rebellion and died in 1622.

His eldest son, Alessandro, was passed over as a deaf-mute, so the succession fell to ten-year-old Odoardo. He was at first guided as regent by his uncle, Odoardo, a cardinal since 1591. This latest Cardinal Farnese contributed to the family’s reputation for artistic refinement, by commissioning Carracci to paint frescos in his private camerino (study) at the Palazzo Farnese in Rome, and the famous Farnese Gallery ceiling, ‘the Loves of the Gods’ around the turn of the century.

the vault in the Galleria in the Palazzo Farnese, by Annibale Carracci
Cardinal Odoardo

Cardinal Odoardo died in 1626 and was replaced as regent by the young duke’s mother, Margherita Aldobrandini. For two years she ably kept these small states out of the growing conflict that would later be termed the Thirty Years War. When Odoardo came of age, however, he was brimming with enthusiasm for battle, and in 1633 directly challenged the might of the Spanish Habsburgs parked on his doorstep in Milan, by re-aligning his state with France. The neighbouring Italian prince, Francesco I d’Este, Duke of Modena, who only two years before had married Odoardo’s sister Maria Caterina, led a Spanish army to capture Piacenza and devastated the countryside. France, sadly, did not send help, and Odoardo was forced to sue for peace in 1637.

Odoardo, Duke of Parma and Piacenza

Duke Odoardo had spent heavily on raising troops, so pressed his already ravaged estates for more taxes. He also borrowed significant amounts from Roman bankers, and when these appealed to the pope (Urban VIII) for aid in getting re-payment, the Pope decided that this was a good opportunity to gain a duchy for his family, the Barberini, just as Paul III had done one hundred years before. He occupied the Duchy of Castro and declared the Farnese no longer vassals there. Odoardo and his ally the Grand Duke of Tuscany, Ferdinando II, whose sister he had married in 1628, were unable to defend these possessions in this ‘Castro War’, but by 1644 had made peace with the papacy, promising to pay the creditors. Castro was restored for now, but the Duke died soon after, in 1646, aged only 34. Once again a younger brother, another Cardinal Farnese (Francesco Maria), was called on to act as regent—but he too died young (at 27) in 1647.

Margherita de’ Medici, Regent of Parma

In a repeat of the previous generation, Duchess Margherita de’ Medici now became regent for her son Ranuccio II, but only for a year, as he came of age in 1648, and immediately provoked a rematch with the Papacy over Castro. Not only did he refuse to pay the debts as his father had promised, he also refused to recognise the newly appointed Bishop of Castro—and worse, was probably involved in that prelate’s murder in 1649. Not a pope to be trifled with, Innocent X again revoked the fief of Castro, sent in his troops, and razed the city of Castro. It was never rebuilt, and its diocese was even transferred elsewhere. The main branch of the Farnese were now un-rooted from their ancestral homeland.

But there did remain another branch of the Farnese family in Lazio, the dukes of Latera—see above. Their castle, the Palazzo Farnese in Latera, located near the western shores of Lake Bolsena, was an ancient medieval castle, enlarged in the 15th century once it became a ducal residence. A new building was built next to it in 1550, in a more elegant Renaissance style—then they were joined together in 1625. Today the complex has been subdivided into various residences but still dominates this hilltop town.

Latera (photo Marco Lodovichi)
Latera, Palazzo Farnese

I don’t know much about the earlier generations, from the founding of this branch in 1408, but they began making waves in the later decades of the 16th century. Mario I, 5th Duke of Latera (r. 1579-1619), was a soldier: he served under his distant cousin the Prince of Parma in the Low Countries, in the 1570s, then for the Emperor in Hungary; he was later instrumental in the Papal takeover of the Duchy of Ferrara from the Este family in 1598, and was named Captain-General of the Church in 1603. His older brother, Ferrante, was a churchman, and was appointed Bishop of Parma—an interesting dynastic cross-pollination—in 1573. The dynastic relationship was not enough however, and he clashed continually with the dukes and the local nobility in trying to extend greater Church authority over the city. The situation became so tense that the Pope intervened and sent Bishop Farnese away on long missions, first as Papal Legate to Bologna in 1591, then as Apostolic Nuncio to the Imperial court in Prague in 1597. Another notable member of the clergy at this point was Mario’s daughter, Isabella, who entered the Order of Poor Clares and took the name ‘Suor Francesca’. Her father built a new monastery for the Poor Clares in the village of Farnese (Santa Maria delle Grazie) in 1618, and she became its first abbess. She later founded monasteries all over Lazio and in the city of Rome itself, and when she died in 1651, was declared to be ‘venerable’ (a step below sainthood).

Mario, Duke of Latera, in the Church of Poor Clares
The Venerable Suor Francesca

Duke Mario had numerous sons, who succeeded as Duke of Latera in succession. The last of these was Girolamo, who was also a cleric when he became the last duke in 1662. He had been Apostolic Nuncio to the Swiss Cantons in 1639, then Governor of Rome in 1650 and Prefect of the Apostolic Palace and Governor of Castel Gandolfo (the papal country retreat) in 1655. Finally elevated to the cardinalate in 1657, he then succeeded as Duke of Latera and governed for six years before he died in 1668. With no heirs, the fief returned to the Papacy. There were now no Farnesi in Lazio at all.

Cardinal Girolamo Farnese, last Duke of Latera

Back in Parma, Ranuccio II had now settled in, after the 2nd Castro War, to a relatively long reign, from 1646 to 1694, which marked a new cultural high point for the Duchy—he patronised artists and musicians and brought to Parma many of the great treasures from the family’s residences in Rome. He tried to re-purchase the Duchy of Castro, and the Papacy extended the terms several times; but finally he gave up (by 1666), and focused more fully on Parma and Piacenza—he was a good ruler, re-developing the local economy after the Thirty Years War, and improving agriculture by draining wetlands near the Po. With the money he saved, Ranuccio purchased two more imperial fiefs—those of the Landi family, at Bardi and Compiano—to add to the duchy in 1682. He married three times, maintaining dynastic ties with his neighbours in Turin and Modena.

Ranuccio II, Duke of Parma and Piacenza

Duek Ranuccio II’s foreign policy was also balanced: his first younger brother, Alessandro, was destined for the Church (every Farnese generation needs a cardinal!), and the second, Orazio, was given a commission to lead Farnese troops in the service of Venice against the Ottomans. When Orazio died of a sickness on his journey home in 1656, Alessandro took his place, then was sent to Spain to try to revive the glorious career of their great-grandfather of the same name. The King of Spain repeatedly appointed him to high commands, as a general in the war against Portugal in 1664, then as Viceroy of Catalonia in 1676 to defend that province against French invasion, but in both cases he was soon withdrawn, having offended many of his officers and those back at court in Madrid by his extravagant and pompous lifestyle and his relationship with the prostitute Maria de Laó y Carillo, who lived with him as a wife for many years. Yet due to close dynastic connections he had with the Spanish king, and the many persuasive letters of his brother Ranuccio back in Parma, Alessandro finally achieved the family goal and was named Governor-General of the Netherlands in 1680. Here too his insistence on being treated as a royal highness and his lavish spending made him an embarrassment for the Spanish court, and he was once again dismissed, in 1682—much to his relief as armies of creditors closed in on his residence in Brussels. He returned to Madrid in 1687 where he was appointed a Gentleman of the Chamber, Councillor of State, Admiral of the Spanish Navy and Knight of the Golden Fleece…but he died just over a year later, leaving his massive debts to be paid by his brother and his illegitimate son Alessandro.

Alessando, Prince of Parma

Meanwhile, Ranuccio II feared the ongoing conflicts between Austria, France and Spain, which usually used the plains of northern Italy as their battleground, so he continued to solidify his links with the Habsburgs by arranging a marriage of his son Odoardo to Dorothea Sophia of the Palatinate, in 1690. She was incredibly well connected: as younger sister of the Holy Roman Empress, the Queen of Portugal, and the new Queen of Spain. A new heir for the dynasty, Prince Alessandro, was born in December 1691, but lived only until August 1693, and was soon followed to the grave by his father, the Hereditary Prince Odoardo, in September, and then by Duke Ranuccio II himself a year later in 1694. Only one daughter remained, Elisabetta, born in October 1692, who would later become one of the most famous women of the early eighteenth century as Isabel, Queen of Spain.

Dorothea Sophia, Countess Palatine of Neuburg, Duchess of Parma

When Ranuccio II died in 1694, his state was nearly bankrupt, so his second son, Francesco, took extreme measures as new Duke of Parma and Piacenza. He dismissed huge numbers of servants, musicians, jesters and dwarves, and stopped the practice of regular court spectacles and lavish banquets so enjoyed by his father. He also married his brother’s widow, Dorothea Sophia, so he wouldn’t have to return her sizeable dowry. She was of a much more sober (maybe we can say ‘Germanic’) temperament, so she worked closely with her husband to restore the Duchy’s finances. Together they did sponsor the arts, however, and in particular stressed learning, improving the University of Parma and founding a College of the Nobility which encouraged Parmesan noble sons to become useful servants of the state by studying law, languages or mathematics. When the War of the Spanish Succession broke out in 1702, Duke Francesco managed to keep his states neutral, though they were occupied by Austrian troops led by Prince Eugene of Savoy, and towards the end of the war he was forced to recognise that his duchies were now fiefs of the Empire, no longer vassals of the Papacy. Seeing that neither he nor his brother Antonio had sons, both Vienna and Rome hoped to incorporate Parma and Piacenza into their domains. But in 1714, Francesco and Dorothea Sophia played their one remaining trump card—in an effort to stave off absorption into the Austrian domains—and married off Princess Elisabetta to King Philip V of Spain, a Bourbon and thus a rival of Austria. She changed her name to the more Spanish Isabel and soon became a crucial part of Philip’s reign, as a strong-willed princess able to counteract his increasing depression and mental instability.

Francesco, Duke of Parma and Piacenza

In 1718, the Treaty of London was signed between Austria, Spain, Britain, France and the Dutch, who all recognised that Isabel Farnese was the heiress of Parma and Piacenza (and in fact of Tuscany too, via her Medici great-grandmother), with the assumption that these territories would be given to her eldest Bourbon son, the Infante Carlos of Spain.

Isabel Farnese, Queen of Spain, with her son Infante Carlos

In February 1727, Duke Francesco died and was succeeded by his brother Antonio, a prince of a very different character. Forbidden from living a life of parties and luxury by his austere brother and sister-in-law, he had lived for years at his country house, the Rocca di Sala, another of those country seats taken from the feudal nobility by Duke Ranuccio I back in 1612. The Sanvitale family had held the fief of Sala, a few miles southwest of Parma, since the mid-thirteenth century, and had built the Rocca as their residence in the fifteenth century (when their fief was elevated by the Duke of Milan into a county). In the seventeenth century it served as one of many hunting lodges for the Farnese family, and in 1723, Antonio decided to make it his seat, which he enlarged and renovated. As duke, he continued to reside there, reviving the more extravagant court of his father, with gambling and feasting late into the night, living openly with is mistress Countess Margherita Bori Giusti.

Antonio Farnese, Duke of Parma and Piacenza
the Rocca di Sala, Duke Antonio’s country seat

Duke Antonio’s first minister convinced him to marry, which he did in July 1727, to a local Este princess, Enrichetta, daughter of the Duke of Modena. But his health was terrible—morbidly obese, like his cousin Gian Gastone, the last Grand Duke of Tuscany—and there was little chance of a child. Yet his niece Queen Isabel, concerned for her son’s agreed inheritance, arranged with France and Spain in 1729 to permit the stationing of 6,000 Spanish troops in Parma to safeguard it from Austrian ambitions. Duke Antonio renounced the Emperor’s recent claims to suzerainty, which prompted an amassing of Imperial troops on the frontiers with Milan. When Antonio suddenly died in January 1731, Austrian troops swiftly moved in and convinced Duchess Enrichetta that she was pregnant, to forestall the claiming of the Duchy by the Infante Carlos of Spain. She reigned in Parma in the name of her unborn child, while the indomitable Dowager Duchess Dorothea Sophia pressed for her to be examined to determine if she was really pregnant. In September the fallacy was revealed, so Austria, humiliated, agreed to allow Carlos to move in—though he had to formally recognise his status as an Imperial vassal. The Dorothea Sophia was named regent, and Enrichetta was kept under house arrest until she, under force, returned the ducal crown jewels. Nine years later she remarried, a German prince from Hesse-Darmstadt, and she moved away.

Enrichetta d’Este, Duchess of Parma

The House of Farnese passed into history. Isabel Farnese, Queen of Spain, lived for many more years, surviving her husband Philip V by twenty years, and dying in retirement at the Palace of Aranjuez in 1766. Her son Carlos—now Carlo in Italian—became much more than just duke of Parma and Piacenza. Only a few years after taking up the reins in his Italian duchies, he marched south and easily ousted the Austrians from the kingdoms of Naples and Sicily and declared himself king. His younger brother, Infante Felipe, would later be installed as duke of Parma (1748), while he himself succeeded his older half-brothers as King of Spain, as Carlos III, in 1759. His descendants would continue Isabel Farnese’s line in Spain, but also established a separate line in Naples; his brother’s descendants continued to rule in Parma and Piacenza until they were overthrown during the Risorgimento in 1859. The Bourbon-Parma line continues to this day, as rulers of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (since 1964, though formally known as the House of Nassau-Weilburg), but also as extended members of the Dutch royal family (due to the marriage of Carlos Hugo, Duke of Parma, to Princess Irene of the Netherlands in 1964), and as Carlist pretenders to the Spanish throne. The Farnese family achieved what no other papal family had—not the Borgias, not the Barberinis—in securing an independent principality carved out of papal lands that endured for nearly 200 years.

Giglo Farnesi

A New Royal House for Denmark: Laborde de Monpezat

In the long and varied history of European monarchy there have always been aspirations by the families of dukes and princes to move up in rank into the world of royalty. There have been some great success stories, for example the princes of Orange forging a new monarchy in the Low Countries in the eighteenth century, or the princes of Liechtenstein and Monaco becoming royal simply by outlasting the demise of the old world when numerous other small principalities disappeared all across Europe in the early nineteenth century. Some tried to seize power from failing dynasties, like the Guise in France in 1589, on the basis of religion. But the most tried and true pattern for an aristocratic family to become royal was by marrying a royal heiress: several English families like the Howards or Dudleys tried to do this in the time of Elizabeth I; some German princelings married reigning queens and tsarinas in Sweden and Russia in the 18th century; but the most successful of all were the dukes of Saxe-Coburg who in the 19th century married heiresses in Great Britain and Portugal, but also established new dynasties in Belgium and Bulgaria. In the Netherlands, successive reigning queens in the 20th century have given rise to the potential of a new royal house, first of Mecklenburg—giving a royal boost to that ancient German ducal house—then Lippe-Biesterfeld, and then Amsberg. But by the 20th century, the idea of a royal family taking on a new name by marriage—or dynastic transfer—had gone out of fashion, and the House of Orange kept the name of its royal house, as did the House of Windsor when its heiress, Elizabeth II, married Philip Mountbatten (Battenberg)—who, as we have seen in previous blog posts, was in fact a prince of the House of Oldenburg, which brings us to Denmark.

The dukes of Oldenburg themselves gained the royal throne of Denmark in 1448, along with Norway and Sweden (for a time) by marriage to the heiress (ultimately) of Queen Margrete I. This dynasty made an attempt at taking over the British monarchy in the late 17th century, with the marriage of Queen Anne to Prince George of Denmark, but none of their many children survived to generate a new royal house. In the 18th century, however, a junior branch of the Oldenburgs (Holstein-Gottorp) did re-generate royal lineages in Sweden and Russia, and in the mid-19th century they added the throne of Greece, and since 1905, that of Norway. Quite a success by dynastic standards.

Margaret I, Queen of Denmark, Norway and Sweden (from her tomb in Roskilde Cathedral in Denmark)

So although the royal family in Denmark will continue to call itself the House of Oldenburg (or more specifically, the House of Glücksburg, one of its junior branches), if we look at it from a pre-modern dynastic point of view, the new royal house in Denmark after Queen Margrethe II’s abdication in January 2024 should become the House of Laborde de Monpezat. This exotic-sounding French surname sounds potentially very grand, as it might fit amongst the numerous houses of dukes and princes featured on this website. It does not—but nonetheless, it does have an interesting history in France’s deep, deep south: Béarn, the land of France’s beloved Gascon king, Henri IV.

Béarn was itself a semi-sovereign principality, ruled by its own princely family from the early Middle Ages until it was merged with the royal House of Navarre in the 1430s, and then the royal House of France itself, the Bourbons, after 1589. It is a rustic country, still today, nestled in the valleys of the Pyrenees and known for its cows, cheeses and Catholic pilgrimage sites. A few valleys over from its capital, the city of Pau, was an estate known as Monpezat. In 1648, the heiress of this estate, Catherine d’Arricau, married a local doctor, Jean de Laborde. The Laborde family were a family of jurists and professionals originally from a village a few miles upriver from Pau, Nay. Perhaps they took their name from another nearby village, Bordes, or from one a bit further away (in the neighbouring county of Bigorre), Laborde, both of which take their name from an ancient Béarnaise word for farm.

the village of Laborde in the Pyrenees
Welcome to Monpezat–watch for cows!

Like many families of the newly emerging ‘middle class’ of the 17th century, the Laborde family wanted to enrich their lineage with the acquisition of a noble fief. This would bring status and prestige, but also certain legal privileges like exemptions from some taxes, and a stronger legal voice in the local assemblies or ‘estates’. Jean and Catherine’s eldest son, Vincent, was entered into a local company of musketeers, another clear sign of the family’s aspirations to noble status, since it was the nobility who traditionally fought in wars and served in elite regiments like the King’s Musketeers. Some of the greatest musketeers in French history have come from this region, including the most famous of them all, d’Artagnan. But this was also precisely the same time period when the Kingdom of France was cracking down on the assumption of noble titles by non-noble people, particularly those who hoped to obtain privileges by acquiring (by purchase or by marriage) a noble fief. So when the family Laborde applied to sit in the Second Order (the nobility) in a seating of the local estates of Béarn in the early 18th century, their request was turned down.

the Castle of Pau, meeting place of the Estates of Béarn

As the 18th century went on, brides came with surnames like de Canet, Cazenave and du Boy, all potentially noble sounding, and the men followed mixed professions as before, some military, some more bourgeois like mayor and wine-seller. In the early 19th century, Charles de Laborde de Monpezat and his brother Jean are both described as négociants, merchant-traders. Charles was also an official with the public treasury of the city of Agen, a bit to the north in Aquitaine, while Jean was also the mayor of their hometown, Taron (in Béarn, not far from Monpezat). The next generations were the same: Philippe and his brother Aristide are both listed in family genealogies as landowners, merchants, and officials in local government. Aristide (1830-1888) rose higher, as the President of the Tribunal of Commerce of Pau, then Mayor of Pau in 1875. Their sister Amélie became the Mother Superior of a house of the Filles de la Charité, founded by St Vincent de Paul, first in Aix (Provence), then in Lyon. Daughters in the next generation solidified the family’s links with the professional legal class of the south of France, with one daughter married to a president (or senior judge) of the tribunal court of Bordeaux. Like many of their contemporaries, some of these used the title ‘Count’ to boost their social status, but with no genuine legal basis.

In the 20th century, the family de Laborde de Monpezat took an interesting turn, but again, not an unusual one, in that the future for social advancement was within the administrative hierarchy of the French colonial empire (as it was for the British Empire). Philippe’s daughter Julie married a fiscal administrator in French Indochina, possibly inspiring her cousin, Henri, son of Aristide, to pursue a similar career. He was also stimulated by a devastating infestation of grape-loving pests (phylloxera) that struck the vineyards of France in the late 19th century. Henri (d. 1929) became the director of a newspaper in Indochina and eventually delegate of the province of Annam-Tonkin (modern northern and central Vietnam) to the Superior Council of the Colonies (which existed as a French government department until 1935). His son André (d. 1998) looked after his family’s business interests in Vietnam in the 1930s-50s, then returned with his family to France as Indochina began its struggle for independence.

André’s son, Henri, although born in Bordeaux (in 1940), spent much of his childhood in Vietnam, was sent to France for early schooling in Cahors, but returned to Vietnam to complete his high school education, then back to France to study law and political science at the Sorbonne and Chinese and Vietnamese at the French school for East Asian Languages. He became a diplomat, and served in the embassy in London in the 1960s, then met and soon married the heir to the throne of Denmark, Princess Margrethe. Upon their marriage in 1967, he was created a Prince of Denmark, and changed his name to Henrik (and became a Lutheran, which apparently ruffled some feathers in the family).

Princess Margrethe meets the family Laborde de Monpezat

Princess Margrethe had originally not been the designated heir to the Danish throne, as the King her father (Frederick IX) had a younger brother, Prince Knud, who was assumed to be the next in line—indeed, in one of the longest unbroken lines of patrilineal succession in European royal history (back to 1448, though with a bit of a hiccup in 1863). In 1953, the Danish Act of Succession was modified to allow for female succession, meaning Knud and his two sons were now placed lower in the line of succession, after the King’s three daughters. Both of these sons, Ingolf and Christian, married in the last years of the reign of King Frederick IX without obtaining royal permission, so gave up their dynastic rights and took the new title, Count of Rosenborg. It wasn’t until the 1990s that the Danish Crown formally permitted marriage of a royal to a commoner without losing their status (and indeed, neither of Margrethe’s sisters married ‘unequally’), so it is a sleight of hand that Henri de Laborde’s family’s use of the title ‘Count’ seems to have allowed Margrethe to have slipped past this issue in 1967, when her cousins could not, in their marriages of 1968 and 1971.

Henri and Margrethe visit France in 1966

The rest of the story of the marriage of Prince Henrik and Queen Margrethe II (who succeeded her father Frederick IX not long after her marriage, in 1972) is fairly well known, and it was not always smooth sailing. Like many consorts of female sovereigns, Henrik struggled to find a place ‘three steps behind’ his wife, and sometimes pressed for more—for example, asking for formal recognition of his surname as part of the royal name (as Prince Philip also pressed for in England, and somewhat obtained with the name ‘Mountbatten-Windsor’ being adopted for junior royals), and the more elevated title of Prince-Consort, which he was finally given in 2005. In 2008, his sons Frederik and Joachim, princes of Denmark, were given the additional title Count of Monpezat. Prince Henrik died content with this in 2018.

the coat of arms of Prince Joachim of Denmark, with Denmark as a background and a smaller escutcheon made up of Oldenburg (left) and Monpezat (right)

Then in 2023, the Queen decided that the sons of Prince Joachim (and their descendants) would be counts of Monpezat only, which surprised (and offended) many, but is seen as very much in line with all of today’s European royal houses ‘slimming down’ in order to better accommodate themselves with modern values. One might argue, purely academically, that regardless of the Queen’s decision, his male-line descendants could still also call themselves duke of Oldenburg and duke of Schleswig-Holstein, but since dukedoms of the old Holy Roman Empire were always restricted to male-line succession, these in fact now only could be claimed by Ingolf of Rosenborg (who has no sons), and by another line of Counts of Rosenborg, more distant cousins (descendants of a younger son of Frederick VIII).

Count Ingolf of Rosenborg

Like his wife, Prince Henrik was passionate about the arts, and about their family’s summer home at Cayx. Purchased as a summer retreat, far from the glare of cameras and his wife’s royal duties in Copenhagen, the Château de Cayx was purchased by the couple in 1974, not far from lands already owned by his family for generations, in the picturesque valley of the Lot, downriver the city of Cahors in Aquitaine. The castle had been built in the 14th century, and passed through several hands, undergoing many renovations.

the chateau of Cayx in Southern France

Amongst its 18th-century inhabitants were the famous brothers,  Jean-Jacques Lefranc de Pompignan, a philosophe and writer in the Enlightenment, and Jean-Georges, Archbishop of Vienne, whose liberal beliefs convinced him to lead the great movement of members of the clergy into the Third Estate at the Estates General of 1789. He then served briefly as President of the new National Assembly (4 to 19 July 1789—pretty crucial dates!), and was appointed one of Louis XVI’s ministers of state in August.

Cayx has once more become a flourishing centre of wine production, and will serve as a base for the newly reinvigorated, now royal, house of Laborde de Monpezat. with roots deep in the Béarnaise countryside. Vive le roi! Vive le roi, Frédéric X!

Frederick as Crown Prince of Denmark
buvez bien!

Cantemir Princes in Moldavia and Russia

Sometimes a princely family rises in prominence from fairly humble origins, burns brightly, then disappears. Often this occurs in zones of conflict between great powers, where huge opportunities can be seized by the bold or the crafty. One such family were the Cantemir, ruling princes of Moldavia, then princes of the Russian Empire. Their dynastic history lasts just over one hundred years. They are also interesting in the history of European dukes and princes in that they were—or at least claimed to be—descendants of Mongol khans.

Prince Dmitrie Cantemir, whose portrait blends east and west

The last three decades of the 17th century was a remarkable period for the Balkan provinces, including Moldavia, a semi-autonomous province of the Ottoman Empire since the late 15th century, as the balance of power between the Christian West and the Muslim East began irretrievably to shift. The first significant defeat of the previously undefeatable armies of the Ottoman Empire, at the siege of Vienna in 1683, was followed by wave after wave of victories led by Habsburg armies, liberating Buda and Belgrade by 1689, and reincorporating the Principality of Transylvania with the Kingdom of Hungary by 1699 (see blog about Transylvanian princes). Further south, the principalities of Wallachia and Moldavia remained vassals of the Turks, but a new stirring of Romanian nationalist consciousness was awakened, and a new protector from the far north began to emerge: Orthodox Russia.

the three Romanian provinces in the 17th century

One family at the heart of this transformation was the House of Cantemir or Cantemirești. Their time as leaders of Moldavia was fairly brief, but more broadly they were central to this awakening of Romanian and Orthodox identities, as patrons of an emerging Moldavian nationalist literature, and as protected clients of the Russian Empire. They patronised one of the first translations of the Bible into Romanian, for example, and wrote one of the first scholarly histories of the land and its people. Yet they also worked very hard to establish an identity for themselves that was quite different from Romanian or Moldavian, perhaps to position themselves more securely on the international and diplomatic stage as an important family with excellent connections, able to act as middlemen between Ottomans and Russians. Moldavia (today’s Moldova) had to wait until the 19th century to be liberated from Turkish rule—half of it was incorporated into the Russian Empire in 1812, while the rest was joined to a newly independent Romania in the 1860s.

the Cantemir coat of arms (augmented after their move to Russia)

Modern genealogical research has established that the Cantemir family originated in Moldavia in the early 16th century, in the area of the hamlet of Silișteni (recently re-named Dimitrie Cantemir), just west of the river Prut, the river that today divides independent Moldova from the Romanian province of Moldavia. Yet the established family tradition, put forth as early as the first years of the 18th century, was that the family were of Tatar origin, descendants of Tamerlane.

Timur (d. 1405), or ‘Timur the Lame’ as he was known to Europeans, was a Mongol khan who founded a great empire in Central Asia and whose descendants dominated both the Persian and Mughal empires for the next three hundred years. The Tatars were kin to the Mongols—both groups were a complex mix of Mongolic and Turkic language and culture—and with the disintegration of the Khanate of the Golden Horde in the 15th century, several Tatar khanates emerged in the areas around the lower Volga and north of the Black Sea. One of these, the Crimean Khanate, remained a powerful force well into the 18th century, though from 1475 they were formally vassals of the Ottomans, just like the Christian princes of the Balkans. This area was known to European writers as ‘Tartary’.

Demetrius Cantemir, in his History of the Growth and Decay of the Ottoman Empire—a book he wrote about 1715, and which was eventually translated and published in England (1734)—said himself that his surname was derived from can-temur, the ‘blood of Timur’. Other sources suggest an ancestor called ‘Khan Temir’. Why choose this as a family’s ancestor? In the early 18th century, Tamerlane was an incredibly popular figure in theatre and opera, and represented the oldest enemies of the Ottoman Turks—a factor perhaps the author thought might bring him favour at the Russian court. Demetrius suggested that a warrior named Cantemir from the Crimea moved to Moldavia to aid the army of Prince Stephen the Great (r. 1457-1504) in his fight against the Turks. Indeed, Cantemir does not appear to be a Moldavian name. The idea of Tatar origins had emerged earlier in Demetrius’ career, when he was in service of the Ottomans, perhaps as a qualification to allow him to serve as a diplomat to the Crimean Khan, but later, once he had sought asylum in the Russian Empire, playing up a claim to having Tatar origins may have been a strategy to obtain princely rank, as there was already a precedent for the nobility from former sovereign Tatar and Mongol dynasties being recognised as princes once they were annexed by Russia. Yet Prince Demetrius Cantemir also considered himself to be thoroughly Moldavian, and his children added another dynastic layer, the idea of Byzantine ancestry through their Cantacuzene mother. Whatever the truth of their origins, the facts show that by the early 17th century, the family were minor boyar landowners on the middle Prut valley, not too far south of the principality’s capital, Jassy.

an engraved image of Jassy (modern Iași)

The first to bear the name Cantemir for certain was Constantine (‘the Old’) (1612-1693) who served as a mercenary in the Polish army fighting against Tatars and Swedes. From the 1660s, he switched allegiances and served in the Ottoman armies against Austria. He rose to become governor of a town, then prefect of a district back in Moldavia, and in 1681 was named Grand Sommelier to the Prince of Moldavia (Gheorghe Duca). He married three times, each time to a cousin of the reigning prince, and mostly to grand heiresses, so by the 1680s he was a very wealthy man, and respected by both Moldavian high nobility and the Ottoman authorities. Indeed, in 1672 and 1676 he served as a personal guide to Sultan Mehmet IV in his campaigns against the Poles. Due to these personal connections in both Jassy and Istanbul, Constantine Cantemir was chosen by the boyars to be Prince of Moldavia in 1685 (age 73, hence the nickname ‘the Old’), soon confirmed by the Sultan. His older son, Antiochus, was sent to the Sultan’s court to ‘ensure loyalty’, and when the Poles invaded the Balkans in 1686 and 1691, Prince Constantine assured them of his Christian faith, but did not betray his master the Sultan. Yet in 1690, he did make a secret treaty with Emperor Leopold, saying that if the Austrians could successfully occupy his principality, he would submit to Imperial authority, in return for confirmation that his son would succeed to his throne.

Constantin and Antioch Cantemir

In March 1693, old Prince Constantine Cantemir died, and the boyars chose as prince of Moldavia his second son, Demetrius (age 19), since the elder son was still in Istanbul. His reign lasted only three weeks, as the Sultan objected and replaced him with Constantine Duca. Demetrius (Dimitrie in Moldavian) was ordered to move to Istanbul where he would remain as a ‘guest’ for the next seventeen years. Here he lived in the Moldavian residence, the Boğdan Saray (or Bogdania Palace), in the northeast quarter of the city—the Greek Orthodox district of Phanarion, today’s Fener, near the great western wall. Built in at least the 14th century (possibly the 12th) Bogdania Palace remained a residence for Christian diplomats to the Ottoman Empire until it was mostly destroyed by fire in the 1780s, and was completely in ruins by the end of the 19th century.

Bogdania Palace or the palace of Demetrius in Constantinople (Istanbul)
some walls of the Bogdania Palace photographed in the 19th century

Back in 1695, Demetrius’ brother Antiochus (Antioh in Moldavian) became Prince of Moldavia, and established his rule in the capital of Jassy. Demetrius thus acted as his brother’s agent in Istanbul (and a willing hostage to ensure loyalty). The treaty of Karlowitz (1699) between the Austrians and the Ottomans was a major humiliation for the Turks, so in retrenching their power in the Balkans, Prince Antiochus Cantemir was replaced in 1700—but he was restored in 1705, then deposed again in 1707, and also brought to live in Istanbul.

a commemorative stamp from Moldova for Prince Antioh Cantemir

While Demetrius was in Istanbul, several marriages were proposed for him by the Sultan: a Brancovan, a Mavrocordatos, but in 1700 he married Cassandra, daughter of a former Prince of Wallachia, Serban Cantacuzeno (d. 1688). The Romanian Cantacuzeno family claimed descent from the noble Byzantine house of Kantakouzenos (who contributed two emperors in the 14th century), and Prince Serban had reputedly made plans for allying with the West, marching on Constantinople, and claiming the Byzantine throne. This marriage alliance would certainly boost the prestige of the new Cantemir dynasty. Demetrius engaged with the local Orthodox scholarly community in Istanbul, studied their art and literature, and became a musician and composer too, Stating on good terms with the Ottomans, he also became one of the few Christians who was an accepted part of the artistic patronage network of the Sultan, Ahmed III, and a welcome visitor to his court.

In 1710, perhaps due to this closeness and trust, Sultan Ahmed appointed Demetrius once more as Prince of Moldavia. War was about to start, this time from a different direction: the north. While peace with Austria and Western Europe had been established in 1699, the Russian Empire, led by a young and vigorous Tsar Peter I, was just getting started as an aggressive military power. Peter dreamed of re-establishing an Orthodox monarchy on the Bosporus, and, having defeated his great northern enemy, Sweden, at the Battle of Poltava in 1709, was now ready to fight for this dream in the south. Probably due to this external threat, Demetrius as Prince of Moldavia was given extra distinctions than his predecessors had been, for example, the title of pasha with three queues (rather than the ordinary two); an expensive and honorific caftan made of many colours and gold and silver thread; and an exemption from the usual tributes and gifts demanded by Ottoman overlords. So he returned to Jassy. Here he tried to establish a more authoritarian rule over the boyars, and tried to get the rich monasteries to support the war financially. But an intellectual reformer was not received well in conservative Moldavia, and his attempts were mostly blocked.

another Moldovan commemorative stamp, this one of the reign of Prince Demetrius fighting for independence of Moldavia, 1710-1711

War was declared by Russia in February 1711. In April, Prince Demetrius surprised everyone by signing his own separate treaty with Tsar Peter: Russia would agree to liberate Moldavia and support a hereditary ruler there (with expanded borders and no tribute to Russia); but also would protect Cantemir and his family if the invasion was unsuccessful, and would grant him lands and palaces in Russia equivalent to those he would certainly lose in the Ottoman domains. It was a great gamble. In early June, Russian troops entered the principality, and by the end of the month, Demetrius declared war on the Sultan. Peter himself came to Jassy and was entertained by Demetrius and his court. But the Moldavian army was small, and only the Russian avant-garde had arrived and was quickly surrounded by the massive Ottoman army and its Crimean Tatar allies. The allied Russo-Moldavian troops were crushed at Stănilești on the Prut on the 22nd of July. Peter made a quick treaty with the Sultan (a humiliation, losing the great prize, the port of Azov), and whisked Prince Demetrius away—some said he was hidden in the carriage of the Empress Catherine.

In August, Peter accorded his new ally, and now protected refugee, the title ‘Prince of Russia’ (with the rank of ‘Serene Highness’), augmented his coat-of-arms with a Russian double-headed eagle, and pledged to return one day to Moldavia to restore his throne. He was soon given the estates confiscated from a Russian traitor near Kharkov (and promised tax exemptions on these lands), and was given the task to rebuilt that city (now Kharkiv in northeast Ukraine). This estate of about 57 villages (and 15,000 serfs) was centred on the estate of Komarichoia, on the main road between Kiev and Moscow. Here the Prince built a wooden manor, a mill and a Romanian Orthodox church in a village he renamed for himself,  Dmitrovska (later called Dmitrovsk; now in Russia according to today’s borders). Prince Demetrius also was given an estate at Solomino (on the Donets, to the east). A small colony of Moldavians was formed, consisting of about 4,000 soldiers, boyars and administrators who had accompanied Demetrius and still considered him their hospodar, or prince (the Tsar allowed him to exercise jurisdiction over these people). But after about a year, most of these returned to Moldavia, and Demetrius was ordered to move to Moscow. The family was given a stone residence in Moscow (a big deal in a city still mostly built of wood), and the Prince built a new Romanian style church which would become the family sepulchre. His sons were soon given positions in the Russian court and in the prestigious Preobrazhensky Guard. Their integration process into the Russian aristocracy had begun.

Prince Demetrius Cantemir re-fashioned as a Russian prince

But there remained hope of a return to Moldavia: in 1716, the Austrians defeated the Ottomans, and Demetrius’s brother-in-law, Gheorghe Cantacuzeno, defected to the Austrian camp. Prince Cantemir tried to get Tsar Peter to grant him a passport (and funds) to go raise an army of support in the Balkans, but his request was denied, and by 1718, the Austrians made a new peace treaty.

By this point, Peter the Great’s interests were focused on building his ‘window to the west’, the new city of Saint Petersburg, and Prince Demetrius Cantemir was not far behind. He purchased an estate a bit to the south of the new city, Chornye Griazi, which later, in the 1770s, was purchased by Catherine II and transformed into the Imperial summer residence town of Tsarskoe Selo. In the newly emerging city, the Prince built a small wooden house on the banks of the Neva, which he replaced in 1720/21 with a grand palace of marble, one of the first Russian commissions for the Italian architect Francesco Rastrelli (later famous for Smolny Cathedral and the Winter Palace). This residence was built next to the Summer Palace, so was one of the most in-demand sites (in what later became known as ‘Millionaire Street’) and therefore passed through many hands, purchased first by Catherine the Great in 1762, then remodelled by later owners in the 19th century before becoming—perhaps ironically—the Turkish Embassy in the years leading up to the First World War. This was a busy period for Prince Cantemir as an intellectual—he wrote twelve books between 1711 and 1723, mostly histories of Romania and the Ottoman Empire. He was elected as a member of the Academy of Berlin in 1714.

Cantemir Palace in Saint Petersburg

In 1720, Demetrius married for a second time, Princess Anastasia, daughter of Prince Ivan Trubetskoi, one of the inner circle of Peter the Great. He shaved his beard and adopted Western dress. He tried to use his great favour with the Tsar to hatch a plan to rescue his brother Antiochus from Istanbul, with French naval assistance, but Peter was not interested in provoking the Sultan again. In 1721, Cantemir was named a Privy Councillor and Senator of the Empire, and it is suggested by some historians that it was in this capacity as Senator that he proposed the idea of formally recognising Peter as ‘Emperor’ (which they did in November). This was his way of gently reminding Peter that his true destiny lay in reconquering Constantinople and restoring the Orthodox faith (and his own principality). At the about this time, the Holy Roman Emperor recognised (or created) Prince Cantemir as a prince of the Empire—perhaps as a means of encouraging an alliance with Russia and intervention in this Balkans against the Ottomans. Indeed, in May 1722, a large Russian army did march out, and headed south, but not to the Bosporus; Peter intended to subdue the region north of the Caucasus Mountains, and Demetrius was brought along as a special advisor and interpreter—and a composer of propaganda messages in courtly Turkish to be distributed amongst the local chiefs. The Russian troops had some successes in Dagestan, but were blocked by the Persian governor in Baku, and soon returned north. By the end of the campaign, Prince Demetrius was very ill; he retired to his estates at Dmitrovka where he died in August 1723.

Anastasia Ivanovna, Princess Cantemir

Demetrius Cantemir’s will was very confusing, leaving the choice of the main heir to Emperor Peter, who died before he could make it. It wasn’t until 1729 that the court confirmed the eldest son, Constantine (1703-1747), as the heir. He was already in favour, having been married since 1727 to Princess Anastasia Golitsyna, daughter of the minister-favourite of Emperor Peter II. The youngest son, Antiochus (1708-1744), instead became the intellectual heir of his father, and went on to establish his name across Europe as a member of the Enlightened ‘Republic of Letters’. He supported Empress Anna Ivanovna in her coup against the old aristocracy in 1730, and in 1731 was appointed ambassador to London (aged only 22!—it is possible he was in fact being sent away from the court, as someone who had witnessed the secrets of the coup). In London he helped bring about a new treaty of friendship between Great Britain and Russia in 1734, and was gradually pulled towards making similar efforts in Paris (where tensions were heating up with Russia over Poland), though he was not formally ambassador there until 1738. Antiochus Cantemir’s job was to secure France’s recognition of his master’s title of ‘emperor’ (which they refused to do), and to keep France from allying with the Ottomans if a new war broke out.

young Prince Antiochus Cantemir

A new war did break out between Russia and the Ottomans in 1739, and Russian troops entered Moldavia. With this army was Prince Constantine Cantemir, who was proposed as its new ruling prince. But once again, peace was soon brokered, Moldavia was returned to Ottoman rule, and the port of Azov returned to Russia.

In 1742, it was rumoured that Antiochus Cantemir was to be recalled from France, by the new empress (Elizabeth Petrovna), and named President of the Russian Academy, in recognition of his reputation as a writer. He is revered as one of the founders of modern Russian poetry, and left behind various publications of poetry and prose, re-edited his father’s historical works, and wrote an epic history of Peter the Great. He had indeed done very much to improve the view most westerners had of Russia. But instead of receiving this post, he was instead confirmed in his post as ambassador to France, then suddenly died in Spring 1744.

Prince Demetrius’ daughters also swiftly established themselves in Russian high society. Princess Maria is thought to have been a mistress of Peter I while he was on the Caucasus campaign of 1722/23 (and possibly had a child by him). Perceived as a threat by Peter’s wife Catherine, she was sent away from court, but later obtained posts as lady-in-waiting to Grand Duchess Natalia in 1727-28 (sister of Peter II) and to Empress Anna in 1730-31. She never married, but was a salon hostess in Saint Petersburg with her widowed step-mother. The much younger Princess Catherine (born in Russia in 1720) obtained a position at court as lady-in-waiting to Empress Elizabeth, and was a well-known beauty (known as ‘Smaragda’ (emerald), and an admired keyboardist. She eventually married Prince Dmitri Golitsyn in a grand ceremony at the Russian court, and went with him to Versailles where he was posted in the embassy and later named ambassador (1760). A year later he was posted as ambassador to Vienna, but she died in France before they departed.

The eldest brother, Prince Constantine, was also involved with the Golitsyn family: he married one (as we’ve seen), and was caught up in their disgrace when they tried to limit the powers of Empress Anna on her accession in 1730. He was exiled to Siberia for a time, then died childless in 1747, so the estates were divided between his surviving brothers Sergei and Matvei. Neither of these made much of a mark in Russian history, and neither had children, so in 1780, the Cantemir estates reverted to the Crown, and not to the descendants of Prince Antiochus (senior; who had died in Moldavia in 1726), who had finally come to Russia during the war of 1736-39.

Of these, Prince Constantine became a Russian general, and was succeeded by his son, Dmitri (1749-1820), a colonel who participated in yet another Russian occupation of Moldavia and Wallachia in 1768/74. In 1773, he was named head of the council to administer the region of Oltenia (part of Wallachia), but he left in disgrace and was later confined due to madness. He left no successors.

Today the family name lives on thorough the Russian town of Kantemirovka (in Voronezh Oblast; formerly known as Konstantinovka, named for Prince Constantine); and the town of Cantemir in Moldova (named as such in 1967), not to mention the town of Dimitrie Cantemir in the Moldavian part of Romania, as above. One of the daughters of General Constantine married a prominent Wallachian nobleman, and their descendants, who took the name Câmpineanu-Cantemir, were leaders of the liberal movement in Romania in the later 19th century. There was a Romanian film about Prince Demetrius in 1973, and occasionally, original works of Prince Antiochus turn on at antique book sales.

The de Beauharnais Dukes of Leuchtenberg and Princes Romanovsky: French? German? Russian?

Readers of this site will know by now that I am slightly obsessed with trans-national noble families that moved effortlessly across Europe in the 18th and 19th century, blissfully ignoring the boundaries of nationalism and attempting, in their way, to hold the continent together through kinship networks and cultural exchange. The recent new film Napoleon brought back into my mind the family of his lifelong love, Joséphine de Beauharnais, and the amazing, and very trans-national journey across Europe taken by her descendants—not his—in the century that followed. By the 1820s the Beauharnais were an adjunct part of the royal family of Bavaria, as dukes of Leuchtenberg. And by the 1840s they had been created Prince Romanovsky, again as sort of an additional dynastic branch, this time to the imperial family of Russia.

Josephine de Beauharnais, 1801, by François Gérard

Joséphine de Beauharnais was the grand progenitrix of this pan-European clan, though she did not live to see it. And she herself was only a Beauharnais by marriage. She was however, created a duchess in her own right (the strangely named duchy of Navarre, see below), as a consolation prize for being divorced from the Emperor Napoleon, so she does qualify for a place on the ‘Dukes and Princes’ blogsite. Her daughter too, Hortense de Beauharnais, was given a duchy, Saint-Leu, this time by the restored Bourbon regime after the fall of Bonaparte. There were thus two dukedoms in France before the titles in Germany or Russia were granted to the Beauharnais family; so let’s start in France.

Marie-Josèphe-Rose Tascher de la Pagerie, known as Rose or Marie-Rose in the days before she met Napoleon Bonaparte (who preferred to call her Joséphine), was born on the island of Martinique in the Caribbean in 1763, to a wealthy owner of sugar plantations. Her father aspired to marry her up the social ladder, so in 1779 he arranged her marriage to the younger son of a former governor of their island, Alexandre, Vicomte de Beauharnais. The new couple started a life together in France, where he was serving in the army, and soon had two children, Eugène (1781) and Hortense (1783).

Alexandre’s family may have been socially superior on Martinique, but they were still relatively nouveau amongst the noble families of France, and he was not formally received at court, which irked him. His military career was also stunted somewhat since, by the time he arrived back in the Caribbean to help the French navy fight against the English in the American War of Independence, the war was over. Like many young noblemen, however, he did pick up dangerous new ideas about democracy percolating around in the New World at this time, and was an eager participant in the Estates General of 1789 as a delegate for the nobility of Blois. When the Revolution broke out that summer, Alexandre was one of the first nobles to join the Third Estate, and in the coming years he joined the Jacobin political club and sat twice as president of the National Constituent Assembly, in July/August 1791. A year later, Citizen Beauharnais re-joined the army, now as a general, and by 1793 was commanding the Army of the Rhine. Blamed for the loss of the city of Mainz, however, he resigned his commission and retreated to his family’s estates in the area south of the city of Orléans. But the long arm of the Terror reached him and in March 1794 he was arrested, blamed for the military failure in Germany and suspected of still harbouring subversive aristocratic tendencies… He was executed in Paris on 5 Thermidor of Year Two (ie, 23 July 1794). His wife Marie-Rose was also arrested, in April, and her life was spared only by the fall of the regime a mere five days after her husband’s death.

Alexandre de Beauharnais as a general

Alexandre’s ancestors, the Beauharnais family, were originally merchants in the city of Orléans—the first named is Guillaume, living in 1390, who was also lord of Miramion, an estate northeast of the city. His descendants expanded their landholdings with the lordships of La Chaussée (or La Chaussaye) and La Boëche, also near Orléans. By the end of the 16th century the family had become part of the noblesse de robe (the judiciary nobility), and held prominent provincial posts: François II (d. 1651) was First President in the Presidial Court of Orléans in 1598 and the King’s Lieutenant-General in the Bailliage of Orléans. He was selected to attend the Estates General of 1614. His son Jean raised the social profile of the family somewhat by acquiring a position at court, that of maître d’hôtel du roi in 1652, and in the next generation they secured their place in the capital as advocates in the Parlement of Paris. It was Jean’s grandsons, François and Charles, who really raised to the family closer to the top of the French aristocratic hierarchy, as prominent leaders of France’s new colony in the New World.

François de Beauharnais (b. 1665) became a protégé of a distant kinsman Jérôme Phélypeaux, Comte de Pontchartrain, who, as Minister of the Navy secured his appointment as Intendant of New France in 1702. The intendant was the civil administrator of the colony, second in command to the governor. François acquired land in Acadia (today’s New Brunswick) which was erected into a feudal estate (the barony of Beauville or Banville). After three years, he returned to France and was given the much more prestigious post of intendant of the Navy, then intendant of the district of La Rochelle until 1715, when he, as part of the Phélypeaux network, fell from royal favour. Meanwhile, his brother Charles had already been making a name for himself as a naval captain, and in 1716 married a rich widow, Renée Le Pays de Bourjolly, whose estates included sugar plantations in Saint-Domingue (today’s Haïti) in the Caribbean. By the mid-1720s, the Phélypeaux family were back in favour, and the new Minister of the Navy, the Comte de Maurepas, appointed Charles de Beauharnois (as it was often spelled then), Governor of New France (1726-46). His time as governor was spent trying to maintain the delicate balance between the British in Canada (in Ontario) and the various native regional alliances (the Abenaki, the Iroquois, the Sioux). This balance was disrupted by his brutal suppression of the Fox tribe (or Renards in French) in the region between lakes Superior and Michigan in the late 1720s. Governor Beauharnois solidified New France’s reach into this territory and much further west with a new fort (1727) on the upper reaches of the Mississippi: Fort Beauharnois (now in Minnesota). He also gave this name to his seigneurie, established in 1729 on the south side of the Saint Lawrence river, southwest of Montréal. The Seigneurie of Beauharnois was later sold when France lost control of Québec in the 1760s, but it remains today as a town and the seat of a county.

Charles de Beauharnois, Governor of New France

In 1744, the War of Austrian Succession spread to Canada, and Governor de Beauharnois tried to build up Quebec’s defences against a British attack. But at age 74, he was seen as too old to face this major challenge, and was soon recalled. Back in France he was named a lieutenant-general of the navy in retirement, and he died a few years later. Neither François nor Charles had any children, so their wealth and estates passed to their nephews, François and Claude-Joseph, the sons of their late younger brother Claude, who had himself been a naval captain in what was now a family tradition. The older brother, François, Baron de Beauville, likewise rose through the navy to become a squadron commander, and in 1757 was appointed Governor-General of the ‘Isles du Vent’, that is the Windward Islands in the Caribbean. This post covered all of the French possessions in the Antilles except the large island of Saint-Domingue, and was based in Martinique. He was the last to be called Governor-General—after 1763 each island was given its own governor. After his sons were born on the island, François returned to France where his newly acquired estate, La Ferté-Avrain in the Sologne region south of Orléans, was erected as a marquisate (1764) and renamed La Ferté-Beauharnais. The old medieval château here was mostly dismantled and a new house was built in a fashionable classical style. It would later be ruined during the Revolution and sold by the family in 1821.

François, Marquis de la Ferté-Beauharnais
Chateau of La Ferté-Beauharnais, as reconstructed in the 19th century

The new Marquis’ younger brother, Claude-Joseph, was also raised in rank, as Count of Les Roches-Baritaud, an estate he had purchased in the Vendée, the western portion of Poitou, near the Atlantic coast north of La Rochelle. He too was a captain in the French navy, and won a significant victory over the British off Lizard Point (Cornwall) in 1756. He died before the French Revolution broke out, but his wife ‘Fanny de Beauharnais’ lived on for many years, and flourished as a salonnière, a well-known writer of poems, plays and novels. They had three children, who would re-appear prominently in the Napoleonic regime: Anne as wife of General de Barral, and Claude as a Senator and Count of the Empire (likely due to the intervention of his cousin-in-law, Empress Joséphine), then as Chevalier d’honneur to Joséphine’s replacement, Empress Marie-Louise, in 1810.

the writer Fanny de Beauharnais

After 1794, Joséphine was a widow. Her late husband’s older brother, François, Marquis de la Ferté-Beauharnais, had remained an ardent royalist, in opposition to his own brother, then emigrated when things heated up in 1792. He joined the Army of Emigrés fighting against the new regime, and didn’t return to France until the amnesties of 1802—from abroad, he even tried to convince First Consul Bonaparte, via the Consul’s new wife (Joséphine), to use his position to restore the Bourbon monarchy. This suggestion fell on deaf ears of course, but in 1805 François was briefly given a chance to make his name in the new Empire, as ambassador to Tuscany, then to Spain. He failed to follow Napoleon’s orders in Spain, however, and was soon recalled and exiled to his estates. He died age 90 (!) in 1846.

So finally to Joséphine and her children by her first husband the Vicomte de Beauharnais. Without taking too much of a detour into the history of Napoleon Bonaparte, we can summarise the astonishing career of this minor nobleman from Corsica who became an artillery specialist and dazzled the leaders of the first French Republic in the 1790s, then led a coup to bring down those same leaders once it was clear their regime was corrupt and ineffective, revealed himself to be a genius military strategist and effective politician, then crowned himself Emperor of the French and founder of a new reigning dynasty for France in 1804. Along the way, he needed the social cachet provided to him by the widowed Vicomtesse de Beauharnais to gain entrée into Parisian high society, just as she needed him to remain relevant in a swiftly evolving political landscape. For the purposes of this blog about dynasty, it is her children who also brought value to her marriage to Napoleon, since, as any good Italian mama’s boy—and he was, as we see so well in the recent film, when his mother Letizia Ramolino took matters into her own hands to ensure her son’s ‘potency’—he was obsessed with creating a dynasty and ensuring his legacy. In the absence of a son of his own he tried to build up the profile of his brothers, to little effect—none but Lucien was really an effective leader, and they fell out over the idea of an imperial Bonaparte dynasty. And so Napoleon adopted Joséphine’s children, Eugène and Hortense, unofficially from the time of their marriage in 1796, and officially in 1806, shortly after the proclamation of the Empire.

Josephine as Empress of the French

Eugène de Beauharnais (b. 1781) began his apprenticeship to power in Italy as aide-de-camp to his new step-father in 1797, then the following year on campaigns in Egypt and Syria. When Napoleon was appointed First Consul, Eugène was named Captain of the Light Cavalry of the Consular Guard, 1800, and rose to the rank of general in 1804. That year the Empire was proclaimed, and Eugène was created a ‘Prince of France’, with the style of ‘Imperial Highness’, and soon after was appointed Arch-Chancellor of State, one of the seven ‘Grand Dignitaries of the Empire’ set up to demonstrate to Europe (and to other Frenchmen) that the Empire of the French had a magnificent court just like anyone else.

Eugène de Beauharnais in about 1800

The new Arch-Chancellor had also recently acquired his own grand residence in Paris, in one of the choicest locations in the city: the old Hôtel de Torcy, built by Louis XIV’s foreign minister in 1714 on the banks of the Seine between the Palais Bourbon and what is today the Musée d’Orsay. Set back from the quays somewhat, it had a marvellous garden overlooking the river. Eugène purchased it in 1803, remodelled it in the now ultra-fashionable Egyptian neo-classical style, and renamed it the Hôtel de Beauharnais. After the fall of the Empire, it would be purchased by the King of Prussia, in 1818, and it would serve as the embassy of Prussia, then Germany, until 1944; since 1968 it has been the residence of the German ambassador.

The Hôtel de Beauharnais on the river side
the Hôtel de Beauharnais on the streeet side, showing its ‘Egyptian’ portico (photo Jospe)

By this point, his mother Empress Joséphine also had a prominent residence of her own, the Château of Malmaison, purchased in 1799 and lovingly refurbished as the country seat of the First Consul then Emperor. Located on a bend of the river Seine about 7 miles west of Paris, Malmaison had been a dilapidated 17th-century country manor, and she transformed it into a palace, especially noted for its rose gardens. Since the early 20th century it has been property of the French state, and remains one of the best places to see the preserved ‘empire style’ of the era of the Empress Joséphine.

Malmaison (photo Pedro Faber)

An even more significant appointment came to Joséphine’s son Prince Eugène the next year: Napoleon returned to Italy and resurrected the ancient Kingdom of Italy (essentially Lombardy, but soon to include the Veneto too), crowning himself with the ancient Iron Crown in Milan in May 1805; he then left the Kingdom in the hands of his step-son Eugène as Viceroy. Eugène turned out to be a very good politician and administrator, keeping the peace (for a time) with the Papacy, carrying out a number of public building projects, and implementing the new Civil Code to align with that of France. As part of the extended Imperial family, he was used in the Emperor’s matrimonial chess manoeuvres, and was married in January 1806 to Princess Augusta of Bavaria, to secure France’s alliance with that key German state, which, in return, was recognised as an independent kingdom that same month. It was also in this same month that Eugène was formally adopted by the Emperor, and though it was made clear he was not heir to the French Empire, he was named heir to the Kingdom of Italy, should Napoleon fail to have a son. As a sign of this, and the addition of the Veneto to the Kingdom of Italy, he was created Prince of Venice, December 1807. Earlier in the year, he had given the Emperor his first Beauharnais grandchild, named Joséphine after her grandmother, and she was created Princess of Bologna, and later given further estates in that region and created Duchess of Galliera. It seemed the destiny of the Beauharnais dynasty was to be in Italy—perhaps ironically given the origins of the Buonaparti. The Prince of Venice earned his spurs on the battlefield in Italy too, as Commander of the Army of Italy in the War of the Fifth Coalition (1809), successfully defending the newly acquired Veneto provinces against the Austrians at the Battle of the Piave in June.

Eugène de Beauharnais as Viceroy of Italy

Hortense de Beauharnais (b. 1783) was raised to be part of the wider Bonaparte family too. She’d been educated at school with Napoleon’s sister Caroline, and in 1802—before the proclamation of the Empire and the systematic efforts of the Emperor to marry his siblings into the reigning houses of Europe—she was persuaded to agree to a marriage with her step-father’s younger brother Luigi. As Louis I, King of Holland, from June 1806, her husband was then sent to bring the Dutch into line with Napoleon’s grand European family alliance, and Hortense was forced to go with him. She grew to like her little court in The Hague and became popular with the Dutch. But she hated Louis, and within a year she returned to France, officially to recover her health after the death of a baby son. She revelled in holding the rank of queen in Paris, young and spirited, second only to her mother at the Imperial court.

Hortense de Beauharnais as Queen of Holland

Always in need of daughters—just as any French king needed them for diplomatic alliances—Napoleon incorporated another Beauharnais girl into the Imperial family in 1804, and gave her rooms in the Tuileries Palace. This was Stéphanie de Beauharnais (b. 1789), daughter of Hortense’s father’s cousin, Claude, Comte des Roches-Baritaud (see above). In 1806, she was created ‘Princess of France’, and like Eugène, she was deployed onto the martial chessboard to secure an alliance with one of the German princes, and married to Prince Karl of Baden, grandson and heir to the brand new Grand Duke of Baden. And like that of Hortense, her marriage it was not successful at first: he had little interest in her and lived in the capital, Karlsruhe, while she lived mostly in the old electoral palace in Mannheim. When he succeeded as Grand Duke of Baden in 1811, however, they came together with a common sense of dynastic duty: to produce a son. After three daughters, however, Grand Duke Karl died (1818), and Stéphanie spent a long widowhood—over 40 years—back in Mannheim. An interesting dynastic legacy was that through her daughter Marie-Amélie, who married the Duke of Hamilton, and in turn through her daughter, Lady Mary Victoria Douglas-Hamilton, the blood of the Beauharnais flows today in the house of Grimaldi in Monaco.

Stéphanie de Beauharnais, Grand Duchess of Baden

Matters took a sharp turn for all of the Beauharnais clan in January 1810, when Napoleon annulled his marriage to Joséphine so he might marry the Austrian Archduchess Marie-Louise. She retired to Malmaison, while Hortense was pushed aside as first lady of the court; after July of that same year, she wasn’t even the titular queen of Holland since that kingdom was abolished. Her life descended into scandal as she secretly gave birth to a son in Switzerland in 1811, named Charles Demorny, whose name apparently was ‘loaned’ by friends of Joséphine’s back in the French Antilles. Demorny’s actual father was the Comte de Flahaut, an aide-de-camp of General Murat, who was himself—it is supposed—the illegitimate son of the grand statesman Talleyrand. This uterine brother of the future Emperor Napoleon III would later in life re-enter politics and be elevated in rank as the ‘Duc de Morny’ (1862).

After her divorce, Joséphine was permitted to keep the title and rank of a crowned empress-queen and given a huge pension. She was created Duchess of Navarre, and given the estates of that name centred on a castle near Évreux, a town on the borders between the Ile de France and Normandy. The Château de Navarre had been built in the 1320s by the Queen of Navarre, Joan III, in the estates of her husband, a cousin of the royal family, Philippe, Count of Évreux. The castle passed with the county of Evreux back into the royal domain, and then in the 1640s into the possession of the La Tour d’Auvergne family, dukes of Bouillon, who rebuilt the château in the 1680s. It became property of the French state after the extinction of that family in 1801, then was acquired by the Emperor for his wife. The new Duchess of Navarre revived the château and spent time there to be far from the imperial court, quietly entertaining friends. After her death in 1814, she was succeeded in the duchy by Eugène and his sons, who sold the property in 1835; the castle was demolished. Later the Beauharnais family did put forward claims to the title ‘Duke of Navarre’ (in the 1850s), but the French government refused this as they were now seen as members of a foreign ruling house, so could not take the required oath to be a peer of France. The title was therefore considered extinct.

the Chateau de Navarre, painted in the early 19th century before its destruction

Also in 1810, a few months after the divorce, Eugène was named heir to another new state created by Napoleon, the Grand Duchy of Frankfurt, created out of the territories of the Imperial city of Frankfurt and the now secularised territories of the Archbishopric of Mainz. Its first grand duke was the last archbishop, Karl Theodor von Dalberg, who agreed that Eugène would succeed him when he died. Perhaps it was assumed that now that the Emperor had a new wife, a son would follow, who would be the proper heir to the Kingdom of Italy (as in fact happened, with the birth of the ‘King of Rome’ in March 1811). So it was best to get the growing Beauharnais family out of Italy—a son was indeed born to Eugène in 1810. As it happened, Dalberg ceded the Grand Duchy to Eugène before he died, in October 1813, but it was occupied by anti-Bonaparte forces in December, and by 1814 its territories were annexed by the Kingdom of Bavaria.

Despite the perceived great betrayal of his mother, Eugène de Beauharnais remained one of the most steadfast of all of Napoleon’s commanders—more so than most of the Bonapartes themselves, it has to be said. He led the Army of Italy to Russia in the epic campaign of 1812, then was left in command of the overall retreat, the army in tatters. He stayed loyal to his adoptive father in 1814, despite the defections of his father-in-law the King of Bavaria and his step-aunt Caroline Bonaparte and her husband Joachim Murat, the King and Queen of Naples. Eugène even fought against Murat’s Neapolitan troops near Parma, before he realised it was all over with the abdication of the Emperor in April. He retired to his father-in-law’s court in Munich, and renounced any further political activity. In particular, he did not support Napoleon during the Hundred Days (the attempt to restore the Empire, March to July 1815).

In contrast, Hortense, who had been warmly received by the restored King Louis XVIII in 1814, and even created Duchess of Saint-Leu in her own right, did support the Hundred Days, and was therefore banished from France after Waterloo. She settled at the Castle of Arenenberg, in the Swiss canton of Thurgau, on the banks of Lake Constance (purchased in 1817). In 1831, she would return to France with her son, Louis-Napoléon, in an attempt to overthrow the new government of King Louis-Philippe and restore a Bonapartist regime (Louis-Napoléon would eventually succeed in this goal, and became Emperor Napoleon III). Hortense was exiled again to Arenenberg where she died in 1837. This castle, originally built by a 16th-century mayor of the city of Constance, was eventually sold in the 1870s to the Canton of Thurgau which maintains it as a museum.

Hortense and her two sons, Napoleon-Louis and Louis-Napoleon (the future Napoleon III), c1811.
Arenenberg Castle, overlooking Lake Constance

The brief duchy-peerage of Saint-Leu had been based on an estate Louis Bonaparte purchased in 1804 in the northwest suburbs of Paris. It included a château from the 1690s that had briefly been owned by the Duke of Orléans and his mistress Madame de Genlis in the 1790s. Hortense received the estate when she separated from Louis in 1810 (though he himself took the title ‘Comte de Saint-Leu’ once he was no longer King of Holland), and she hosted several glittering fêtes here. But after the fall of the Empire, the house and estate was returned to its original owners, the Princes of Condé, cousins of the King—and after the shocking death, possibly by suicide, of the last Condé prince in the house, it was demolished in 1837 and the estate sold off. It is possible that young Louis-Napoléon could call himself ‘Duc de Saint-Leu’ in the peerage of France, but once he became emperor any claims to this title were absorbed back into the state.

the chateau at Saint-Leu

Meanwhile, Eugène de Beauharnais was swiftly incorporated into his wife’s family in Munich. In November 1817, he was created Duke of Leuchtenberg and Prince of Eichstädt, with the style of Royal Highness (since he had lost the style of Imperial Highness). He and his wife and children lived in the Palais Leuchtenberg in Munich, where the new Duke happily cultivated his art collection until his early death in 1824 at age 42. He lived just long enough, however, to see the first of his children re-enter the ranks of the highest levels of European royalty, when his daughter Joséphine married Prince Oscar Bernadotte (with equally French roots), heir to the thrones of Sweden and Norway. She became queen in 1844 and lived a long a full life in Stockholm.

The dukedom of Leuchtenberg had been an ancient imperial fief, originally a county (created 1158) held by an eponymous noble dynasty in the northeast quarter of Bavaria, near the mountainous borders with Bohemia. In the next generation the family von Leuchtenberg was raised to the rank of landgrave (a higher grade of count), and they maintained their semi-independence as holders of the largest secular fief within Bavaria until their extinction in 1646. The husband of the last heiress, Mechtild, was Duke Albrecht VI of Bavaria, youngest son of Duke Wilhelm V, so he was granted the landgraviate of Leuchtenberg in her name. But he soon ceded this to his brother Maximilian, the new reigning Duke of Bavaria, who in 1650 gave it to his son, Prince Maximilian Philipp and raised it to the rank of a dukedom. When this first Duke of Leuchtenberg died in 1705, the territory was absorbed into the Electorate of Bavaria. As a landgraviate it was given out once more by the Emperor in 1708 (during the War of Spanish Succession, when Bavaria was occupied), to the Austrian Lamberg family, in order to help them qualify fully as Imperial princes (since it was an immediate fief of the Empire); but it was returned to Bavaria at the end of the war in 1713. The castle of Leuchtenberg, one of the largest in what is called the Upper Palatinate, was built around 1300. It fell into disrepair after the extinction of its original dynasty in 1646, then was brought into a state of ruin by a major fire of 1842.

Leuchtenberg Castle (photo Monster4711)
Maximilian Philipp of Bavaria, 1st Duke of Leuchtenberg

The Principality of Eichstädt (today spelled Eichstätt) was, like Leuchtenberg, a former imperial fief that was added to the territories of the House of Bavaria—in this case much more recently. The small town nestled in the valley of the river Altmühl, about halfway between Munich and Nuremberg, had been the seat of an independent bishopric since the 8th century, and formally a principality of the Empire from 1305. It was the home of an important Jesuit college from the 1560s (and is still an important Catholic university in Germany). Like all of the ecclesiastical territories of the Holy Roman Empire, it was secularised in the last years of the Empire’s existence, in 1802, and its lands were annexed by the new Kingdom of Bavaria. It was re-created as a principality for Eugène and his descendants, with large estates, about 20,000 ‘subjects’, and several castles.

Eichstätt Residenz

The main residence of the family thus became the old episcopal palace in Eichstädt, built around 1700 (replacing an older medieval building). A short distance to the east was an episcopal hunting lodge (built about 1690), Schloss Hofstetten. Much closer to Munich and the royal court, the Leuchtenbergs were given a small castle called Ismaning, overlooking the river Isar northeast of the city. This had been the residence of the Prince-Bishop of Freising, whose lands were also secularised in 1802, and was rebuilt in a classical style by Eugène and his wife Princess Augusta. After the principality of Eichstädt was returned to the Bavarian Crown in 1833, Augusta remained at Ismaning, and after her death in 1851, it was sold. Later it was donated to the local municipality and today serves as the town hall.

Schloss Hofstetten
Schloss Ismaning (photo Octavian)

In Munich itself, Eugène and his wife were given a plot to build on across an open square from the Royal Palace (or Residenz)—this was a new district of the city, just outside the old city centre and new aristocratic palaces here were meant to embellish the very grand new boulevard of Ludwigstrasse. The finest architects were chosen and the Palais Leuchtenberg arose, with neo-Renaissance style in emulation of Roman palaces, and over 250 rooms, a ballroom, a chapel, and so on. After Augusta’s death, the palace was sold to her nephew, Prince Luitpold of Bavaria. Badly damaged in World War II, the ruins were acquired by the state and demolished. It was rebuilt in the 1960s, using the old plans, and today houses the Ministry of Finance.

the rebuilt Palais Leuchtenberg in Munich (photo Panoramafreiheit)

After Eugène de Beauharnais’ death in 1824, his son Auguste became the 2nd Duke of Leuchtenberg and Prince of Eichstädt—though he was only 14, so remained under the care of his mother and the rest of the Bavarian royal family. When he was 19, Auguste escorted his younger sister Amélie to Brazil where she became the second wife of Emperor Pedro I—and he was created Duke of Santa Cruz, in the peerage of Brazil (one of the few ducal titles connected to the New World; named for one of the imperial residences near Rio de Janeiro). Back in Europe, he was briefly considered a candidate for the new throne of Belgium in 1831, but not chosen. He had impressed his brother-in-law Emperor Pedro, however, and so in 1834 journeyed to Lisbon where the Emperor’s daughter (by his first marriage) had recently been installed as Queen Maria II. They married in December, and Auguste was created HRH Prince of Portugal. Sadly Auguste died only three months later. The familial link was maintained with Portugal, however, since the Empress Amelia had returned to Europe after the abdication of her husband in 1831, and she lived on in Lisbon until her death in 1873.

The Principality of Eichstädt was ceded back to the Bavarian Crown in 1833, but the Duchy of Leuchtenberg now passed to Eugène’s second son, Maximilien, again, still a teenager. When he was 20 his uncle the King of Bavaria sent him to Russia to take part in military manoeuvres. He was handsome and well-educated, and while he was there, attracted the attention of the Tsar’s daughter, Grand Duchess Maria Nikolaievna. They were wed two years later (1839) in Saint Petersburg, and were required to settle in Russia as Tsar Nicholas stated he could not bear to lose his favourite daughter. It was a love match, and Maximilian converted to Orthodoxy to satisfy the Russian court. In return, he was created Imperial Highness, and the couple was given a plot in Saint Petersburg a short distance from the Winter Palace where they could build a grand residence of their own. Finished in 1844, the Mariinsky Palace (or the ‘Palais Marie’ in French), across the square from St. Isaac’s Cathedral, became one of the major imperial residences and social gathering spots of the city. Today it is still a grand sight, and houses the Legislative Assembly of the City of Saint-Petersburg.

The Mariinsky Palace today (photo Geevee)

Now a Russian prince, Duke Maximilian of Leuchtenberg continued to pursue his passions, notably the study of mineralogy and the patronage of the fine arts. He became a member of the Academy of Sciences and President of the Academy of Arts in 1843. But his trips to survey mining operations in the Urals gave him tuberculosis and he died in 1852—the Beauharnais-Leuchtenberg men do not seem to live to great age! His widow Maria replaced her husband as President of the Academy of Arts—she remained an avid art collector and filled the Mariinsky with treasures. She raised her very young brood of children (the youngest, George, was only 9 months old) here and at their summer country estate Sergievka on the coast near Peterhof, where she and Maximilian had built the Palais Leuchtenberg shortly after their marriage.

Grand Duchess Maria with her two older sons, Nicolas and Sergei, 1850s
the Palais Leuchtenberg at Sergievka (photo Rasaddin)

But in 1854, Grand Duchess Maria secretly married her lover, Count Grigori Stroganov, and they moved abroad, settling in Florence from 1862. She had two more children and died in semi-disgrace in 1876. While this was going on, she sold the remaining estates of the family in Bavaria (1855). Her children were formally entitled Prince and Princess Romanovsky, to indicate their place in the Romanov family. They ranked as Serene Highnesses and their coat of arms was augmented with an imperial crown and placed against a Russian double-headed eagle. They were definitely Bavarians no more.

Beauharnais-Leuchtenberg arms as Princes Romanovsky: quarters starting in upper left are Leuchtenberg, Eichstadt, Beauharnais and something else pertaining to Bavaria (none of the heraldry websites specify–can anyone help?)

The new Duke, Nicholas (or Nikolai Maximilianovitch, Prince Romanovsky), was well placed to make a career on the European stage, related by blood or marriage to the royal families of Bavaria, Portugal, Sweden, and so on. In 1862, his cousin Otto of Bavaria, was deposed as King of Greece, and Nicholas was considered to replace him—as an Orthodox prince he was seen as a good candidate by the Greeks, but his Romanov blood made him suspect by the other Great Powers (notably Britain). It was a similar story when he was considered for the throne of Romania in 1866. Instead he followed his father’s footsteps and studied mineralogy, becoming the President of the Society of Mineralogy in 1865. In 1868, he fled Russia however, since his mistress Nadezhda Annenkova was pregnant. They wished to marry but she was denied a divorce from her first husband. It was a huge scandal. They married anyway, and lived abroad, where two sons were born, in Geneva and in Rome. They eventually settled in Bavaria at Schloss Stein (inherited from an aunt), until the Duke (alone) was restored to grace in 1877 and given a chance to resume his military career, as a lieutenant-general. Finally, in 1890, the marriage was recognised (as morganatic) and the sons were given the title Duke of Leuchtenberg, now a Russian creation (with the rank of ‘Highness’, ie not imperial or royal). The two boys, Nicholas and George, eventually did come from Bavaria to Russia, but not until after the deaths of their parents in 1891. We will return to them below.

Nicolas, 4th Duke of Leuchtenberg, Prince Romanovsky
The Upper and Lower castles at Stein, Bavaria (photo Schulleitung)

The full imperial and ducal titles thus passed to the second son, Eugene (Evgeny). Unlike his sisters, Maria and Eugenia, who had married ‘properly’ into other European ruling dynasties (Baden and Oldenburg), the 5th Duke of Leuchtenberg followed his brother’s example and married for love. In 1869, he married Daria Konstantinova Opotschinina, who was created ‘Countess of Beauharnais’ by the Tsar. They had one daughter, then Daria died. He remarried in 1878, his wife’s first cousin, Zenaïde (‘Zina’) Skobeleva, but had no further children. The 5th Duke was very close to the Tsar, as he had been raised within the Imperial family after the departure of his mother (Grand Duchess Maria) for Italy in the 1860s, and rose through the ranks of the army, as Division General in the Russo-Turkish Wars of the 1870s, retiring as a lieutenant-general in 1886. His rank at court was raised from Serene Highness to Imperial Highness in 1890 (the same year as his brother’s sons were denied a similar styling), and his wife’s rank was raised to ‘Duchess of Leuchtenberg’ as well. His daughter, also called Daria, Countess of Beauharnais, lived well into the 20th century, but on a return visit to Russia in the 1930s she was arrested and executed.

Eugene, 5th Duke of Leuchtenberg

After the death of Eugene, 5th Duke of Leuchtenberg and Prince Romanovsky, in 1901, these titles passed to his youngest brother, George. That same year, the new 6th Duke was considered, as now has been seen several times for this family, for a sovereign throne, this time the Kingdom of Serbia. Again his Russian blood was seen as both an asset and a problem, to different European powers, but his chances were boosted because he also had a Balkan wife, Princess Anastasia of Montenegro. Serbia had a coup in 1903, however, and the old dynasty was overthrown—the new king had a son and heir, so George of Leuchtenberg-Romanovsky was no longer needed. His marriage was also at an end, and in 1906 he and Anastasia divorced. He left her for a French mistress, and died in Paris in 1912. Anastasia remarried Grand Duke Nikolai Nikolaievich of Russia, a prominent imperial general and commander-in-chief of Russian forces at the start of World War I.

George, 6th Duke of Leuchtenberg

The 6th Duke’s elder son, Alexander, was born from a previous marriage, to Duchess Theresa of Oldenburg (who was herself already considered part of the Russian royal family, as her branch of the House of Oldenburg had moved to Russia at the very start of the 19th century). Alexander (or ‘Sandro’) was now 7th Duke of Leuchtenberg, and Captain of the Hussars of the Imperial Guard. In 1909 it was rumoured he was going to marry the daughter of US industrialist George Jay Gould, but nothing came of this. He did marry, in 1917, Nadezhda Carelli, but they had no children. Coming from one of the most connected princely houses in Europe, in March 1917, the Duke tried to get the British ambassador to Russia to help his Romanov cousins; then in 1918, he went to Berlin to seek aid from Wilhelm II. Neither of course was successful, and Sandro escaped to France where he settled in the Pyrenees near the southern border. He died there in 1942.

Alexander, 7th Duke of Leuchtenberg, as a young man

The 8th and last Duke of Leuchtenberg (of the Bavarian creation) and Prince Romanovsky (of the Russian creation) was the 6th Duke’s younger son (the child of Anastasia of Montenegro). As a young man, Sergei had been close to his step-father, Grand Duke Nikolai, served in the navy during World War I, and after brief capture by the Bolsheviks, participated in naval activities for the Whites in the Black Sea. He then settled in Rome. The 8th Duke never married and died in 1974, the last of the fully royal branch of the House of Beauharnais. His sister, Elena, had died in 1971, leaving as a widow Count Stefan Tyszkiewicz, from a Polish magnate family, who became a car designer in London. Their daughter, Countess Natalia, who died in 2003, was the last of the line. It would be interesting to know what, if anything, was left of the family fortune, whether she inherited any of it, and where it went after her death.

Sergei, 8th Duke of Leuchtenberg, Prince Romanovsky

We do know that much of the fortune, including the Beauharnais collection of artworks, if not the princely titles, had already passed from the 4th Duke to his morganatic sons. As noted above, the elder of these sons, Nicolas, re-created as duke of Leuchtenberg by the Tsar in 1890, returned to Russia, sold off his possessions in Bavaria, and purchased a new estate at Gory, near Novgorod, and a mansion in Saint Petersburg. He was a major-general in the famous Preobrazhensky Regiment, and fought in the First World War. After the Revolution, and brief involvement in the Whites (the royal counter-revolutionaries) in Ukraine, he settled in the south of France—where he took up once more the old family title of Marquis de La Ferté-Beauharnais—at the Château de Ruth, in the Vaucluse near Orange, where he grew grapes and produced wine until he died in 1928 (since 2010, these wineries have belonged to another proprietor).

Duke Nikolai Nikolaievich of Leuchtenberg, in costume for a ball, 1903

Brother George was also a captain in a Russian guards unit from the 1890s, and President of the Saint Petersburg Historical Society. After the Revolution, he settled at another old family property in Bavaria, the former monastery of Seeon, and wrote history books. He is perhaps best remembered as a host to Anna Anderson in the 1920s at Seeon, supporting her claims to be the lost Grand Duchess Anastasia, before she moved on to the United States. The former abbey of Seeon, founded in the 10th century, was built on an island in a lake in the southeast corner of Bavaria; secularised from 1803 and owned by the Leuchtenbergs from the 1850s until 1934, it is today owned by the state and opened as a cultural centre.

the monastery of Seeon in its lake, with the Bavarian Alps in the distance (photo Simon Waldherr)

Both Nicholas and George had several sons. Of the younger line, Dimitry de Leuchtenberg (the name he used), moved to Québec and became a well-known promoter of the professionalization of the sport of skiing (d. 1972); his brother Constantine’s family settled in Ontario. Of the elder line, Nicolas settled with his uncle George at Seeon in Bavaria where he died (1937); while his younger son Sergei emigrated to the United States, his elder son Duke Nicolaus von Leuchtenberg, Marquis de La Ferté-Beauharnais (b. 1933), remained in Germany. He is a retired television engineer in Munich. The current head of the family had two sons, but only one, Constantin (b. 1965) is still living—he is unmarried, and none of the other branches have male heirs, so it is probable the entire House of Beauharnais-Leuchtenberg will soon be extinct.

Duke Nicolaus von Leuchtenberg, head of the House of Beauharnais today (photo BR)

Lobkowicz Princes: Survivors of the Great Bohemian Purge

The Kingdom of Bohemia has a unique place in European history. As the only kingdom within the boundaries of the Holy Roman Empire, and the only mostly Slavic state in a sea of German principalities, it was an anomaly, as were its leading noble families in the middle ages. These Bohemian lords, speaking Czech, always had an independent streak, for example jumping on the idea of a reformation of the Catholic Church long before Martin Luther and his 95 theses. Many Bohemian nobles then did embrace the Lutheran reforms—and this led them into trouble when their very Catholic king re-conquered the country in 1620. Many prominent Bohemian noble houses were simply wiped out, replaced wholesale by Catholic families from Austria and other parts of the Empire. One of the few native survivors were the lords of Lobkowicz, who not only survived, they thrived. Raised to the unprecedented rank of Prince of the Empire in 1624, they one of the very first of the ‘new princes’ created by the Habsburg emperors in the seventeenth century to solidify the loyalty of the upper aristocracy of Central Europe.

Hasištejn Castle, one of the many Lobkowicz castles that cover the forested hills of northern Bohemia

The House of Lobkowicz (or Lobkowitz in German, and Lobkovic in modern Czech) was not ancient, as noble families go. Genealogists trace their founding ancestor to a squire in the late 14th century, Mikuláš ‘Chudý’ (Nicholas ‘the Poor’), who hailed from the region of northern Bohemia where the two main rivers of the Kingdom, the Labe (or Elbe) and the Vltava (or Moldau) come together. The former drained Bohemia’s northern forested mountains, while the later came out of the hills of the southwest and passed through the capital Prague, before joining the Elbe and flowing north into Saxony and across the North German plain to the sea. The Vltava’s journey across Bohemia is famously portrayed in music by the Czech composer Bedřich Smetana in 1874.

Mikuláš Chudý attended Charles University in Prague and gained the attention of King Václav (or Wenceslas) IV, as one of his scribes. He rose through the ranks of the royal administration and was created Grand Scribe of the Kingdom in 1417. Meanwhile, the King made him a landed nobleman by granting him an estate, Lobkovice, near his place of origin, and he took this as his surname. He rebuilt the old fortress there as a gothic style castle, and his family have owned it—with a few breaks—continuously ever since. It is not certain where this village got its name, but one story relates it to the love of the hunt (lov in Czech), which is certainly apt for a noble estate.

Lobkowicz Castle drawn in 1819

In 1418, Mikuláš z (‘of’) Lobkowicz helped his royal patron Václav IV secure the castles of several rebels in the far north-western reaches of the Kingdom, and was given several to keep for himself, notably Hasištejn which guarded one of the main roads from Prague to Saxony. Like many of Bohemia’s castles, Hasištejn had been originally built by a noble family who habitually crossed this northern frontier and had a dual identity (and name) as both Germans and Czechs (in this case Schönberg and Šumburka), and so it also had a German name, Hassenstein. Hašistejn Castle became the main seat of the senior branch of the family, who were thus called the Hasištejnský z Lobkowicz, until the senior line became extinct. Hasištejn Castle itself, however, was mostly abandoned by the family in the 16th century, then damaged by a major fire. It is still owned by the family but remains in ruins.

Hasištejn Castle ruins today

The two sons of Mikuláš the founder, Mikuláš II and Jan Popel, built on their father’s successes and were raised to the level of Freiherr (free lord or baron), of the Empire in 1459. Though the Habsburgs were not yet permanently kings of Bohemia, this was the first contact between the Austrian ruling dynasty and the House of Lobkowicz, a close relationship that would endure for the next 500 years. The sons of Mikuláš II would later (1479) also be created barons of Bohemia, which ensured them a voice in the Kingdom’s House of Lords. Mikuláš II married an important heiress, Žofie ze Žirotina, whose family, the lords of Žirotín, had been prominent warriors and knights in north Bohemia for centuries, and conveniently died out at this time. Mikuláš added their black eagle to his family’s fairly plain red on white coat-of-arms, thus adding some noble lustre to the rather nouveau lineage of the House of Lobkowicz.

Original Arms of House of Lobkowicz (photo VitVit)

The most famous member of the early House of Lobkowicz was Lord Bohuslav (d. 1510), a renowned humanist writer and poet, who built up an enormous library at Hasištejn Castle. He had studied at the famous universities in Italy and while there renounced Utraquism, the uniquely Bohemian faith that had challenged orthodox Catholicism in the 15th century. He was rewarded with the prestigious court post of Provost of Vyšegrad, the older royal castle just outside of Prague. Bohuslav travelled to the Holy Land in 1490 and later wrote about his travels, all the while accumulating more books and manuscripts for his great library. The Lobkowicz Library still exists today, split between the family’s palace in Prague and the Castle of Nelahozeves, about 11 miles north of the city, which has recently been remodelled to house and display much of the family’s great collections (see below).

Bohuslav’s older brother, Jan II, Baron of Lobkowicz, served as a diplomat for King Vladislav II in the 1470s-80s, an envoy to various cities in the Low Countries and to Rome. He too went on pilgrimage to the Holy Land and wrote a book about it. He also founded a monastery at Kadaň, near the castle of Hasištejn. Jan II relocated his seat to lands acquired by the founder of the family in the more central fertile valley near Lobkovice itself, Castle Obříství, and his branch took that name, while Hasištejnský was used by a junior branch. The senior line remained barons throughout its history, and by the 18th and 19th centuries had moved into service in Bavaria and Austria. The last Baron von Lobkowitz died in 1961. The junior line were a bit more prominent, notably in the person of another Bohuslav, who became vogt (or governor) of Lower Lusatia in 1555 (another Slavic region, just north of Bohemia, across the mountains, now in Germany), then Chief Justice of Bohemia in 1570, and finally Grand Chamberlain of Bohemia, one of the most senior members of the royal court in Prague, in 1576. Two members of this branch were rectors of the University of Wittenberg in Saxony in the middle of the 16th century—which indicates that this branch of the family had become firmly Lutheran—and several of the daughters of this branch married into mixed Saxon/Bohemian noble houses, like the Schönburgs (see above) or the Schwambergs (Švamberka). This line also remained barons, until their extinction in the early 17th century.

The second major branch of the Lobkowicz family, founded by Jan Popel (d. 1470), produced all the later lines of counts and princes. Until the extinction of the Hasištejnská branch, they used the additional surname ‘Popel’, taken from the village of Popelov in Českolipska (in the far north of the Kingdom). The word popel in Czech means ‘ashes’, and the family turned this into a punning motto: ‘Popel jsem a popel budu’ (‘I am ashes and ashes I will be’), reminiscent of the lines spoken about piety humility at a Christian funeral. This branch split in the early 16th century into the Bílina branch and the Chlumec branch, named for their primary residences. As above, it was the cadet branch that surpassed the senior branch in prominence, so before we get to the line of princes, we should look at the line of counts. The Castle of Bílina was in northwest Bohemia, near the mountains. It was famous for its spa waters—developed as an international business in the 18th century. The castle was built in the 13th century, and acquired in 1502 by this branch of the Lobkowicz family. Violently re-catholicised after the revolt of 1620, they nonetheless held on to it, rebuilt it as a baroque palace in the 1670s, then passed it to the line of princes by marriage in the early 18th century. The spa was developed as a major resort in the 1870s, with stunning buildings including a faux Roman temple. Like many properties, Bílina was confiscated by the state after the Second World War, then restored to the family after the fall of Communism. The spa was sold to a private company in 1997 (and they still sell the famous bottled water).

Bílina Castle today (photo SchiDD)
Bílina and its spa, 1899
spa water today

Prominent members of this branch included Kryštof (Christoph) ‘the Younger’ (d. 1609), who was a key supporter of Emperor Rudolf II who moved his capital from Vienna to Prague (by this point the Habsburgs were both Holy Roman Emperors and kings of Bohemia). Kryštof was an important diplomat, sent to Spain to help keep the branches of the Habsburg family united in the late 16th century, and hosting envoys from Poland when they visited Rudolf’s court. Another cousin prominent at Rudolf’s court was Děpolt Matouš (Leopold Matthias; d. 1619), a senior member of the Order of Malta in Bohemia, who was appointed Viceroy of the Kingdom of Bohemia in 1591 (a royal placeholder for when the Emperor-King was absent). He was one of the four Regents of the Kingdom who were assaulted by Protestant rebels in Prague Castle in May 1618, but he was removed from the room just before the famous Defenestration (see below). Another cousin, Jiři (George), was an especial royal favourite of Rudolf, but belongs to the junior Popel branch, so we’ll return to him below.

Děpolt Matouš, Baron Lobkowicz

From this branch, Vilém (William) ‘the Elder’ (d. 1626), brother of Kryštof, was a leader of the Protestant nobles in Bohemia. Though he had frequently served the Habsburgs as governor of the western counties of the Kingdom, he avidly joined the revolt of 1618, and personally threw one of the Habsburg ministers out of the window of Prague Castle in the famous Defenestration that sparked the Thirty Years War. One of the few Protestant nobles to escape the death penalty after their defeat in 1620, he was nevertheless imprisoned and dispossessed of his major estate, Horšovský Týn. This castle, in the mountains in the west of Bohemia, had belonged to the bishops of Prague since the 12th century (its German name is Bischofteinitz), but was acquired by this branch of the Lobkowicz family in 1542, and transformed into a modern Renaissance palace. After confiscation, it was given to the powerful Austrian house of Trauttmansdorf, so it remains part of their story (a future blog post), well into the 20th century.

a contemporary print of the Defenestration of Prague, May 1618
Horšovský Týn (photo Jik jik)

In contrast, Vilém ‘the Younger’ (d. 1647) stayed very loyal to the Catholic Habsburgs, bought up lots of confiscated estates after 1620, and was appointed Judge of the Court in 1628, and after 1634, Grand Master of the Hunt of Bohemia, an office that became hereditary in his line. Vilém and his wife, Benigna Kateřina (herself born a Lobkowicz), demonstrated their wealth and their Catholic piety by building one of the most magnificent buildings in Prague, the Loreta ‘Santa Casa’ (to emulate the ‘Holy House’ of the Virgin Mary in Loreto, Italy), right next to the Royal Palace. The Baroness financed most of he project from the estates she had acquired from defeated Czech Protestants. From these beginnings the Loreto complex would continue to rise thanks to Lobkowicz patronage later in the century.

Loreta Santa Casa, Prague (photo Balou 46)

This incredibly wealthy couple’s son, Baron Kryštof Ferdinand (d. 1658)—who was given his second name as a display of loyalty to the new (and very Catholic) Habsburg Emperor and King of Bohemia, Ferdinand II—was appointed viceroy of Silesia (then still a dependency of the Bohemian Crown), while his son, Václav Ferdinand (d. 1697), became a busy ambassador for the emperor, in Bavaria, France, Spain and England, and was elevated to the rank of Count of the Empire, in 1670. He was awarded the Order of he Golden Fleece, the highest honour in the Habsburg world, in 1695. His marriage to Maria Sophia von Dietrichstein highlights the integration in this century of the native Czech nobility with new Austrian families being imported into Bohemia: her father was a Prince of Dietrichstein, while her mother was a princess of the House of Liechtenstein. Her brother was, like her husband, a major diplomat in this period of strained Spanish-Austrian relations.

But the branch of Lobkowicz counts did not last very long. After Václav Ferdinand’s death, and that of his son, Count Leopold Joseph, in 1707, he was succeeded as head of this branch by his cousin Count Ferdinand Vilém (d. 1708), already eminent as president of the Bohemian Court of Appeals and even Viceroy of the Kingdom of Bohemia (from 1670), and then by his brother Count Oldřich Felix, who was the family’s last hereditary Master of the Hunt of Bohemia, who was killed ignominiously—probably while on a hunt—by a falling tree in 1722.

The next line down the tree of this Popel branch of the House of Lobkowicz was based in Zbiroh, one of the grandest Renaissance castles still extant in the Czech Republic, with an ancient Gothic castle at its core, including a chapel from the mid-1200s. It has been held by various noble families, and at times by the Bohemian Crown itself, and served as a residence for famous European scholars and visiting dignitaries, and as a prison for Protestant nobles during the Thirty Years War, including Baron Vilém ‘the Elder’ of Lobkowicz. Jan III had originally acquired Zbiroh, along with the much more rugged looking fortress of Točník, in the mid-16th century. Both are in the western part of Bohemia. But Jan III spent a lot of his time at court in Prague, as he was (since the 1540s) Grand Justiciar of the Kingdom and Master of the Royal Household.

Zbiroh Castle (photo Marek Vidtman)
Točník Castle (photo Cevenol2)

When he died in 1569, Jan III was succeeded by six sons. The eldest, also Jan, continued his father’s career in high positions in the royal judiciary. Other sons were given posts in local government as ‘hetmen’ or marshals of Bohemian districts. The fifth son, Jiři, rose to greater heights and became a favourite of Emperor-King Rudolf II. At first Grand Chamberlain of Bohemia (1582), he added his father’s office of Grand Justiciar, then in 1585 his uncle’s office of Grand Master of the Household, the second highest position in the Kingdom. He ardently pursued Protestants, and forcibly reclaimed and re-founded the monastery in his family’s lands at Kadaň. But Jiři of Zbiroh felt he was not rewarded sufficiently for his zeal, and in 1593 turned against Rudolf, hoping the other Bohemian nobles would rise with him. They didn’t, and in 1594 he was captured, stripped of his lands and titles, and held in prison for the many years. His older brother Ladislav III also joined the rebellion, fled the country and was condemned to death–he left behind a gorgeous portrait. He was pardoned just before he died, but when his son died (1614), the Zbiroh branch became extinct. The castle passed into royal hands until it was sold in the 1860s

Baron Jiři Popel z Lobkowicz
Ladislav III

This finally takes us to the most junior branch, but the one that rose the highest. The uncle of Grand Master Jiři, Ladislav II, had held this position from 1570 to 1585. He founded a separate line of the family based at the castle Chlumec (or Vysoký [‘high’] Chlumec), in the forested hills south of Prague. This castle, built in the 14th century, was acquired by the Lobkowiczes in 1474, and remained one of the main family seats in Bohemia until the 20th century. Like most of their castles, it was confiscated in World War II, nationalised under the Communists, then restored in the 1990s—but this one was not retained, and in 1998 was sold to a relative, Count von Arco-Zinneberg.

Vysoký Chlumec Castle (photo ŠJů)

Ladislav’s eldest son, Ladislav the Younger, rose to become another of Rudolf II’s favourites, Captain of his guard, and eventually Governor of Moravia, 1615, where he started the process of re-Catholicising this separate province of the Bohemian Crown. He also extended his influence outside of Bohemia, having married two countesses of the prominent imperial family of Salm-Neuburg, and acquired a lease, then the fief outright in 1575, of two immediate imperial territories in Franconia just across the western Bohemian border. ‘Immediate’ means there’s no other lord above you in the feudal chain besides the emperor, and this will be important later. These two fiefs were called Sternstein (today spelled Störnstein) and Neustadt an der Waldnaab, and they had been possessions of the kings of Bohemia since the mid-14th century. The old castle of Sternstein sits high on a rock overlooking the river Floß, which flows out of the hills into the ‘New Town’ (Neu Stadt) on the Waldnaab river, which flows south and becomes simply the Naab before it joins the Danube at Regensberg. The old castle at Sternstein was already a ruin by the time Ladislav of Lobkowicz acquired it, and the rest was pulled down to provide materials to refurbish the Old Schloss at Neustadt. This castle became the main seat of this branch of the family until a New Schloss was built, in a fashionable Italian style, in the 1680s. The family abandoned both castles in the early 18th century, however, and they were sold altogether to the King of Bavaria in 1807.

the Old Castle at Neustadt (photo btr)
the New Castle at Neustadt (photo btr)

Ladislav’s younger brother, Zdeněk Vojtěch (also called Zdenko in German) inherited these Franconian properties in 1621, and in 1624 was raised to the rank of ‘Prince of the Empire’. As noted at the start, these so-called ‘new princes’ were created by Habsburg emperors starting in the 1620s as a means of building up more support (primarily Catholic) for their rule in the Imperial council of princes—since several of the older princely houses had now become Protestant (like Brandenburg, Brunswick or Nassau). Lobkowitz (as it was now being increasingly spelled, and its members increasingly speaking German, but I’ll keep using the old Czech spelling) was one of the very first of these new princes. There was a major qualification required, however, in that the new princes had to own an immediate fief, and one that was deemed to be of princely rank. From 1641, therefore, the fief of Sternstein was declared a sovereign Imperial County, and its owners full Imperial Princes. This great honour was first won by Zdenko, who, like so many of his kinsmen rose in the service of Emperor Rudolf II, to become Grand Chancellor of Bohemia (1599). He remained in this post under Rudolf’s successors, Matthias and Ferdinand II.

Zdeněk Vojtěch, 1st Prince of Lobkowicz

His wife also played a major role in the family’s elevation: Polyxena z Pernštejna (or von Pernstein) was from another major Bohemian noble house, daughter of the previous Grand Chancellor, and of a Spanish aristocrat, Maximiliana Manrique de Lara. She was also widow and heiress of the incredibly wealthy Vilém z Rožmberka (von Rosenberg). From her father she inherited the fabulous Pernstein Palace in Prague, and from her first husband the majestic Roudnice (Raudnitz in German) Castle north of the city. Rožmberka’s fortune was used by Polyxena to buy up lots of confiscated properties of Protestant nobles after the Battle of White Mountain in 1620, like Nelahozeves and Dolní Beřkovice (see below), and even to re-acquire some old Lobkowicz properties like Obříství. Together Zdenko and Polyxena were the leaders of the Catholic faction at the court of Prague, and Polyxena famously defended the Habsburg ministers in her palace immediately following the Defenestration of 23 May 1618.

Polyxena z Pernštejna, 1st Princess of Lobkowicz
A 19th-century historicist-style painting of Polyxena defending the Hahsburg ministers in her palace after the Defenestration (by Václav Brožík)

Pernstein Palace, now renamed Lobkowicz Palace, had been built by Polyxena’s father in the late 16th century, at the far end of the narrow ridge upon which earlier Bohemian kings had constructed the Royal Palace and the basilicas of St Vitus and St George. After centuries of Lobkowicz possession, it was confiscated by the Nazis in 1939, and finally restored to the family in 2002 (opened soon after as a museum), and is today the only part of the Prague Royal Castle complex in private hands.

Lobkowicz Palace at the far right end of Castle Hill (Hradčany) in Prague
Lobkowicz Palace, Prague, main entrance (photo VitVit)

As noted above, the other parts of the Lobkowicz collection on display today are in a restored castle a few miles north of Prague, Nelahozeves, which had been built as a country retreat by the Habsburgs in the mid-16th century, and afterwards purchased by Polyxena, 1st Princess of Lobkowicz in 1623. It became mostly an administrative centre for the dynasty rather than a residence. After the family regained possession in 1993, they immediately re-opened it as an art gallery with temporary exhibitions, then launched the first of its permanent displays in 1997 which featured some of the most significant works from the Lobkowicz Collections. The town of Nelahozeves’s other claim to fame is as the birthplace of composer Antonín Dvořák (in 1841).

Nelahozeves Castle

The 2nd Prince of Lobkowicz (from 1628) was Wenzel (Václav) Eusebius, one of the most influential statesmen in 17th-century Europe. As President of the Imperial War Council in Vienna from 1652, then President of the Imperial Privy Council from 1669, he was essentially the first minister for Emperor Leopold. He became increasingly tied to the pro-French faction at court from the 1670s, however, which led to clashes with the Emperor, to the extent that he was arrested in 1674 and sent to his residence at Roudnice, where he died three years later.

Václav Eusebius, 2nd Prince of Lobkowitz

Roudnice, located on the River Elbe, about 20 miles north of Prague, was built to guard one of the major crossing points of the river in the 12th century. Rebuilt in the 15th century as the summer residence of the bishops of Prague, it was later sold to various nobles and eventually to Vilém z Rožmberka. The 2nd Prince of Lobkowicz made it his seat in the 1650s, hiring Italian architects to remodel it as a grand residence worthy of princes, adding a chapel, theatre, clock tower and formal gardens. During the Communist era, Roudnice housed a state music school, which remained after it was restored to the Lobkowicz family for two more decades, and since 2009 it has been opened to the public as a museum.

Roudnice Castle (photo Harke)

The 2nd Prince confirmed his family’s princely status with the recognition of the County of Sternstein as an immediate imperial fief in 1641. This was confirmed in 1652 and he was admitted as a fully voting member of the Council of Princes of the Empire. To bolster this new status even further, he married not a Czech noblewoman, but an Imperial princess, from a junior branch of the Wittelsbach family (the Counts Palatine of Sulzbach), and in 1646 he purchased the formerly sovereign duchy of Sagan in Silesia, a Polish province that had been part of the Crown of Bohemia since the 14th century (Żagań in Polish). The duchy, the northernmost of Silesia’s numerous component dukedoms, had been ruled by a branch of the former royal dynasty of Poland, the Piasts, then by the kings of Bohemia, the dukes of Saxony, and again Bohemia. In 1627, Ferdinand II gave it to his leading general, Wallenstein, but confiscated it again after his betrayal in 1634. The Lobkowicz princes rebuilt its castle as a baroque palace, but after the entire province of Silesia was conquered by Prussia in the 1740s, they sold it to another German princely house, the Birons, in 1786.

Lobkowicz Castle in Żagań (Sagan), Poland (photo Stefan Fussan)

The coat-of-arms of the princely branch of the House of Lobkowicz was by now more complex: with elements for Pernštejn (the bull’s head); for the duchy of Sagan (the angel and the golden lion), and for the duchy of Silesia (the black eagle); for Sternstein and Neustadt (the star and mountains for Sternstein—literally ‘star stones’—and black and gold stripes); and the Lobkowicz family arms overall.

Lobkowicz Princes as Dukes of Silesia-Sagan and Counts of Sternstein

The 3rd Prince of Lobkowicz, Ferdinand-August, was less prominent, but maintained his father’s place on the Imperial Privy Council and the family’s place amongst the high Habsburg aristocracy by being awarded the Golden Fleece in 1689. At first excluded from high politics due to his father’s disgrace, by the 1690s he had repaired the damage and acted first as formal Representative of the Emperor at the Imperial Diet in Regensburg (1691-98), then as Master of the Household of Empress Amalia, wife of Joseph I (1698-1708). Like his father, Ferdinand-August also demonstrated the family’s new social prominence through his marriages, first to a princess of the House of Nassau, then a princess from Baden-Baden. They were now genuinely part of the trans-national princely order of Central Europe. The 3rd Prince was particularly known as a connoisseur of fine paintings—adding Veronese, Rubens, Breughel and Cranach to the family art collections—as well as musical scores. His son, Philipp Hyazinth, the 4th Prince, continued this trend and collected musical scores, including some from far-off England. His wife, Eleonora Carolina, was the heiress of the Bílina branch of the Lobkowicz family, so added that castle to their domains, along with another, a bit further into the western mountains, Jezeři, or Eisenberg. This medieval castle had been held by various noble families until it was confiscated in the rebellion of 1618 and granted to Vilém ‘the Younger’ of Lobkowicz. In the 18th and 19th centuries it was used as a hunting lodge; in the 20th it was nearly destroyed by coal mining.

Ferdinand August, 3rd Prince
Jezeři Castle, in the western mountains of Bohemia (photo SchiDD)

By the mid-18th century, therefore, the Lobkowicz family had enough estates to create a second majorat (an estate held together by rules of entail), which was done for the 4th Prince’s younger brother, Prince Johann Georg Christian (Jan Jiří Kristián), a successful soldier in Habsburg service who was Governor of Sicily in 1732, Field Marshal in Transylvania and Bohemia, then Commander-in-Chief of forces in Italy and Governor of Milan, 1743-44. His branch, called the Second Majorat branch, or the Mělnik branch, would give numbers to their heads like the senior branch, and continue to the present—we’ll pick them up again towards the end below.

The 5th Prince of Lobkowicz was just a teenager when he succeeded, and died just two years later in 1739. So the 6th Prince, Ferdinand Philipp (d. 1784) headed the family for the middle of the 18th century. He went against tradition by supporting Frederick the Great in his war against the Habsburgs in the 1740s, in an attempt to safeguard his duchy of Sagan (since Silesia was taken by Frederick early in the war). He therefore spent a lot of time away from Vienna, living for a spell in London. But when he returned to Bohemia, he acquired a second major city palace in Prague, on the outskirts of the old city, the much grander Palais Lobkowicz, sometimes called the Kvasejovic Palace after its original builder, Count Kvasejovic—he had it constructed in 1702 but almost immediately sold it due to financial difficulties. The Lobkowicz family acquired it in 1753 and moved out of the older, more cramped palace up on the Hradčany. In 1927, this much grander palace was sold to the new Czechoslovak state which used it as the Ministry of Education. From 1948 it was the Embassy of the People’s Republic of China, then since 1974 the Federal Republic of Germany.

Ferdinand Philipp, 6th Prince
Palais Lobkowicz in Prague (photo Raymond Spekking)

The family of course by now needed a permanent seat in the imperial capital of Vienna as well, so the 6th Prince purchased in 1745 the Dietrichstein Palace, one of the first major baroque palaces that had been built after the Second Siege of Vienna of 1683, when Imperial aristocrats felt secure in the expansion of Vienna into a truly imperial capital. This palace was very close to the Habsburg imperial palace complex, across the street from what is today called the Albertina. From the mid-19th century, the family let it out and mostly lived in Bohemia, in Roudnice or in Prague, and it served for many years as the Embassy of France. After the First World War, the Palais Lobkowitz was the Czechoslovak embassy, then after the Second World War, it was the Institut Français. In 1980 it was finally sold outright to the Austrian government, and today it houses the Theatre Museum, a wing of the Kunsthistorisches Museum.

Lobkowitzplatz in Vienna, by Bernardo Bellotto (c1760) with Palais Lobkowitz on the left (St Stephens in the background)

Both Lobkowicz palaces in Prague and Vienna are also known for their connections to the composer Ludwig van Beethoven. The 7th Prince, Joseph Franz Maximilian, like his ancestors, had a passion for music, and was himself a talented cellist and singer. He participated in the founding of the Society of Friends of Music in Vienna (better known as the Musikverein), which first met in his Vienna palace, and he was a director of the Court Theatre. The Prince was a patron of both Haydn and Beethoven, who dedicated several symphonies to him—the 3rd Symphony was premiered in his Vienna palace in 1804 (and the hall was thereafter referred to as the ‘Eroica Hall’); while many of his works were premiered in Prague at the Palais Lobkowicz. Beethoven dedicated his 5th and 6th symphonies both to the Prince and to his brother-in-law and fellow patron, Count Razumovsky.

Joseph Franz Maximilian, 7th Prince von Lobkowitz, patron of Beethoven

By this point, the Duchy of Sagan had been sold, so in 1786, the Emperor rewarded the family’s renewed loyalty with the title Duke of Raudnitz (the German name for Roudnice). As the Holy Roman Empire was dissolved in 1806, the imperial county of Sternstein did not survive as an independent state within the new German Confederation, so the 7th Prince sold his estates there to the new King of Bavaria. His son, Ferdinand Joseph, 8th Prince of Lobkowicz (d. 1868), solidified their hold on princely status however by obtaining the honorific title of Durchlaucht (‘Serene Highness’) in 1825 (this was initially for the head of the family only, but in 1869 it was extended to all members of the senior line), and eventually a seat as hereditary member in the Austrian House of Lords in 1861. He married a Lichtenstein princess, as many of these old Viennese families continued to be intertwined dynastically well into the 19th century. The 8th Prince also began to modernise the family business, embracing the entrepreneurial spirit of the 19th century by opening a large sugar factory in Bílina.

Ferdinand Joseph, 8th Prince

The 8th Prince had many brothers, and the estates were divided to create several new sub-lineages. Prince Johann Nepomuk founded the line of Křimice. The next brother Prince Joseph Franz, who served as Head of Household of the Empress Elisabeth (the famous ‘Sisi’), founded the line of Dolni Beřkovice. See more on these lines below. The fourth brother, Prince Ludwig Johann, founded a line in Hungary (ext. 1918); while the youngest, Karl Johann (Karel Jan), rose in the Imperial administration to become Governor of Lower Austria in 1858, of Moravia in 1860, and of Tyrol in 1861—but left no descendants.

Prince Karl Johann / Karel Jan

The 9th Prince (Moritz Alois) and the 10th Prince (Ferdinand Zdenko) continued to lead prominent lives in Vienna and Prague, both with seats on the Privy Council and both awarded the Order of the Golden Fleece. By the end of the 19th century, they were one of the largest landowners in the entire Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, with nearly 30,000 hectares. The 10th Prince (d. 1938), was particularly close to the last Habsburg emperor, Carl, as he had been his chamberlain since 1907. After the war, reform acts passed by the new Czechoslovak government reduced the family landholdings by about 80% in return for monetary compensation. The Prince was a loyal supporter of this new regime, and ceased using his titles; both of his eldest sons embraced the new world and married for love, renouncing their claims to the (now empty) titles of Prince of Lobkowicz and Duke of Roudnice, which in theory passed to their cousins (below).

Ferdinand Zdenko (Zdeněk), 10th Prince

The second son, Maximilian, was, like his father, a republican, and, having married an Englishwoman in 1924, served as a diplomat for Czechoslovakia in the crucial years during the Second World War. He was formally exiled from Czechoslovakia in the late 1940s, became the head of the family (after the death of his nephew, a jazz musician, in 1964), and died in Massachusetts in 1967. His grandson William Lobkowicz (b. 1961) returned to the Czech Republic in the 1990s to work for the restoration of the family’s main properties, the Lobkowicz Palace in Prague, Roudnice Castle, the art collections, and so on. His older brother Martin (b. 1954) is the lineal head of the family. Today the family maintains interesting connections with their native Boston, for example, in 2023 Boston Baroque is sponsoring a programme of music connected to the Lobkowicz Collections in Prague.

Maximilian Lobkowicz
William Lobkowicz, at Roudnice (photo Michal Novotny)

One of the first family residences to be restored in the 1990s and re-opened for tourism is Střekov Castle (aka Schreckenstein), built upon a rocky outcrop far above the Elbe. Over the centuries it became a symbol of Northern Bohemia, an inspiration for poets, painters and musicians. Střekov Castle had been built by the King of Bohemia in the 14th century to collect tolls on the river, and then given to various vassals until it was sold to the Lobkowicz family in 1563, who rebuilt and expanded it. By the 17th century it was uninhabited, however, and fell to ruin. Like all other noble properties, it was confiscated in 1948, and was restored in the early 1990s.

Střekov Castle (photo Rudko)

The princely title—though no longer recognised by the Czechoslovak or Austrian governments—passed in 1938 with the death of the last prince to conclude a dynastically ‘equal’ marriage (the 10th, above) to the branch based at Křimice. This castle, on the outskirts of the western city of Plzeň (Pilsen), was built by local burghers in the 13th century, then passed to the noble house of Vrtba in the 17th century, who rebuilt it in classical style in 1811, then passed it by marriage to Prince Johann Nepomuk von Lobkowitz (above). Nationalised in 1948, Křimice was used as a school run by the Škoda car company, a home for youth and a museum depository, falling into near ruin before it was restored to the family in 1994.

Křimice Castle today (photo Václav Štorek)

The 11th Prince of Lobkowicz, Jaroslav Aloys, was a lawyer, and began the family’s long association in the 20th century with the Belgian aristocracy, through his 1905 marriage to the daughter of the Duke of Beaufort-Spontin (who also held lands in Bohemia). His sisters also married Belgian aristocrats. Their son, Friedrich Franz (Bedřich František), briefly the 12th Prince (1953-54), moved to France and lived at the Château of Breuilpont in Normandy.

Prince Jaroslav still held significant lands in Czechoslovakia in the 1930s (about 1,000 hectares) but also had a good income from the old castle brewery at Křimice, as well as some local factories. After the Communist takeover, he did not leave the country, and was allowed to stay in the castle until 1951, when it was given to Škoda—though he was allowed to live in the old brewery. His second son, Jaroslav Claude, who became the 13th Prince of Lobkowicz (nominally) in 1954, also stayed in Czechoslovakia, and worked as an administrator of the castle at Křimice, then later as a journeyman in Plzeň. He died in 1984, so it was his sons, Jaroslav and František who reasserted their branch of the family’s place of prominence in the Czech Republic (as Bohemia was called after 1992). Jaroslav, 14th Prince of Lobkowicz, Duke of Roudnice, Count of Sternstein, etc (b. 1942), is a civil engineer who worked for Siemens in Munich until he returned to his homeland in the 1990s and was elected as a Member of Parliament in 1998 (he served several terms, retiring in 2017), and was also a member of the Plzeň city council. His son, Hereditary Prince Vladimir Jaroslav (b. 1972), now runs the family agricultural estates at Křimice. The current Prince’s brother František (1948-2022) became a priest in Czechoslovakia in the 1970s, and in 1996 was elected first bishop of a newly created diocese of Ostrava-Opava, in Moravia.

Jaroslav, 14th Prince of Lobkowicz

The youngest of the many brothers of the 13th Prince, Ladislav Otto (1925-1958), did not stay in Czechoslovakia, but left in the late 1940s to develop the family’s connections in Belgium. In 1958, he was formally created ‘HSH Prince de Lobkowitz’ by the King of the Belgians—in part aided by his brother-in-law, the Count of Limburg-Stirum who was Head of the Household of King Leopold III. His son Prince Stéphane (b. 1957) is head of the Belgian branch today—recognised as one of the six princely houses of Belgium—and has been elected several times to the parliament for the Brussels region (as indeed have his wife and his daughter). He lives in the suburbs of Brussels in Uccle, and has written a biography of the late King Baudouin. So although he is not the most senior member of the Lobkowicz family, he is the only one recognised legally as a prince.

Prince Stéphane de Lobkowitz

The younger branch of this senior line was based at Dolni Beřkovice (Unterberkowitz). This castle, near the old Lobkowicz heartlands in north-central Bohemia, is also located on the river Elbe. As with other properties, the old castle was confiscated from the local nobility in 1620 and acquired by Polyxena z Pernštejna. The ancient fortress was rebuilt as a palace in the early 17th century, then rebuilt again in the mid-19th century once it became seat of the junior line. In the Communist era Dolni Beřkovice was used as a school and a warehouse, and when it was restored to the family it went to a female descendant who had married into the House of Thurn und Taxis.

Dolni Beřkovice Castle (photo Martin Veselka)

Prominent members of this branch include the son of its founder, Prince Ferdinand Georg (d. 1926), who was Vice-President of the Bohemian House of Lords in the 1890s, and Grand Marshal of Bohemia in 1913; and a great-nephew, Prince Edouard (d. 2010), who in 1959 tied this family to royalty by marriage to Princess Marie-Françoise de Bourbon-Parme, daughter of Xavier, head of the House of Parma (and Carlist pretender to the Spanish throne). She was also a niece of Prince Felix, consort of Grand Duchess Charlotte of Luxembourg, and of Zita, the last Empress of Austria and Queen of Hungary (and the last Queen of Bohemia, for that matter). Their children are thus first cousins to the current reigning family in Luxembourg and the Habsburg pretenders to the thrones of Austria, Hungary and Bohemia.

the wedding of Prince Edouard de Lobkowitz and Princess Marie-Françoise de Bourbon-Parme

Prince Edouard was born in the US to an American mother (the golfer Anita Lihme) and educated in Paris and America. Late in life he served as ambassador from the Order of Malta to Lebanon (1980-90). His eldest son, Edouard Xavier, graduated from college in the US then joined the French army before he was suddenly murdered in Paris in 1984—a case that is still unsolved. The surviving son, Prince Charles-Henri, a society favourite, is currently restoring several ancient castles inherited from his Bourbon-Busset grandmother in central France: Boszt (old and new) and Rochefort, both in the town of Besson in the Bourbonnais.

Boszt, Vieux-Chateau (note coat of arms of Lobkowitz and Bourbon-Parma) (photo Hadrianus)

The current head of this branch of the family is Prince Maria Ferdinand (b. 1942), who lives in Canada. His cousin Michel (b. 1964), was a member of the Czech Parliament several times in the 1990s, and briefly Minister of Defence in 1998.

Finally the branch of the ‘Second Majorat’, also known as the Mělník branch, founded in 1715 for the second son of the 3rd Prince of Lobkowicz. The first prince of this line, Field Marshal Jan Jiří Kristián (seen above), was originally intended to be based at the old Bílina branch castle of Jezeři, but right away he made a deal with is older brother ceding this property in exchange for cash. It wasn’t until the 4th son, Prince August Antonín’s marriage to the heiress Countess Ludmila Czernin z Chudenic in 1753, that the family was established permanently in a residence, the Castle of Mělník. Mělník is located in that same flat plain of north-central Bohemia from which the Lobkowicz family emerged, specifically in this case, right at the confluence of the two great rivers, Elbe and Vltava, a fertile land known for its agriculture and wine. It was also a place of symbolic value to Czech nationalism of the early 19th century, as it was seen as the ancient heartland of the Czech people, and these rich lands were often used by the Crown as dower lands for queen-consorts as widows. In the middle ages there was a fortress here, on the heights overlooking the river, dating from as far back as the 9th century. In 1542, the King gave Mělník Castle to a powerful nobleman, Zdislav Berka of Dubá, who rebuilt it as a renaissance palace. It then belonged to the Czernin family by the 17th century who thus passed it to the House of Lobkowicz by marriage.

Looking up at Mělník Castle from the confluence of the Labe (Elbe) and Vltava (foregrond) rivers (photo Volodymyr Vlasenko)

Across the river Elbe was another castle, Hořín, built by the Czernins in the 1690s on a grander scale and surrounded by parklands. This too became Lobkowicz property in the 1750s. Restored to the Lobkowicz family in the 1990s (with about 2,000 hectares), today Mělník is renovated and partly open to the public; while Hořín has fallen into disrepair. Attempts were made in the 2010s to convert the latter into flats, but as of 2022 the castle is for sale.

Hořín Castle (photo Horakvlado)

August Antonín, 4th Prince of this 2nd Majorat (d. 1803), was a diplomat, Austrian envoy to Spain in the 1770s, and later Grand Marshal of Bohemia. His son, Antonín Isidor, 5th Prince (d. 1819), was Grand Chamberlain, or head of the Royal Household in Bohemia. In 1847, this branch was extended the honorific style the senior line enjoyed, that of Durchlaucht (Serene Highness) but only to the head of the branch, not all its members. The most prominent member in this century was Prince Jiří Kristián, 7th Prince (d. 1908), who was the leader of the conservatives in Bohemia and President of the Bohemian Diet (as ‘Grand Marshal of Bohemia’), from 1871 until the year before his death in 1907 (with some interruption). He was also a deputy in the Austrian House of Deputies and then promoted to a hereditary member of the House of Lords in 1883.

Prince Jiří Kristián, 7th Prince of the 2nd Majorat

Another Prince Jiří Kristián, the 9th Prince of the 2nd Majorat, was a car racer and died in a crash in Berlin in 1932, so the title passed to his uncle then his cousin. Today the 12th Prince is Antonín Otokar (b. 1956), though it is his twin brother, Jiři Jan, who worked for the restoration of the family properties and manages the estates. This branch has spawned several academics, MDs and PHDs, male and female. Two younger brothers of the 11th Prince made a name for themselves in the 20th century: Nikolaus (d. 2019) was a political theorist and philosopher who taught in the United States in the 1960s, then was Rector then President of the University of Munich and then President of the University of Eichstätt in Bavaria (until 1996). He was given the Order of the Golden Fleece by the exiled head of the House of Habsburg in 1978, but much more recently the Order of Tomáš Masaryk by the Czech Republic, in 1998. His brother Frederick (d. 1998) was an esteemed Professor of Physics at the University of Rochester in New York. The heir to this branch (since neither of the twins has a son) is Nikolaus’ son, Johann von Lobkowicz (b. 1954), who in the restitutions of the 1990s, regained the Castle of Drahenice. This most recent acquisition of this ancient princely house, was built by the Valdštejna family in the 17th century, then went through several hands before it was purchased by the Mělník branch of Lobkowicz princes in 1870. Today it is restored, but not open to the public.

Drahenice Castle

Now go grab a cold beer, Czech style, from a brewery whose roots stretch back to noble Lobkowicz breweries in the hills and forests of north-central Bohemia…