Dukes of Brunswick II: Lüneburg, Hanover, and the Queen-Consort who never was

An interesting illustrated poster was published in about 1715 for distribution to the people of Great Britain that celebrated the health and vitality of their new royal family: the Hanoverians. At the top is the prosperous looking King George I, a former war hero in Europe and a symbol of the ongoing stability of the Protestant faith in England. Below him are the figures of his son and daughter-in-law, the Prince and Princess of Wales, and their already growing nursery of royal children, Prince Frederick and his sisters, Anne, Amelia and Caroline. A prosperous eighteenth century beckoned for the British people. It was a very ‘family values’ type item of propaganda. But there’s a curious omission: the King has no wife, alive or dead. It’s as if he generated his dynasty completely on his own.

celebrating the Hanoverian Succession. A version from 1748 that adds the children of Frederick, Prince of Wales, but still with George I alone at the top of this ‘dynastic column’ (© The Trustees of the British Museum)

Sophia Dorothea of Brunswick-Lüneburg was, at least in theory, the queen-consort of Great Britain in 1715. Yet she never left Germany, and lived in confinement for the entirety of her husband’s reign. Her story is fascinating, and not well known, but before we tell it, we need to look at the dynasty of dukes and princes she represents. It is in fact the same dynasty as her husband’s and they were first cousins. The House of Brunswick-Lüneburg is just another name for the House of Hanover. It is one of the oldest princely houses in all of Europe, with roots stretching back to the ninth century. Known initially as the House of Welf (or Guelph in English), its early history has already been traced in a previous blog post, in the context of another British queen-consort, Caroline of Brunswick. Queen Caroline’s branch was based in Wolfenbüttel, while Sophia Dorothea’s family were based further north in Lüneburg. These two halves of the overall Duchy of Brunswick-Lüneburg, created in 1235, had been divided, subdivided, re-combined and re-divided several times in the centuries that followed. This post will focus on the line of Lüneburg that was founded from a division of 1428, and then another division in 1634. After 1692, though Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel was the senior line, its dukes were eclipsed by the rise of the Hanoverians, first as electors of Hanover, then (from 1714) as kings of Great Britain and Ireland. The senior line became extinct in 1884 and in theory at least the two branches were united once more in the person of Queen Victoria’s cousin, the Duke of Cumberland, as we’ll see at the end of this post.

One of my favourite paintings of the Hanoverians: Sophia Dorothea with her two children, Georg August and Sophia Dorothea, by Jacques Vaillant, c1690–in an interesting inversion of the above description, there’s no father here!

As seen in the previous blog, the main seat of the medieval House of Welf was in Brunswick (Braunschweig in German), but had a second seat much further north, on the great North German plain, Lüneburg, a city wealthy in trade links and salt deposits. The first major division was made in 1269, with the senior line in Lüneburg and junior lines being established in Wolfenbüttel, Grubenhagen, Göttingen and Calenberg. Officially, the imperial fief of Brunswick-Lüneburg remained undivided, so all princes from all branches had the potentiality to succeed, and individually the smaller units were referred to as ‘principalities’ within the duchy. The first line of Lüneburg came to a violent end in 1370, and following a devastating War of Lüneburg Succession, this branch of the dynasty moved its headquarters further south, to Celle.

The Castle of Celle was built on the river Aller, a tributary of the Weser that flows across the North German Plain, through Bremen and into the North Sea. Other tributaries include the Oker (which flows through both Brunswick and Wolfenbüttel) and the Leine (which joins Göttingen to Hanover). So most of the family’s territories—aside from Lüneburg itself—were joined by a network of rivers. The castle at Celle was very ancient, probably a tenth-century fortress guarding the river crossing. But it wasn’t a proper residential castle until the 1370s. It still today has the basic footprint of a rectangular keep with four huge corner towers, all on a moated island, but today’s appearance is from the later fifteenth century, the so-called ‘Weser Renaissance Style’. Remodelled in the 1670s by Duke Georg Wilhelm (below), with Italian influences, grand baroque state rooms, a theatre (one of the few remaining in northern Germany today) and French gardens, it was then underused in the eighteenth century until it became the prison for the disgraced Caroline Matilda of Hanover, Queen of Denmark, between 1772 and 1775. Celle was later used as a summer residence for the Hanoverian royal family of the nineteenth century, who expanded its landscape gardens.

the Schloss at Celle (photo Hajotthu)

One of the trends of the House of Brunswick in the Middle Ages was a desire to expand westward across Westphalia by absorbing smaller imperial counties, like Wölpe in 1302, Hoya in1582 and Diepholz in 1585. They also expanded their influence by placing sons in the key neighbouring bishoprics of Hildesheim, Verden and Bremen, and after the Reformation gradually absorbed these territories into their domains as well (basically creating what is today called the state of Lower Saxony). A new division of the entire House of Brunswick occurred in 1428, when Bernhard kept Lüneburg, Celle and other northern territories for himself, and gave Wolfenbüttel and other southern lands to his younger brother Wilhelm.

the basic division between the two main lines of the House of Brunswick, circa 1720 (Hoya, Diepholz are incorporated within the dark blue, in its western section)

Bernard died in 1434 and was succeeded by his sons ruling jointly, Otto IV the Lame, who died in 1446, and Frederick II the Pious. The brothers built the Castle of Celle into a proper princely residence. Frederick had an exceptionally long reign, even with a pause in the middle when he resigned to enter a Franciscan monastery he had built in Celle in 1457. His eldest son, Bernard II, had first been Bishop of Hildesheim, but resigned to take up his father’s position, with his brother Otto V as co-duke. Both sons were dead by 1471, so Frederick the Pious reigned once more until his death in 1478

Otto V’s young son Henry succeeded, age 10, under the regency of his mother, Anne of Nassau. He was pious like his grandfather, but got in trouble as an adult when he refused to support the election of Charles of Burgundy as Emperor Charles V in 1519. He was forced to abandon Germany and took refuge at the French court. Seeing his sons embrace the early phases of the Protestant Reformation, he attempted to return in 1527 to block the spread of heresy in Brunswick. He was pushed out and died in exile in 1532.

Henry, Duke of Brunswick-Luneburg

These sons, Otto, Ernst and Franz, all studied at the University of Wittenberg, the seat of their mother’s brother, the Elector of Saxony, the protector of Martin Luther. Otto and Ernst were given the duchy of Bruswick-Lüneburg by the Emperor to rule jointly in 1520, and they introduced many of the Lutheran reform ideas. Otto went further and married for love rather than duty in 1527, so resigned his rule and received instead the barony of Harburg. His children were to be reckoned as barons, not princes.

The line of Brunswick-Harburg was thus based in the castle of Harburg built by the counts of Stade in the 1130s on one of the branches of the Elbe south of the city of Hamburg. Acquired by the House of Brunswick in the 1250s, it remained a secondary castle until it became the seat of this separate branch in 1527. Otto of Harburg’s son Otto II took over in 1549 and was restored to his rank as a Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg in 1560. He turned Harburg into a princely residence. After it returned to the main line in the mid-seventeenth century it was transformed again into a fortress. Much of this was pulled down in the nineteenth century, and today Harburg has been amalgamated into the city of Hamburg.

Harburg Castle in about 1620

Otto II died in 1603, leaving four sons. The eldest, Otto Henry, had died in 1591, and had married unequally, so his son Charles, a Spanish governor in the Low Countries, could not inherit. The next son, John Frederick, declined the succession, and Christopher soon died, so William Augustus and Otto III ruled together until their deaths in 1642 and 1641, respectively. The elder duke of Brunswick-Harburg was a scholar, and travelled all over Central Europe and Scandinavia. When the lands of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel were redistributed in 1634 (see below), he was given the County of Hoya, but when he himself died, unmarried, this, plus his possessions in Harburg were re-divided between the lines of Celle and Wolfenbüttel.

Meanwhile, another division had been made between the sons of Duke Henry, in 1539, with the creation of an apanage of Gifhorn for the youngest son, Franz. The castle at Gifhorn, only a princely capital for ten years, is one of the best preserved in the region, southeast of Celle, upriver on the Aller. Franz built a new residence here on the site of a much older castle. Heavily fortified, with ramparts, a wide moat and four corner bastion towers, it remained a fortification for the dynasty until the 1790s. Duke Franz was also an ardent supporter of the Protestant movement; the chapel he built here in 1547 was the first built specifically for Reformed worship in Germany. But the Duke died in 1549 and left only daughters, so Brunswick-Gifhorn did not spawn a separate branch.

Gifhorn Castle in the 1650s

Franz’s elder brother, Ernst the Confessor, thus ruled Lüneburg-Celle alone. He introduced Lutheran preachers all over his domains in the 1530s and secularised monasteries. He convinced the north German cities of Hamburg and Bremen to join the Schmalkaldic League, defending their church against the forces of the Catholic Emperor, and by the time of his death in 1546 was the most influential prince in the northern parts of the Empire.

Ernst the Confessor, Duke of Brunswick- Lüneburg-Celle

Ernst left four underage sons, Franz, Frederick, Henry and William, who were governed by their mother, Sophia of Mecklenburg, for the first ten years. Frederick died young, followed by Franz in 1559, leaving Henry and William to govern together. The brothers quarrelled and Henry gave up the bulk of the Brunswick-Lüneburg lands to William, agreeing instead that he would inherit the lands of the Wolfenbüttel branch which was heading for extinction already in the 1560s. As we can see in the Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel post, that gamble paid off, though not until 1634, and a new line of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel was created which persisted until the 1880s.

Duke William alone took over the Lüneburg lands and the family seat at Celle from 1569. In 1561 he had made an excellent marriage in Dorothea of Denmark, daughter of Christian III. She began to take charge of his estates in the 1580s as he slipped into mental illness, and after he died in 1592, she governed on behalf of their many sons: of fifteen children total, six boys survived to adulthood. The eldest, Ernest II, became head of this branch of the family, and the year before he died in 1611, convinced his siblings to agree to a new family pact that stipulated that the Brunswick-Lüneburg lands were henceforth indivisible—no more partitions—which was formally confirmed as law by Emperor Mathias.

The next two brothers were both ecclesiastics, but in the confusing times of the late sixteenth century governed their bishoprics either as elected Catholic bishops or as Lutheran ‘administrators’ of their sees: Christian in Minden and Augustus in Ratzeburg (on the south-western and north-eastern borders of Lüneburg respectively). Christian also took the lead in governing Lüneburg after 1611 and successfully added the principality of Grubenhagen to the south. In 1629, he renounced his ecclesiastical position and stepped aside as Sweden occupied the prince-bishopric of Minden—it was secularised and given to Brandenburg in the settlement of Westphalia in 1648. By that point, Christian had died, as had Augustus, who left several children by his ‘concubine’—these took the surname ‘von Lüneburg’ and continued on into the 1960s. The fourth son, Frederick, also held church offices, notably Provost of Bremen Cathedral, and died at the end of that eventful year 1648.

Meanwhile the youngest brother, Prince George, was lord of Calenberg and Göttingen from 1635, adding these southern territories to the Lüneburg branch of the family, whose lands now stretched from the Elbe River in the north to the Harz Mountains in the south. At first he lived in the Harz at the mighty hilltop castle of Herzberg (part of the Grubenhagen estates), where most of his children were born, but in 1636 relocated his seat—while his older brothers still governed from Celle—to the town of Hanover on the river Leine. Here he built a new residence, the Leine Castle or Leineschloss.

Duke Georg, Prince of Calenberg, showing all the various coats of arms of provinces accumulated by this branch of Brunswick- Lüneburg, and interesting crests at the top, including the iconic white horse of Hanover or Lower Saxony

Hanover—whose name may derive from hohen Ufer, the ‘high riverbank’—developed as a town in the thirteenth century, at a crossroads linking trade routes from the Hanseatic cities of the north to the hilly interior to the south. Duke George’s new residence on the Leine had been a Franciscan friary since the fourteenth century. Secularised in 1533 when the area became Lutheran, the new castle incorporated the old monastery church as its chapel. Enlarged later in the later seventeenth century by Duke Ernst August, notably with the addition of a theatre, the Leineschloss was the birthplace of the future George I of Great Britain in 1660. It became a royal palace from 1814 and was rebuilt and expanded over the next two decades in a neoclassical style under the guidance of the Duke of Cambridge, viceroy of Hanover. It was then the main royal residence of the kings of Hanover after the dynastic separation from Great Britain in 1837, until it was taken over by occupying Prussian administrators in 1866. The Leineschloss was almost completely destroyed by aerial raids in World War II, and rebuilt in 1957-62, though with a more modern look. Today it is the seat of the parliament for the state of Lower Saxony.

the Leineschloss in Hanover before it was modernised in 1816
the Leineschloss today

Duke George of Brunswick-Calenberg died in 1641. His eldest son Christian Ludwig succeeded to all of the family lands in 1648 with the death of his uncle Frederick, but as was firm family tradition, shared rule with his many brothers. He resided at Celle and gave Calenberg to the second son, Georg Wilhelm (I’ll shift to German spellings now). Meanwhile their sister Sophie Amalie became Queen of Denmark and Norway in 1648, having married the son of Christian IV in 1643. Her husband Frederick III had been (when he was the second son, not the heir) the Lutheran administrator of Verden and Bremen during the Thirty Years War—we will see these two territories later added to the patrimony of the House of Hanover.

Christian Ludwig died in 1665. Before he did though, the brothers had made a pact, 1658, agreeing that none would marry except the youngest, Ernst August. In 1665, the second brother, Georg Wilhelm, became Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg, and passed the secondary principality, Calenberg, to the third brother Johann Friedrich, keeping only Celle for himself. He did this because he was about to break the brotherly pact by marrying: a Huguenot noblewoman from Poitou, Eléonore Desmier d’Olbreuse. The marriage was deemed unequal, and their one child, Sophia Dorothea, born 1666, was barred from claiming full rights as a member of the House of Brunswick. In 1674 the Emperor raised Eléonore and her daughter to the rank of Countess of Harburg and Wilhelmsburg.

Georg Wilhelm, Duke of Brunswick- Lüneburg-Celle
Eleonora d’Olbreuse

Harburg refers to the Brunswick residence outside Hamburg as above. The latter name was a curiosity: three small islands in the river Elbe near Harburg acquired by Georg Wilhelm in 1672 and renamed for him. He connected the islets together using dams, and gradually the area was developed as part of the port of Hamburg. Harburg-Wilhelmsburg formed one administrative unit from the 1920s and was annexed to the city of Hamburg in 1937. It even had a small moated castle, dating from about 1500, today a ruin.

George William lived for many years at Celle, and served as a military commander as a loyal supporter of the Emperor in Vienna—while in contrast, his Catholic brother Johann Friedrich supported France in its wars of the 1670s. He had turned out to be one of the most distinctive of the Brunswick brothers: a Francophile and a Catholic. Travelling in Italy as a young man in the 1650s, he had encountered the intense personal piety of the Catholic Reformation in Rome and renounced his Lutheran faith in about 1651.

Johann Friedrich, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg-Calenberg

In the 1660s, while Georg Wilhelm remained in Celle, Johann Friedrich settled into his share of the duchy, Calenberg, making Hanover his residence. Here he imported Italian architects to design new baroque churches, and, inspired by developments he’d seen in garden design in France, he decided to build a French garden of his own, Herrenhausen, a short distance outside the city. This was built in a floodplain of the Leine, the site of a small manor house built in the 1640s and now enlarged as a summer palace. Herrenhausen eventually was connected to the city of Hanover by a one-mile long Allee and included several distinct gardens (the Great Garden, the Hill Garden, and the George and Welf gardens). Much of it was developed by the Electress Sophia (below), and she, her husband and son are buried here. Herrenhausen was still owned by the House of Hanover in the 1940s, badly bombed in 1943 and rebuilt only in 2010-13, reopening in time for the fantastic exhibitions celebrating the three-hundredth anniversary of the Hanoverian accession to the British throne—during which time I was fortunate to visit this magical place.

Herrenhausen and its gardens in 1708
Aerial view of Herrenhausen at top left, the George Garden towards the bottom, the Allee, and the Welf Garden at right (photo Carsten Steger)

Duke Johann Friedrich was not meant to marry, according to the pact agreed by the brothers in the 1650s, but he did. In 1668 he married Benedicta Henrietta of the Palatinate, daughter of one of the sons of the ‘Winter Queen’ (Elizabeth of Bohemia) who had, like himself, renounced Protestantism. Her sister was the Princess of Condé, first princess of the blood in France, so this marriage made the dukes of Brunswick nervous. Happily for them, the couple had only daughters, so they could not inherit the Welf properties, but two of the three made excellent marriages: one became Duchess of Modena, and the other, Wilhelmine Amalia, became Holy Roman Empress as wife of Joseph I. Johann Friedrich’s other long-term impact was the hiring in 1676 of a new librarian at Herrenhausen, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who also became a trusted ducal counsellor, and stayed in the family’s employment for the next forty years.

When Johann Friedrich died in 1679, he passed the principality of Calenberg and the residences in Hanover to the youngest brother, Ernst August. Ernst had been chosen to marry the princess from the Palatinate, Sophie, whom none of his older brothers seemed to want, in 1658; he then was selected to act as Prince-Bishop of Osnabrück in 1662. His marriage was no obstacle here, since Osnabrück now had a very strange constitution: since 1648, it was agreed that the Catholic canons of the cathedral would elect their own bishop, and when he died, the territory would be governed by a Lutheran member of the House of Brunswick—and then would return to the Catholics again when he died, on and on in alternation. Ernst and Sophie moved into the bishop’s residence outside the town, Iburg Castle, then after 1667 began construction of a new palace in the city itself.

Ernst August of Brunswick-Lüneburg, Prince-Bishop of Osnabrück, later Elector of Hanover

Iburg Castle, about 16 km south of Osnabrück, had ancient roots, with a castle built here as early as the eight century by the local Saxon kings. A new castle was constructed in the eleventh century by Bishop Benno—who gave his name to the central tower, the Bennoturm—as well as a Benedictine monastery. Ernst August added a Protestant chapel in the castle, leaving the earlier Catholic one too.

Iburg Schloss, with the Benno Tower at its core (photo Basotxerri)

The Osnabrück residence built by Ernst August remained the main seat of the prince-bishops until the principality was secularised and incorporated into the Kingdom of Hanover in 1803. The palace is still lovely today and it serves as the main buildings for the University of Osnabrück.

The residence of the prince-bishop in Osnabrück (note curious backwards printing at top when it is the right way at bottom)

Now ruler of all of the Brunswick-Lüneburg territories except Celle (still occupied by Georg Wilhelm), Ernst August moved his residence to the Leineschloss in Hanover. He began the process of enhancing his family’s position within the Holy Roman Empire—serving as a commander in the armies of Emperor Leopold I in the defence of Vienna against the Turks in 1683, then in the battles to reclaim the Hungarian plain, he struck a deal in return that would turn his patchwork of duchies into a unified state which would be erected into the ninth electorate of the Empire. There had been seven electors since the fourteenth century, but after 1648 there were eight, since Bavaria and the Palatinate split the ancient Wittelsbach vote. In anticipation of his family’s elevation, Ernst declared in 1683 that from henceforth, his family would be ruled by primogeniture and the centuries-old practice of dividing the duchy up between sons would cease. In 1692, the Emperor held up his end of the bargain, and Brunswick-Lüneburg was named an electorate, though it is better known as Hanover. The new elector was also given an official ceremonial role within the Empire, as ‘arch-bannerer’, with ceremonial duties at imperial coronations and funerals (this office was later exchanged in 1710 for ‘arch-treasurer’).

coat of arms of the electors of Hanover, with the red shield of a high office of the empire (in this case, Archtreasurer, with Charlemagne’s crown) with the Brunswick lion, the Hanoverian horse and the Lüneburg lion (with hearts) on the top row, and various other fiefs, most notably the bear’s paws of Hoya

By this point, the heir, Georg Ludwig, was married. He had initially rejected the idea of marrying his cousin, Sophia Dorothea, as someone not fully princely due to her parents’ unorthodox marriage. But in 1675, Duke Georg Wilhelm decided to secure his daughter’s future by declaring that his marriage to Eléonore d’Olbreuse was fully valid, not morganatic, and that she and her daughter were both intitled to be styled duchess of Brunswick. He even staged another wedding ceremony at Celle in 1676 to be clear: it was not attended by his family. Duchess Eléonore even became pregnant in 1679 and there were fears she would have a son, throwing all of the Hanoverian plans into disarray. The child did not live, but Ernst August was thus convinced that his son would marry Sophia Dorothea. They married in November 1682, and although they had two children right away they soon loathed each other and lived apart.

Georg Ludwig as a young man (the future George I of Great Britain)

Then in the 1690s, the domestic harmony of the House of Hanover fell apart. All the sons of Ernst August and Sophie were warriors: Georg Ludwig and his brother Friedrich August also fought at the siege of Vienna 1683. But after the latter was killed in battle in Transylvania in 1691, the next sons in line, Maximilian Wilhelm and Christian Heinrich, realised that the new primogeniture rules meant they would not receive a portion of the duchy to rule when their father died. They plotted against him, were arrested and exiled. Both became imperial commanders and converted to Catholicism. Christian Heinrich was killed in 1703 near Ulm, but Maximilian Wilhelm lived on in Vienna until 1726.

This rebellion averted, another arose in 1694, in the person of the heir’s wife, Sophia Dorothea. Though her husband of course had a mistress by the early 1690s (his wife’s lady in waiting, Melusine von der Schulenberg), when Sophia Dorothea herself fell in love, with Philipp, Count von Königsmarck, a general in the army of the Elector of Saxony, it was unacceptable. In 1694 it became public knowledge at court, and her husband threatened her with imprisonment or violence. She appealed to her parents in Celle, and got no support, so planned to escape with Königsmarck to Dresden. On the night of 11 July, the Count suddenly disappeared—and no one has ever discovered what happened: was he thrown into the Leine? It caused an international incident involving Saxony, Poland, Austria, France… Georg Ludwig demanded a divorce, which was granted by the end of 1694. Sophia Dorothea was confined to Ahlden House, a large moated manor house on the Lüneburg Heath west of Celle. Today it is an antiques auction house. She was sometimes called the ‘Princess of Ahlden’ but it was an empty title as she was confined here for the rest of her life (she died in 1726).

Sophie Dorothea as Flora, by Henri Gascar, 1686
Ahlden House in the 1650s

The first Elector of Hanover, Ernst August, died in 1698. Shortly after this, his widow, Electress Sophie, was named as heir to the thrones of England, Scotland and Ireland by the Act of Settlement, 1701. She very nearly succeeded her cousin, Queen Anne, but died at her beloved Herrenhausen only two months short, in the summer of 1714. The history of the House of Hanover now became the history of the royal house of Great Britain, so outside the scope of this blog site. Georg Ludwig, Elector of Hanover, became George I, king of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and his family governed these islands until the death of Queen Victoria in 1901.

Electress Sophie in 1706

Links with Germany certainly continued: King’s George’s sister, Sophie Charlotte, married the Elector of Brandenburg and became the first Queen of Prussia when her husband’s status was elevated in 1701 (Charlottenburg Palace in Berlin is named for her). The youngest brother, Ernst August, was selected to fill the family’s post as Prince-Bishop of Osnabrück in 1715. In Britain he was also created Duke of York and Albany; his elder brother, Maximilian Wilhelm, was given nothing, and as a Catholic, was excluded from the line of succession. A later Hanoverian prince, Frederick (also duke of York), occupied this curious hybrid episcopal see of Osnabrück from 1764; he would be the last, as the prince-bishopric was dissolved in 1803.

Osnabrück was not the only family tie remaining in this region. The Electorate was now one unit, giving the Elector (aka the King of Great Britain and Ireland) a vote in the Imperial Diet. But after 1715 there were also several other adjacent territories that continued to have elements of separate government and gave additional votes to the Elector: the counties of Hoya and Diepholz, and now the duchies of Bremen and Verden, secularised former bishoprics governed by Sweden after the Thirty Years War and now purchased by Hanover. George I also added the final domains of Celle to Hanover after the death of his uncle and father-in-law. Georg Wilhelm had also occupied the neighbouring Duchy of Saxe-Lauenburg, whose ancient line of dukes had died out in 1689 (this duchy, one of the Empire’s oldest, will have its own blog post); so it too passed to the Elector of Hanover as a separate political entity (and yet another vote in the Diet), though not confirmed by the Emperor until 1729. Some of these territories had direct votes like Bremen and Verden, while others were entitled just to participate in a collective vote of the council of counts of Westphalia, like Hoya and Diepholz, and the county of Spiegelberg (south of Hanover, a county since the 1060s, part of Brunswick-Calenberg since the 1550s). In one of the last accountings of the votes allocated to German princes in the Diet, in 1792, Brunswick-Celle and Brunswick-Lüneburg (aka Hanover) are listed separately, as is Brunswick-Calenberg and Brunswick-Grubenhagen. By my reckoning that is seven individual votes, plus the collective vote in Westphalia, and one for Osnabrück—but what did this mean in practice? Did the King of England try to outvote other princes in imperial matters? I’ve asked some historians of the Holy Roman Empire, but never received a sufficient answer.

In Great Britain, King George I distributed titles to his family: his son Georg August was already Duke of Cambridge (from 1706), and from 1714 became Prince of Wales, Duke of Cornwall and Duke of Rothsay (and in Hanover was known as the ‘Electoral Prince’). Meanwhile, his daughter, Sophia Dorothea, succeeded her aunt as Queen of Prussia (and mother of Frederick the Great). The King’s younger brother Ernst August was, as we’ve seen, named Duke of York and Albany, and in 1721 his second grandson, William, was named Duke of Cumberland. The elder grandson, Frederick, had been left in Hanover to be raised as a German prince, far from the court of London. The King also named his half-sister (his father’s illegitimate daughter) Sophie Charlotte Countess of Leicester (in the Irish peerage), and Countess of Darlington (1721 and 1722), and his own mistress, Melusine von der Schulenberg, Duchess of Munster (1716, peerage of Ireland), then Duchess of Kendal (1719, peerage of Great Britain). There was never any mention of the Princess of Ahlden.

the royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom in the 18th century, including the arms of Brunswick-Lüneburg-Hanover at lower right (and arch-treasurer of the Holy Roman Empire)

In the eighteenth century, the Hanoverians became increasingly English, though several younger sons were sent abroad to be educated at the University of Göttingen (founded in 1734 by George II). The Electorate was overrun by French armies in 1803, and in the post-Napoleonic settlements, was elevated to the rank of a kingdom in 1814. George III’s youngest son, Adolphus, Duke of Cambridge, was viceroy of the new Kingdom of Hanover, from 1816. From 1837, there emerges a separate story for Hanover again since Queen Victoria could not succeed to the German territories due to the Salic Law. Her uncle the Duke of Cumberland took over as King of Hanover, but his son, George V, lost the territory in 1866 after backing the wrong horse in the short war between Austria and Prussia for dominance in Germany. So we can finish off by looking at the development of the extensive properties in the old duchies of Brunswick and Lüneburg by its now royal house.

Prince Adolphus, Duke of Cambridge, Viceroy of Hanover

The gardens at Herrenhausen had already been expanded, with the addition of the George Garden and the George Palace (Georgenpalais) in the reign of King George III in 1817. These had been built by an illegitimate son of George II, Johann Ludwig, Count von Wallmoden, an imperial lieutenant-general and collector of art and antiquities. He built the Wallmoden Schloss in 1782 to house these treasures. Wallmoden’s mother had been Amalie von Wendt, created Countess of Yarmouth (1740), but he had taken his name from her husband (and legally his father), the Count of Wallmoden—from an ancient Brunswicker noble family from the area southwest of Wolfenbüttel. By the end of his life Johann Ludwig had been created count of the Empire, with his own vote in the Diet (for the immediate lordship of Gimborn), and was Commander-in-Chief of the Hanoverian army (1803). After he died in 1811, the castle and gardens were acquired by the King, and the gardens were developed in ‘English style’. Since 1921, they have been owned by the city of Hanover.

The Georgenpalais, Hanover (photo Tim Rademacher)

Nearby, King George V replaced the eighteenth-century Schloss Monbrilliant with a new neo-gothic structure, the Welfenschloss and adjacent gardens, the Welfengarten. There was a plan to move the official royal seat here from the Leinschloss, but exile from the Kingdom scuppered that plan and the palace was never fully completed. Today it forms the main buildings of the Leibniz University Hanover (since 1899); and the former grand stables are now the university library. The gardens remained property of the former royal family, however, until 1961, when they were sold to the city, keeping only a smaller residence on the grounds, the Fürstenhaus (built in the 1720s), which is still the family’s private residence.

Welfenschloss in 1895
Fürstenhaus in Hanover (photo Bernd Schwabe)

Also still owned by today’s House of Hanover is Marienburg Castle, about 30 km south of Hanover. Built by George V in the 1850s as a present for his wife Marie as a grand neogothic fantasy, it sat mostly empty after the family moved to Austria in 1866—to Cumberland Castle, built in the 1880s on Lake Traunsee near Gmunden in Upper Austria.

Marienburg Castle (photo Michael Gäbler)
Cumberland Castle, Gmunden, Austria (photo C.Stadler/Bwag)

After 1945, however, they moved back to Marienburg. In 1954, the heir moved to the nearby Calenberg estate and opened Marienburg as a museum. It was given to the current head of the family’s son, Prince August, in 2004, who used it primarily as the ‘formal’ seat of the family and management offices. But in 2018, August sold it to the state of Lower Saxony for a symbolic one euro, to a heritage foundation. His father blocked it in the courts, however, so it now belongs to a different charity, the Marienburg Castle Foundation, with August as chair. This year it began a major course of renovations that is expected to last nearly a decade.

Ernst August, Hereditary Prince of Hanover unveils a new bust of Leipzig at Marienburg, 2016 (photo Bernd Schwabe in Hannover)

The Duchy of Brunswick-Lüneburg had one last burst of life at the very end of the existence of the German principalities in the early twentieth century. After Prussia conquered the Kingdom of Hanover in 1866, its heirs were prohibited from exercising authority in any areas of the ancient duchy. Nearby, the duchy of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel continued, but became extinct in 1884—the heir would have been his distant cousin, the Prince of Hanover, also known by his British title the Duke of Cumberland, but the German government determined that unless he renounced his claims to the Kingdom of Hanover, he could not take over as Duke of Brunswick either. For thirty years, that territory was governed by regents appointed by the Kaiser. Then in 1912, Cumberland renounced his claims to enable his son Ernst August to marry Victoria Louise of Prussia, the daughter of the Kaiser (see here for an interesting ‘musing’ about this wedding). The wedding of May 1913 was the last great gathering of European royals before the First World War, with guests from George V of England to Nicholas II of Russia. As a sort of ‘wedding present’, the Kaiser restored the young couple to the Duchy of Brunswick, which they governed from November 1913 until the collapse of the German Empire in November 1918.

an engagement photo (later photoshopped with veil) of the future Duke and Duchess of Brunswick, 1913

With the end of the war, the Duke of Brunswick was also deprived of his rank as a British prince and the title Duke of Cumberland. They lived on in exile in Austria then at Marienburg—Ernst August died in 1953, but his widow lived on until 1980, age nearly 90! The House of Brunswick-Lüneburg continues today as princes of Hanover in exile, but its names live on in incredibly diverse places all over the world. The state of Virginia has a Hanover County, a Brunswick County and a Lunenburg County (using the spelling prevalent in English in the eighteenth century). There is a New Brunswick Province in Canada, a city of Guelph in Ontario (with a university of the same name), and fourteen towns in the US called Brunswick, and seventeen towns called Hanover. Hanover island is in Papua-New Guinea, while Hanover Island is in the extreme south of Chile.

the Brunswick-Lüneburg arms at Schloss Celle (photo Hajotthu)

The Princes of the Isles: From Viking Warlords to the Great Clan MacDonald

I’ve been watching ‘Vikings’ on television again this summer, and always find it fascinating to see how Norwegian and Danish seafaring culture impacted the culture of the British Isles in the early medieval period. But this series, or the series ‘The Last Kingdom’, focuses almost entirely on the eastern and southern realms of Anglo-Saxon England: Northumbria and Wessex. Those who know something about the history of Scotland, however, know that Scandinavian power also extended over much of the northern and western parts of that kingdom, and even endured for several more centuries. One of the epic princely stories from this time period is that of a Viking warrior, Somerled, King of the Isles (d. 1164). From him descends one of the most powerful clans of Highlands and Islands of Scotland: the MacDonalds. These were entitled ‘Lord of the Isles’—though sometimes given title ‘prince’ or even ‘king’—whose territories at their greatest extent stretched from the Outer Hebrides to the Isle of Man, and on the mainland across the north of Scotland to Inverness, until it all came crashing down at the end of the fifteenth century.

A Victorian vision of a Norse-Gaelic king of the Isles

After that, the successive chiefs of Clan MacDonald held no higher noble titles than ‘laird’ in the Scottish system, with the exception of one branch, Macdonnell, based in Ulster, which received an earldom (later marquessate), of Antrim, in the peerage of Ireland; and another received a barony, of Slate, also in Ireland. One line, Clanranald, made noises about being of ‘princely’ stock in the early eighteenth century when they supported the Jacobite pretender (and were given a barony, but only in the Jacobite peerage). Today, some of the Highland chiefs are referred to as ‘prince’ of their clan—so I have decided to include them as honorary members of this website on ‘dukes and princes’, as descendants of the genuinely princely Somerled, Prince of the Isles.

The thorny question, though, is whether Somerled was a Viking or not. Recent DNA tests have affirmed that his paternal ancestors were indeed Norse, but in his own time, the warrior-king thought of himself as part of the Gaelic community that stretched across the narrow channel between Ireland and Scotland, the kinship of the royal house of Dalriata. This was politically astute as he tried to balance his fragile independence between the far-off king of Norway—who still claimed to be sovereign in these parts—and the rising power of the Gaelic kingdom of the Scots, and the always feuding kingdoms of Ireland. Legends connected his ancestry through royal lineages of Ulster all the way back to Conn of the Hundred Battles, the legendary second-century High King of Ireland. Another motive may have been Somerled’s desire to unify the Gaelic Christian world under the leadership of the Monastery of Iona in the face of Latin Christianity taking over from the south and east.

So his identity in truth was blended. His name is spelled either Somhairle in Irish or Sumarliði in Norse (‘summer traveller’). His descendants are known as Clan Somhairle. But where did he come from? Much of Somerled’s story is fragmentary and sometimes contradictory. He is said to have been born in Argyll, or maybe in Ireland (his father is given an Irish name: Gille Bride). He first appears in archival sources in 1153 during a rising of his Scots nephews against King Malcolm IV. It seems he had initially been serving in, or provided mercenaries to, the armies of King David I, who subjugated Argyll in the 1130s. He later fought against this King David’s grandson, Malcolm IV, because (it is conjectured) his sister married an illegitimate son of King Alexander I (who had been displaced by David I), and her sons were thus trying to regain their inheritance. This probably spurred his own ambitions to create an independent kingdom of his own in Argyll and the Western Isles (Islay, Skye, Mull, Lewis, etc). These ‘southern isles’ (in contrast to the northern isles of Orkney and Shetland) were called in Norse the Suðreyjar, or the Sudreys in English (or even ‘Sodor’). In Gaelic, the Kingdom of the Isles was called the Rioghachd nan Eilean.

the extent of the Kingdom of the Isles in the tie of Somerled (dark red) also showing relative position to the Orkneys, the Kingdom of the Scots, and the chietaincies of Northern Ireland

Somerled’s main seat was his castle on the island of Islay: Finlaggan. This remained the princely headquarters for his descendants the Lords of the Isles until the 1490s. It was located on Eilean Mór, ‘the Great Island’, in Loch Finlaggan in the interior of the island. A stone castle was built in the thirteenth century to replace Somerled’s wooden fort. This island also had a church, Kilfinlaggan, once a monastery—possibly founded by an Irish monk, Saint Findlugan, in the seventh century. Both are in ruins today. A smaller island in Loch Finlaggan, Eilean na Comhairle (‘Isle of the Council’), served as the administrative centre for the Kingdom of the Isles.

the ruins of Finlaggan, showing the castle and the church (and the separate council island behind it)
a lovely aerial shot of the two islands

The war Somerled fought in the 1150s was also over another significant island, the Isle of Man, which had been ruled by a dynasty of Norsemen since the 1070s: the Crovans. Norsemen had created chieftaincies and small kingdoms here since the ninth century. Their lords were called the Ivarids (or Uí Ímair in Irish), ‘the dynasty of Ivar’, which has led some to believe they descended from the ferocious legendary Viking warrior Ivar the Boneless who invaded England with his ‘Great Heathen Army’ in 865. But it may simply be a different Ivar who lived about the same time. He founded a dynasty that ruled variously in York and in Dublin for the next two centuries. Ivar hailed from Lochlann, the Irish term for Norway (or for the Norwegian realms in western Scotland). In 990, the Jarl of Orkney took direct control over the Western Isles in the name of the King of Norway, and installed a local jarl, Gilli, as viceroy. Norse kings in Dublin extended their rule over the Western Isles in the eleventh century. One of these, Godred Crovan (which could mean ‘whitehand’—or else a corruption of Cuarán, the name of an early King of the Isles), fought for the Viking king Harald Hardrada at Stamford Bridge, 1066, then fled to the Isle of Man where he proclaimed himself king by the end of the 1070s. He was later ousted and died on Islay in 1095.

One of the most intriguing moments of Norse-Scottish history occurred in about this time, in 1093, when King Magnus III of Norway came to the Western Isles to re-establish direct rule and to potentially conquer the mainland from the Scots, famously pulling his longboats over the isthmus of Kintyre to prove that this narrow peninsula should indeed be considered an island, and therefore legally his. In 1098, the king of the Scots officially renounced claims over the islands (and did include Kintyre).

ships of course feature prominently, and this early image of a galley or lymphad became the arms of the Croven dynasty and later the kings of the Isles

One of the Croven kings of the Isle of Man, Olaf Godredson (Óláfr Guðrøðarson), ruled for a long time by Viking standards (1112-1153). In about 1140, Somerled married his daughter, Ragnhild Olafsdottir. Olaf had used this marriage as part of his anti-Scots coalition (with Fergus of Galloway, and even Stephen of Blois, king of the English), and also sought Norse support by sending his son Godred to Norway to do homage, 1152. Olaf was assassinated in 1153 by his own kin from Dublin while Godred was on the return voyage. The son found maintaining his father’s realm difficult, and he was pushed out of Man by Somerled, on the encouragement of local leaders. Somerled installed his son by Ragnhild, Dugall, on the Manx throne.

Castles from this time period on the Isle of Man include the main fortress built by Norse princes in the capital Castletown on the south-eastern side of the island, now called Castle Rushen, and Peel Castle on the western side, facing Ireland. Rushen’s central square tower was built in the tenth century then significantly augmented in the early fourteenth century when Man was captured by the Scottish kings. Peel Castle has a stone round tower from the eleventh century that survives, but the old wooden fort was replaced, like Rushen’s walls, in the early fourteenth century—though in this case with distinctive red sandstone. Peel Castle was the seat of the bishops of Sodor and Man until the eighteenth century, whereas Rushen was privately owned by the Stanley family as Lords of Man. Both were taken over by the British Crown in the eighteenth century. Though not part of the United Kingdom, the British monarch is still today the ‘Lord of Man’.

19th-century print of Castle Rushen, Isle of Man
Peel Castle today

The complicated succession war in which Somerled had intervened in Scotland and in Man also involved the MacLochlans of Tyrone and the O’Connors of Connaught in the north of Ireland. The deposed Godred Olafson himself tried to take the Kingdom of Dublin in 1155. By 1156, Somerled abandoned the cause of his Scottish nephews and focussed instead on Man. There was a great battle off the coast of Islay in January 1156 and neither side could claim a victory. Somerled and Godred therefore initially divided the realm, but by 1158, the latter was driven out, and Dugall confirmed as King of Man. Somerled himself took the title King of the Isles (rex insularum, or in Irish rí Innse Gall), which included the Western Islands (the Outer and Inner Hebrides, but also the islands in the Firth of Clyde (Arran and Bute), as well as Argyll, Kintyre and Lorne on the mainland. He then made peace with Malcolm IV by 1160. But in 1164, possibly during another invasion of Scottish territory, he was killed at the Battle of Renfrew, south of Glasgow. He was probably buried on Iona, in the chapel he founded, Saint Oran’s.

Dugall mac Somairle only held on to Man for about a year, before it was taken back by his mother’s family the Crovens, with help from the King of Norway. The Kingdom of the Isles was thereafter divided: the northern Hebrides (Lewis, Harris, Skye) and the Isle of Man returned to the Crovan Dynasty, while the southern Hebrides (Mull, Islay) and the mainland territories were retained by Clan Somairle.

the later division between the Crovan and Somairle families

The Crovan Dynasty continued as kings of Man until 1265. This was just two years after the great Battle of Largs, the last attempt of a king of Norway to keep control of western Scotland. Alexander III defeated Haakon IV at a small town on the coast of Ayrshire and ended five hundred years of Viking incursions. The 1266 Treaty of Perth transferred the Hebrides and Man to the Scottish Crown.

Of the sons of Somerled, facts are unclear, but it appears that Dugall (Dougall or Dubgall) received Lorne and Argyll, Angus got the northern Hebrides, and Ranald (or Ragnall) got Kintyre. Somerled’s daughter, Bethoc, was Prioress of Iona. Ranald asserted himself with the title ‘King of the Isles and Lord of Kintyre’, but as was so common in ruling dynasties of the period, Angus challenged this supremacy, and though Ranald was killed in about 1192 (or forced into a monastery), ultimately Angus and his sons were killed by Ranald’s sons in 1210. So two main branches emerged: the MacDougalls on the mainland (Argyll and Lorne) and the MacDonalds (named for Ranald’s second son, Donald or Domnall) in the islands. A third clan, Clan Ruaidri, descended from Ranald’s elder son, held Uist, Barra and some parts of the mainland; they died out in the 1340s. The MacDougalls fell from prominence after backing the wrong horse in the Scottish Wars of Independence (1290s-1320s) and their lands were redistributed to Stewarts and Campbells. Their seat has long been (and remains today) Dunollie Castle near Oban—the old fortress is a ruin, so they moved into a newer house next door in the mid-eighteenth century. Dunstaffnage Castle was their other famous stronghold, but it was lost with many of their other lands in 1309.

Dunollie Castle, seat of the MacDougalls

It is the line of Donald, the MacDonalds, that this blogpost will follow. Today Clan Donald is represented by four lines, with four clan chiefs: Macdonald of Macdonald, Macdonald of Sleat, Macdonald of Clanranald and Macdonald of Glengarry (plus many, many sub-branches). The founder was Donald, son of Ranald. He was possibly named for his mother’s clan, if she was indeed Fonia, daughter of William, Earl of Moray, son of King Duncan II—since Donald/Domnall was a name commonly used by the royal family. It comes from Gaelic dumno-ualos ‘world-ruler’ (in contrast, Ranald is not Gaelic in origin, but Germanic, from Norse Rögnvaldr, ‘ruler’s counsellor’). The facts of Lord Donald’s life are even shakier than those for his father and grandfather. He was possibly the subject of a story about a miracle escape from a Manx prison thanks to the intervention of the Virgin Mary in 1249, and probably died around 1250. He had two sons, Angus (Aonghus) Mór, Lord of Islay, and Alasdair, Lord of Kintyre. From the latter descends Clan MacAlister.

a helpful map from Clan Donald website showing the distributions of the branches covered in this post

Aonghus mac Domhnaill was the first to bear the surname that became ‘MacDonald’. As a vassal of the King of Norway he had participated in the war against the Scots in the 1260s, but as that failed after Largs, he submitted to the King of the Scots, 1264, and the Isles, as seen above were formally annexed to Scotland. He therefore integrated into Scottish politics, for example, attending a council that met at Scone in 1284 to recognise Princess Margaret as heir to the throne. But he also involved himself in Irish politics, helping his kin defend versus the expansion of Anglo-Irish power in the north (and marrying his daughter to an O’Donnell, king of Tyrconnell). He had three sons: Alasdair Og, Lord of Islay, Aonghus Og and Eoin (Og means ‘the younger’). The last of these was founder of the line of MacDonald of Ardnamurchan. The eldest, Alasdair, held on to Kintyre, Jura and other small islands, and sometimes used the title ‘Prince of the Isles’. He married a MacDougall cousin and made claims on their territories, and supported King Edward of England in his attempts to subjugate Scotland after 1292. He was killed in 1299, and the MacDonald succession was unclear: his sons seem to have been excluded and became mercenaries in Ireland; his brother Aonghus took over instead and continued the feud versus the MacDougalls. Aonghus supported the rise of Robert the Bruce by about 1306 and was rewarded with his rival’s lands on the western coast (Lochaber, Ardnamurchan and Glencoe). He fought with the Bruce at Bannockburn, 1314, and perhaps campaigned in Ireland with his brother Edward, 1315-18 (and maybe was killed there).

Aongus Og mac Domhnaill had two sons. The younger, illegitimate, was Eoin Fraoch (‘snarling’), who founded the line of MacDonald of Glencoe—well known from the song about the famous massacre of 1692, when Clan Campbell carried out orders from William III to bring to heel the disloyal, Stuart-supporting, MacDonalds. The older son, also called Eoin  or Iain (John), is seen as ‘Lord of the Isles’ in a document from 1336, though some near contemporaries did call him ‘king’: Rí Innsi Gall. He was courted by one faction in the ongoing succession wars of Scotland and gained the islands of Mull, Skye, Lewis and others for his clan (later confirmed by King David II). He then added the lordship of Garmoran on the mainland, through marriage to a MacRory, with the castle Tioram (‘Dry Castle’), an island in Loch Moidart that controlled access to Loch Shiel (also called Dorlin Castle). It too was said to have been built originally by Somerled, and eventually became the seat of the Clanranald branch of the family (below). Iain MacDonald’s bride was Lady Margaret Stewart, daughter of King Robert II. His new royal associate pressed him to disinherit his sons from his first marriage, but he was given the large Lordship of Lochaber as an incentive. By the time of his death in 1386, MacDonald power was nearing its high point. He controlled much of the western mainland and all of the Western Isles, including Iona, and was buried there.

Iain’s elder son, by the first marriage, was Ranald, Lord of Garmoran. He founded the lines of Clanranald and MacDonald of Glengarry (to which we will return). The younger sons, by Princess Margaret, were Donald, Lord of the Isles, and Iain, Lord of Dunyvaig. The latter rebelled against his brother in 1387, lost, and was exiled—he later served the English kings Richard II and Henry IV in their Irish affairs. His descendants were the MacDonalds of Dunyvaig. Dunyvaig Castle itself was another of those built by Somerled in the twelfth century, on the other side of Islay, on Lagavulin Bay. After the confiscations of the MacDonald castles of the late fifteenth century, it fell into disrepair, then was rebuilt when it was restored in 1545, as the seat Dunyvaig line (aka Clan Donald South, later earls of Antrim; see below). Surrendered to the Crown in 1608, it was given to the Campbells in 1647 and soon pulled down.

the ruins of Dunyveg Castle

Donald MacDonald of Islay, Lord of the Isles, shifted the focus of the clan more towards the Kingdom of Scotland. As a grandson of King Robert II, he stressed his royal blood, and added a tressure to his arms (the same decorative ‘frame’ that is used in the Scottish royal arms). In the late 1390s, he started to encroach on territory on the mainland: Ross and Badenoch, lands of one of the branches of the House of Stewart. By 1395, he had taken Urquhart Castle, one of the most famous in the Highlands, a royal castle on Loch Ness in the Great Glen. This helped in his march towards conquering the Earldom of Ross, which controlled much of the far north of Scotland. In 1402, its last Earl (Alexander Leslie) died, and his sister Mariota, who was married to Donald, made claims on the vast territory. By 1410, MacDonald had taken Dingwall Castle, seat of the earldom—and deriving its name from the Norse Þingvöllr, meeting place of the ‘thing’ or assembly— on Cromarty Firth on the east coast of Scotland. 1411 saw two big battles: between clans MacDonald and McKay for dominance of the north; and against the Duke of Albany—Robert Stewart, Donald’s uncle, but also regent to his other nephew, King James I—and the Earl of Mar (Alexander Stewart). The latter battle was known as ‘Red Harlaw’ due to its savagery. Donald was victorious in all of these and the Crown recognised his possession of the Earldom of Ross. But in 1415, Albany retook Dingwall and assigned the earldom to his son John—John spent most his time fighting in France, and when he died there in 1424, Ross was uncontestedly in the hands of the MacDonalds. The ancient province of Ross, stretching from coast to coast, may have taken its name from the Norse word for Orkney (Hrossey, ‘horse island’), or—and more sensibly to me—from Gaelic for ‘headland’, referring to the great rocky cliffs near Dingwall. It had been an earldom from at least the twelfth century.

the arms of the Lord of the Isles with the tressue

By this point, Donald, 2nd Lord of the Isles, had died and was succeeded by his son, Alexander, 3rd Lord and now 10th Earl of Ross. His brother Angus was created Bishop of the Isles, in 1426. This diocese, covering the Western Isles from the Hebrides to Man, is sometimes called Sodor, taking its name from that ancient Norse word for the southern isles (see above). It was created in about 1130; after 1387 it was divided and Man was ruled separately (and the diocese was abolished altogether in 1689). About thirty years after his death (c. 1440), Bishop Angus I was succeeded as bishop by his son Bishop Angus II.

Earl Alexander MacDonald continued his father’s struggle against the Duke of Albany, and thus supported James I in the re-taking of power from his uncle in 1425. By 1428, however, King James asserted Crown rule over the far too independent MacDonalds—he summoned the northern clans to his court at Inverness and arrested many of their chiefs, including Alexander and his son John. When he was released in 1429, Alexander returned with an army and burned Inverness to the ground. He was then defeated after a major battle, and formally submitted to the King at Holyrood Abbey in Edinburgh, then sent back to prison, now at Tantallon Castle on the Firth of Forth. The King and his chief ally in the north, the Earl of Mar, took over much of the MacDonald power. Earl Alexander was released in 1431, but his independent power and his enmity with the King had ended. In fact, when Mar died in 1436, Alexander was easily re-confirmed as Earl of Ross, and restored to Dingwall, Inverness, and even more lands. And in 1437 he was named Justiciar of Scotia, the highest Scottish official for the northern parts of the Kingdom. He died at Dingwall in 1449.

the seal of Alexander MacDonald of Islay

Alexander’s three sons from three marriages divided much of the patrimony. John of Islay, 4th Lord of the Isles and 11th Earl of Ross, was recognised as the ‘MacDomhnaill’, that is, the Chief of Clan Donald; while his brothers founded separate lineages: MacDonald of Sleat and MacDonald of Lochalsh. The latter was in fact the eldest son, Celestine, but Lochalsh was a significant lordship on the mainland, so seemed a good compensation for losing the overall headship of the family. Sleat was on Skye, and the lineage based here, founded by Hugh (or Ùisdean), was also called ‘Clan Donald North’ (we’ll return to them below).

Earl John returned his family’s power centre from Dingwall to the Western Isles; he held his court at Castle Ardtornish in Morvern. Located across the sound from Mull, at the southern opening of the Great Glen, it had been a hub of sea lanes since the time of Somerled, and one of the main MacDonald bases since the mid-fourteenth century. By the sixteenth, it was given by the Crown to the MacLeans; abandoned since the late seventeenth century, today Ardtornish belongs to the Campbells of Argyll.

ruins of Ardtornish Castle

The Lord of the Isles made war on the Scottish king once more in the 1450s, joining the rebellion of the Douglas Clan. He retook Urquhart Castle and the city of Inverness, and kept these when he made peace with James II in 1455. But in 1461, he made a deal with King Edward IV of England, who was annoyed that James III was harbouring the recently deposed Henry VI. The secret ‘Treaty of Ardtornish-Westminster’ of February 1462 stipulated that the MacDonalds would be loyal to England, if Edward would partition Scotland between Clan MacDonald and Clan Douglas—roughly north and south of the Forth of Firth. The Earl’s forces advanced under leadership of his illegitimate son Angus Og. But soon backed down. In about 1475, the King of England revealed this secret treaty of 1462 to the King of Scots, so the Lord of the Isles was summoned to the Scottish Parliament. He failed to appear, and was declared forfeit of this titles. He made peace with the King in 1476, but lost the earldom of Ross and the lordships of Skye and Kintyre, but kept the Outer Hebrides. John’s son Angus revolted, ejected his father from the clan and started a civil war. Early in the 1480s, Angus defeated his father off the coast of Mull—a place still called Bloody Bay.

Angus MacDonald solidified his hold on power by marrying the daughter of the first Earl of Argyll, Colin Campbell. He was murdered, however, by his Irish harper in 1490. His father John tried to take over the Lordship of the Isles by giving that title to his nephew Alexander of Lochalsh. He tried also to retake the Earldom of Ross, but was defeated by the Mackenzies at the Battle of the Park (c1491), west of Dingwall. In 1493, King James IV formally ended the independence of the Lordship of the Isles, by assuming the title for the Crown directly. The title is still given to the heir to the throne—so today William, Prince of Wales, is also the Lord of the Isles. Meanwhile, the earldom of Ross was now used as a royal dukedom for various younger sons of Stuart kings. In 1540, James V formally annexed Islay and the other islands of the Hebrides to the Crown of Scotland. John MacDonald spent the rest of his life a pensioner of the Crown in the Lowlands (dying in Dundee in 1503). The late Angus’s son, Donald (Domhnall Dubh), had been taken by his mother’s family, the Campbells of Argyll, and held as a prisoner for most of his life. He was released in 1543 and led a brief revolt versus the Earl of Arran, Regent of Scotland, with the support of Henry VIII, but he died in 1545 in Drogheda, Ireland. The main line of Clan Donald came to an end.

The leadership of Clan MacDonald passed to the line of Hugh of Sleat (pronounced ‘Slate’). Sleat is the peninsula that forms the southern ‘arm’ of the Isle of Skye; it takes its name from sléttr, Norse for ‘smooth/even’, and this area is indeed flat and more fertile than the rest of the island. Their seat was at Dunscaith Castle. This castle (‘fortress of shadows’) was named for an ancient warrior maiden, Scáthach (‘the shadow’), from Irish mythology. Built just offshore, it was held by the MacDonalds by the fourteenth century but fought over with the rival Macleans. This branch was confirmed in possessions on Skye by the Scottish king in 1476 as the overall lordship of the Isles was crumbling. Hugh’s son Donald Gallach was murdered in 1506—in a violent clash that involved his brothers contesting the succession. He was succeeded by his brother Gilleasbaig Dubh—who had a long career as a pirate and was also murdered, in 1520.

Dunscaith

Much of the sixteenth-century history of Clan MacDonald of Sleat was an unending bloody rivalry with the MacLeods over control of Skye and Lewis, or feuds with other branches of the MacDonalds (which also developed into rivalries between Protestant and Catholic—for example the Clanranald line on South Uist were Catholic). Clan chiefs led piratical raids on neighbouring islands, or mercenary ventures to Ireland. The Scottish royal government was powerless to maintain order, but little by little the more loyal Clan Campbell became dominant in the west of Scotland. One by one the MacDonald chiefs submitted to the monarch and accepted legal charters of ownership over their land. The rivalry with the Campbells was re-activated in the Civil Wars of the 1640s when the MacDonalds supported the Crown and aggressively pursued the Convenanter Campbells. The tables were then turned with the loyal Campbells attacking the rebellious MacDonalds in the 1690s, notably at Glencoe. Naturally, the MacDonalds were therefore Jacobites in the eighteenth century, and on and on and on…

The Chief of MacDonald of Sleat—who was also, though not really recognised at the time, Chief of all of Clan Donald—continued to reside on Skye. Dunscaith Castle was abandoned to ruin in the early seventeenth century and they moved to Duntulm, at the other end of Skye on the northern peninsula, Trotternish. This castle was also from the fourteenth century, and was now expanded, but also abandoned in the mid-eighteenth century for a nearby modern house, Monkstadt.

Duntulm, Skye

Donald Gorm (‘Blue Donald’) succeeded as 8th Chief in 1616 and was created Baronet, of Sleat, in 1625. He was a Royalist who fought for Charles I, and died in 1643. The 4th Baronet, Sir Donald, was a Jacobite, and was created ‘Lord Sleat’ in 1716 (it is considered to be in the ‘Jacobite Peerage’, so legally never existed within Great Britain). This branch was the only one that did not later support the Jacobite uprising of 1745, so they kept their lands, while others had their estates confiscated. They were eventually rewarded: in 1776, the 9th Baronet (or 6th Lord Sleat) was created Baron MacDonald, of Slate, in County Antrim, in the Peerage of Ireland.

Alexander, 1st Baron MacDonald

In 1814, the MacDonalds of Sleat added the surname Bosville, following a marriage with the heiress of estates in Yorkshire, including Thorpe Hall. The 3rd Baron, Godfrey, married Louisa, an illegitimate daughter of the Duke of Gloucester (George III’s brother), but their eldest son was born before the marriage. So the Bosville lands passed to the eldest son, while the second son received the baronial title and lands on Skye. In 1910 the elder son recognised retrospectively as capable by Scottish law of inheriting the baronetcy (and maybe, though purely hypothetically, the Jacobite title of Lord Sleat?). So today the head of Clan MacDonald of Sleat is the 17th Baronet, based at Thorpe Hall in Yorkshire, while the head of Clan Donald overall is the 8th Baron MacDonald, based on Skye.

In 1947, Alexander, 7th Baron MacDonald, was formally recognised by Lord Lyon as the High Chief of Clan Donald, or ‘Chief of Name and Arms of MacDonald—and in a sense the ‘Prince’ of the House of Somerled. He was further recognised by the Crown through his appointment at Lord Lieutenant of Inverness-shire in 1952. The 7th Baron was succeeded in 1970 by his son Godfrey. Until the 1920s, this branch of the family was based at Armadale Castle, on the southeast side of Skye, where the ferry comes in from Mallaig on the mainland. The mansion was built in the 1790s and given an extravagant neo-gothic tower in the early nineteenth century. Abandoned in 1925, it is now a ruin, but the gardens are maintained and are host to the Clan Donald Centre and the Museum of the Isles. The 8th Baron had sold this estate to a family trust in 1972, and moved his family to Kinloch Lodge, a small whitewashed former farmhouse and later hunting lodge, a few miles up the coast. It is run today as a luxury hotel. The 8th Baron MacDonald, Chief of Clan Donald, worked in local government in Scotland in the 1970s-80s. His ‘crown prince’ is his son Hugo (b. 1982).

Armadale Castle
Kinloch Lodge

There were, and are, many junior branches of Clan Donald, the heirs of Somerled, Lord of the Isles. Of these, two stand out in history and were given noble titles: MacDonnell of the Glens in Ireland, and MacDonald of Clanranald in Scotland.

In the sixteenth century, the head of the Irish branch (‘Clan Donald of the South’) was also the Laird of Dunyveg (see above), retaining the familial link across the sea with Islay. They were also called MacDonnell of ‘the Glens’, the nine valleys in the northernmost part of County Antrim, with their seat in Glenarm (one of the nine), which they had inherited in the late fourteenth century. Many members of this branch migrated to Ireland in the 1520s-30s, causing unrest in an already unsettled area. They were encouraged to move by James V, who delighted in unsettling the regime of his uncle Henry VIII; but were checked by English forces in a pitched battle in 1539 at Belahoe (Ballyhoe), County Meath.

The 6th Laird of Dunyveg’s younger brother, ‘Sorley Boy’ (Somhairle Buidhe, or ‘Somerled the Blonde’) MacDonnell, became one of the greatest warrior chieftains of the north of Ireland in the latter half of the sixteenth century. In 1559, he defeated a family who had long dominated the northern coast of Ulster, the MacQuillans, and took their stronghold, Dunluce, as his own. Dunluce Castle had been built on a great rock jutting out into the sea in the thirteenth century. Sorley Boy also took over their title, Lord of the Route—the name for this coastline. Dunluce was abandoned by the family in the 1690s and fell apart, as the family had shifted their seat to Glenarm Castle in the 1630s.

Dunluce Castle, County Antrim, Northern Ireland

The 1560s-80s was a time of constant conflict with the English crown, or with the other powerful lords of Ulster, the O’Neills and the O’Donnells (see here for some of the turbulent history of the O’Neills). But marriage alliances were forged with both of these: Sorley Boy, Lord of the Route, married Mary O’Neill, daughter of the Earl of Tyrone, while her half-brother (and rebel leader) Shane O’Neill married a MacDonnell niece, Catherine. Catherine’s sister married Hugh O’Donnell, King of Tyrconnell—so it was all in the family. Eventually, Sorley Boy made formal submission to Queen Elizabeth in 1586 and was re-granted his lands as fiefs of the Crown. He died in 1590 and was buried in the family necropolis at Bonamargy Friary near Ballycastle, on the bit of the coast of Antrim closest to Scotland.

Sorley Boy had a number of nephews who were now both lords of the Glens and of the Route. They also continued to maintain a presence across the strait in Kintyre, so were interestingly both Scottish and Irish. After 1615, however, they were deprived of their Scottish lands by the Campbells acting on behalf of James VI. The senior line died out in 1626, so Sorley’s son, Ranald (or Randal) MacSorley MacDonnell, succeeded as the ‘Lord of the Route and the Glens’. He was—after the ‘Flight of the Earls’ of 1607, in which most of the senior Irish chiefs fled abroad rather than submit to English rule—the seniormost Gaelic nobleman in Ulster. His willingness to submit to James VI of Scotland, now James I of England, got him an appointment on the Privy Council of Ireland and the post of Lord Lieutenant of Antrim in 1618, with the new title, Viscount Dunluce. In 1620, he was created Earl of Antrim. Yet he remained a Catholic in this era of the Protestant plantations of Ulster.

His son, the 2nd Earl of Antrim, also called Randal MacDonnell, was a Royalist, and a regular attendee of the Stuart court in London. His wife, the widow of the royal favourite the Duke of Buckingham, was herself a favourite of the Queen, so Antrim’s standing was high. As tensions rose against Charles I in the late 1630s, he proposed an invasion of southwest Scotland using his (Catholic) Irish tenants against (Protestant) Scots (and hoping to regain his family’s lost lands in Kintyre). This invasion never materialised, but did further damage the reputation of Charles I in Scotland. His support for the Crown in the next Irish phase of the Civil Wars earned him the even higher title of Marquess of Antrim, 1645—but he was later tried for suspected collusion with the Cromwellian regime.

The Marquess had no sons, so this title became extinct in 1682. The earldom of Antrim, however, continued to his brother and his descendants into the eighteenth century, and was recreated in 1785 for the 6th Earl with a special clause allowing female succession. Antrim was then again a marquisate briefly from 1789 to 1791. Thereafter the earldom passed into the Kerr family of Lothian, who took the name MacDonnell. Today they are represented by the 10th Earl of Antrim, and their seat is still Glenarm Castle in County Antrim. They also maintained a grand townhouse in Merrion Square in Dublin, Antrim House, but it was torn down in the 1930s.

Glenarm Castle, Antrim
a sketch of Antrim House, Dublin

Back in Scotland, the line known as Clanranald (founded by Ranald, 2nd son of Iain, Lord of the Isles, above), continued to maintain the original lands of the MacDonalds in the Western Isles. Their main seat was Castle Tioram, on the mainland in the district of Lochaber. But several chiefs were buried at Howmore on South Uist (one of the Outer Hebrides), and not far away was the birthplace of another famous member of this branch of the family, Flora MacDonald (of ‘Skye Boat Song’ fame). A later seat was also on South Uist, Ormacleit, built in the early eighteenth century but destroyed soon after the Fifteen, and the seat moved to Nunton (Baile nan Cailleach, ‘settlement of the nuns’), on Benbecula, the smaller island between North and South Uist, from which Bonnie Prince Charlie had to be smuggled, ‘over the sea to Skye’.

Flora Macdonald (by Ramsay, 1749)
Tioram Castle
Ormacleit Castle

In the early seventeenth century, Donald, 11th Chief of Clanranald, was the first to try to settle affairs with the Scottish crown and end a century of feuds and piracy. He met royal commissioners on Mull and agreed to submit to rule of law in return for debt relief. His son the 12th Chief ‘ruled’ for fifty years and was a chief supporter of the Royalist cause in the Highlands in the 1640s. But like the others, their royalism translated into Jacobitism in the eighteenth century: the 14th Chief (Allan) died in the Fifteen after being mortally wounded at Sheriffmuir. The 15th Chief, Ranald, was created ‘Lord of Clanranald’ by the Old Pretender in 1716—he survived and died unmarried in Paris in 1725. The clan lands were confiscated, but restored to his cousin and heir, the 16th Chief, Donald, of the Benbecula line. The 17th Chief did not support Bonnie Prince Charlie in the Forty-Five, but his son (and eventually the 18th Chief) did: this Ranald was one of the first to join the rebellion and raised significant troops at Culloden, after which he too escaped to France, and died there in 1776.

A clansman from Clanranald

Another MacDonald worth mentioning here, in the context of late eighteenth-century France, is Jacques-Etienne MacDonald, whose father Neil MacEachen MacDonald, had been an early supporter of Bonnie Prince Charlies and received him at his home on South Uist in 1745 after Culloden, and helped him escape to France. Jacques-Etienne was born and raised in France, and became a Marshal of France under Napoleon and Duc de Tarente (both in 1809), in recognition of his conquest of the Kingdom of Naples. But it is unclear whether the Marshal MacDonald was in fact a MacDonald—several sources say the family MacEachen were a line of Clan Maclean. In any case, his story will feature in a separate blog with the other Irish curiosity in French history, the Duc de Magenta, Patrice de MacMahon, President of France in the Third Republic.

By the end of the eighteenth century, poverty in the Highlands and oppression towards Catholics, convinced many hundreds of members of this clan to emigrate to Canada (Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island). The chiefs by this point were little help, as they—like other aristocrats—were keen to clear the people off their lands to make them more profitable for sheep. Ranald George, 20th Chief of Clanranald, was head of the clan for much of the 19th century. He married the daughter of an earl from the southwest of England, and was the same year elected MP for a borough in Devon (1812 to 1824). He sold off most of his Scottish estates, except the now ruined castle of Tioram. So his interests were clearly elsewhere. He was even nearly replaced as Clan Chief by the head of Clan Glengarry, Alexander MacDonnell (see next). He died in London in 1873 and was succeeded by his son Reginald, an admiral in the British Navy and Commander-in-Chief of the East Indies Station. The main line ended in 1944 with the death of the 23rd Chief, and passed to cadets of the Boisdale line: the 24th Chief, Ranald MacDonald, was recognised by the Lord Lyon in 1956 (and is the 10th Lord of Clanranald in the Jacobite Peerage).

Of the other clans that received a noble title (beyond ‘chief’), there were also the MacDonalds of Glengarry. Their chieftain was at one point one of the greatest landowners in the Highlands. Alastair Dubh, 11th Chief of Glengarry, was one of the leaders of the Jacobite rebellion of The Fifteen, and was created ‘Lord MacDonell’, 1716, by the Old Pretender. They took part in The Forty-Five as well, with the Glengarry Regiment being the largest contingent at the Battle of Culloden. After this, their lands were mostly confiscated, and the seat, Invergarry Castle, destroyed by government troops.

Invergarry Castle

One of the most colourful men of the early nineteenth century in Scotland was the 15th Chief, Alexander (or Alasdair in Scots), the 5th Lord MacDonell in the Jacobite Peerage, who had tried to unseat the Chief of Clanranald (above) in 1824. He was a flamboyant character who always dressed in traditional kilt and maintained old traditions of always being accompanied and served by an entourage, always with a piper in tow. He attended the coronation of George IV in Highland dress and was said to have popularised that style all over Britain and stimulated the imagination of Sir Walter Scott. Yet traditionalist as he was, he too was equally guilty of his part in the Clearances, resulting in a mass exodus to Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

Alasdair MacDonell of Glengarry

Indeed, the head of this branch today, the 24th Chief of Glengarry (or 13th Lord MacDonell) lives in Vancouver. Today there are MacDonalds all over the world—one of these who can come to prominence in recent years, and certainly in the world of dukes and princes, is Mary Donaldson, Queen of Denmark since January 2024. So in a sense, the Viking blood of Somerled has gone home to rule…

the Viking Queen–Mary Donaldson, in a photo from 2013 when he husband was still Crown Prince Frederik of Denmark

Kinsky Princes: From Bohemian Forests to Viennese Palaces

Once upon a time, in a far-off forest in Bohemia, a princess was attacked by a ferocious wolf. Her attendant bravely fought off the wild beast, and in gratitude, the princess ennobled her hero and granted him a coat-of-arms depicting the bold swipe of wolf’s claws on a blood-red field (some modern descriptors call these boar’s teeth). Centuries later, his purported descendants, the Kinskys, would rise to the ranks of princes themselves, and by the 19th century were amongst the richest noble houses in the entire Austro-Hungarian monarchy.

Kinsky Arms

The Kinsky family emerged from legend into history in the early 13th century with the possession of an estate in northwest Bohemia around the village of Vchynice, from which they took their name. This is just outside the town of Lovosice on the great river Elbe as it flows north towards the mountains separating Bohemia from Saxony. Their lands were downriver from the estates that formed the core of another Czech house that survived the great purge of the native nobility by the Habsburgs in the 1620s, the Lobkowitz family, seen in a previous blog post. By the 14th century, the owners of Vchynice had taken it as their surname, and eventually dropped the first letter to be instead Chynsky (or ‘Chinitz’ in Latin sources), and added z (‘of’) Vchynic, or von Wchinitz in German. Today the family name in Czech is spelled Kinští, but they are commonly known in other European languages including English as Kinsky. They are not, it should be noted, related in any way to the famous family of actors descended from Klaus Kinski, whose original name was Nakszynski and who emigrated from northern Poland to Germany.

The family from Vchynice gained more lands and took on roles as royal officials in towns and forests in the Kingdom of Bohemia. Jan Vchynsky z Vchynice (d. 1590) was Burggraf (administrator of a royal castle) of Karlštejn, the famous castle built by Emperor Charles IV in the 1340s. His son Radislav (d. 1619) added greatly to his family’s landholdings (though Vchynice itself had been sold in the 1540s) and to its prestige. He was guardian of the orphaned sons of the noble Tetauer of Tetova family, and, noticing the similarity of their coat of arms, decided to claim kinship as well as their noble status (and, in good early modern practice, forged some documents as ‘evidence’), adding the name ‘Tetova’ to his own (c. 1596). Tetova, or Tettau in German, was an old fief in Lusatia, a province for centuries part of the Bohemian Crown, but lost to Saxony in the 1630s (today the town is just across the border, in the Province of Brandenburg). The von Tettau family continued on for centuries, active in Brandenburg and then Prussian court and military service—both families continue to use the same coat of arms, and many genealogies still say one family is an ‘offshoot’ of the other. And maybe they are.

The newly rebranded Radislav Kinsky z Vcynhic a Tetova (or Wchinitz und Tettau in German) was favoured by Emperor Rudolf II, King of Bohemia, and in 1611 was appointed Master of the Court of Bohemia, and given a seat in Bohemian Diet with the rank of ‘lord’ (pán) for himself and his family. His nephews, Radislav, Oldřich and Vilém were all actively involved in the great uprising of the Protestant Bohemian nobility against Habsburg rule in 1618—and the famous ‘defenestration of Prague’ of May 23rd. When this uprising was crushed after the Battle of White Mountain in 1620, Radislav fled, and Oldřich had his lands confiscated, like so many members of the old Czech nobility, soon replaced by loyal Austrian nobles. Somehow Vilém had sufficiently ‘acted obscurely’ during the revolt, and managed not only to hold on to the family estates, but was promoted in rank to ‘Count Kinsky’ in 1628. This was mostly due to his association with rising Imperial warlord, Albrecht von Wallenstein (or in Czech, z Valdštejna)—his wife’s brother’s wife was Wallenstein’s wife’s sister, if you can follow that (or his brother-in-law was also brother-in-law of Wallenstein). At some point in the early 1630s, Count Kinsky was living in exile in Dresden in Saxony, and tried to get Wallenstein to switch allegiances and join the Protestant side of the Thirty Years War—this did not happen, but they remained close, and were both assassinated by agents of the Emperor who feared the rising independent strength of his own general, at Cheb (Eger) in February 1634. One of his estates that was confiscated was the mighty castle of Teplice (Teplitz) in the mountains of the northwest—it had only been acquired by the family in 1585, but from here on was one of the principal residence of the princely Clary-Aldringen family (so will properly be looked at for that family).

Villem, 1st Count Kinsky

The youngest of all those brothers, Jan Oktavián, in the years before the uprising, had been chamberlain of Emperor Matthias (successor of Rudolf II), and obtained the castle and estate of Chlumec nad Cidlinou, in 1611. This castle on the river Cidlina is northeast of Prague, built in the 15th century and expanded by the Pernštejn family in the 16th. It was the Kinsky seat until a new castle was built in 1721-23 just outside the town, Karlova Koruna (see below). The older castle fell into disrepair and was finally town down in the 1960s.

the old castle at Chlumec, in 1640

Jan Oktavián was pardoned after the events of 1618-20, and consolidated the landholdings of all the branches over the next several decades, notably the castle of Česká Kamenice in the farthest northern corner of Bohemia. Built in the 1530s by the Vartemberks, it had been purchased by Radislav Kinsky, and stayed in the family until 1945. Since then it has been used as housing for the state forestry administration.

Česká Kamenice

All the current Kinskys descend from Count Jan Oktavián. He took on his father’s office of Master of the Court from 1646—an office passed to his two sons then two grandsons before it was finally confirmed as hereditary by Maria Theresa in 1743. The Kinsky Masters of the Court (Hofmeister in German, Hofmistr in Czech) would thus perform a key role when any Habsburg visited Bohemia, but most importantly at their coronations in Prague. Jan Oktavián was confirmed in his rank of count in 1676 and died three years later.

His son Count František Oldřich (Franz Ulrich) (d. 1699) was thus Master of the Court and also High Chancellor of Bohemia, 1683, and a member of the Emperor’s privy council from 1689. In the 1690s he was one of the leading members of the Imperial court and led important negotiations with the Ottomans. Two other Kinskys held the highest judiciary office in the Kingdom of Bohemia: František Oldřich’s brother Václav Norbert (d. 1719), in 1705-1711, and the latter’s son, František Ferdinand (d. 1741), 1723-36. The latter was a diplomat and organised the election in Frankfurt of the Archduke Charles of Austria as Holy Roman Emperor Charles VI in 1712.

Count František Oldřich Kinsky
Count František Ferdinand Kinsky

Count František Ferdinand built a new family residence at Chlumec, Karlova Koruna Castle in the early 1720s: named ‘Charles’ Crown’, in honour of the coronation of Emperor as King of Bohemia. This castle, a baroque pleasure palace with a unique floorplan, on a small hill overlooking a park, is still in amazing shape, and was restored to the Kinsky family in 1990 following the period of Communist rule. The nearby hexagonal Chapel of the Annunciation (later of St John the Baptist) became the family sepulchre for many years.

Karlova Koruna, Chlumec, in 1809
amazing floorplan of Karlova Koruna

Count František Ferdinand also acquired the Castle of Eckartsau in Lower Austria, 1720, an ancient medieval castle which he remodelled as a in Baroque style. Located on the Danube between Vienna and Pressburg (today’s Bratislava), it made a convenient stopping point for the Imperial family, so Emperor Francis I purchased it in 1760—it was thus only a Kinsky property for 40 years—it later became famous for hosting the last court of Austria-Hungary in 1917-18, and was the place of abdication for the last emperor, Charles I, in November 1918.

Schloss Eckartsau in Austria

František Ferdinand had three sons, all high-ranking military commanders in the second half of the 18th century. His second son Joseph in particular was Commander of the Army of Hungary in 1787, then of the entire Habsburg army in 1788. His younger brother Franz Joseph became Director of the Theresian Military Academy in Vienna, founder of an army cadet school in Prague, and all-round pedagogical wonder of his century. The eldest, Leopold Ferdinand married a Liechtenstein princess and founded the senior line of the Kinskys, the Chlumsky Branch. There are still several Kinsky counts around descended from this line, but they are not princes.

Count Franz Joseph Kinsky

It was Václav Norbert’s second son, Štepán Vilém (Stephan Wilhelm) (1679-1749) who promoted his branch of the family into the highest ranks of the Habsburg nobility. He served Emperor Charles VI as a diplomat—St Petersburg and Versailles—and was Grand Marshal of Bohemia, 1733, and Grand Master of the Court. In 1746, the Emperor’s grateful daughter and successor, Maria Theresa, as Queen of Bohemia, created him Prince Kinsky von Wchinitz und Tettau; a year later, he was also created Prince of the Empire by Maria Theresa’s husband, Francis Stephen of Lorraine, recently elected as Emperor Francis I. Unlike most princes of the Empire, the Kinskys did not hold an immediate fief, so the title was attached to the person, and was only held by the senior male (so other children were count/countess). It did not bring the family a vote or a seat in the Imperial Diet.

Arms of Stephan Wilhelm, 1st Prince Kinsky, in a place of honour on the ceiling in Prague Castle

When the Kinsky estates were divided, the first Prince Kinsky received as his share the castles at Česká Kamenice (see above) and Choceň. Choceň (Chotzen) was located in the Pardubice region. It was a market town with a castle built in the 1560s and rebuilt in the 18th century, by which point it was in Kinsky hands. The family completely rebuilt it after a fire in 1829, and used it as a favoured summer residence in the next century. Since 1945 it has housed an art school and a history and archaeology museum.

Choceň Castle

Franz Joseph, 2nd Prince Kinsky, succeeded his father in 1749, but he died in 1752 at age 26 with no male heir, so the succession passed to a first cousin. The first Prince’s younger brother, Philipp Joseph, had also been a diplomat, notably the Imperial envoy to London, 1728 to 1736. He then served, like so many of his forebears, as High Chancellor of Bohemia, 1738, and one of the close advisors to Empress Maria Theresa in the first years of her reign. But he too died relatively young, in 1749, meaning that the succession went instead to his son, Franz de Paula Ulrich. A younger son, Johann Joseph, became an entrepreneur on his estates—glass and textiles—and founded another line of Kinsky counts.

Count Philipp Joseph Kinsky
Franz de Paula Ulrich, 3rd Prince Kinsky

The 3rd Prince Kinsky (1726-1792) had a long military career, rising to the rank of General of Artillery in 1767, Director-General of the Austrian Artillery, 1772, then Field Marshal, 1778. He purchased grand residences in two of the Habsburg capitals: Prague and Vienna. The Kinsky Palace in Prague, located right on the Old Town Square (Staroměstské náměstí) in the heart of the historic city, had initially been built in the 1750s by the Golz family, then purchased by the Kinskys in 1768. A distinctive pink and white rococo palace, it also had spaces for shops on the ground floor that opened up onto the square: at the end of the 19th century, Franz Kafka’s father had a haberdasher’s shop here, and young Franz himself went to secondary school located on a higher floor. In the 1920s-30s it served as the Polish Legation to Czechoslovakia, and since 1949 has been part of the National Gallery.

Kinsky Palace, Prague

On the other side of the Vltava River that flows through Prague, the Kinskys built a Summer House, in about 1830, and a Romantic garden with rare trees and waterfalls. Since 1901 the Summer House has housed a museum of ethnography.

Kinsky Summer Palace, Prague

Meanwhile, in Vienna, Prince Kinsky purchased in 1784 a palace built by the Daun family in 1713 on the northwest edge of the old city close to the University, facing onto a large square called the Freyung. In the 20th century, the Palais Kinsky passed out of the family to a daughter who married an Argentine, so it became the Argentine Embassy in the 1960s. Sold by the family in 1987, it was restored and re-opened in the 1990s as an auction house and a place for fancy receptions—its lower levels house shops and restaurants.

Kinsky Palais, Vienna

The princely line of the Kinskys in the later 18th and early 19th centuries was quite limited in terms of the number of sons, meaning that the family’s wealth did not need to be divided amongst heirs. Like many of the great aristocrats in Vienna in this period they were great patrons of music: Joseph, 4th Prince Kinsky (d. 1798) was a patron of the Czech musician Pavel Wranitzky—who is not very famous, but has wonderfully bold music in the heroic vein of late Haydn—while the 5th Prince, Ferdinand (d. 1812), was an important patron of Beethoven from 1809—one of the aristocratic trio that included Archduke Rudolf and Prince Josef František von Lobkowitz—the three paid him a pension to enable him to stay permanently in Vienna and not seek employment elsewhere. But he soon died; his widow continued the pension, and was thanked by means of a song, An die Hoffnung (‘to hope’).

Joseph, 4th Prince Kinsky
Ferdinand, 5th Prince Kinsky

Another junior branch was created by Ferdinand’s younger brother, Count Franz de Paula. The most prominent member of this line was his daughter, Franziska, who became Princess-Consort of Liechtenstein as wife of Prince Aloys II (r 1836-58), and then regent of the principality for her son, 1858-60.

Franziska Kinsky, Princess of Liechtenstein

Rudolf, the 6th Prince (d. 1836), was part of the Czech national revival movement that took hold of much of the Bohemian elite society in the 1820s—in particular he supported the creation of a National Museum in Prague. Though mostly still based at Choceň Castle, in 1828, he also added to his family’s estates through the purchase of Heřmanův Městec (Hermannstädtel in German), a town east of Prague towards the hills of Moravia. He improved the town, built and orphanage and hospital, and extended the old castle and developed its English style gardens. Since the 1950s, this castle has housed a retirement home.

Rudolf, 6th Prince Kinsky

The 4th, 5th and 6th princes all died relatively young, in their 30s-40s; in contrast, the 7th Prince Kinsky, Ferdinand Bonaventura (d. 1904), lived until he was 70. He sat as a hereditary member of the Austrian House of Lords, but was not very political. Instead, he developed his estates in Bohemia, notably its industries, sugar and beer. He had three sons and a daughter, Elisabeth, whose daughter once again connected this family to the House of Liechtenstein: Georgina von Wilczek was Princess-Consort of Liechtenstein from 1938 to 1989.

Ferdinand, 7th Prince Kinsky.

The eldest son, Karl, 8th Prince Kinsky von Wchinitz und Tettau (d. 1919), only outlived his father by 15 years. As heir, he had long made his name as one of the premier equestrians in Europe. In particular, he was passionate about horseracing in England. In 1883, he himself rode his prize-winning horse (Zoedone) to victory at the Grand National.

Karl, 8th Prince Kinsky

Horses had in fact been an important aspect of the Kinsky dynastic identity for centuries. A Kinsky was put in charge of the Emperor Charles VI’s newly commissioned stud farm in eastern Bohemia in 1723, to breed horses specifically for elite cavalry units. These were the famous ‘Kinsky Horses’, with a distinctive gold colour and renowned stamina. Count Oktavián, from one of the junior branches, was one of Europe’s most successful breeders in the mid-nineteenth century, and introduced English style racing to the Austro-Hungarian monarchy in 1874—an event still held today (the Grand Pardubice Steeplechase).

a Kinsky Horse

The 8th Prince managed to stay in England for many years by serving in a diplomatic post, as Austrian attaché to Great Britain. He became very close, maybe too close, to Lady Randolph Churchill (the American-born Jennie Jerome). When he was recalled to Austria-Hungary due to the outbreak of World War One, he accepted a military command but arranged it so he would fight only on the Eastern Front against Russia, and never against Britain. In December 1918, noble status was abolished shortly after the declaration of the independent republic of Czechoslovakia; then in April 1919, titles of nobility were abolished for Austria too. In December that same year the 8th Prince died, and was succeeded by his brother, Rudolf, the 9th Prince, who died in 1930 leaving five daughters.

The princely title thus went to his nephew Ulrich (Oldřich). This prince’s father, Count Ferdinand Vincenz (d. 1916), had served in the last decade of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy as Master of the Horse for Emperor Franz Josef. He lived at Moravský Krumlov, inherited from a maternal uncle, and Horažd’ovice. The former, in southern Moravia, is a huge castle from the 13th century, built by the Lipá noble family and held until 1620—it was then held by the Liechtensteins until passed to Prince Kinsky in 1908 (so it mostly belongs in their story). Today the castle belongs to the town and is slowly being restored back to its former glory. Horažd’ovice Castle is a more modest building, in the far west of Bohemia, bought by Prince Kinsky in 1843. A 13th-century Gothic castle was replaced in the 15th century by the Švihovský family, who, as we’ve seen with so many others, had their lands confiscated in 1620. The Kinskys developed local industries here, notably pearl oyster farming. It too belongs to its town and houses a variety of civic spaces: a city museum, gallery, information centre, youth centre, library and a restaurant too!

Moravský Krumlov
Horažd’ovice Castle, and its pizzeria

Prince Ulrich was born at Choceň. Like so many of his ancestors, he did not have a long life (1893-1938), but in his final years he impacted the future of the family through his strong support of the Sudenten German Party which advocated annexation of much of western and northern Bohemia by Nazi Germany, a fateful decision that heavily impacted the future of his dynasty.

Ulrich, 10th Prince Kinsky

His son Franz Ulrich, 11th Prince Kinsky (1936-2009), emigrated as a child with his mother to Argentina, where he spent most of his life. At the end of the Second World War, his family’s lands were confiscated due to his father’s political stance, first by the restored republic, then by the Communist regime. They were not restored following the ‘Velvet Revolution’ of the 1990s, as many estates were to old Czech noble families. In 2003, many (over 150) lawsuits were filed versus the Czech state, pressing claims totalling over 13 billion Euros. The Prince argued that he was only two in 1940, and that his mother’s family, Bussche-Haddenhausen, were strongly anti-Nazi.

Franz Ulrich, 11th Prince Kinsky

His son, Karel Maximilian (‘Charlie’ or ‘Carlos’), 12th Prince Kinsky (b. 1967, in Buenos Aires), succeeded in 2009 and renewed the application to the Czech government for restitution of lands in 2012, and the European courts upheld his claim that his father (the child in the 1940s) had not been given a fair trial. It remains pending. He is married and has an heir, Wenzel (Václav) Ferdinand (b. 2002).

Yet another Liechtenstein connection was made by the 11th Prince’s first cousin, Countess Marie Kinská, who in 1967 married the Hereditary Prince Hans Adam II, who has reigned since 1989. The Princess of Liechtenstein died in 2021.

Marie Kinska, Princess of Lichtenstein

Today there remain three main lines of the House of Kinsky: the princely branch (nominally based) at Choceň and two branches of counts, at Kostelec and Chlumec. Unlike the princely line, these branches were more firmly identified with Czech nationalism in the 1930s, and although they also had their castles and estates appropriated by the Communist regime after 1945, they were recovered in the 1990s.

The Kostelec branch was founded by a second son of the 5th Prince Kinsky at the end of the 18th century. The Castle Kostelec on the Orlice river is in northeast Bohemia, a ‘fortified church’ built in the early 14th century then held as a castle by various families until purchased by Josef Kinsky in 1796. A newer castle was built here by this branch of the Kinskys in about 1830, in neoclassical style. The two buildings were restored to the Kinskys in the 1990s, and house a gallery and town history museum.

Kostelec Castle

The Chlumec (or Chlumsky) branch, as seen above, is actually the senior line, formed by the elder brother of the 1st Prince at the start of the 18th century. One of these, Count Zdenko Radslav Kinsky (d. 1975), was the instigator of the 1938 Declaration of members of the old Czech families proclaiming the inviolability of the territory of the Czech state and protesting any idea of its dismemberment or a takeover by Nazi Germany. His properties were confiscated when this failed and a Nazi protectorate was established in Bohemia. It was returned in 1945, then confiscated again by the Communists in 1948. He emigrated to France and died in Rome.

Count Zdenko Radslav Kinsky

Count Zdenko’s son, Count Václav Norbert (d. 2008), married an Italian heiress and added her surname, dal Borgo, to his own. Late in life he became active in the Order of Malta—no longer crusading knights, but a global Catholic charity—and served as ambassador from the Order (which is based in Rome) to the Republic of Malta, then as Grand Prior of the Order in the Czech Republic, 2002-2004. The Kinsky-Dal Borgo branch reclaimed Chlumec, Karlova Koruna and other castles in the 1990s, and have been avidly restoring them.

Karlova Koruna today

Another member of this cadet branch, Count Christian (d. 2011), married the heiress of a mighty fortress in Austria, Heidenresichstein, in the far north of the country near the border with Bohemia. A moated castle with several towers, it was built in the later twelfth century, and was held by two families—amongst others—for about three centuries each: von Puchheim and Palffy. The latter died out in 1942, and ultimately the inheritance went to the Kinskys, who still own it today.

Heidenresichstein Castle, Austria

Schönburg, Schönberg, Schomberg: Beautiful Princes from Dresden to Dublin

If a beautiful fortress in French-speaking lands gave its name to a dynasty or two of dukes and princes (‘Beaufort’), then attractive castles in German-speaking lands can too. There are certainly a number of castles in Germany and Austria named schön burg, or the similar yet different schön berg, referring to a mountain, not a castle. Given how much noble families liked to build their castles on mountaintops, it is therefore not surprising that there are several von Schönburg or von Schönberg noble families. This blog piece will look at three of them, two from Saxony in east-central Germany, and one from the Rhineland in the west. All three shifted the scene of their activities at different points in their history: one (Schönburg) became princes and migrated to Austria and Bohemia; another (Schönberg) became military leaders in France (as ‘Schomberg’) and married into a dukedom (Hallwin); while a third (spelled either way) moved first to France (and also took on the latter spelling), then to England where they too became dukes. Perhaps even more extraordinarily, this last family also received a second dukedom, and it was the second ducal title ever in the peerage of Ireland—the short-lived dukedom of Leinster (in its first creation).

Schönburg Castle in Saxony (photo Mewes)
Schönburg Castle in the Rhineland (photo Alexander Hoernigk)

This post will be hard to categorise therefore: Germany? Austria? France? England? Ireland? It’s another good example of how truly mobile many of these elite families were in the eras before the divisive forces of nationalism took hold in the nineteenth century. Neither the French nor English Schomburg dukedoms lasted very long, so the only family still extant today are the Schönburg princes in Austria.

All three families traced their origins to the 12th and 13th centuries; but of the three, only the family that ended up as princes were very significant before the late 16th century. The first who obtained top rank however was the Saxon family who ended up as marshals of France and dukes of Hallwin, so we will start there. In the early 13th century, a Saxon knight called Hugo was named Castellan of Rudelsburg, one of the defensive castles of the bishops of Naumburg, whose diocese was in the borderlands between Saxony and Thuringia. It is suggested in some sources that Hugo’s family were a branch of a family long in service to the bishops of Naumburg who took their name from a castle on the other side of the city, high above the River Saale, Schönburg. By the 14th century both of these two families, one called Schönburg and the other Schönberg, had focussed their landholdings further south and east into Saxony. Schönburg Castle itself, long used as the summer residence of the Naumburg bishops was seized by the Electors of Saxony when their diocese was secularised in the Reformation, and it was used as an administrative building for a while, then slowly degenerated. In 1815 it became part of the Prussian province of Saxony (not the Kingdom of Saxony, just next door), and it has been maintained as a romantic ruin ever since.

We’ll return to the Schönburg family, who became much more prominent by the and of the 13th century (and ultimately princes), later. For now, we’ll look at the Schönberg family, who remained fairly minor nobles for quite a while. They moved east into the Margraviate of Meissen, and built a castle, Rothschönberg (‘Red Schönberg’, c. 1300), west of Dresden, the city that eventually became capital of the Electorate (and later kingdom) of Saxony.  Other castles were acquired in this region, like Sachsenburg; and further south towards the mountainous border with the Kingdom of Bohemia, notably Purschenstein (1380) which had been built two centuries earlier to guard the important trade routes coming out of Czech lands. Further east in the still quite heavily Slav-populated Lusatia they acquired the lordship of Pulsnitz (or Połčnica in the original Sorbian).

Rothschönburg Castle (photo Jörg Blobelt)
Purschenstein Castle (photo Norbert Kaiser)

Over the next several centuries these Schönberg lords provided the dukes and electors of Saxony with numerous chamberlains, soldiers and administrators—all the way up to the end of the independent Kingdom of Saxony in 1918. One post held repeatedly by this family from the 16th to the 18th century was ‘Grand Master of Forges, Mines and Forests’ which surely brought them a healthy income as well as prestige. The dynasty also supplied the Church with a number of senior clergy: two bishops of Meissen (1451-76), then two bishops of Naumburg (1480-1517). In the next generation, Nikolaus von Schönberg became Archbishop of Capua in Italy (1520), and a Cardinal (1535)—and notably, a strong supporter of the new ideas of Nicolas Copernicus about the movement of the planets. His brother Anton went even further into the realm of reforms, and became an early leader of the Lutheran reformation in Saxony.

Nikolaus, Cardinal von Schönburg

When the Wars of Religion broke out in this region, Wolf von Schönberg, Lord of Sachsenburg, commanded some of the Saxon armies in the fight against the Catholic armies of the Emperor. He was named Marshal of the Court of Dresden. His eldest son Hans was, like several of his predecessors, Superintendent of the Mines. But his second son, Caspar, travelled to France in about 1560 and lent his sword to the Protestant cause there. For whatever reason, he then converted to Catholicism in 1568, was naturalised as French and named a field marshal in the armies of the King, who sent him on missions to try to reconcile the Catholic cause with the German Protestant princes. Gaspard de Schomberg (as he was now known) also became a favourite of the King’s younger brother, Henry, Duke of Anjou, and accompanied him to Poland in 1574 when he was elected king there. Gaspard had also brought his younger brother, Georg, to the French court, and helped him obtain a position of page in the household of the Queen Mother, Catherine de Medici. Georges also went with Anjou to Poland—and swiftly back when Henry discovered he had become king of France (Henry III) in 1575. Georges de Schomberg then took part in the famous ‘Duel of the Mignons’ in April 1578, in which the King’s beautiful young men did battle, Georges taking the side of the King’s rival, Henri, Duke of Guise. After a good start, Shomberg was stabbed in the heart and died. It was a shocking event and one of those that convinced the people of Paris that the court had become a den of depravity.

a later engraving of the Duel of the Mignons

Meanwhile, Gaspard’s fortunes continued to rise. In 1578 Henry III granted him the County of Nanteuil and its beautiful Renaissance château north of Paris in the province of Valois. It had been the chief residence of the Duke of Guise for two decades, so this was a real sign of the King’s favour (and perhaps remorse over young Georges’ death). The Château de Nanteuil was held by this family until the 1650s, then passed to the Estrées dukes, and in the 18th century to the princes of Condé, Bourbon cousins of the kings of France—sadly it was destroyed during the Revolution.

Nanteuil

The new Count of Nanteuil was evidently not liked by the Holy League (that is, the supporters of the Duke of Guise); so after King Henry III’s death in 1589, Schomberg fled to Saxony. But he soon returned to support the new reign of Henry IV, again using his Protestant connections, and in 1594 was appointed the King’s Superintendent of Finance, a post he held for three years, a crucial time for the first Bourbon king rebuilding the French government after the devastation of the Wars of Religion. Gaspard de Schomberg died in 1599. He had married a French noblewoman and left behind a very French son, Henri de Schomberg.

Just before his father died, Henri also married a French noblewoman, Françoise d’Espinay. She was an important heiress, bringing to the marriage the massive medieval fortress of Durtal, on a rock overlooking the River Loir in Anjou. This castle later passed to the La Rochefoucauld dukes (via the heirs of his daughter Jeanne), and in the 19th century became a hospital, and today a private residence once more. Henri, Count of Nanteuil and Durtal, was also Superintendent of Finance, for Louis XIII (1619-22), then was named Grand Master of the Artillery, 1622, and Marshal of France in 1625. Marshal de Schomberg led royal forces against French Protestants in the years that followed, notably at the Siege of La Rochelle, notably defeating a number of English troops sent by King Charles I under the command of the Duke of Buckingham. In 1630 he led an army across the Alps and captured the important Piedmontese fortress of Pinerolo—long the key to the French strategic position in northern Italy. Back in southern France, he arrested the rebellious duke of Montmorency in 1632, and replaced him as governor of Languedoc. But he died only a month later, so the post was given to his son.

Henri de Schomberg, Marshal of France

This son, Charles, was the first we’ve encountered so far to enter the very highest aristocracy, as Duke of Hallwin. But he wasn’t created duke on his own merits, and in fact he had to share the title with someone else!  Hallwin was a lordship in French Flanders which gave its name to a long line of lords—though how it was spelled in this Dutch/French language border zone was incredibly diverse: Halewijn, Hallewyn, Halluin, Alluyn… One of these lords, Charles, was created Duke of Hallwin and Peer of France in 1587. He and his family will have a separate blog post. The first duke was succeeded by his grandson, Charles II, who died with no heirs in 1598; his sister Anne was allowed to retain the title duchess (unusually for France where dukedoms tended to be males-only fiefs). Duchess Anne first married in 1611, Henri de Nogaret, the son of the Duke of Epernon (one of the great royal favourites of the previous two reigns). He took the title Duke of Hallwin in the name of his wife, but was also sometimes called Duke of Foix-Candale having inherited that estate from his mother. They divorced, and in 1620, Duchess Anne re-married, this time to Charles de Schomberg-Nanteuil. The title was recreated on a different Hallwin fief, Maignelais (still in Flanders). Strangely (or at least as described later by the Duke of Saint Simon who was obsessed with such things), her previous husband was allowed to continue to use the title of Hallwin, and especially its peerage which granted him a seat in the Parlement of Paris. At royal ceremonies, the ex-husband Hallwin was given precedence over current husband Hallwin since dukedoms were ordered by year of creation. But at Parlement, there could only be one person sitting as Duke-Peer of Hallwin, so apparently they admitted whichever arrived first and turned the other away. There were no children from either marriage, so when Henri de Nogaret died in 1639, then Anne d’Hallwin in 1641, the situation was resolved.

Charles de Schomberg, Duke of Hallwin, Marshal of France

Charles de Schomberg, Duke of Hallwin, took over from his father as Governor of Languedoc in 1632, was also created Marshal of France in 1637, after successfully blocking a Spanish invasion in the eastern Pyrenees in the Thirty Years War. He later became Governor of the Three Bishoprics (Metz, Toul and Verdun), in 1645, and at court held the important post of Colonel-General of the Swiss Guard. In 1646 he took a new wife, Marie de Hautefort, the late king Louis XIII’s favourite and confidante, but now exiled for having taken part in an attempted coup against his widow, Anne of Austria. Ever part of the ultra-pious faction as court, Marie drew her husband into more pious circles and later in life they became strong supporters of conversion societies that aimed their efforts towards Calvinists and Jews. The Marshal-Duke died in 1656 without any children, so this part of this story comes to an end.

But not exactly: Marshal Schomberg had supported the career of a younger man in the French army, also called Schomberg. Despite adhering to different religious confessions, and their families having quite different coats of arms (the usual indicator of one noble lineage’s kinship with another), the French seemed to accept that these two German soldiers were from the same house. In fact, the Saxon Schönbergs used a red and green rampant lion on yellow, while these Rhenish Schönburg/Schönbergs using a more complex shield made up of an ‘escarbuncle’ of eight golden rays on silver, quartered with an array of six silver shields on red. The third Schönburg family surveyed here, those who became princes, used a much simpler design of red and white diagonal stripes.

The Rhenish Schönbergs took their name from another castle called Schönburg, this one called ‘in Oberwesel’, the Wesel being a village on the left bank of the Rhine, just one bend upriver from the famous Lorelei rock. Built in the 12th century it was a fief of the Elector-Archbishop of Trier, who ruled much this side of the river. An old family of ministerialis (a type of service nobility in early medieval Germany) was given this fief and took it as their name (in the 1150s). Much later, the castle was destroyed by a devastating French invasion of the region in 1689, and as the resident branch of the family died out in 1719, the fief returned fully to Trier but was seldom used and began to crumble. It would be restored in the 1890s by a wealthy socialite New York family, the Rhinelanders (with a very fitting surname); then after the Second World War it was acquired by the town of Oberwesel, and today it is run as a hotel.

Schönburg on the Rhine (photo Traveler100)

Over the centuries, the family divided into several lines and went into service of either the imperial archbishops (Cologne, Trier, Mainz), or one of the powerful territorial lords, like the Elector Palatine or the Count of Nassau. One branch remained Catholic and was most famously represented by Baron Otto Friedrich von Schönburg, a General Field Marshal for the Catholic League in the Thirty Years War (killed at the Battle of Breitenfeld in 1631). His brother and heir, Johann Karl, was an Imperial councillor and was created Count von Schönburg in the 1630s. He was also Count of Montigny and other places in Luxembourg due to an ancestor’s marriage in the previous century.

General Otto Friedrich von Schönburg

Another branch began at some point to spell the name Schönberg; and were elevated to the rank of count by the early 17th century. Count Meinhard was a soldier in the mercenary Protestant armies of Count Palatine John Casimir in the French Wars of Religion. His son Hans Meinhard continued the link with the Wittelsbach rulers of the Palatinate, first as a diplomat for Elector Frederick IV, being sent to Emperor Rudolf II in Prague and to the Dutch States General to try to hold the peace in a succession crisis of 1609. Then when Frederick IV died, he moved into service of his son Frederick V, who appointed him Master of his Household in 1611. He then made his family’s first connections with the Stuarts in England by travelling to London to arrange the marriage of Princess Elisabeth, daughter of James I, with his master Elector Frederick. While at the English court he met Lady Anne Sutton, daughter of the Baron of Dudley (she’s sometimes called Anne Dudley). They married in 1615, and she soon gave birth to a son, but sadly died immediately after. Hans Meinhard himself died a year later in 1616.

The orphaned child Friedrich was raised by his guardians in Heidelberg, then sent to the Sedan Academy, a proper boarding school for young Calvinist noblemen, then to Leiden University in Holland. In the Thirty Years War, he led Dutch then Swedish troops against the forces of the Catholic League, then moved into French service after 1635 when that Catholic kingdom curiously entered the war on the Protestant side. In 1639, he married his cousin Johanna Elisabetha von Schönberg, which consolidated the succession as she was co-heiress of many of their family properties. They had three sons: Friedrich, Meinhard and Karl. In the 1640s, Count Friedrich once again fought in Dutch armies, then in the 1650s returned to France, where he was promoted to Field Marshal (1652) then Lieutenant-General (1655). As noted above, some sources suggest that his initial introduction to the French army, and his rapid promotion were due to an assumed (or projected?) kinship with Marshal de Schomberg. He too started spelling his name the French way. Their difference in religion didn’t seem to matter.

Friedrich, Count von Schönberg

In the 1660s, the half-English, half-German French commander Frédéric de Schomberg took an even more unusual turn: he led English troops sent by King Charles II to Portugal to help that country regain its independence from Habsburg Spain. He had the support of Louis XIV in this, but since France had *only just* signed a peace treaty with Spain, he officially had to work for the British king. In 1663, he was rewarded by the Portuguese king with the title Count of Mértola and a significant pension. Sources conflict whether this was a ‘for life’ only title, or whether it passed to his descendants (see below). It is also unclear whether the title also included the ancient Moorish castle (mostly a ruin by the 17th century) and estates (very lucrative for their mines), in the far southeastern region of Portugal near the border with Spain. Schomberg even took part in the coup against King Alfonso VI in 1668 led by the Queen and the King’s brother Dom Pedro.

Schomberg was back in France by 1669 when he married for a second time, Suzanne d’Aumale, Dame d’Haucourt, one of the cultured and intellectual women of Parisian salon society known as the précieuses (not flatteringly—people thought their ‘precious’ mannerisms were affected and snobbish). He then set off to war once more, as commander of a French army invading Catalonia, 1674 (this time overtly fighting against Spain), and was created a Marshal of France in 1675. The new Marshal Schomberg then commanded on the northern front against the young Dutch Stadtholder, William III, Prince of Orange, in 1676. He faced him again on the battlefield in the next war in 1684—but the very next year, everything changed.

Schomberg as a Marshal of France

In 1685, Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes (the religious peace brokered so painstakingly by his grandfather Henry IV), and Marshal Schomberg had to make a decision: renounce Protestantism and become a Catholic, or move abroad. Unlike his more ‘amenable’ cousins earlier in the century, this Schomberg remained true to his faith. He first moved to Brandenburg, where many French Huguenots were given asylum, and took up command as a general in the armies of ‘the Great Elector’, Frederick William of Brandenburg. In 1688 he was asked to be second in command in the armies led by his former opponent, William of Orange, as they embarked on the ‘Glorious Revolution’ to save Great Britain from the Catholic absolutist tyranny of King James II. When William then became co-king (with his wife Mary) in 1689, Schomberg was named Master-General of the Ordnance, awarded the Order of the Garter, and in May was created Duke of Schomberg, with subsidiary titles, Marquess of Harwich and Earl of Brentford. He was also given £100,000 to compensate for the lands and revenues he had lost in France (such as the estate of Courbet outside of Paris). This German-French-British duke then died in Ireland, at the moment of victory over the forces of James II at the Battle of the Boyne, 1 July 1690. He was buried in Saint Patrick’s Cathedral, Dublin.

Of the 1st Duke of Schomberg’s sons, the eldest, Count Friedrich, served with his father in France and in Portugal, then returned to Germany. In theory he inherited the Portuguese title Count of Mértola, then after his death in 1700, passed it to his daughter, the wife of the Count of Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg. The youngest son, Charles, had been named in the creation of the dukedom as heir to the dukedom (perhaps as the second son was already being considered for a dukedom of his own?), so became 2nd Duke of Schomberg in 1690. Charles had moved in military service with his father, as a lieutenant-general in the army of Brandenburg, then in the invasion of England of 1688. During the Nine Years War (1688-97), William III sent him to command French Huguenot troops (in the pay of England—the Schomberg Regiment) in northern Italy, where he was killed at the Battle of Marsaglia, October 1693.

This left the second son, Meinhard. He had accompanied his father on his military mission in Portugal in the 1660s, then back to France where he rose to the rank of maréchal de camp in 1678; he also accompanied his father and brother to England in 1689, and was named a general of the cavalry, commanding a wing of the army of William of Orange at the Battle of the Boyne. In 1691, Meinhard was named Commander-in-Chief while William III was abroad on the continent fighting in the Nine Years War. To raise his profile to help him maintain such a lofty command, in March that year he was created Duke of Leinster (with subsidiary titles Earl of Bangor and Baron of Tara) in the peerage of Ireland—in other words, the title got him a seat in the Parliament in Dublin, but not in London. Two years later, however, he succeeded his younger brother as Duke of Schomberg and thus did get a seat in the English House of Lords. As noted above, the Dukedom of Leinster was only the second dukedom created in the Irish peerage (the other being Ormonde, created for the Butlers in 1661). It would be good to dig into Irish archives to see if any lands were given to the new duke as part of this creation—but it did not survive very long. After he served once more as Commander-in-Chief for an army sent by Queen Anne to invade Spain via Portugal in the War of Spanish Succession—in which he was unsuccessful and disgraced—he died in 1719 and both ducal titles, Schomberg and Leinster—went extinct. Leinster as a dukedom is much more well known in its second creation, in 1766, for the richest family in Ireland, the Fitzgerald earls of Kildare. But that is a different story.

Meinhard Schomberg, Duke of Leinster and 3rd Duke of Schomberg

Before he died, Meinhard Schomberg re-established some of the family links with the Palatinate. After his first wife Barbara Luisa Rizzi died, in 1682 he married a woman called Raugravine Karoline von der Pfalz. The raugrave/raugravine title was given to the second family of the Elector Palatine Charles Louis (eldest son of Frederick V and Princess Elisabeth of England and Scotland), whose second marriage to one of his wife’s ladies-in-waiting, Luise von Degenfeld, was deemed unequal (and possibly bigamous, since he wasn’t quite divorced from his first wife). These children thus had royal blood, but were not legally capable of succeeding to the Electoral throne (or ultimately to the British throne). Karoline bore Schomberg a son, Charles Louis, who used the courtesy title ‘Marquess of Harwich’, but died at age thirty in 1713 before he could succeed to the ducal titles. Of the daughters, a younger daughter, Mary, married a cousin, Christoph von Degenfeld, and their descendants used the surname Degenfeld-Schonburg, which continues today. The oldest daughter, Frederica, Countess of Holderness by marriage, assumed (by some accounts, not by others) the title Countess of Mértola, then passed claims to it on to the Osborne family (dukes of Leeds), then in the mid-19th century to the Pelham family (earls of Yarborough). Since 2013 it is held (theoretically) by Lady Anthea (Miller) Lycett, who is also a co-heiress to two ancient English baronies, Conyers and Fauconberg.

Although neither of the Schomberg families left much of a built legacy in France, this last Duke of Schomberg did commission buildings in England. In 1694, the Duke purchased and redeveloped Portland House on Pall Mall, and renamed it Schomberg House. By the mid-18th  century it was divided into three parts and developed for different purposes (flats, shops, residences for artists) but retained the name. In the 19th century it housed some of the War Office, and parts of it were demolished. Today only the façade remains.

Schomberg House in London (photo Steve Cadman)

About 20 miles outside London, towards the Chiltern Hills, the Duke built Hillingdon House in 1717, as a hunting lodge. After his death it passed to the Watson-Wentworth family (the earls, later marquess, of Rockingham). It was destroyed by fire in 1844 and rebuilt in a very different style. Since 1917 it has housed a station of the Royal Air Force.

Hillingdon House before 1844

Finally, we travel back to Saxony and the third family von Schönburg. This family may have had the same origins as those based in the Schönburg castle on the River Saale, but across the 13th to 15th centuries consolidated their holdings to a group of castles and fiefs on the upper valley of the Zwickauer Mulde river, which flows northwards into the Elbe. This region came to be known as ‘Schönburger Land’, a territory that stretched south towards the mountainous border between Saxony and Bohemia.

The two Saxonies (red and yellow) with the Schönburg lands in between (Waldenburg, Glauchau and Hartenstein)

These lands were next door to the similarly sized territories of the House of Reuss which eventually became an independent principality within the Holy Roman Empire, but that outcome was difficult here since the Schönburg lands fell into different jurisdictions, in Saxony, Thuringia and Bohemia, giving them different status in each, a different voice in each local assembly, and limited ability to consolidate into a ‘state’. For example, they built a ‘Neuschönburg’ on a conical hill in northwest Bohemia, in the Egertal (the valley of the Ohře in Czech, and the ruined castle is today called Šumburk). This passed out of their hands by the early 17th century however.

Šumburk, aka Neuschönburg, Czechia (photo Czeva)

One of the earliest Schönburg castles, Glauchau became the core property for the ‘comital branch’, that is, the one that did not become elevated to princely status. This was followed by Castle Lichtenstein (1286), Castle Waldenburg (1378), and Castle Hartenstein (1406). These names certainly reflect the forests and hills of this territory on the edge of the Ore Mountains (Erzgebirge): “light stone”, “forest castle” and “hard stone”. More estates still were added in the 16th century, notably the dissolved Priory of Wechselburg. The Schönburger Land ran roughly north to south from Waldenburg to Hartenstein, with Glauchau in the middle. All of these lordships were kept in one branch of the family or another for centuries, until the confiscations by the East German state in 1945 (a total loss estimated at over 30,000 square miles).

Lichtenstein Castle is perched on a hilltop overlooking the Zwickauer Mulde valley. It is mentioned as a lordship as early as 1212, given by the Emperor to the King of Bohemia (thus making its feudal position complicated later on), then leased by the latter to the Schönburg family. It was destroyed and rebuilt several times over the centuries, taking its current form in the middle of the 17th century. In 1797 a family crypt was built here and it houses several generations of the family. After 1945 it was used as a Catholic charity retirement home, until 2000 when it was re-acquired by the Schönburg family; in 2014 the local government forced its resale to developers and there is a strong local town historical group working to restore the largely decayed building.

Lichtenstein Castle in Saxony (photo Jörg Blobelt)

Hartenstein and Stein castles, to the south, have had a somewhat better recent fate. Built only about a mile apart, Hartenstein on a hilltop and Stein down in the valley, both have been held by the Schönburgs since the early 15th century. Hartenstein was initially built in the 12th century to guard the roads into the mountains with its rich minerals. It was created a county in 1323 (like Lichtenstein a fief of the King of Bohemia). Part of the County was sold to the Elector of Saxony in 1559. About the same time, the old castle was rebuilt in a Renaissance style—three hundred years later it was remodelled along neo-gothic lines. It was one of the grandest castles in the region until it was nearly completely destroyed by American bombs in April 1945. Left a ruin, it has been repurchased by the Schönburgs, and since 2002 there have been efforts to preserve what remains and partly rebuild its structures.

Hartenstein before it was bombed

In nearby Stein, the castle survived the war and the Communist era and is once again lived in by the Hartenstein branch of the family, after serving as a local history museum from 1954 to 1996. This structure is a fascinating complex of architectural styles, with an upper castle dating from the early 13th century and a lower castles from the late 15th century. Although it was also acquired by the Schönburgs in 1406, it was held by vassals until the mid-17th century. From 1702 it formed a separate lordship for a junior member.

Stein Castle on the Zwickauer Mulde (photo Caulobacter subvibrioides)

Like all Germanic noble houses, there were divisions and subdivisions. One of the biggest of these came in the 1530s, when there was a basic division between the Glauchau line and the eventual princely line, with Waldenburg and Hartenstein as main seats; and these two were divided between two lines in 1569. All branches of the family were elevated to the rank of count in 1700. In 1740, an agreement was reached with the Elector of Saxony in Dresden that recognised his suzerainty over several of these fiefs that had previously been held directly from the Emperor. In return the Saxon estates promised to assure legal and military guardianship in these areas.

Thuringia and Saxony (pink) in 1740, with Schönburg Land in orange at centre

Then in 1786, Count Otto Karl von Schönburg-Waldenburg established primogeniture as the ‘house law’ in anticipation of the extinction of the line of Schönburg-Hartenstein, which occurred later that same year. As a result of this increased landholding, the Holy Roman Emperor created him Fürst von Schönburg in 1790, with the rank of ‘Serene Highness’. His main contribution to the family’s estates was the development of Grünfeld Park at Waldenburg, in the 1780s.

Waldenburg Castle, Saxony

The strange hybrid vassalage of the Middle Ages continued even in the 18th century, with Hartenstein being a fief of the Elector of Saxony, while, until 1779, Waldenburg and Lichtenstein were fiefs of Bohemian Crown and thus subject to the Emperor in Vienna.

the Schönburg family claimed ancient Imperial links, with an early (legendary) knight who saved Charlemagne’s life during a battle with the Saxons, so the Emperor dragged his bloody fingers across his silver shield as a mark of commemoration

Though he was elevated to the rank of prince of the Empire, the family had little time to create a genuine state within the Empire before it was all dissolved in 1806. The Principality of Schönburg was mediatised, meaning the dynasty was still ranked as ‘princely’, but they held no actual sovereignty, its lands being more fully integrated into the new Kingdom of Saxony—though retaining special rights for several more decades. The 1st Prince had already died, in 1800, and his eldest son, Otto Viktor became the 2nd Prince. Otto Viktor and his brother Friedrich Alfred both pressed the leadership of the Confederation of the Rhine for recognition as a member state, then again lobbied the Congress of Vienna of 1814-15 to get their state recognised as independent in the post-Napoleonic world, to no avail. By this point, the brothers had already turned on each other: the Emperor had never formally recognised their father’s proclamation of primogeniture, so in 1813, the 2nd Prince renounced ownership of Hartenstein, keeping Waldenburg (the richer half) for himself, creating the two princely lines that survived into the modern era.

A monument to Prince Otto Victor in Waldenburg

Otto Viktor, now called either the 2nd Prince of Schönburg or the 1st Prince of Schönburg-Waldenburg, retired from military service (he had fought in the Napoleonic Wars in the service of Saxony then Prussia), and now turned his attentions to politics, actively working with the Saxon legislature to create a new constitution for the Kingdom in 1831 (which guaranteed his dynasty two seats in the Saxon Upper House). He tried to create a state-within-a-state in Waldenburg, introducing reforms to local government, but his rule was so paternalistic verging on despotic, that his ‘subjects’ angrily rose up during the 1848 Revolution and burned down Waldenburg Castle. He died in 1859, leaving a very large family including several sons who founded a number of sub-lineages.

The 2nd Prince acquired a residence worthy of princes in the capital of the Kingdom of Saxony, Dresden. The Palais Schönburg, built in the 1750s in the old town not far from the royal castle was owned until the early 19th century by the counts von Vitzthum. It was demolished in 1885 when this part of the city was re-laid out for wider streets

Palais Schönburg in Dresden

The 3rd Prince of Schönburg-Waldenburg, Otto Friedrich, extended the family’s reach outside of Saxony, acquiring many more estates in the mountainous far west of Bohemia, notably imperial forestland near the spa town of Marienbad (today’s Mariánské Lázně). Here he built a hunting lodge, Glatzen (Kladská), and set about reforesting the land and developing it for forestry and tourism. He also purchased (1835) the very cute Rothlhotta castle, on a rock in a lake (today’s Červená Lhota). He remained active like his father in the politics of the Kingdom of Saxony, mostly in defence of the last shreds of autonomy his family enjoyed in his hereditary estates. Nevertheless, the last rights of Schönburg sovereignty were lost to Saxony in 1878, though the family was permitted to keep the rank of Serene Highness.

Rothlhotta (Červená Lohta), Czechia

Otto Friedrich was succeeded in 1893 by his grandson, Otto Viktor II, since his son had died a few years before aged only 32. The 4th Prince was thus only 11 when he became head of the family. As he grew to maturity, like many wealthy aristocrats of his day, he travelled the world and became a collector. Between 1907 and 1910 he journeyed extensively in the Middle East and East Africa, bringing back numerous objects for a museum he established at Waldenburg. He served at a royal court, though not in Dresden, but in Potsdam for the German Emperor in the Life Guards. In the Spring of 1914, the Prince of Schönburg was active in supporting the candidacy and installation of his sister, Princess Sophie, and her husband Prince Wilhelm of Wied, in their new role as Prince and Princess of Albania, in that country’s first steps towards independence from the Ottoman Empire. It was not a success, and they were driven out by September. By that point, of course, World War One had broken out, and the 4th Prince of Schönburg-Waldenburg was amongst the first casualties on the Western Front.

Otto Viktor II, Prince of Schönburg-Waldenburg
The Prince and Princess of Albania

The Prince and Princess of Wied had a daughter, Princess Marie Eleonore, who married a cousin, Prince Alfred of Schönburg-Waldenburg, from a second line descended from the 2nd Prince (Hugo, d. 1897). This branch was established at Castle Droyssig, but went extinct in the male line after Alfred’s death in 1941 and that of his father in 1945. This castle, rebuilt by the counts von Hoya on the site of an ancient provostry of the Order of the Holy Sepulchre, was acquired by the 2nd Prince in the 1830s and given to his son Hugo. The family installed a bear pit in the moat in the 1850s, and even after the family was dispossessed of the castle in 1948, the bears remained, or rather, were reinstated (in 1955). The ‘Bärenzwinger’ is still a local tourist attraction, and after it fell into disrepair, it was renovated and bears reintroduced in 2003.

Droyssig Castle (photo Christian Bier)
the bears’ pit at Droyssig (photo Christian Bier)

The 4th Prince, Otto Viktor II, was succeeded by his brother, Günther, who endured the dismantling of the German Empire and the Kingdom of Saxony in particular—in 1918, his family were the largest landowners in Saxony after the royal family itself. In the two decades that followed, he made Waldenburg Castle a centre of art and culture, and became President of the German Art Society in Berlin. The 5th Prince was arrested with the Communist takeover in 1945 and interred in a camp on the island of Rügen in the Baltic, then escaped to the British Zone. Estates and castles in both East Germany and Czechoslovakia were confiscated. He lived in Celle for several years, then the United States. Returning to Europe in 1957, he died in 1960 in Salzburg. He had no children, so passed his inheritance to a second cousin.

Günther, last sovereign prince of Schönburg-Waldenburg

Wolf, 6th Prince of Schönburg-Waldenburg came from a branch established by his grandfather, Prince Georg, another younger son of the 2nd Prince. Georg had served as Adjutant-General of the King of Saxony, and acquired the castles of Hermsdorf and Guteborn in Upper Lusatia as his portion of the succession, which became the seat of this branch. This hilly wooded area northeast of Dresden is crowded with castles built by the nobility in the 16th and 17th centuries. Guteborn remained a smaller residence while nearby Hermsdorf was transformed in the 1730s into a more glamorous baroque schloss. Both were acquired by the counts von Hoya in the 18th century, then passed to the Schönburgs by marriage in the 19th. Guteborn Castle became much more closely associated with the monarchy of Saxony in November 1918 when the last king, Frederick Augustus III, took refuge here during the revolutions that followed the collapse of the German Empire. He signed his abdication here too. Due to the castle’s association with the monarchy, after the Schönburg family were pushed out in 1948 by the Communists, they blew up the building entirely. Only a round chapel and the castle’s moat remain. Hermsdorf was transformed into a nursing home, so its interiors were mostly destroyed. Today it is owned by the local municipality.

Guteborn Castle
Hermsdorf Castle (photo SchiDD)

The 6th Prince died in 1983 leaving only three daughters; his brother Georg also had daughters (though one married very well, to Archduke Franz Salvator, of the Tuscan line of the House of Habsburg) and died the year before; their youngest brother Wilhelm had died in 1944, so the succession passed to a nephew, Ulrich (b 1940). He has a daughter, so his heirs are his brother Wolf and his nephew Kai-Philipp (b. 1969). The latter is divorced and has no children, so this princely title may end unless it is allowed to pass to distant cousins in the next branch over, whose status is challenged.

These are the descendants of yet another son of the 2nd Prince, Ernst (d. 1915). Prince Ernst’s son Friedrich Ernst (d. 1910) made a very good marriage into the highest rungs of European royalty, though politically ‘hot’: Princess Alice of Bourbon, daughter of the Carlist Pretender to the Spanish throne, the Duke of Madrid. By Carlist standards she was an Infanta of Spain, but by those who supported King Alfonso XIII she was not. The young couple was married in 1897 and almost immediately squabbled over money—she later claimed she’d been forced into the marriage; news headlines spread gossip that she ran off with her footman, and within a few years they had an annulment. This meant that her husband’s family tried to deny the legitimacy of her son, Karl Leopold, though he was born during the marriage. Karl Leopold later moved to Tahiti where he had several children, also before he married his wife. So there is an heir, Vetea-Pierre (b. 1941), but it’s doubtful the family would allow him to succeed. Princess Alice did remarry, and moved to Florida.

Princess Alicia de Borbón

The second major branch of the princely house of Schönburg, based in Hartenstein, and its adjacent castle (their seat), the Castle of Stein, was established in the family division of 1813. Friedrich Alfred, 1st Prince of Schönburg-Hartenstein, rebuilt Hartenstein Castle in 1820 in a neogothic style. He died in 1840, and though the princely title went to his younger brother, Heinrich Eduard, by law, the Hartenstein estates were re-divided between surviving siblings, meaning the eldest brother—the Prince of Schönburg-Waldenburg—was now owner of Waldenburg and half of Hartenstein. Very complicated. Did this mean he now had one and a half seats in the Saxon legislature?

Heinrich Eduard, 2nd Prince of Schönburg-Hartenstein

The 2nd Prince of Schönburg-Hartenstein moved his branch of the family into the orbit of Habsburg Austria, becoming Catholic in the process (in 1822), and notably purchasing a grand palace in Vienna in 1841, near the Belvedere Palace. The Palais Schönburg, originally built in the early 18th century by the Starhembergs, remained their main urban seat until it was sold in the 1970s to a Viennese bank—restored in 2007 it is now used for events.

Palais Schönburg in Vienna (photo Helmuth Furch)

This branch of the family’s move to the south is indicated in the family tree by multiple marriages into the highest Viennese aristocracy: The 2nd Prince married Princess Pauline von Schwarzenberg in 1817 followed soon after her death by her sister Ludovika. His son Alexander married Princess Karoline von und zu Liechtenstein in 1855 bringing that family’s characteristic name Alois into the family for the first time for their son.

Heinrich Eduard was succeeded in 1872 by his son, Alexander, the 3rd Prince, who was a diplomat and a politician in the Bohemian local legislature and later in the Imperial House of Lords.

Alexander, 3rd Prince of Schönburg-Hartenstein

In 1896, he passed the title and estates on to his son Alois, the 4th Prince of Schönburg-Hartenstein. The 4th Prince was even more active in Austrian society and military affairs than his predecessors: in 1899 he became President of the Austrian Red Cross (a post he held until 1913), and in Spring 1918, the Emperor Carl promoted him to Colonel-General in the imperial army with the task of keeping order in the increasingly chaotic capital—he arrested strike leaders and army deserters in particular. That summer Schönburg led one last push of the Austrian army into northern Italy and suffered a terrible defeat. Unlike many former nobles, he kept his hand in affairs in the establishment of the Austrian Republic, and in 1934—as a now very experienced statesman—was temporarily Minister of Defence (March to September). In the years that followed, Alois von Schönburg was an avid supporter of the autonomy of Austria and worked to block the rise of National Socialism. He died at Hartenstein in 1944.

Alois, 4th Prince of Schönburg-Hartenstein

Since then the heads of the junior princely branch have been very quiet: the 5th Prince, Alexander, died in 1956, and was succeeded by his grandson, Aloys (his own son Aloys having died in Prague in May 1945 from battle wounds—in fact, four of the sons of the 5th Prince were killed in the war, two of them just teenagers. The 6th Prince lived in Munich and died before he reached thirty in 1972 and was succeeded by his uncles who had remained in Vienna, Hieronymous (d. 1992) and Alexander (d. 2018). The current 9th Prince is the latter’s son, Johannes (b. 1951). The family continue to intermarry with the old aristocracy of the Austrian Monarchy: the 8th Prince married a Windisch-Grätz princess, while the current heir, Prince Aloys Louis (b. 1982) recently married a Beaufort-Spontin duchess.

There are numerous members of the Schönburg-Hartenstein branch, as there are also of the branches of the Schönburg-Glauchau counts. Though they held a lower rank, this branch an even more impressive array of castles and palaces in this corner of Saxony, some of which have been re-acquired and restored. 19th-century German history is littered with counts and countesses from this branch. The most famous member in recent years is the colourful woman known in the press as the ‘punk princess’ in the 1980s, Princess Gloria of Thurn und Taxis, born Countess Gloria von Schönburg-Glauchau in 1960. Her brother, Count Alexander, is the head of the comital branch and a prominent journalist.

Princess Gloria in the 1980s–Schön! (photo Ron Galella)

Beaufort: the last of the Plantagenets

Who is a current British duke whose surname is that of another ducal title, but whose ancestors’ surname was the one that is now the title of the current dukedom? Confused? What British dukes are royal yet not royal? Peers fifth in precedence amongst English non-royal dukes? The dukes of Beaufort. Whose house gave its name to a sport that since 1992 has been part of the Olympic Games? And also so closely connected to hounds and horses?

The Beaufort Hunt at Badminton

The Beaufort title was created in 1682 at a time when King Charles II was concerned with extending the ‘majesty’ of the Stuart bloodline by raising all those with this blood, legitimate or not, to a status above the rest of the nobility. He did this by making use of the then still rare ducal title, notably for his (or his brother’s) illegitimate offspring (Richmond, Saint Albans, Grafton, Berwick and so on). But the duke of Beaufort was not a Stuart, nor was he a Tudor—his family was a curious holdover from the dynasty that had ruled England in the Middle Ages: the Plantagenets. But choosing a ‘surname’ was tricky: Plantagenet was perhaps too obvious, and while Beaufort had been used by this family in the 15th century, when they were dukes of Somerset, by the 16th century their (illegitimate) descendants used the name Somerset instead. Meanwhile, the Somerset ducal title itself was now already in use by another family, the Seymours. It is confusing indeed! So instead of Beaufort dukes of Somerset, we will now have Somerset dukes of Beaufort. An even further twist enters the picture when considering that Beaufort itself was a place in France, one that had not been held by any English family since the 14th century, and had instead become a completely separate dukedom, held first by the illegitimate offspring of King Henry IV, Bourbon-Vendôme, then by one of the grandest aristocratic families in France, Luxembourg-Montmorency. So in the eighteenth century, it was possible for an English Duke of Beaufort to travel to France and meet another Duke of Beaufort. What’s more, if these two dukes journeyed to Brussels, they might even have met a third Duke of Beaufort (-Spontin), a Belgian title which took its name from a castle in the Ardennes.

The 18th-century English dukes of Beaufort were proud to claim a direct patrilineal link to the Plantagenets, and continued to do so into the 21st century—at least until science reared its ugly head. During the DNA testing of the remains of the last Plantagenet king, Richard III, in 2014, scientists announced that there had been a ‘genetic disconnect’ somewhere in the 18th century—ie, somebody lied about paternity at some point. But at least culturally and socially, the dukes of Beaufort of today represent the last of the Plantagenet dynasty in England. And as a ducal family in general, they have certainly been able to maintain this semi-royal status, as one of the wealthiest landowners in the United Kingdom with their own recognised livery—blue and buff—in the world of hunting and horse racing, and a palatial residence and near princely status in the counties of the southwest—Gloucestershire and Herefordshire—and across the border into Monmouthshire in South Wales.

Beaufort Hunt blue and buff

The Beaufort story starts in France, where a small, but apparently beautiful, fortress in southern Champagne was called the ‘bellum forte’ or beau fort. This formed the core of a lordship from at least the 10th century, and was held by the powerful noble Broyes family who controlled much of this region on behalf of the Counts of Champagne. It was inherited by the Counts of Rethel (from northern Champagne) in about 1200, then was sold in 1270 to Blanche of Artois, wife of the Count of Champagne. Blanche’s second husband (from 1275) was Prince Edmund of England (known as ‘Crouchback’), the younger brother of King Edward I. Edmund was also Earl of Lancaster, so the association of Beaufort with the House of Lancaster began, as Blanche took the lordship as part of her widow’s dowry and transferred it to the children of her second marriage: her third son, John, was specifically called Lord of Beaufort, but when he died in 1317 it returned to the general pool of Lancastrian possessions. The 4th Earl of Lancaster, Henry, was raised to the rank of Duke in 1351, and his two daughters included Beaufort in their dowries, notably the second daughter, another Blanche, who in 1359 married John of Gaunt, a younger son of King Edward III who was re-created Duke of Lancaster in 1362.

the village of Montmorency-Beaufort in Champagne

By this time the Hundred Years War was raging in France and possessions of English royals were confiscated by the French Crown. Sources conflict at this point, as some say the castle and lordship of Beaufort was confiscated by King Charles V in 1369, while others claim that John of Gaunt’s children by his mistress Katherine Swynford were born in Beaufort, or at least the eldest, John, in about 1372, explaining why they were given ‘de Beaufort’ as a surname. More informed sources consider this unlikely.

John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster and Lord of Beaufort, receives a letter

We’ll turn to the children of Katherine Swynford, and their unique status, next, but first we can finish the French side of this story. The seigneurie of Beaufort, now a property of the French crown, was given out numerous times to various supporters over the next two centuries: to the Duke of Burgundy, to the Duke of Nemours, to Charles of Anjou; in 1477 it was elevated to the status of a county for a royal councillor, Thierry de Lenoncourt, then retained this status when restored to the Duke of Nemours. It was given in 1507 to the King’s cousin, Gaston de Foix, then to the latter’s sister, the Queen of Aragon, Germaine de Foix. And on and on to various French aristocrats at the Valois court.

In 1554, the family of Luxembourg-Brienne (who owned much of this area of Champagne) ceded the seigneurie of Beaufort to François de Clèves, Duke of Nevers (who was also Count of Rethel, so that Champenois link remained), whose daughter Catherine, Duchess of Guise, sold it to Gabrielle d’Estrées, the famous mistress of King Henry IV, in 1597. The county of Beaufort was then legally joined to several adjacent lordships and erected into a duchy-peerage for ‘la Belle’ Gabrielle and for her son, César de Bourbon, born three years before. César was at the same time created Duke of Vendôme (the old Bourbon patrimony), and in 1599 inherited everything from his mother upon her untimely death (some say just before King Henry married her, which would have made Vendôme the dauphin of France—but that’s another story). In time, while César’s first son became Duke of Vendôme, his second son François was ‘advanced’ by the King to the rank of Duke of Beaufort so that he could make use of its peerage to take a seat in the Parlement of Paris. Beaufort was a famously popular rebel leader during the civil war known as the Fronde, given the nickname ‘Roi des Halles’ (King of the Marketplace’), then reconciled with the monarchy and served as a commander in the armies of Louis XIV. This over-the-top colourful figure died leading a heroic if foolhardy charge against impregnable Ottoman defences at Candia in Crete in June 1669—his body was never recovered.

François de Bourbon-Vendôme, Duc de Beaufort, by Jean Nocret, one of my absolute most favourite paintings

The ducal title passed back to the Vendôme family; the last duke, Louis-Joseph de Bourbon, then sold it in 1688 to Charles-François de Montmorency-Luxembourg, son of the Marshal de Luxembourg. In 1689 Beaufort was re-erected as a duchy-peerage, but this time taking the name Montmorency. This was due to the fact that the Montmorency family no longer owned the lordship of that name (having been confiscated by the Crown in the 1630s); it also consolidated this family’s landholdings in the region of Champagne, as their other duchy (known as ‘Luxembourg’ or ‘Piney’) was literally next door to Beaufort. The dukes of Montmorency (Beaufort) remained prominent at the court of France throughout the 18th and 19th centuries. The village and the remains of its ancient beau fort took on the name Montmorency, which it kept until 1919, when it was renamed Montmorency-Beaufort.

Returning to the English Beauforts, we can look at one of those fascinating medieval personages who continued to blend the English court with life on the Continent. Catherine de Roët was the daughter of a knight from Hainaut in the Low Countries, who came to England in the suite of Philippa of Hainault, wife of Edward III, in 1328. She was later placed in the household of Blanche of Lancaster, wife of John of Gaunt (the King’s third son) and was given the responsibility of looking after their daughters, especially following the Duchess of Lancaster’s death in 1368. Catherine (or Katherine) was at this time married to Hugh Swynford, one of the knights in John of Gaunt’s retinue. It was also about this time that her sister Philippa married another courtier in Queen Philippa’s household, the poet Geoffrey Chaucer. Katherine became the mistress of John of Gaunt (remarried in 1371 to the Infanta Constance of Castile). Four children were born in the next decade: John, Henry, Joan and Thomas.

Katherine Swynford, from her tomb

Katherine Swynford continued to serve as a lady-in-waiting in the household of the new Duchess of Lancaster, and later in that of Mary of Bohun, married to John of Gaunt’s son Henry of Bolingbroke in 1381. Finally, in 1396, the Duke married his former mistress and obtained a papal bull retrospectively legitimising his and Katherine’s children, giving them the name ‘Beaufort’. But why? It seems strange to me to choose a fairly obscure lordship in Champagne that was no longer part of the Lancaster landholdings. Tudor historians dismiss the idea that it was named for the lordship of Beaufort in Anjou, but this would make more sense to me, since Anjou was in fact the historic place of origin for the Plantagenet dynasty, and Beaufort castle, part of the dowry of John of Gaunt’s ancestress, Queen Isabella of Angoulême (wife of John I), continued to be fought over, frequently, in the Hundred Years War. The County of Anjou had been lost to the Plantagenets in the first years of the 13th century, but it was always a place deemed worthy of re-conquest by the English monarchs, so the naming a child ‘Beaufort’ would have more symbolic value.

John of Gaunt’s nephew, King Richard II, confirmed the legitimacy of these Beaufort children with an act in Parliament in 1397. But a few years later, in 1407—Bolingbroke having overthrown his cousin Richard and crowned himself as Henry IV—another legal confirmation was made of his half-siblings’ legitimacy, but this time with the added clause ‘excepta dignitate regali’. This meant that although his half-siblings were legitimate and thus able to legally inherit property (and had any social stain removed from their bastardy), they could not inherit the throne of England, the ‘royal dignity’. The exact validity of this proclamation has been debated by historians for centuries—for example suggesting it was never formally presented to Parliament, so invalid as law—notably because part of the claims of the Tudor dynasty to the throne depended on the status of their Beaufort ancestors.

John de Beaufort, Earl of Somerset, with his wife and her first husband, Canterbury Cathedral

Richard II had already loaded down his cousins with titles and royal offices. The eldest, John de Beaufort, was created Earl of Somerset in 1397 shortly after the formal legitimisation, and given the offices of Lieutenant of Aquitaine and Warden of the Cinque Ports. He was even married to the King’s niece, Margaret Holland, daughter of the Earl of Kent. Later that same year, John was elevated further to Marquess of Dorset, only the second time this title had appeared in England. The second son, Henry, was named Bishop of Lincoln. Their sister Joan was honoured by the King raising her husband, Ralph Neville of Raby, to an earldom (Westmoreland), also in 1397. But when Henry IV took the throne in 1399, he deprived his half brother of his offices and the title Marquess of Dorset (with the King apparently pronouncing that “the name of marquess is a strange name in this realm”). He remained Earl of Somerset, however, and in 1404 was appointed Constable of England. His brother Bishop Henry was transferred from Lincoln to Winchester, and served for a year as Henry IV’s Lord Chancellor (1403-04).

Where did these early Beauforts live? They were initially raised in their mother’s house at Kettlethorpe in Lincolnshire (and thus close to the bishopric where second son Henry would initially be established). By the 1390s, John was given several manors in Somerset, which would in a sense form his earldom—lands formerly held by the Montague earls of Salisbury in the southern part of the county, near Yeovil. He and his brothers were also given lordships and manors in Northamptonshire, Derbyshire, Norfolk and elsewhere.

But in terms of a family seat, this might best be considered to be Corfe Castle in Dorset (so again connected to one of the main family titles). This was a royal castle, built initially by William the Conqueror and one of the earliest stone castles in England. It was frequently used as a residence for royal hostages and like the other main royal castle-prison, the Tower of London, was usually whitewashed giving the central tower a unique white appearance as it guarded a pass through the white chalk hills of Dorset. The Earl of Somerset was named Constable of Corfe Castle in 1407, and the family would be based here for the next half-century. The castle remained in royal hands until 1572 when Elizabeth I sold it to Christopher Hatton, whose heirs sold it in 1635 to the Bankes family. The Bankes were royalists who held this castle against Parliamentary forces longer than any in southern England, but ultimately were pushed out in 1645 and the castle’s defences ‘slighted’ (made indefensible). The family recovered the property, but left it a ruin for the next three-hundred years; in 1981 they gave it to the National Trust which undertook major renovations in 2008.

Corfe Castle, Dorset, today

Not far to the north in Dorset, the Beauforts patronised an important collegiate church, Wimborne Minster, built by the Anglo-Saxons in the 8th century, and burial place of King Aethelred I. It was rebuilt by the Normans in the 11th century. The 1st Earl’s son, the 1st Duke of Somerset, would be buried here in 1444, and his grand-daughter, Lady Margaret Beaufort (mother of Henry VII), would build a family chapel here.

Wimborne Minster, Dorset

Meanwhile, in London, the family had power bases notably at the episcopal residence of the bishops of Winchester, Winchester Palace, in Southwark on the south bank of the Thames (which at that time, extraordinarily was within the diocese of Winchester). This great palace was built in the 12th century and survived until the 18th century when it was divided up into tenements and storehouses, then mostly burned down in 1814. Across the river, the Beauforts acquired a mansion in the City of London known as Cold Harbour (or Coldharbour or Harborough), located on a street of aristocratic mansions known as Upper Thames Street, near today’s Cannon Street tube station. It had once belonged to Alice Perrers, mistress of Edward III but was confiscated when she was disgraced and exiled in 1376. It was given to the Duke of Exeter whose niece Margaret Holland was married to John de Beaufort, and they took over the house from about 1401. It was later a favoured residence of Lady Margaret Beaufort during the reign of Henry VII. Coldharbour Mansion was later owned by the earls of Shrewsbury and was destroyed in the Great Fire of London of 1666.

Winchester Palace, Southwark, London
a sketch of what Cold Harbour might have looked like

By 1410, the 1st Earl of Somerset was well established, with lands and residences all over southern England. But he died suddenly in March of that year, aged only about 35. His son Henry became 2nd Earl, but was still in the nursery, aged 9. So Henry, Bishop of Winchester, became head of the Beaufort family. By the end of the reign of Henry V, he was one of the most powerful men in the Kingdom, serving again as Lord Chancellor (essentially head of government) in 1413-17, and then for the infant King Henry VI in 1424-26. Beaufort had also been named as one of the leaders of the Regency Council for the infant king in 1422, and when he retired as Chancellor was named a Cardinal (1426) and Papal Legate for Germany, Hungary and Bohemia (1427). With this latter charge he led an army in Bohemia against the Hussite heretics, but was badly defeated at Tachov. Cardinal Beaufort remained at the centres of power in England in the 1430s-40s, but now as just one of Henry VI’s many feuding advisors—he once again played a prominent role in arranging the King’s marriage with the King of France’s niece, Margaret of Anjou, in 1445, then died in 1447. This marriage brought the Beauforts a powerful ally at court, but in the long run much enmity from those who sought to undermine the Queen’s power over her husband and later son.

Cardinal Beaufort in Winchester Cathedral

Meanwhile, the youngest Beaufort son, Thomas, had come of age: Henry IV had created him Earl of Dorset in 1412, and revived his older brother’s appointment as Lieutenant of Aquitaine. Dorset too had a stint as Chancellor of England (1410-12). In the next reign, Henry V made him Duke of Exeter, in 1416—the title held previously by the family of his sister-in-law, Margaret Holland (and re-created for them later)—and kept him close during his re-conquest of Normandy, 1418-19. The King named him ‘Count of Harcourt’ to encourage a sense of ownership in the old Norman dominions (which included the powerful stronghold of Harcourt). The Duke of Exeter was also a member of the regency council for Henry VI in 1422 and died in 1426, leaving no living children from his marriage to Margaret Neville of Hornby.

The Beaufort family thrived in the reign of Henry VI. The children of John, 1st Earl of Somerset, were a virtual second royal family, and at times came close to usurping that place entirely—something that caused the strong rivalry with the House of York and led in part to the Wars of the Roses. Henry Beaufort, the 2nd Earl of Somerset, had died as a teenager at the siege of Rouen in 1418, so it was his brother John who led the family in this reign. In 1421, he and younger brother Thomas went to France with their royal cousin Henry V. They fought at the Battle of Baugé, and both were captured. John remained in captivity for 17 years, and Thomas for six. When he was released, Thomas was created ‘Count of Perche’, with a similar design as above to inspire him to re-take that French county, while the youngest brother Edmund was created ‘Count of Mortain’ in Normandy. None of these titles (Harcourt, Perche, Mortain) were recognised by the French king. Thomas was killed in 1431 at the siege of Louviers, when Edmund took over command of the English army, and made a name for himself re-capturing the important port of Harfleur and delivering the besieged city of Calais. Meanwhile their sister Joan married the King of Scots, James I, who had been in captivity in England for nearly two decades—James was released upon their marriage in 1424 and he and Joan Beaufort returned to Scotland where she played an important political role for the next twenty years.

Joan de Beaufort, Queen of Scots

When the 3rd Earl of Somerset was finally released in 1438, he returned to England and was given command again in France, as Captain-General of Aquitaine and Admiral of the English navy. He proved to be a poor commander and presided over the loss of much of Aquitaine. Nevertheless, in August 1443 he was created Duke of Somerset and Earl of Kendal, and led another campaign to France, this time disastrously losing the English hold on Normandy. By this point, Henry VI had failed to establish himself as a powerful monarch, and his royal cousin the Duke of York’s influence was rising. The 1st Duke of Somerset died in May 1444, after only eight months of being a duke (though there are some indications he’d been named a duke as early as 1438). He left behind a widow, Margaret Beauchamp of Bletsoe, and an infant daughter, Margaret Beaufort, future progenitrix of the Tudor dynasty.

John Beaufort, 1st Duke of Somerset, Wimborne Minster

The Duke of Somerset’s brother Edmund, meanwhile, had been given a re-creation of the Earldom of Dorset in 1442—still based in its stronghold at Corfe Castle—then promoted to his father’s old ‘strange’ title, Marquess of Dorset. In 1444, he was named Lord Lieutenant of France, supplementing his brother’s near complete control there. When John Beaufort died in 1445, Edmund replaced him as 2nd Duke of Somerset (though formally not re-created until 1448). He forced the Duke of York out as supreme commander in France, and, allied with Queen Margaret of Anjou, functioned essentially as Henry VI’s prime minister from June 1450. He acted as godfather to the Prince of Wales at his baptism in 1453, and strongly hinted that he should be named the child’s heir and head of the House of Lancaster. The 2nd Duke of Somerset was no more successful in war than his brother had been, however—he was forced to surrender the Norman capital of Rouen, then lost all of Normandy by 1450, and the remaining strongholds in Aquitaine by 1453. In April 1454 the Duke of York ousted him from government and imprisoned him in the Tower of London (and spread rumours that the Prince of Wales was actually Somerset’s son), until the King regained his senses at the end of the year and released him. By the spring of 1455, however, England was at war with itself, and Somerset was killed by Yorkist forces at the Battle of Saint Albans.

Edmund Beaufort, 2nd Duke of Somerset, in Rouen

The pretensions of the House of Beaufort that clashed so intensely with the House of York can be seen visually in their coat-of-arms: the golden lions of England quartered with the lilies of France, made different to the royal arms of England by a border of alternating blue and silver (known in heraldry as a ‘bordure compony’). These arms were supported by one of the most curious of heraldic animals: the ‘Beaufort yale’. A yale was a mythical beast, like an antelope but with tusks and horns that could swivel in any direction. Under the Tudors it became one of the ‘king’s beasts’ and can be seen in statue form today in front of Hampton Court Palace.

Arms of Lady Margaret Beaufort at St John’s College, Cambridge, with the Beaufort yales, the red rose of Lancaster and other family symbols
the Beaufort Yale

There were now two Dowager Duchesses of Somerset, both with Beauchamp as a surname (though from different branches). Duchess Margaret looked after her daughter Margaret by agreeing to her swift marriage in November 1455 (though she was only 12) to King Henry VI’s half-brother (who was already her legal guardian), Edmund Tudor, Earl of Richmond. Duchess Eleanor (daughter of the Earl of Warwick) was left with three sons and five daughters. In 1458, in an attempt at reconciliation, it was agreed by the Royal Council that the Duke of York should pay the widowed Duchess Eleanor and her children an annual pension of five thousand marks as compensation for the death of the their father. The eldest son, Henry, had just turned twenty and was now 3rd Duke of Somerset. He became the hope of the House of Lancaster, with the King slipping increasingly into madness and the Prince of Wales still a child. In 1459, Somerset was sent with a force to take the fortress of Calais from the Earl of Warwick, Richard Neville—his cousin via his great-aunt Joan and his cousin-in-law via his mother. Back in England, the Duke of Somerset was initially successful in battle, at Wakefield in 1460, then at the second Battle of Saint Albans in 1461. But a few weeks later he lost the Battle of Towton, and fled to France as York proclaimed himself king as Edward IV. Somerset’s titles were attainted by Parliament in December, but he was pardoned in 1463 and restored to his lands and titles. He nevertheless re-joined the forces of Queen Margaret in rebellion against Edward IV, but was defeated at Hexham in Northumberland in May 1464—he was captured by Yorkist forces and executed on the spot.

Brother Edmund now became 4th Duke of Somerset. He had lived in France since 1461, attempting to rally the French king to Margaret of Anjou’s cause. He was only recognised as duke by the Lancastrians since the title was once more attainted in May 1464. He returned with Queen Margaret to England in 1470, and was captured and executed after the Battle of Tewkesbury in May 1471. His brother John, known as the Earl of Dorset (again only recognised by Lancastrians) was also killed at Tewkesbury.

execution of the 4th Duke of Somerset, Tewkesbury, 1471

All that remained now of the House of Beaufort, so powerful just two decades before, was the Dowager Duchess Margaret; her daughter Margaret, Dowager Countess of Richmond, aka Lady Henry Stafford (her first husband Edmund Tudor had died in 1456, and Stafford would soon follow, later in 1471); the latter’s young son, Henry Tudor, living abroad at the court of the Duke of Brittany; and five married Beaufort women. The eldest of these, Eleanor, was the widow of the powerful Earl of Ormond—her daughters from a second marriage became major heiresses and took many of the Beaufort estates into the houses of Carey and Percy in the Tudor era. Anne married into the Paston family, famous for the ‘Paston Letters’ which are an invaluable source for students of the late 15th century; while Margaret was widow of the Earl of Stafford, elder brother of Sir Henry Stafford—making it a little confusing to have two Lady Margaret Beaufort Staffords. The more famous of these Lady Margarets was of course the mother of King Henry VII and the all-seeing dowager-grandmother until a few months into the reign of Henry VIII.

Lady Margaret Beaufort, with arms and portcullis symbol behind her, and the red rose of Lancaster above her

Lady Margaret Beaufort has featured prominently and with great vigour in recent television dramas about the early Tudors, and has been in archaeological news as well, with the rediscovery in December 2023 of the location of the ‘lost Tudor palace’ of Collyweston. The manor of Collyweston, in the northwestern corner of Northamptonshire (not far from Stamford, in Lincolnshire), was built in the early 15th century and granted to Margaret by her son shortly after his accession in 1485. She enlarged the house and arranged its terraced gardens in about 1500, and notably hosted the court in 1503 as part of the send-off arranged for her grand-daughter, Princess Margaret, on her way to marry the King of Scots. After Margaret’s death in 1509, Henry VIII gave it to his natural son, Henry FitzRoy, and later in the century it was given to Princess Elizabeth by her brother Edward VI, but not visited often. By the end of the century, it was leased to the Cecil family (whose seat, Burghley House was not far away), and though it was sold by James I to a royal servant in the 1620s and mostly dismantled in the 1640s, the estate once again passed to the Cecils, earls of Exeter by the end of the 18th century. By this point, almost all traces of the original house were gone.

the dig at Collyweston

This was the end of the powerful Beauforts of Somerset. But not the end of the House of Beaufort. The 3rd Duke of Somerset had a son, Charles Somerset, born of a relationship with Joan Hill in about 1460. In 1492, he made an excellent marriage, to Elizabeth Herbert, daughter of the Earl of Pembroke and heiress of his title Baron Herbert and of the chief seats of that family, Raglan Castle and Caldicot Castle, both in Monmouthshire in southeast Wales (see the Herbert family, dukes of Powis). The new Baron Herbert thus bore the arms of Beaufort, ‘bruised’ with a silver ‘baton sinister’ indicating his illegitimate birth, and overall the escutcheon of the Herberts, three silver lions on a divided red and blue shield. Adding to their already unique ‘Beaufort Yale’, the Somerset family arms had two other rather strange supporters which they picked up from the Herberts: a green wyvern on one side, a fairly common Welsh beast, and a curious silver panther with spots of various colours and bursts of flame coming out of its mouth and ears. Heraldic experts of the 19th century puzzled over this magical panther, equating it possibly to those seen on the continent in the Middle Ages, which were also spotted and had flames coming out of their mouth, thinking it might refer to ancient Greek texts that said that panthers had very sweet-smelling breath, which made all other animals—except the evil dragon—approach it, thus being a symbol of the sweetness of Christ. This panther is seen as one of the supporters of the royal arms under Henry VI, so perhaps it came to the Beauforts from there. The Somerset family would keep the division of the coat of arms between Beaufort and Herbert until the 1620s, when the latter was dropped.

arms of the Marquess of Worcester showing Beaufort and Herbert at top, Woodville and Russel on bottom, with supporters: a panther on left and a wyvern on right

Of the major estates gained by the Somerset-Herbert marriage, the seat of the family became Raglan Castle. Raglan had long been an important Norman border fortress between the English county of Hereford and the untamed wilds of South Wales. Built soon after the Conquest, it was held by the Bloet family for two centuries until it was purchased in 1432 by a Welsh nobleman on the rise, William ap Thomas, who rebuilt the castle to more modern fortification standards. His son William took the surname Herbert, supported the Yorkist cause, and was created Baron Herbert of Raglan in 1461 and Earl of Pembroke in 1468. He had greatly expanded Raglan as befitted his new status, but was suddenly executed in 1469 after falling out with the Earl of Warwick. He had married his son and heir to the Queen’s sister, Mary Wydville, but this was not enough to recover favour, and ultimately the 2nd Earl of Pembroke had to surrender his father’s earldom to the Crown. When he died in 1491, he left an orphan, Elizabeth Herbert, who married Charles Somerset and in a way joined together Lancastrian and Yorkist factions—a very good Tudor precedent.

Raglan Castle

Raglan Castle remained the seat of the Somerset-Herberts in the 16th century and was developed as a great aristocratic seat with art collections and a renowned library. After the Civil War, the republican government of the 1650s decided to ‘slight’ it (like Corfe, above), and after the restoration of the monarchy, the family decided not to rebuild it—instead they focused on Badminton (below). In the mid-18th century the Somersets decided to slow the decay of the ruin and turned it into a tourist site; it was fixed up a bit in the 19th century, and the great hall given temporary roof for entertainments and a royal visit. In 1938 Raglan was donated to the Commission of Works, which since the 1980s is called Cadw, the Welsh equivalent of English Heritage. It remains one of the great wonders of medieval castle building in the UK.

Near to Raglan Castle is Saint Cadoc Church, which became a burial site for the Somerset family. Initially built by the medieval de Clares—powerful lords of this area between England and Wales, it was expanded in the early modern period by the Herberts and Somersets, notably with the addition of the Beaufort Chapel in the mid-16th century. The church was restored by the 8th Duke of Beaufort in the 1860s, and a Lady Chapel added. By this point, however, the main family burial area had shifted to Badminton.

Saint Cadoc’s Church, Raglan

The other main Herbert castle inherited by the Somersets was Caldicot in Monmouthshire. Based on the coast of the Seven estuary, it guarded roads to south Wales, and had initially been built by the Norman representative of the Crown here, the Sheriff of Gloucester, in the 1070s. The Bohun family, earls of Hereford, built a more extensive castle in the 1150s, and when their family estates were divided between two members of the royal family (Thomas of Woodstock and Henry of Bolingbroke) it entered the royal domain, but was given to the Herberts as stewards. The Somersets did not use Caldicot Castle much, and by the 18th century it was a ruin. Sold in 1857 to the Cobb family, who restored parts of it, it was held by them until sold to Chepstow District Council in 1964, and opened as a museum.

Caldecot Castle in the 18th century

Charles Somerset’s title to these Herbert estates was confirmed when he was called to Parliament as Baron Herbert of Raglan, Chepstow, and Gower in 1506. Then in 1514, Henry VIII raised his cousin in rank to Earl of Worcester and Lord Chamberlain of the Household. This last post meant it was he who was responsible for making much of the arrangements of the famous Field of the Cloth of Gold in 1520. By then Elizabeth Herbert had died, so the Earl re-married, Elizabeth West then Eleanor Sutton of Dudley, firmly tying his family to the rising ‘new men’ of the Tudor era.

Charles Somerset, 1st Earl of Worcester, with the white staff of the Lord Chamberlain

His son Henry, 2nd Earl of Worcester, added to the family’s lands in Monmouthshire by obtaining the newly dissolved Tintern Abbey in the Wye Valley. Unlike some of his peers, he did not modify the buildings of this ancient Cistercian monastery to form a new country house, but stripped the building for parts (notably the lead roof) and let the rest fall to ruin—it became one of the most ‘romantic’ ruins in England, celebrated in poetry and music.

Tintern Abbey ruins

The 2nd Earl’s marriage in 1514 is quite interesting: Margaret Courtenay, daughter of the Earl of Devon and of Princess Catherine of York, brought not just the usual noble dowry, but added still more Plantagenet blood to the Somerset clan. But they had no children (though some genealogists say his eldest daughter Lucy was Catherine’s daughter, and took her Plantagenet blood to marriage to John Neville, 4th Baron Latimer, step-son of Queen Katherine Parr), and his second marriage, in 1527, to Elizabeth Browne, was less illustrious, though she had a Neville mother who herself had a Beaufort great-grandmother. There’s always a connection, and remember how twitchy the Tudors were about anybody with Plantagenet blood…

The 2nd Earl of Worcester was followed by his son, William, 3rd Earl, a supporter of Jane Grey—he survived her downfall and lived into the 1580s, and married two fairly insignificant women, thus ruffling no feathers. A younger son, Thomas Somerset, made more waves: a fervent Catholic, he had been a servant of Bishop Gardiner in the reign of Mary I, and was imprisoned for more than 25 years in the reign of Elizabeth I—the last stint (from 1585) for complicity in the plot of Mary, Queen of Scots. He died in the Tower in 1586.

William, 3rd Earl of Worcester

The 4th Earl of Worcester rose to prominence again in the reign of James VI and I. He had got to know James VI of Scotland in the 1590s when he was sent to his court as an emissary of Elizabeth I. Once in England, James named his distant cousin (via Lady Margaret Beaufort) Earl Marshal, one of the most important positions at court, though after 1604 he had to share the office with six (later four) other courtiers as the King decided to put it ‘in commission’ to spread out the honour. In 1606, Worcester was created Keeper of the Great Park, an area southwest of London around the Tudor hunting lodge of Nonsuch. Here Worcester built his own house, Worcester Park House, which only stayed in the family a short time: it was bought during the Civil War by Col. Thomas Pride, and passed through various hands across the centuries before burning to the ground in 1948—hardly a trace remains.

Worcester Park in 1828

In 1616, the 4th Earl rose to his highest position as Lord Privy Seal, an office he held for nearly ten years. He died in 1628 leaving two sons and a daughter who, in keeping with the theme of ‘Plantagenet blood’ in this blog, inherited a double dollop more from their mother, Lady Elizabeth Hastings, daughter of the Earl of Huntington and Catherine Pole—both of whom were descended from Plantagenet kings.

Edward, 4th Earl of Worcester

The 5th Earl of Worcester, Henry Somerset (known as ‘Lord Herbert’ as the heir) was not just someone with a lot of royal blood; he was also a Catholic. But he was one of the richest peers in England and Wales and a firm supporter of King Charles I to whom he lent a lot of money with which to raise a Royalist army. For this he was rewarded with an upgrade: the title Marquess of Worcester in 1642. He hosted the King at Raglan in June-September 1645, then surrendered the castle to Parliamentary forces in late 1646. He died in custody later that same year.

Henry Somerset, 1st Marquess of Worcester

The younger son, Thomas, was also a favourite at the court of James I. He had been one of those English lords sent north of the border to announce the death of Elizabeth I in 1603, and when his father was named Earl Marshal in 1603, he was named Master of the Horse to Queen Anne of Denmark. In 1616 he married an Irish noblewoman, and in 1626 was given an Irish title, Viscount Somerset of Cashel. But he died in 1651 with no children. His sister was also a famous royalist: Blanche, Baroness Arundell of Wardour is known for having valiantly defended her home, Wardour Castle, in Wiltshire, in May 1643, with only 25 men and her maids holding out for a week against over a thousand Parliamentary troops.

The next generation saw another two sons: Edward became 2nd Marquess of Worcester, while his brother Thomas became a Catholic priest and a leader of the English Church abroad, as a nuncio for Pope Clement IX sent to England. He died in 1678 in Dunkirk. Meanwhile, the 2nd Marquess (while still ‘Lord Herbert’) raised a force of Welsh troops in 1643 to support the King and was created Earl of Glamorgan and Baron Beaufort of Caldecote in his own right. These troops were almost immediately abandoned however, and he was sent by the King to Ireland, where he worked—as a Catholic, and having an Irish wife—to negotiate an alliance with the Irish Catholic Confederates. He was accused, however, by the Royalists of granting too many concessions to the Irish, so he ended up joining them in their rebellion. He fled to France by 1645, then attempted return to England in 1653 but was caught and held for a year in the Tower of London. Restored to his honours by Charles II in the 1660s, he nonetheless preferred to stay away from court, working instead in his ‘laboratory’ where he developed some interesting engineering devices: a proto-steam engine, a hydraulic machine for irrigation, and more.

Edward, 2nd Marquess of Worcester

The 2nd Marquess had married twice, both to Catholics: Lady Elizabeth Dormer and Lady Margaret O’Brien. By his first wife he had a son, Henry (next), and two daughters: Anne was married to a Howard and was mother to the restored line of dukes of Norfolk; while Elizabeth re-connected her family to the Herberts in its junior line (the earls of Powis). These families were the apex of the Catholic nobility in Britain. Nevertheless they retained favour with the Stuarts, but did not cross the line when other Catholic nobles supported James II in 1688. So close was the family to the royal family that in 1646, Henry had been considered for marriage to the King’s daughter, Princess Elizabeth. But Henry went into exile and Elizabeth died in 1650. While abroad, he renounced Catholicism and became ‘acceptable’ to Lord Cromwell, and was elected as simple ‘Mr Herbert’ as an MP for Breconshire in 1654. He was involved in a royalist plot in July 1659, and was sent to the Tower until November. He was then sent by Parliament to Breda in the Netherlands as part of the delegation inviting Charles II back to England in May 1660. At the Restoration, Lord Herbert was appointed Lord Lieutenant of Gloucestershire, as well as for Herefordshire and Monmouthshire. The family estates were restored to him, not to his father. He continued to sit in Parliament (now as MP for Monmouthshire) until he succeeded as 3rd Marquess of Worcester in 1667.

At this point, the 3rd Marquess of Worcester started to develop a new seat for the family, Badminton, acquired from his cousin, Elizabeth Somerset (daughter of the Irish Viscount). The old manor in south Gloucestershire had been purchased by the 4th Earl of Worcester in 1612, and his son the Viscount started modernising it in the 1620s. The 3rd Marquess relocated here from Raglan, and already by 1663 was able to entertain the King and Queen here—over the next three hundred years, Badminton would serve as a nearly royal residence for this nearly royal family. The household at Badminton in the late 17th century, for example, was described as ‘princely’, with over 200 members of staff.

Badminton House, Gloucestershire. by Canaletto, 1749

In the 1670s, the Marquess of Worcester was appointed Lord President of Wales and the Marches, which allowed him to exercise some of these semi-royal prerogatives on behalf of his distant cousin King Charles II. He built Great Castle House atop the old Monmouth Castle, 1673, as the seat for his office as Lord President. This building was later given over to the local judiciary, and later became a school, then regimental headquarters and now a museum.

As a Catholic, however, the Marquess of Worcester was drawn into some of the scandals of the time—he was accused of being involved in the Popish Plot, but nothing came of it, and was opposed to Parliament’s attempts to block the succession to the throne of the King’s Catholic brother James. In 1682, the King rewarded him by elevating him further in rank with by creating him Duke of Beaufort. He then served as one of the chief mourners for Charles II in February 1685 and bore the Queen’s crown at the coronation that followed in April. James II appointed the new duke Gentleman of the Bedchamber, and he was dispatched to the southwest during Monmouth’s Rebellion that summer, keeping the city of Bristol loyal to the Crown. He did this again in late 1688 as William of Orange’s troops were arriving just a bit to the south of Bristol in the Glorious Revolution. The Duke of Beaufort did not, however, go into exile like other supporters of James II, but he did support the idea of naming William III as regent, not king, in the Spring of 1689. Nevertheless, he did accept the decision made by Parliament, swore the oath to the new King and Queen, and received them at Badminton in September 1690.

Henry Somerset, 1st Duke of Beaufort, in Garter Robes

Yet the 1st Duke of Beaufort was still suspected of disloyalty in the later 1690s, and even accused of being involved in a Jacobite plot in 1696. He increasingly stayed away from court and preferred to live at Beaufort House in Chelsea. Here his wife, Duchess Mary (born Mary Capell, sister of the 1st Earl of Essex), was becoming known as a gardener and collector. This house had been built by Thomas More in 1520 and was forfeit to the Crown upon his arrest in 1534. It was then given out as a London residence to various men like the French ambassador or ministerial families like the Paulets or the Cecils, and later court favourites like the Earl of Middlesex and the Duke of Buckingham. In 1677 it was acquired by the Marquess of Worcester from the Earl of Bristol. Chelsea was still an area of large gardens in the seventeenth century, and Beaufort’s neighbour was the famous collector, Sir Hans Sloane, who bought Beaufort House in 1737, and demolished it in 1739 to expand his own gardens. Only the name ‘Beaufort Street’ remains in the area.

Beaufort House, Chelsea, and its gardens

The 1st Duke of Beaufort died in 1700 and was buried in Beaufort Chapel in Saint George’s, Windsor, and later was moved to St Michael and All Angels church in Badminton, built in 1785. In addition to work done at Badminton, the Duke also developed another family property in this era: Troy House, a former property of the Herberts of Troy (an estate just south of the town of Monmouth), was restored in 1681-82 as a wedding present for his son and heir, Charles (known as the Earl of Glamorgan until his father’s elevation to the dukedom, then Marquess of Worcester). Troy House remained the residence for the heir to the dukedom until 1899 when it was sold, alongside many of the family’s Welsh estates, to nuns who created a convent school. It remained as such until the 1980s, and today sits as a mostly abandoned ruin, with developers struggling with local planning regulations to develop it into flats.

Troy House and Monmouthshire, 1672
Troy House in about 1900

The 1st Duke of Beaufort was succeeded in 1700 by his grandson, Henry, since his eldest son Charles had died two years before. The 2nd Duke began the family’s long tradition of steady but fairly unremarkable service as Tory politicians in the 18th century. He married three times but left only two sons when he died in 1714. Henry, 3rd Duke Beaufort, spent a much longer time as duke, but was known mostly for social and cultural affairs rather than politics. He commissioned the Badminton Cabinet, for example, a set of exquisite wooden drawers made in Florence that sold in 2004 for 19 million pounds (to the Prince of Liechtenstein), making it the most expensive piece of furniture in the world. His other connection to the art world was through the marriage of his illegitimate daughter, Margaret Burr, to the painter Thomas Gainsborough (though this didn’t occur till the year after the Duke’s death). In a divorce trial scandal of 1742 the Duke did have to prove publicly that he could have an erection in order to disprove his estranged wife’s claims of impotence. A year later he was involved in an international scandal in which Jacobite peers were discovered to be encouraging the French government to support an uprising in favour of the exiled Stuarts, but he died in February 1745 before things really heated up.

Charles, 4th Duke of Beaufort

The 3rd Duke’s brother, Charles, now the 4th Duke of Beaufort, was more directly involved in the Jacobite rising known as The ’45—he even hosted a secret visit of Bonnie Prince Charlie to London in September 1750—but the government never pursued him. He died in 1756, but in his short time as duke had contributed to the a significant makeover of the family estates. Badminton was given a new Palladian style in the 1740s, celebrated in grandiose paintings of the house and grounds by Canaletto, the famous Venetian artist the Duke brought to England. The Duke also added Worcester Lodge at the edge of the Park: a unique building with an elevated dining room over a grand archway, under a domed painted ceiling.

Worcester Lodge, Badminton

In time, Badminton House became synonymous with horse racing and fox hunting, but also gave its name to the sport badminton. The game was supposedly invented by the Beaufort children in a particularly harsh winter in the 1860s, when they found they could play indoors with a soft shuttlecock that would not damage the walls or the priceless Classical sculptures in the main entrance hall. Or was it a game imported from India, and only made popular in England? In other sports, the Badminton Horse Trials have been held on the estate since 1949, and the Beaufort Hunt is still one of the two most prominent in the United Kingdom. In terms of the house itself, although Badminton House is one of those rare great country houses that remains completely private and not open to the public, we can see many of its interiors in television series filmed there, most recently Bridgerton.

a recent fashion shoot in the original badminton court, the Badminton Great Hall

Aside from the contributions to the build-up of Badminton House in the 1740s, the 4th Duke also added an interesting title to the family’s collections, though his marriage to Elizabeth Berkeley, sister of Norborne, Baron Botetourt. Their son, Henry, 5th Duke of Beaufort, inherited the barony of Botetourt a few months before his death in 1803. Baron Botetourt was one of the last colonial governors of Virginia, and though his time in office was short (1768-70), his legacy was great. A new county in the western part of the colony was named for him in 1770, as was an endowed award at the College of William & Mary in Williamsburg, the colonial capital where he died and was buried in the crypt of Wren Chapel. A statue of Lord Botetourt has stood in front of the Wren Building since then (off and on), and is a much-revered symbol of the College. Years later, the small ensemble of the William & Mary Choir was named the Botetourt Chamber Singers, and when the Choir travelled to Europe in May-June 1993 (as written about by me in a previous blog post), we visited Badminton to commemorate this Botetourt link and were privileged to have a private tour conducted by the 11th Duchess of Beaufort herself. By this point, however, the title ‘Baron Botetourt’ was in fact in abeyance, since the 10th Duke had no children. The title had originally been created in 1305 for the Botetourt family, and passed to a cadet of the powerful Berkeley family of Gloucestershire by marriage in the 1350s, but was in abeyance from 1406. Norborne Berkeley, an MP for South Gloucestershire, in royal favour as a Groom of the Bedchamber to George III, was able to pull the barony out of abeyance for himself in 1764, but when he died in 1770 with no children, it went into abeyance again.

Lord Botetourt’s statue in front of the Wren Building, College of William & Mary, Virginia

Lord Botetourt left not just the claims to this ancient barony to the Beauforts, but a beautiful house, Stoke Park. The Berkeleys had been lords of the manor of Stoke Gifford, a village to the north of the city of Bristol, since the 1330s. Sir Richard Berkeley had built a house upon a hill here in the 1550s, and this was significantly rebuilt by Norborne Berkeley in 1760. It became the dower house for successive generations of the Beaufort family until it was converted into a hospital for the mentally handicapped in 1909. The hospital was closed in the 1980s and sold for development—but was used for teaching rooms by the University of the West of England until 2003. Since then it has been converted into flats, but the estate of Stoke Park remains an extremely popular public park run by the city of Bristol.

Stoke Park, outside Bristol

The 5th Duke of Beaufort was only twelve when he succeeded. As he came of age in the 1770s he took on the family’s traditional roles in the Welsh borders, as Lord Lieutenant of Monmouthshire, then of Brecknockshire, deeper into Wales. He was also colonel of the Monmouth and Brecon militia. At court he was Master of the Horse to Queen Charlotte. After his death in 1803, his roles in Wales were taken over by his eldest son, Henry Charles, 6th Duke, who added a third lord lieutenancy, of Gloucestershire, in 1810. He was also Warden of the Forest of Dean. Henry Charles had previously served as a Tory MP (1788-1803), but stayed away from politics once he became a peer.

Henry, 5th Duke of Beaufort

His younger brothers and nephews were more active in military and colonial affairs: his brother Lord Charles was Governor of Cape Colony, 1814-26, whose son became a Lieutenant-General in South Africa and Commander-in-Chief of the Bombay Army, 1855-60; his nephew Arthur was a Lieutenant-General and eventually Governor of Gibraltar, 1876-78; and his youngest brother, Lord Fitzroy (the 9th son of the 5th Duke!), was a Field Marshal and Commander of British troops in the Crimean War. Following an initial success at Alma, his reputation to posterity was memorialised after a terrible defeat at the Battle of Balaclava in October 1854 in the epic poem ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’, by Tennyson. Lord Fitzroy, a soldier since the Napoleonic Wars—famously losing an arm at Waterloo—had been created Baron Raglan of Raglan in 1852; his aide-de-camp, Lord Calthorpe, interestingly, bore the unusual first name Somerset, as his mother was Lady Charlotte Somerset, Raglan’s younger sister. His health broken the failed attempts to take the city of Sebastopol, Lord Raglan died in Crimea in June 1855. He established a junior line of the Somerset family, with a seat at Cefntilla Court in Llandenny (in Monmouthshire). The family (and title) still exists, though they sold Cefntilla in 2015.

Lord Fitzroy Somerset, Baron Raglan, about 1840
Cefntilla Court, Monmouthshire

Both sons of the 6th Duke, Henry and Granville (named for his mother Charlotte Leveson-Gower’s family) were Tory MPs, the former in the 1810s-20s, the latter in the 1830s-40s (and he became a Privy Councillor and member of the Cabinet). The 7th Duke had married Lady Georgiana Fitzroy, another interesting link between two ‘illegitimate’ branches of the British royal family (he a Plantagenet, she a Stuart). They bought a house in London in 1840, on Arlington Street in St James’s Square, expanded it and renamed it Beaufort House. But though he spent lavishly on it, this house was not a family possession for long, sold to the Duke of Hamilton in 1852 a year before the Duke’s death.

Beaufort House, now known as Wimborne House, from Green Park

The next duke (the 8th) was named Henry Charles, but was known as Charles; in the same way, all of his sons were named Henry, but went by their second names—names usually reflected a dynastic identity in the Middle Ages, and in the spirit of the 19th-century revived passion for all things medieval, this family revived its links with their medieval origins: the Henrician kings of the House of Lancaster. The 8th Duke was, as the family always was, a Tory, and served in the Earl of Derby’s government as Master of the Horse (1858-59 and again 1866-68). This office was by now mostly political, nothing to do with the sovereign’s horses. But he was heavily involved in sports: from 1885 he published the first of 28 volumes of books about sports known as the Badminton Library (the last appearing three years before his death, in 1896; though another five volumes appeared in the next two decades). He was still one of the greatest landowners in the UK, with over 50,000 acres in Monmouthshire and Gloucestershire, where, like his ancestors, he served as Lord Lieutenant for the Crown.

Henry, 8th Duke of Beaufort

The eldest of his four ‘Henry’ sons (Henry Adelbert, Henry Richard, Henry Arthur and Henry Edward) was a fairly staid late Victorian and succeeded as the 9th Duke in 1899. His two brothers, however, made waves as prominent lords who scandalised society through their sexual behaviour. Lord Richard Somerset, Comptroller of the Royal Household in the 1870s, had to leave the country due to his love for a teenage boy. He lived in Florence until his death in 1932, and published poetry now identified with the school of late Victorian poets known as the ‘Uranians’. Lord Arthur, an equerry of the Prince of Wales, was involved in the even more high-profile ‘Cleveland Street Scandal’, 1889, in which several socially prominent men were identified as having encounters with male prostitutes—when questioned, Lord Arthur apparently pointed a finger at a much higher ranking figure, possibly the Prince of Wales’ son Prince Albert Victor (‘Prince Eddy’), so the investigation was rapidly hushed up. Somerset resigned his posts at court and in the army and also went abroad to avoid arrest, spending the rest of his life with a male companion in France (d. 1926).

Caricature of Lord Arthur Somerset

The 9th Duke had a son, Henry Hugh, who became the 10th Duke of Beaufort in 1924. He was Master of the Horse for four sovereigns, between 1936 and 1978—the office had now ceased to be political and was now purely ceremonial, but certainly horse related. It was he who founded the Badminton Horse Trials in the 1940s, and was known for much his life simply as ‘Master’. The 10th Duke was, for good or ill, one of the world’s experts on foxes and fox hunting, as Master of the Beaufort Hunt. He was also President of the British Olympic Association from 1949 to 1966. Ceremonially, in addition to accompanying the sovereign at events like Trooping of the Colour, the Duke represented the Crown as Lord Lieutenant of Gloucestershire (from 1931), as well as the City of Bristol. His relationship with the royal family was always extremely close, not just due to shared love of the countryside, but due to his marriage in 1923 to Lady Mary Cambridge, the former Princess Mary of Teck, the niece of Queen Mary. Many stories are told of the Queen staying at Badminton during World War II and bringing with her truckloads of luggage (and reputedly ‘lifting’ certain Beaufort heirlooms to which she took a fancy).

Henry, 10th Duke of Somerset, and his wife, born Princess Mary of Teck

When the 10th Duke died in 1984, Queen Elizabeth II attended his funeral. But he and Duchess Mary had no children. His sister’s grandson eventually inherited the Herbert barony in 2002, and in 2015 the Botetourt barony was split amongst her various descendants. But the dukedom, being a male only title, and the Badminton estate (entailed with the dukedom), passed to Mr David Somerset, already in his fifties, a great-grandson of the disgraced Lord Richard. He had been invited by his distant cousin to live at Badminton many years before, so the succession was smooth. As 11th Duke of Beaufort, he became President of the British Horse Society, and continued to lead the Beaufort Hunt which brought him into frequent conflict with hunt saboteurs. (there are some great photos of his life here: https://www.tatler.com/gallery/duke-of-beaufort-death-gallery). It was his wife, the former Lady Caroline Thynne (daughter of the Marquess of Bath) whom I met in the summer of 1993 (and wrote about here). I also had the pleasure of hosting their daughter, the historian Lady Anne Somerset, at a conference I organised in Oxford shortly after the publication of her celebrated biography of Queen Anne (published 2012).

David Somerset, 11th Duke of Beaufort
the 11th Duchess of Beaufort in 1993 taken by one of my choir friends

Henry, 12th Duke of Beaufort, took over from his father in 2017. The estate is still enormous (about 52,000 acres). He is also known as singer-songwriter ‘Harry Beaufort’, and both his marriages reflect connections with the world of the arts: the first to actress Tracy Ward (granddaughter of the Earl of Dudley; sister of actress Rachel Ward; today an environmental campaigner as Tracy Worcester, her married name before her divorce), and the second to Georgia Powell daughter of a film director and granddaughter of a novelist. The Duke has a son, Henry, Marquess of Worcester, and a grandson, Henry, Earl of Glamorgan (b. 2021)—so despite the claims of the DNA ‘disjuncture’ the Plantagenets will still reign supreme for the next generations, at least in their horsey corner of Gloucestershire.

the 9th Duke of Beaufort on horseback

Dukes of Beaufort-Spontin: Belgians who went Bohemian

On the northern edge of the deep forested valleys of the Ardennes in what is now eastern Belgium was an ancient fortress overlooking a bend in the River Meuse, not far from the town of Huy between Namur and Liège. It seems to have had an attractive aspect so was called the bellum forte or Beaufort. The castle is long gone, destroyed by troops moving through the area in about 1430, but its ruins have been dated to the early 11th century. It is thought that the noble family called Beaufort took its name from the castle and early on split into multiple branches. One of these became counts of Beaufort in the 17th century then merged with another local family in the 18th century to become Liedekerke-Beaufort; another became the dukes of Beaufort-Spontin from 1782.

ruins of the Castle of Beaufort in the Ardennes, Belgium

These are not the only dukes of Beaufort in European history. The most famous, dukes in England since 1682, are based in Gloucestershire and derive their name from a castle in Champagne that was held by the dukes of Lancaster in the 14th century. This same castle also gave its name to a dukedom of Beaufort that was given to the mistress of King Henry IV, Gabrielle d’Estrées, and her son, César de Bourbon-Vendôme, in 1598. A post about this Beaufort will follow separately later this summer.

The medieval lords of Beaufort in the Ardennes were vassals of the prince-bishops of Liège. Liège was a semi-independent principality within the Holy Roman Empire that stretched along the length of the Meuse, sandwiched between the territories of the counts of Namur and dukes of Brabant on one side, and the dukes of Luxemburg and Limburg on the other. In about 1260, the Beaufort family was granted another fief by Emperor Henry VII (from Luxemburg): Spontin, a bit further to the southwest, deeper into the Ardennes. This castle was situated in the border zone between the principality of Liège and the county of Namur, so there was frequent military action. The château and estates later (the early 16th century) passed into the hands of the family of Glymes de Florennes, who then (the late 18th century) passed it back to the family Beaufort-Spontin once more (see below). The 16th-century owners had transformed the medieval fortress of Spontin into a more comfortable residence, which was later given to the younger daughter of the 1st Duke of Beaufort-Spontin as part of her dowry, when the Duke’s interests shifted more towards Austria and Bohemia. Today Spontin Castle is held privately, not open to the public.

Spontin Castle

In the early 15th century, one branch of the Beaufort-Spontin line settled further upriver on the Meuse, near Dinant in the southernmost parts of the principality of Liège, on a riverbend dominated by huge rocks, 100 meters high, where they built a castle called Freÿr. Today this castle is one of the most exceptional tourist sites of Wallonia, boasting terraced walled gardens and the oldest orangerie in the Low Countries, from the early 18th century. The Count of Namur, rival to the Bishop of Liège in this region, gave the castle to Jean de Rochefort-Orjol in 1378; Jean’s grand-daughter Marie married Jacques de Beaufort in 1410 and took the castle with her into marriage. A century and a half later, French troops destroyed the medieval castle at Freÿr, so a new castle was built in what is now called ‘Renaissance Mosane’ (for the Meuse) style. Three large wings were added in the 17th century, but one was removed in the 18th century to add an elaborate gate to create an enclosed space. The terraced gardens were added in the 1760s.

Château of Freÿr on the River Meuse

At the Castle of Freÿr in 1675, delegates from France and Spain met to negotiate a deal for trade along the River Meuse, with Louis XIV himself as a guest. According to the castle website, this meeting was where coffee was served for the first time in the region, so the treaty is sometimes called the ‘Coffee Treaty’. As with Spontin, when the family interests shifted to Austria in the early 19th century, Freÿr Castle and its estates were left to a daughter, Herénégilde and through her it eventually passed to the barons Bonaert, who still own it today.

In the early 18th century the Southern Netherlands passed from Spanish to Austrian rule. In 1746, as a reward for his family’s continued loyalty to the Habsburgs, Count Charles-Albert de Beaufort-Spontin (1713-1753) was created Marquis de Beaufort-Spontin, with rank and honours equivalent to the princes of the Empire. He was also titled Marquis de Courcelles and Beauraing, for other estates he held in Wallonia. In 1747 he married Countess Marie-Marguerite de Glymes, heiress of another major noble family in these parts, owners of the Château of Florennes. This ancient castle had also been a fief of the prince-bishops of Liège, held by the Rumigny-Florennes family until the late 13th century, when it passed by marriage to younger son of the Duke of Lorraine, Thibaut, Lord of Neufchâteau. Thibaut then succeeded as Duke of Lorraine himself in 1302, and Florennes remained a northern territorial outpost of this family, rulers of a duchy just to the south of the Ardennes, until 1556. Then it passed to the Lords of Glymes, illegitimate descendants of the medieval dukes of Brabant, until it was inherited by the Beaufort-Spontin in 1771.They lost the castle during the French Revolutionary wars when that conflict spilled into the Southern Netherlands, but recovered it afterwards during the establishment of the Kingdom of Belgium. Sold in 1893, the Château de Florennes became a Jesuit college in the 20th century, and since the 1950s a seminary for girls.

Château of Florennes

The son of the first Marquis de Beaufort-Spontin, Frédéric-August (1751-1817), became a chamberlain of the Empress Maria Theresa in 1775, represented in the Austrian Netherlands by her brother-in-law, Charles-Alexandre of Lorraine. After Maria Theresa died and was succeeded by her son Emperor Joseph II, Beaufort-Spontin was raised again in rank in 1782, this time to the fairly unusual (in the Low Countries) rank of duke. Why were dukedoms rare here? The disparate provinces that today make up the Kingdom of Belgium (Flanders, Brabant, Namur, etc) were collected together by the dukes of Burgundy in the 14th and 15th centuries, then governed by the kings of Spain in the 16th and 17th, and since the king of Spain’s formal legal title in these provinces remained no higher than duke, the Habsburgs did not elevate many of their subjects to this rank (though they did create a number of princes, like Ligne or Croÿ or Merode). After 1713, Austria took over administration of the region from Spain, and set about creating new titles for families that stayed loyal (as opposed to those who had supported a French takeover) during the War of Spanish Succession. The Beaufort-Spontin family were thus created counts in 1713. Other fiefs they accumulated in the Southern Netherlands included the county of Noyelles and the viscounty of Audenbourg in Flanders (the former now in France); and the Imperial ‘Free Barony’ of Hosden near Huy—this last one was one of those fascinating micro-principalities that owed no feudal loyalty to anybody but the Holy Roman Emperor himself. It is also interesting since, as a ‘German-style’ fief, it was divided between a number of heirs: the Duke of Beaufort-Spontin in fact only held ¼ of the barony and only ¼ of its ‘sovereignty’.

Frédéric-August, 1st Duke of Beaufort-Spontin

The first Duke of Beaufort-Spontin earned his elevated rank due to his personal links with Emperor Joseph II, the large amount of land he had inherited from both his father’s and his mother’s lineages that made him one of the greatest vassals of the Habsburgs in the Low Countries, and perhaps also due to the impending marriage with the sister of a prominent Spanish aristocrat and politician, the Duke of the Infantado, First Minister of King Carlos III. Beaufort-Spontin’s ducal title was not like others that existed within the Holy Roman Empire, like Brunswick or Saxony; the Austrian Netherlands had slightly different rules to the neighbouring provinces of the Empire, granting him neither any degree of semi-sovereignty within his estates, nor the rank of duke and duchess for all members of the family—only the head of the family and his wife enjoyed this rank, while all others were styled count or countess. In 1789, the 1st Duke was further honoured with the rank of ‘imperial count’, thus solidifying his family’s position within the nobiliary system of the Holy Roman Empire. During the wars of the French Revolution, Frédéric-August was appointed chamberlain to Archduke Charles, a son of Emperor Leopold II, and the last Governor-General of the Austrian Netherlands, 1793-94, before these lands were conquered by France and incorporated first into the French Republic. Beaufort-Spontin served as Grand Marshal of the Archduke’s court in Brussels.

The Duke’s first wife Leopoldina Alvarez de Toledo died in 1792. There had been a son, Pierre, who was heir presumptive to the vast succession of his Spanish grandfather, the Duke of the Infantado (and another five dukedoms and two principalities, in Spain, Naples and Sardinia), but he died before he reached age ten. This grand inheritance thus passed to his eldest sister, Marie-Françoise, who married the Duke of Osuna. Beaufort-Spontin still needed a male heir, so he married for a second time, 1807, Ernestine von Starhemberg, from one of the leading families of the Austrian court in Vienna. A son and heir was born in 1809, Frédéric-Louis. Having been deemed an émigré and thus an enemy of the French Empire, the Duke travelled to Paris to attempt to keep his lands from being confiscated. Napoleon tried to incorporate him into his imperial court, as he had with other Belgian princes, Arenberg and Merode, but Beaufort-Spontin would not forego his loyalty to Vienna, his lands remained confiscated, and he departed once more for Vienna.

But the 1st Duke of Beaufort-Spontin’s career was only just about to reach its pinnacle. After Napoleon’s armies were defeated in 1814, the European Great Powers met to decide what should happen to the former Austrian Netherlands. Present at the Congress of Vienna, the Duke was a vocal advocate for keeping the southern provinces separate, rather than merge them with the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Such was his pre-eminent position, while decisions were being debated, he was named temporary Governor-General of the Southern Netherlands, from February to March 1814—the last person to ever hold this post. The southern provinces were in fact soon incorporated into the new Kingdom of the United Netherlands, and the Duke became Chamberlain and Grand Marshal of the Court of its first king, William I, in 1816. Beaufort-Spontin died the next year in 1817.

His son Frédéric-Louis became the 2nd Duke at age 8. Raised by their Viennese mother, eventually, both he and his younger brother Alfred (b. 1816) decided to transfer the family interests to the heart of the Habsburg empire, which since 1804 had transformed into the Empire of Austria. This Empire also included the Kingdom of Bohemia where their father had purchased in 1813 the castle and estate of Petschau, which today is called Bečov nad Teplou in Czech.

Schloss Petschau, today’s Bečov nad Teplou in the Czech Republic

Petschau Castle, built in the early 14th century on the Teplá River in the far west of Bohemia, in Karlovy Vary District. It had been built by the lords of Rýzmburk, then passed through the hands of various families into the lords of Questenberk from 1624, then inherited by the Kaunitz family in 1752. After the purchase by the Duke of Beaufort-Spontin, the family rebuilt the old castle in a neo-gothic romantic style and linked it to the baroque château that had been built next door. Bečov was confiscated by the Communists at the end of World War II and was turned into a school, then became the seat of the local historical institute.

The baroque palace of Bečov in front of the old castle

The 2nd Duke died unmarried in 1834. By this point, the family not only lived in their main base at Petschau, they also owned a number of other castles and estates in western Bohemia, and also acquired estates in the province of Lower Austria, on the border with Bohemia, notably the Castle of Weineren (today Weinern), a baroque country house now owned by descendants through a female line. Though most of their ancestral lands in Belgium were now held by female-line cousins (as above), they did retain the Château of Florennes and a grand residence in Brussels, the Hôtel de Beaufort (rue aux Laines, not far from the Royal Palace)—this has, since the 1980s, been redeveloped as a home for the elderly.

Schloss Weinern, Lower Austria
The Hôtel de Beaufort in Brussels

The 2nd Duke’s brother Alfred became 3rd Duke of Beaufort-Spontin. He was close to the Habsburgs as an imperial chamberlain and was a member of the estates of both Bohemia and Lower Austria. His family was even more firmly established within the highest ranks of the nobility of Austria-Hungary in 1876 when he was granted a new title, Prince of Beaufort, with the style ‘Serene Highness’ and a hereditary seat in the Austrian House of Lords.

Alfred, 3rd Duke of Beaufort-Spontin

Duke Alfred also brought to Bohemia an ancient treasure: the Reliquary of Saint Maurus. Maurus was a 6th-century disciple of Saint Benedict. This wooden box containing some of his remains was constructed in the early 13th century and covered in gilded silver plate and gemstones. It was held at the Abbey of Florennes for centuries until it was sacked during the French revolutionary wars. Alfred recovered it and restored it in the 1830s, and in the 1880s moved it to his castle at Pletschau. During the Second World War, the family buried it under the floorboards of the castle’s chapel, where it remained mostly forgotten until excavated by an American businessman with support of the Czech government in the 1980s. Despite protests from the Beaufort family, there has been no question that this precious artifact would leave the Czech Republic, and it has been painstakingly restored and placed on display at Bečov since 2002.

Reliquary of Saint Maurus

Alfred died in 1888 and was succeeded by his son, Friedrich, the 4th Duke of Beaufort-Spontin and 2nd Prince (or Fürst) of Beaufort. Friedrich continued to maintain the family’s links with Belgium through his marriage to a princess from the house of Ligne. He died in Bohemia in 1916 on the eve of the independence of the new state of Czechoslovakia.

The 5th Duke of Beaufort-Spontin, and 3rd Prince of Beaufort, Heinrich (1880-1966) worked as a young man in the Habsburg government in Bohemia; he was part of the progressive circle of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, who, as heir to the Austro-Hungarian thrones had plans to reform the Empire to grant more autonomy to Slavic minorities to keep them loyal to the Habsburgs. As we know, the Archduke never got the chance to put any of his ideas to the test, and as Duke Heinrich aged, he grew more attracted to German nationalism as a counter-force to the Czech nationalism that dominated Czechoslovakia after World War One; by the 1930s, he was a member of the pro-German Sudeten Party and supported the Nazis after their takeover of Sudetenland in 1938/39. His sons fought in the German armies, so when the Second World War concluded, their properties were confiscated, and, unlike some other aristocratic families were not restored in the 1990s.

Duke and Prince Heinrich, as a young man

The 5th Duke of Beaufort-Spontin moved with his family to Austria and died near Graz in 1966. His son Friedrich, the 6th Duke and 4th Prince, headed the house until 1998. The family is still listed amongst the princely houses of Belgium, though the link with their ancestral home is fairly thin. Today the 7th Duke, another Friedrich (b. 1944), the last to be born at Petschau / Bečov, became a professor of medicine (radiology) at Graz University. His younger brother, Count Christian (b. 1947), was Director of the Weapons Collection of the Museum of Applied Arts in Vienna. Both of them made a widely publicised visit to Bečov in July 2018.

brothers Friedrich and Christian von Beaufort-Spontin in 2018

Neither of the brothers has a son, only daughters, so the titles of the House of Beaufort-Spontin will soon be extinguished. They no longer own the Austrian castles on the northern frontier in Lower Austria, but instead live in Styria, outside its capital of Graz, in an old manorhouse called Gallmannsegg, near the town of Kainach. Here they host an annual car festival.

the car show at Gallmannsegg, near Graz, Styria

The arms of Beaufort-Spontin are quartered with those of the Counts of Looz (another powerful feudal dynasty from the region of the principality of Liège), from whom they claimed descent. Behind the shield is a princely mantle and a princely coronet,

(images Wikimedia Commons)

Marshals in France, dukedoms in Italy: Napoleon’s dukes and princes—the one-offs

In June 1790, Revolutionary France abolished the use of titles of nobility. While France was still a kingdom—for now—its Second Order no longer had a hereditary place at the top of society. Legally, there were no more dukes or princes in France. A decade later, in May 1804, First Consul Bonaparte was proclaimed Emperor of the French, and when he was crowned in Notre Dame in December, he needed a court composed of an entourage with noble honours. At first he created an imperial family, with the title ‘prince français’ for his brothers Joseph and Louis and his brother-in-law Joachim Murat, later extended to his other brothers Jérôme and (grudgingly, only at the very end) Lucien, plus his sister Elisa, his adopted son Eugène de Beauharnais, his adopted daughter Stéphanie de Beauharnais, and his uncle, Joseph Fesch. Also granted the rank of prince were those who held one of the Grand Dignities of State: two Arch-Chancellors (Empire and State), an Arch-Treasurer, a Grand Elector, a Grand Constable, a Grand Admiral and a Grand Huntsman. A year later an eighth, the Grand Almoner, was added, and by 1810 there were twelve. In keeping with the still pseudo-meritocratic ideals of the First Empire, these were essentially nobles of service, ie they weren’t inherently noble people, they just filled a specific function at court.

The Army Swears its Loyalty to Napoleon after the Distribution of Eagles, 1810 (by David), the marshals of France are in the centre with their batons of command

Emperor Napoléon realised that soldiers like rewards after winning victories, and the Order of the Legion of Honour was not sufficient for those of highest rank. Bonaparte’s best generals and closest military comrades had already been elevated to the supreme rank of Marshal of the Empire alongside the creation of the imperial princes in 1804. There were fourteen in the first promotion (plus four older generals who were semi-retired). Under the Old Regime, a Marshal of France held an equivalent rank to a duke, so it seemed logical to grant dukedoms to the most successful marshals. But France had abolished titles and fiefs, so at first, the Emperor looked abroad, to new territories being conquered abroad. So in 1806, principalities—sovereign but in vassalage to the Empire of the French—were given to Talleyrand (Minister of Foreign Affairs and Grand Chamberlain), Marshal Bernadotte and Marshal Berthier. These were, respectively, Benevento and Pontecorvo in Italy (both former papal enclaves in the Kingdom of Naples), and Neuchâtel in Switzerland (a former possession of the kings of Prussia). Soon after, in Spring 1807, he began to offer a different kind of title, a ‘victory title’ for those who had won a significant battle (like Danzig, below).

In 1808, the Emperor took another step forward and created a full new hereditary nobility, from princes down to barons, with complete and detailed regulations for heraldry, styles of address, and sums of money required to pass along titles to heirs (for example, 200,000 francs annual income was needed to secure a dukedom). But still, there was reluctance to have these titles reflect French placenames (in fact, Napoleon repeatedly denied a title to Marshal Jourdan, since he wished to be honoured for his victory at Fleurus, 1794—very early in the Revolutionary Wars—which was at that time part of France, though today it is in Belgian Hainaut). So most of these names were drawn from Napoleon’s other kingdom, the Kingdom of Italy, created in March 1805 (or in other subject territories like the kingdoms of Etruria or Naples). Altogether, between 1808 and 1815, there would be four victory princes, ten victory dukes, and twenty ‘duchies-grand fiefs’ (plus those principalities already named above, and three other dukedoms that were ‘anomalous’, including one for the Emperor’s former wife—see Beauharnais-Navarre). Only the ‘grand fiefs’ were attached to specific lands and incomes granted with the title. Of all these Napoleonic dukes and princes, some achieved a sufficient income and passed along their titles to sons, in varying degrees of recognition by the Bourbon royal governments after 1815 (or revived for cousins or other heirs by the restored Bonaparte regime of the Second Empire). Today there is still one principality (Essling), three victory dukedoms (Auerstaedt, Montebello and Albufera), and three regular dukedoms (Feltre, Otrante, Reggio). Most of these will eventually have separate blog posts; this post will focus exclusively on those titles that were awarded then vanished after only one holder (or in some cases two)—some lasting a few years, and in one at least, only a few days.

the elements behind a coat of arms for a marshal-duke of the Empire, with crossed marshal’s batons and a ducal bonnet, and the ribbon of the Order of the Legion of Honour

What is so interesting, to me, about all of these titles, is how they drew on men from all walks of life, and an equally interesting cross-section of women, from highborn ladies to washer women. The most famous names of the First French Empire, Ney, Berthier, Davout, Junot, Suchet, and so on, left families that carried on their ducal titles into the 19th and 20th  centuries. What follows here instead are some of the lesser-known stories of the Napoleonic era, that burned bright and then were extinguished.

We can start with a Corsican, with someone who grew up with Bonaparte himself. Giovan Tomaso Arrighi de Casanova, 1st Duc de Padoue, born in 1778 (so nine years younger than the future emperor), was the Emperor’s cousin via his mother, Letizia Ramolino Buonaparte. The family was noble, like the Bonapartes, with roots in the centre of the island going back to the Middle Ages. Their seat was in Corte, and Joseph Bonaparte was born here. Giovan Tomaso’s father Giacinto was himself a prominent administrator in the revolutionary government—he had been a judge in the Superior Council of Corsica in the 1770s, then representative of the noble estates of Corsica at the court of Versailles in the 1780s. After the Revolution he became an administrator of the northern part of the island, and eventually Prefect of Corsica in 1811. By this point his younger two sons, Antonio and Ambrogio, had been killed in the wars, and his eldest had become a full general, having started his career in the entourage of his cousin Joseph Bonaparte, then served as aide-de-camp of General Berthier in Egypt. Here he earned his reputation as a commander, and he would eventually add a sphinx to his coat of arms. In 1808 he was created duke of Padua (Padoue in French), one of the cities in the Veneto (Venice’s mainland) that had been added to Napoleon’s Kingdom of Italy in 1806. In 1809 the Duc de Padoue was named an inspector-general of the cavalry. During the Hundred Days—when Napoleon returned briefly to power in Spring 1815—he was named Governor of Corsica, and a peer of France, but when the Bourbons were restored for a second time in July, General Arrighi de Casanova was put on the proscribed list and exiled. He lived in Lombardy until 1830s, and even after returning to France he kept a low profile, as a militant Bonapartist, until the tide turned in 1848, and he was elected to the National Assembly. In 1850 he was named Governor of the Invalides, and in 1852, his cousin Napoleon III named him a senator of the Second Empire. He died a year later, at Courson, a château he had acquired southwest of Paris, on the road towards Chartres.

The Duc de Padoue, with the Invalides behind him
Chateau de Courson

The Duc de Padoue had married a woman from the higher aristocracy, Anne-Rose de Montesquiou-Fezensac, from one of the most ancient houses of southwestern France, and they had a son and a daughter. Ernest-Louis, 2nd Duc de Padoue, born the year of the collapse of the First Empire, saw great prominence in the Second. He was named a senator following his father’s death (and his ducal title was confirmed), and a councillor of state. In 1859 he was named Minister of the Interior and a Secretary of State. After the fall of the Second Empire, he returned to his family’s roots, and represented Corsica in the National Assembly, from 1876-81. When the 2nd Duke died in 1888, the title was extinct. His daughter Marie-Adèle could take the family’s wealth to her marriage to the Belgian aristocrat, the Duc de Caraman, but not the title. A cadet branch does remain, and are still prominent in Corsica.

Ernest Arrighi de Casanova, 2nd Duc de Padoue

After the Emperor’s cousin, we can turn to one of his closest confidants, who also became part of the family (distantly), by marriage. René Savary, Duke of Rovigo, played a crucial role in the imperial government as Minister of Police from 1810 to 1814. Son of a brewer from Charleville (on France’s northeast frontier) who had become commander of the nearby fortress of Sedan, René was the youngest of three sons. The elder two lost their lives in French military service, but by then, René had already risen much higher: by 1800 he was General Bonaparte’s preferred aide-de-camp and confidant, leading to his appointment in 1801 as commander of the elite gendarmerie assigned to defend the First Consul personally. The next year Savary married Félicité de Faudoas de Saint-Sulpice, a distant cousin and close friend of Hortense de Beauharnais, Bonaparte’s adopted daughter. They were then both promoted into the top ranks of the imperial hierarchy, he as brigadier general in 1803, and she as lady-in-waiting to the Empress in 1804. He continued to act as preferred aide-de-camp to the Emperor in the glorious campaigns of the next few years. He commanded his own troops at the battle of Ostrolenka in 1807 where he defeated a Russian army. The next year, he was rewarded with a dukedom, based on the small town of Rovigo on the River Po.

René Savary, Duke of Rovigo

The new Duke of Rovigo had some diplomatic missions in 1807 and 1808 (to Russia, to Spain), but this proved not to be his forte. Instead, he was given more to do in the area of intelligence and spies (which he had been involved with for several years already), and replaced the disgraced Fouché as Minister of Police in 1810. He set about cracking down on freedom of the press, but missed signs for a pending coup attempt against the Emperor in 1812, so lost credibility with Napoleon and with the people. He kept his post, however, and was named by the Emperor to the Regency Council in Spring of 1814, to assist Empress Marie-Louise in ruling on behalf of her son Napoleon II. He and his wife accompanied her when she relocated to Blois at the time of the surrender of Paris.

The Duke of Rovigo did not rally to the Bourbons in the First Restoration, and resumed his duties as head of the Gendarmerie under the Hundred Days (though not as Minister of the Police, since Fouché returned to favour). Unlike most of the other dukes created by Napoleon, Rovigo loyally accompanied his master after his second abdication in July 1815, first to Rochefort to catch the ship to England, and then, he hoped, on to Saint Helena—but the British did not allow this. He was not welcomed back in France (where he was condemned to death by the Chamber of Peers), so was taken to a prison in British-held Malta. He was permitted to escape, travelled to the Ottoman Empire but was expelled by the Turks, travelled to Trieste and was arrested by the Austrians. He was also to return to France in 1819 for a second trial, and was acquitted and restored to his former honours. But he was never forgiven by royalists for some of his more shady involvements with espionage, in particular the capture and execution without trial of the King’s cousin the Duke of Enghien. In 1823, Rovigo published a memoir giving his version of these events of 1804; he accused others who were by then in favour with the King, so he was barred from court and once again went abroad. He lived in Rome until the July Revolution, and was then briefly restored to favour, being appointed commander of French troops in Algeria. Like many colonial officials of the era, he had a vision for new westernised extensions of Europe, and built a settlement called Rovigo with schools and hospitals etc, but his brutal repression of the local people left a bad legacy in French North Africa. He soon became ill, returned to France, and died in 1833.

The Duchess of Rovigo lived for another eight years. She and her husband had raised two sons and five daughters. The younger son, Tristan, became a Captain of Spahis in Morocco where he was killed in 1844. The older son, another René Savary, became 2nd Duke of Rovigo, and was a presence in French military and political affairs for the next three decades, but never rose to great prominence—unlike his father he was a strong legitimist, not a Bonapartist. He married twice, once to a woman from County Clare in Ireland, and the second time to the daughter of a surgeon in Geneva. He had a daughter from each marriage, but no son, so when he died in 1875, the duchy of Rovigo became extinct.

Coat of arms of Savary de Rovigo (the stars in chief indicate a title of the French Empire)

Another close companion of Bonaparte (and with an even shorter lifespan for his dukedom—five days—if it was even formally recognised by anyone at all), was the Duke of Ligny, created for General Girard in the days after the defeat at Waterloo. Jean-Baptiste Girard was the son of a merchant-tanner from Provence. At 19 he joined the Army of Italy and took part in Bonaparte’s early smashing successes in Italy then Egypt. By 1799 he was an adjutant-general, then in 1806 promoted to brigadier general. He commanded in the various campaigns in Spain, Russia and Germany, and was taken prisoner at Liegnitz in Silesia in August 1813, and held until the fall of the French Empire the next spring. He immediately rallied to the call of the Emperor in the Hundred Days and was an important element in the French victory over the Prussians at Ligny, 16 June, but he was mortally wounded. Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo on the 18th, yet he named the dying Girard Duke of Ligny on the 21st, and he died five days later. He had married an Italian woman while on campaign in 1799, and there were daughters, but no sons to potentially claim this most ephemeral of dukedoms.

Jean-Baptiste Girard, ephemeral Duc de Ligny

Two other dukedoms held only by a single man were Gaëta and Decrès—neither of these were created for marshals but for members of the administration. The former at least follows the pattern of taking its name from a place in Italy, whereas the second was an anomaly and was simply the surname of its bearer.

Denis Decrès was from a minor noble family in the south of France (de Crès), who had begun his career in the royal navy in the 1780s, mostly in the West Indies. He maintained his naval service under the new regime and by 1798 was a junior admiral, commanding in the eastern Mediterranean, notably at Aboukir. From 1800 he shifted more towards a political career, and was named Maritime Prefect of Lorient, one of the chief naval bases in Brittany, then in 1801 was named Minister of the Navy and the Colonies. He maintained this post for the next thirteen years, despite rising criticism over the Navy’s declining reputation, the failed invasion of Britain in 1802, and the terrible defeat at Trafalgar in 1805. Much more enduringly, he has been criticised for overseeing the re-enslavement of Africans in the colony of Saint-Domingue (Haïti) who had been freed earlier in the revolutionary period. He was promoted to Vice-Admiral in 1804, Count of the Empire in 1808, then Duc Decrès in 1813.

This last promotion may have been due to his joining the extended network of families connected by marriage to the Emperor himself, via his marriage (also in 1813) to Marie-Rose (‘Rosine’) Anthoine de Saint-Joseph, a niece of Julie and Désirée Clary, the wives of Joseph Bonaparte and Marshal Bernadotte respectively (and her sister married Marshal Suchet, Duke of Albufera). Duc Decrès was re-appointed to his ministerial post in the Hundred Days, then retired from public life after Waterloo. He died in his Paris residence in 1820 in a fire set by servants who were trying to rob him. He had no children.

Duc Decrès, Minister of the Navy and Colonies

One of the witnesses of the wedding of Denis Decrès in 1813 was Martin Gaudin, Duc de Gaëte and Minister of Finance. Like his colleague, he held this post continually from 1799 to the fall of the Empire in 1814, and again during the Hundred Days in 1815 (in contrast to other ministers who came and went). The son of a lawyer in the Parlement of Paris, Gaudin had worked in the royal finance and tax administrations in the 1770s-80s. He joined the revolutionary movement in 1789 and was an influential member of the Finance Committee of the Constitutional Assembly that was set up to reorganise the Kingdom. Through the 1790s Gaudin was denounced several times for having royalist leanings, and miraculously survived each time. He earned the favour of First Consul Bonaparte who named him to his post as Minister of Finance the day after his Coup of Brumaire (November 1799). In 1804 he was named Grand Officer of the Legion of Honour, and in 1808 Count of the Empire, then in 1809, Duc de Gaëte, which took its name from the important city in the Kingdom of Naples, Gaeta. Like Decrès he also retired from public life after 1815, but did return to play an important financial role once more in 1820 when he became Governor of the Bank of France, a position he held for fourteen years. He also married, quite late, in 1822, Marie-Anne Summaripa, an aristocrat from the Greek island of Naxos who had been married to a French diplomat in Constantinople. They had no children, so when he died in 1841 the title became extinct. It’s worth noting that there was another Duke of Gaeta created in the 19th century, created in 1870 for Enrico Cialdini, one of the revolutionary soldiers in the Italian Risorgimento. His ducal title also died with him, in 1892.

Martin Gaudin, Duc de Gaëte, Minister of Finance

Unlike the dukes of Padoue, Rovigo or Ligny, young men who rose to prominence alongside General Bonaparte, another one-off duke was an older man, who like Decrès and Gaëte, already had an established career before the Revolution. Marshal Lefebvre, Duke of Danzig, born in 1755, became one of the closest military companions of the younger General Bonaparte. His is an inspiring rags-to-riches tale, popularly retold in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, notably with his wife as the protagonist, a washerwoman from Alsace who rose to be a senior courtier in Paris. François-Joseph Lefebvre was the son of a local military official in a small town in Alsace, who had joined the Royal Guard when he was 18 back in 1773. In 1783, he married Catherine Hübscher, a local washerwoman and barmaid, and together they moved to Paris as he rose through the ranks of the Royal Guard. When the Revolution broke out, Lefebvre at first remained loyal to the Old Regime, defending the royal family at Versailles during the attacks of the autumn of 1789, and even assisting the King’s aged aunts, Adélaïde and Victoire, in their escape from France in Spring 1791.

As the popular story goes, it was soon after, in the summer of 1792, when Catherine Lefebvre took pity on a penniless and friendless Corsican captain, Napoleone Buonaparte, and took care of washing his clothes to help him maintain appearances. How much of this is true and how much is legend will probably never be known. Once the Republic was proclaimed in September 1792, her husband’s star rose swiftly, as a brigadier general from 1793, and division general in 1794, leading troops in actions against Allied armies in the Rhineland. Captain Buonaparte, meanwhile, made his name in late 1793 masterminding the siege of Toulon. In 1799 their fortunes came back together in Paris, and General Lefebvre, who had been named military governor of Paris in March, was a key supporter of General Bonaparte in the Coup of Brumaire in November. Now as First Consul of France, Bonaparte secured the election of his friend as a Senator of the Republic in 1800, then promoted him as Marshal of the Empire in the first round of promotions of 1804.

François-Joseph Lefebvre, Duc de Dantzig

Marshal Lefebvre continued to hold important commands in Germany, and was named Commander of the Imperial Guard, infantry, in 1806. He led this elite unit at Jena in October 1806, then successfully besieged the important Prussian port city of Danzig in March to May 1807. For this he was rewarded in May 1807 with the ‘victory title’ Duke of Danzig (spelled ‘Dantzig’ in French; today’s city of Gdańsk in Polish), and a large sum of cash presented by a grateful emperor in a chocolate box when they met at the nearby abbey of Oliwa. In the following years the Marshal-Duke was sent on commands in Spain, then back to Germany, and led the Old Guard in the Russia campaign of 1812—during which he lost his eldest son, who himself had risen through the ranks, first as his father’s aide-de-camp, then as brigadier general in his own right. One son remained, of an extraordinary thirteen altogether, but he too died a few years later in 1817, still a teenager.

By this point, the new Duchess of Danzig was having to hold her own at court in Paris. The Emperor and his snobbish sisters were apparently repulsed by her coarse manners and language, which she refused to ‘amend’, earning her later the nickname ‘Madame Sans-Gêne’ (‘without embarrassment’) in later plays and films about her life. But as the story goes, the Emperor never forgot their original connection and never sent her away from his court in the Tuileries.

Catherine Hübscher Lefebvre, Duchesse de Dantzig
A scene from the play ‘Madame Sans-Gêne’ (1893)

The Duc de Dantzig remained loyal to the Emperor to the very end in 1814, unlike some of the other marshals, but swiftly acknowledged the restoration of King Louis XVIII and was named a peer of France. He did rejoin Napoleon in the Hundred Days, however, so was excluded from the Chamber of Peers in the second restoration of 1815. His peerage was restored in 1819 but he died a year later. His wife retired to the chateau of Pontault-Combault in Brie (east of Paris), which she and her husband had purchased in 1813 (today it is the Hôtel de Ville of that small town). Here she stayed true to her roots and supported the poor by means of various charities with her now very large fortune. She died in 1835. With no sons to succeed, the dukedom of Danzig was extinct.

the former Chateau de Pontault-Combault

Another of the Emperor’s most loyal courtiers—in fact nicknamed ‘l’ombre de Napoléon’ (‘Napoleon’s shadow’), Duroc, was given a dukedom, but was not a marshal of the Empire. He was amongst the small group of imperial dukes whose titles were granted due to their high positions either politically in the government, or ceremonially and administratively in the imperial court. Duroc was in the latter category as Grand Marshal of the Palace from 1805. As such he was the head of the military household and in charge of palace security, especially at the Tuileries where he acted as governor.

Géraud-Christophe Duroc (or Du Roc) was the son of Claude de Michel du Roc, the younger son in a robe noble family from the south of France who had moved north to Lorraine and became captain in a regiment of dragoons. Claude married late at 48 and finally had a son at 52, and lived to be almost 90, dying in 1809, having added the surname Michel to his forenames, to sound less noble. The son, Géraud-Christophe, born in 1772, came of age at the start of the Revolution, and at first left France as a noble émigré, but after the first major victory of the revolutionary armies at Valmy in 1792, he returned and joined their cause. His friendship with Napoleon started when he served as his aide-de-camp in the Italian campaigns of 1796 and then in Egypt. He was promoted to the rank of brigadier general in 1800, but was also sent abroad by the now First Consul Bonaparte on diplomatic missions. From 1805 he was governor of the Tuileries and Grand Marshal of the Palace, and in 1808 was created Duc de Frioul, which took its name from the region of Friuli in northeast Italy. He continued to accompany the Emperor on most campaigns and was killed at the Battle of Bautzen in Saxony in May 1813. Napoleon wrote later that he felt closest to Duroc, and demonstrated this in an intimate manner by taking the name Duroc as an incognito when he travelled to Rochefort after his abdication in early July 1815 (and reputedly proposed to use the name ‘Colonel Duroc’ if he had been granted exile in Britain, which of course he wasn’t).

Duroc in ceremonial robe for the coronation of 1804 as Grand Marshal of the Palace

Duroc had married in 1802 Marie-des-Neiges Martínez de Hervas, whose father managed a Spanish bank in Paris, and who would later serve as finance minister for Joseph Bonaparte when he was named king of Spain. In 1813, she was given the duchy of Frioul to support herself as a widow, which, as a ‘duché-grand fief’ included lands and revenues granted by the Emperor. She remarried in 1832, another general, Charles Fabvier, and lived—like her father-in-law—to be almost 90. There had been one son, Napoléon-Louis Duroc, who lived for a year (1811-1812), and a daughter, Hortense-Eugénie, who, had she outlived her mother (she died in 1829, aged 17), might have been able to call herself ‘2nd Duchesse de Frioul’, but this is uncertain and would have depended on the goodwill of King Louis XVIII.

A Napoleonic duke who did gain the goodwill of the restored Bourbon king, perhaps too swiftly, was Marshal Augereau, Duc de Castiglione. In contrast to Dantzig or Duroc, this member of the one-off dukes club was never a close friend of Bonaparte, and ended up in disgrace for having abandoned him so quickly in favour of the Bourbon Restoration. Born in 1757 in one of the poorest neighbourhoods of Paris, the faubourg Saint-Marcel, the son of a domestic servant and a fruit seller, Charles-Pierre Augereau, launched a military career as a young man in the French army, but was forced to flee abroad after drawing his sword on an officer. Much of the facts about his subsequent meanderings across Europe are open to question as we only have his own testimony, and he seems to have been prone to exaggeration. He served for some periods in the Prussian army, then in the armies of Naples and Portugal, but also spent time as a fencing master or even a brigand, before returning to France in 1792, inspired by the revolutionary events there. Within a year he was a general, first in the Army of the Pyrenees and then the Army of Italy, where, in August 1796, he led his troops to victory over the Austrians at Castiglione—hence the later name of his ‘victory title’.

General Augereau in Italy 1796

Back in France, General Augereau got involved in politics, supporting the far left, and as elected Deputy representing the Haute-Garonne (the department surrounding the city of Toulouse). But he hesitated in supporting the coup led by his fellow general, Napoleon Bonaparte, in November 1799 (18 Brumaire), then accepted a posting to lead French troops sent north to spread the revolution to the Batavian Republic (the new name for the Dutch Republic). He continued to fall in and out of favour with now First Consul Bonaparte, but was too good of a commander to be dismissed. So he was included in the first promotions to the rank of Marshal of the Empire, in 1804, and held various commands in the campaigns in Germany, Spain and Russia. In 1808 he was given his dukedom of Castiglione, a small town in the Veneto near Lake Garda. He also remarried, a woman of much higher social class. His first wife, Gabriella Grach, had been born in Smyrna (the Greek city now called Izmir), the daughter of a rich merchant (or so he claimed), and eloped with young Augereau while he was serving in Naples. She died in 1806, and the Marshal re-married Adélaïde-Joséphine de Bourlon de Chavange, who was only 19! In 1812, the new Duchess of Castiglione was appointed one of the ladies-in-waiting of the Empress Marie-Louise, thus helping the Duke solidify his ties to Napoleon’s court.

Charles-Pierre Augereau, Duc de Castiglione, as a Marshal of the Empire

But it wasn’t enough, and he defied the Emperor’s orders to keep Lyon loyal in the Spring of 1814, when everything was falling apart; not wishing the destroy the city, he did not pursue the siege. Napoleon criticised him publicly, and in mid-April, Augereau formally denounced the Emperor and declared his loyalty to the restoration of the Bourbons. Louis XVIII made him a peer of France and a knight of Saint-Louis. In the Hundred Days of 1815, however, Augereau expressed willingness to join the Emperor once more, but this time Napoleon rebuffed him and denounced him as a traitor. After the second restoration of the monarchy, the Duke of Castiglione took up his seat in the Chamber of Peers, but died soon after, in 1816, at his Château of La Houssaye in Brie. His wife re-married, a Belgian nobleman, the Count of Sainte-Aldegonde, and returned to active court service herself as an older woman, as a lady-in-waiting to Queen Marie-Amélie from 1831. Marshal Augereau had no children to carry on his ducal title; he had a half-brother, Jean-Pierre, who was also a general, and a baron of the Empire (1811), but he did not inherit the ducal title, and himself had no children.

the Chateau of La Houssaye

An even worse betrayer of Napoleon was Marshal Marmont. Auguste-Frédéric Viesse de Marmont, Duc de Raguse, had come to prominence with Bonaparte when they both served in the artillery at the siege of Toulon in 1793. He became a very successful general of the Republic and marshal of the Empire but became too independent after he was given his own territories to govern in 1811; his sudden alliance with the Bourbons in April 1814 blackened his name for a century in the memory of the French people. Indeed the verb ‘raguser’ was used to mean a base betrayal until the end of the nineteenth century. Nevertheless, he had one of the longest and most interesting careers of any of the Napoleonic dukes.

Unlike several of the other marshal-dukes listed here, Marmont was not a rags to riches story. He was from a noble background. His grandfather Edme Viesse had been a prominent administrative official in northern Burgundy and acquired the fief of Marmont, as well as the office of royal secretary in the Parlement of Besançon which was an ennobling office. His father Nicolas Edme built on this by entering military service (a typical pathway to transform an administrative family into a noble one) but also increasing the family wealth by operating large iron forges on their estates in northern Burgundy. He acquired the fifteenth-century château of Châtillon-sur-Seine, which was renamed Château Marmont.

Chateau de Marmont as it appeared in 1870

Auguste-Frédéric was born in 1774. He rose through the ranks alongside Bonaparte and was named a Brigadier General in 1798 (as a reward for his successful capture of Malta from the British, which enabled the French armies to return safely from the Egypt campaign). Following the Coup of Brumaire (1799), First Consul Bonaparte named him a Councillor of State, and promoted him to Division General after his victory at Marengo over the Austrians. In 1804, he was named General-in-Chief of the Army of Holland, sent to restore order in the French satellite ‘Batavian Republic’. While he was there he erected a curious monument, a great pyramid near Utrecht, and a new town he called ‘Marmontville’. But he was not amongst the first round of promotions as Marshal of the Empire, which irked him—the beginnings perhaps of the breakdown of his relationship with Napoleon. He was also disappointed in 1805 when his plans to invade Britain from Holland failed to come together.

the pyramid built near Utrecht, ‘Marmontberg’ later called the Pyramid of Austerlitz

In 1806, General Marmont was transferred to another sphere of the expanding French Empire, as Governor of Dalmatia, the former Venetian province along the eastern shores of the Adriatic Sea which he secured for Napoleon’s new Kingdom of Italy, and to which he added the Republic of Ragusa (today’s Dubrovnik), ending its 450 years of independence. His title, Duke of Ragusa (or Raguse in French), granted in 1808, was thus one of the ‘grand fiefs’ that was actually quite closely tied to his interests and fortunes (the duchy came with a large annual income of 50,000 francs taken from lands in Dalmatia). Here too he saw some disappointments in the direction of Napoleon’s foreign policies, as he hoped to use his base in the Balkans to launch an invasion of the Ottoman Empire and spread the French Revolution and its values to the peoples of the Near East (much as Napoleon himself had desired to do a decade before in Egypt and Syria), but this was not supported. Another important victory over the Austrians at Znaim in Bohemia, 1809, finally earned him his marshal’s baton, and a promotion to the post of Governor-General of the Illyrian Provinces. This territory, separated from the Kingdom of Italy in 1809, included Dalmatia and Ragusa, but also now included the former Austrian provinces of Carinthia and Carniola. The latter, today’s Slovenia, became the centre of French administration, with its capital at Laibach (now Ljubljana). The Duc de Raguse became virtually an independent ruler here as the French Emperor turned his attentions elsewhere. Some suspected that Raguse had visions of becoming a king in Illyria, having seen the successes of marshals Murat in Naples and Bernadotte in Sweden, and, perhaps to derail these ambitions, he was soon redeployed by Napoleon elsewhere in Europe, first as commander of a French army in Northern Spain in 1811. He was seriously wounded in battle and retired back to France.

Marshal Marmont, Duc de Raguse

Returning to the army in Spring 1813, the Duc de Raguse participated in the major battles of the Germany campaign, and after the French armies were pushed back across the Rhine into France itself at the end of the year, he continued to defend the capital as the Allies advanced little by little towards Paris in the Spring of 1814. At one point in early March he was sharply criticised by Napoleon for executing a strategic retreat, sneering that ‘he had conducted himself like a sub-lieutenant.’ Nevertheless, he continued to fight in the districts east of Paris, and by the end of the month was left in charge of defending Paris. In the face of a much larger Allied force, he signed an armistice on 31 March that allowed the French army to withdraw from the city. This agreement was signed at 2 AM with Russian commanders at the Hôtel de Marmont (also known as the Hôtel de Raguse). This was a large house in the northern edge of the city (near today’s Gare du Nord) built in the 1770s which he had acquired as part of the dowry of his wife Anne-Marie Perregaux, daughter of the rich banker, Jean-Frédéric Perregaux (as this neighbourhood declined, the house was mostly dismantled/refashioned in the 1930s).

Marmont gives the keys to Paris to Tsar Alexander
the appearance today of the Hôtel de Raguse in Paris

The Emperor rejected calls for his abdication by the Allied Powers, so proposed a renewed assault on Paris. The Senate announced the end of his regime on 2 April, and sent out feelers to Marshal Marmont to see if he would carry on fighting or join them. On 5 April he negotiated directly with Austrian and Russian officials and agreed to join his army to theirs; this led to the abdication of Napoleon on the 6th and earned Marmont the lifelong hatred of diehard Bonapartists. Marshals Marmont and Ney went to Compiègne to receive Louis XVIII on 29 April and to formally welcome him back to France.

The restored Louis XVIII created the Duke of Ragusa a peer of France and named him major-general of the newly re-formed Royal Guard. The following Spring, during the Hundred Days, Ragusa did not support the return of the Emperor, but fled with the King to Ghent; nevertheless, in the Second Restoration, the King distrusted his loyalty and he was marginalised. He therefore focused his energies back in Burgundy, developing his family’s forge business at Châtillon. These business ventures were not successful, and he found himself strapped for cash, so he pressed the Austrian government to restore the pension from the estates of Dalmatia that had been created along with his duchy. Perhaps surprisingly, Austria had promised to do this according to the various settlements that ended the Napoleonic empire, so he did in fact receive this money. Nevertheless, it was not enough and he was forced to sell the Château de Marmont in 1826.

But the story of Marshal Marmont, Duke of Ragusa, was not finished. In 1826, the new King, Charles X, relied on the good relations Marmont had established with the Russians back in 1814 and sent him as France’s official representative at the funeral of Tsar Alexander. This renewed royal favour was once more even more strongly demonstrated at the very end of June 1830, when the King appointed him Military Governor of Paris, in an attempt to restore order in the political unrest which in the coming weeks developed into a full insurrection, later termed the ‘July Revolution’. When the King abdicated on 2 August, Marmont went with him, first into exile in Great Britain, and then to Austria, where he again (remarkably) ensured that his Dalmatian pension would still be paid, but turned down an offer of employment in the Austrian army. Curiously, here he spent time with the living remnant of Napoleon’s empire, his son, the Prince Imperial (or ‘Napoleon II’), now called the Duke of Reichstadt. In Vienna his use of the title Duke of Ragusa clashed with political realities, since the Emperor (Francis I) now added this title to his own, as the entire Illyrian coast had been restored to Habsburg rule. Nonetheless, his memoirs, published after his death, prominently used both titles, Marshal Marmont and Duc de Raguse. He settled in Venice in 1838 where he lived mostly forgotten until his death in 1852—the last marshal of the First Empire.

the Marechal-Duc de Raguse as an older man

In the end, this survey reminds us that the link between military leadership and the ducal title—its original purpose—had not been forgotten by the age of Napoleon. Under the Old Regime in France gaining a marshalcy was often the penultimate step towards gaining your family a ducal title, the crowning achievement for any noble house. But like many of the marshals of France under the Old Regime, a life spent in the military often mean long periods of time away from home, and the marital bed, and thus the failure of a family to generate more than just a ‘one-off’ duke.

The Lieven Princes: How minor nobles from the Baltic spread their wings on the currents of Swedish and Russian empires

The Baltic states of Estonia and Latvia were long dominated by German nobles who settled in the wake of conversion crusades led by military orders in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. Over the centuries that followed, they formed a fairly closed set of families, intermarrying and retaining their authority over the local native populations (Estonians, Letts, Semigallians, etc), and occasionally rising to greater power and rank due to service to foreign powers like Russia, Sweden, or Poland-Lithuania. Eventually they lost their dominant position following the first World War, and most were then expelled completely following the second World War and Soviet occupation of the region.

coat of arms of the House of Live, Liewen, Lieven

One family amongst these did claim to have local Baltic rather than German roots, though this may have just been family mythology. In the 1260s, a certain Gert Live (Gerhardus Lyvonis) appears in the records as a vassal of the Archbishop of Riga (today’s capital city of Latvia). The family story was that Gert was a descendant of a local chieftain of the Letts, also called Livs or Livonians, Kaupo, who converted to Christianity in 1186, and travelled to Rome in 1203 to gain support for his position as an independent prince or quasi-king and for the conversion of the Livonian people. The surname Lieven ultimately is said to derive from Live, or ‘the Livonian’. An independent Livonian state run by its own Livonian Brotherhood did not survive very long, however, and by the 1230s was subject to the Teutonic Order who constructed their own Baltic state called Terra Mariana.

The medieval Baltic states

Several generations later, Gert’s descendant Hincke or Heinrich exchanged his lands in Livonia for some further north, in the diocese of Ösel-Wiek, in what is now the western parts of Estonia. This semi-independent diocese is known in Estonian as Saare-Lääne, formed of the island of Saaremaa and the mainland county of Lääne (which means ‘western land’). The new family base was the manor of Parmel, which today is called Liivi—I’m uncertain if the family took its name from this manor or the other way round (it is also the name of the local river). From the 1380s there was a stone fort at Parmel; Heinrich’s family held this manor until 1694 and there are still remnants of the stone building today.

In the fifteenth century the family split into its two main branches: the line of Jürgen of Parmel stayed in the north and ultimately became prominent in Swedish affairs, and rose to the rank of count in the 18th century; while the line of Johan moved south into what is now Latvia and formed what is called the Courland branch, who ultimately entered Russian service and became princes in the 19th century—hence the family’s inclusion in this website.

So we need first to look at the growth of the Swedish Baltic empire. In the 1560s, Jürgen’s son Heinrich sided with a Danish prince, Duke Magnus, who was attempting to erect the northern parts of Estonia and Livonia into an independent kingdom (with Russian support). Magnus was attacked by a coalition of Polish and Swedish forces (the ‘Livonian War’) and ultimately chased out. Sweden took over these territories and Heinrich Live was taken as prisoner to Sweden, his possessions confiscated. The northern parts of the former Terra Mariana became Swedish Estonia, while the southern parts became (eventually) Swedish Livonia. The Swedish Crown would govern these territories—with not insignificant impact on Sweden itself, since Riga was the second largest city in its empire after Stockholm—until they were conquered by the Russians in 1721.

In 1582, Heinrich Live’s son Reinhold swore an oath of loyalty to the Swedish king and regained his father’s lands in Swedish Estonia. He was appointed a noble deputy to the Estonian Landrad (the local estates) in 1599, and became a colonel in the Estonian contingent of the Swedish army. His son, Bernhard, was also part of the Swedish government in Estonia, and married a woman from another local Baltic family (with the wonderful name of Yxkull, or Üxküll), but his grandsons began to integrate more fully into the Swedish court nobility.

Reinhold, who began to use the surname von Liewen (or Liven) was a Captain in the Swedish Royal Life Guards, 1645, and in 1653 was created a baron by Queen Christina, with lands centred on the city of Eksjö in the Swedish county of Småland. Småland is a large but mostly rural province on Sweden’s southeast coast. It was not the richest province in the realm, but Eksjö was conveniently located on trade routes between the north and the south, and the coast and the interior. Eksjö was one of the few territorial baronies to exist in the Kingdom of Sweden—most were simply tied to the family name.

In 1654, Reinhold von Liewen was sent back across the Baltic: he was governor of the island of Ösel and its chief fortress Arensburg Castle (Kuressaare in Estonian). He acquired more lands in Estonia in the parish of Rötel (Ridala in Estonian), not far from their ancestral lands, notably Weissenfeld, or Valgevälja (‘white field’ in Estonian), which also became known as Kiltsi manor (after the name of its former owners). The old castle there had been rebuilt in a Renaissance style in the early 17th century; today only ruins remain.

ruins of Weissenfeld (today in Estonia)

His younger brother Bernhard Otto was also created a Swedish baron in 1653, and also expanded landholdings in Estonia, at Raggafer (Rägavere) further inland, southeast of the capital of Reval (today’s Tallinn). In the 1660s he led the Estonian noble company in the Swedish army and in 1673 was named colonel of the Turku County cavalry regiment—Turku is in southwestern Finland and was an important base of operations for the Swedish empire of the Baltic, of which the Liewens were now at the very centre. He and his older brother formed the two main branches of this now baronial family, the ‘Black Liewen’ and the ‘White Liewen’.

The senior line, ‘Black Liewen’ served at court and in the military, and acquired more lands in Sweden, notably Vik and Bärby in Uppsala County). These were acquired by Baron Bernhard von Liewen, a soldier who had gained experience abroad in France and the Dutch Republic, then returned to Sweden to emerge as a hero in the 1670s war defending Scania against the armies of Denmark. When war broke out between Sweden and Russia, King Charles XII took Baron Liewen with him to Livonia to help him navigate the territory, but he was killed in battle soon after, in 1703.

Bernhard, Baron von Liewen

Vik Castle had been built by the powerful Bielke family in the 15th century, and is considered by many to be the best preserved medieval castle in all of Sweden. Located on the shores of a picturesque lake south of the city of Uppsala, Vik was renovated in a more ‘French’ style in the 17th century, and again by later owners in the 19th century. The Liewens acquired it through marriage to an heiress in 1689; in 1809 it passed by another marriage to the Essen family who owned it until 1912 when they sold it to a banker, who then sold it in 1923 to the local county government—today the county runs it as a conference centre.

Vik Castle, near Uppsala

This branch of the family also continued to maintain its presence in other parts of the Swedish empire, as commanders of the Estonian regiments of the Swedish army, or as governors of military garrison towns in the newer Swedish provinces in northern Germany, such as Wismar in Pomerania. By the end of the 17th century they were marrying noblewomen with surnames from the highest Swedish nobility—Oxenstierna, Bonde, Brahe—and were now being buried in Stockholm, not Reval.

the Swedish version of the Liewen coat of arms

This branch moved more closely into the favour of the royal house in the early 18th century: Baron Carl Gustaf of Vik was named Chamberlain to Duke Carl Friedrich of Holstein-Gottorp, whose mother, Hedvig Sophia of Sweden, was for a time heir to the Swedish throne. Ultimately the Holstein-Gottorp family succeeded to the throne, from 1751, and the von Liewen family benefitted. Carl Gustaf’s widow, Ulrike Juliane Brahe, became Chief Mistress of the Court in 1762, while her son Carl Gustaf II was Marshal of the Court from 1759. Carl Gustaf II had been a chamberlain since the 1740s, and a gentleman in waiting in 1751. The next year, the new king, Adolf Frederick, appointed him a caretaker, as ‘knight of honour’, of his second son, Prince Carl (born 1748, who would later become King Carl XIII). Carl Gustaf was also sent on diplomatic missions, to Hesse and to Russia, and ended his career as Governor of Stockholm County in 1768.

Carl Gustaf von Liewen

The most prominent member of this branch at the Swedish court was Carl Gustaf’s daughter, Ulrika Elisabet, known as ‘Ulla’, who was a Maid of Honour to Queen Lovisa Ulrika from 1764, but became the favourite, and (probable?) mistress, of her husband, King Adolf Frederick. They are rumoured to have had a daughter together, but this is not certain. Perhaps more importantly, she became a well-known leader of an intellectual salon in Stockholm, and was involved in the liberal politics of the reign of King Gustav III, but died relatively young in 1775.

Her brother, Carl Gustaf III, first spend some time commanding the Royal Suédois Regiment in France in the early 1770s, at a time when Sweden and France were renewing friendly ties (against mutual foe Prussia), but returned to be Chamberlain to the Dowager Queen Lovisa Ulrika and then Colonel of the Regiment of Life Guards. He ended his days as a Lieutenant-General and President of the Military Court. When he died in 1809, this branch of the family ended.

The junior branch in Sweden, the ‘White Liewen’ had a much broader spread, with many sons and grandsons forming sub-branches of their own. There were numerous commanders and generals in Swedish service but also in Austrian, French or even Spanish service. Several commanded the Turku regiment in southwest Finland, and there were also a number of commanders of the military fortress at Landskrona in western Scania, built by the Danes in the 16th century to help control water traffic through the Øresund, which separates Scania from the rest of Denmark (Scania became Swedish only after 1658). The Liewens also acquired property in this southern region, for example Lärkesholm a bit further inland (in the northern part of Kristianstad County). As a now more ‘southern’ Swedish family, they frequently commanded the regiment of the County of Kronoberg, just north of Scania in the province of Småland (thus closer to their barony of Eksjö), and they acquired lands in this county too (Malteshom, Silkesnäs).

Of all of these, one branch stood out, founded by Hans Henrik von Liewen, who was a successful military commander, rising to the rank of lieutenant-general in 1714, He was rewarded by being elevated to the rank of count in 1719, and a Councillor of State. Much of this was in recognition of the confidence he gained with the king, Charles XII, when in 1713 he journeyed to the Ottoman Empire to try to convince the warrior king to return to Sweden following his huge defeat by the Russians at Poltava in 1709. Instead he joined the King in his self-imposed exile and built up a friendship; when they both returned Hans Henrik was put in charge of re-constructing Sweden’s navy from its main base at Karlskrona. King Charles died in 1718, so it was actually his sister Queen Ulrika Eleonora who granted the new elevated title. The first Count von Liewen died as a respected member of the Swedish court in 1733.

Both of his sons were prominent in the Swedish army in the decades that followed, but the eldest, Count Hans Henrik ‘the younger’ brought the entire clan to its greatest heights so far. From the mid-1740s he was part of the inner circle of Duke Adolf Frederick of Holstein-Gottorp, who had been elected as heir to the Swedish throne, so when Adolf Frederick became king in 1751, Count von Liewen was favoured. His sister, Henrika Juliana, also became a court favourite, as a maid of honour to the new Crown Princess, Louisa Ulrika of Prussia, and one of her chief confidantes. The six maids of honour of the Crown Princess were known for their beauty and intelligence, and were painted in a curious ‘hen picture’ (Hönstavlan) by Johan Pasch in 1747, with the playful caption: ‘Who is the cursed rooster that would not crow, Hens, in seeing your features and your charms?’ But in 1748, this close confidence with the Crown Princess was apparently broken, and Henrika Juliana is believed to have been the informant that exposed a coup she had planned against those Swedes who wished to limit the power of the monarchy. Later in 1748, Henrika Juliana married and left the court, but she remained politically active, in the ‘Hats’ party who advocated a strong parliament dominated by the nobles, and thus a weak king. She is credited with editing the party’s provocative pamphlet, En ärlig Swensk (‘An Honest Swede’), published in 1755-56, and subsequently denounced by the King in the parliament.

The Hens Picture

Her brother Count Hans Henrik retained royal favour, however, and that same year was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant-General. In 1759 he was sent as Ambassador to Russia, where Adolf Frederick’s nephew, Grand Duke Peter, was preparing to take over as Tsar as heir to Empress Elizabeth. Back in Sweden, Hans Henrik was appointed a Privy Councillor in 1760, then Governor-General of Swedish Pomerania, on the northern coast of Germany, in 1766. He governed there until 1772, then returned to take up a post as Chief Marshal of the Court and Marshal of the Realm for his old friend’s son, now King Gustav III. When he died in 1781, the title of count died too.

Hans Henrik the younger, Count von Liewen

The other, still baronial, branches continued, but declined in prominence in the nineteenth century. Baron Frederik (d. 1875) was a merchant in Linköping, while his cousin Jakob Vilhelm (d. 1858) became a captain in the merchant navy. His grandson, Baron Christian von Liewen, was a sea captain who founded a shipping company in Helsingborg. When he died in 1917, the Swedish branches of the House of Liewen came to an end.

And so we must jump back across the Baltic to Livonia. The branch that was established by Johan Live back in the early 16th century acquired lands in a region known as Vidzeme, today the northern part of Latvia. In 1533 they founded a new town a bit further to the south, in lands governed by the archbishops of Riga, which they named Lievenhof in German (today called Līvāni). In 1631 they were formally admitted into the nobility of Courland (Kurzeme in Latvian), an independent duchy founded in the 1560s by the last Grand Master of the Livonian Order, Gotthard Kettler. This territory, now the far western part of modern Latvia, was nominally a vassal of the Kingdom of Poland-Lithuania, but increasingly came under Russian influence in the 17th and 18th centuries.

In the early eighteenth century, the seat of the family in Courland (now called ‘von Liven’ or ‘Leeuwen’) at was Bersen manor (Bērze in Latvian, or Lieven-Bersen, today called Līvbērze), which had a long grand frontage and a prominent gateway tower that became a symbol of the locality. The gateway and its tower were destroyed by the Soviets when they needed clearer access to the farm after nationalisation, but since 2020 there has been an exciting burst here of archaeology and regeneration of the house and its estate (referred to as ‘Live Manor’).

a historic photo of Bersen (today in Latvia)

Another grand manorhouse built in Courland in the mid-18th century was Dünhof (also called Livens Manor), now Daugmale, on the banks of the Daugava River before it flows into the city of Riga. A few miles away was Baldone Manor (Baldohn), acquired by the family in 1750. Friedrich Georg von Liven (d. 1800) was a Russian army officer who retired to this estate to beautify its parks and gardens, and to establish a resort in its sulphur springs. This resort remained quite popular well into the 20th century, but declined in the 1930s and is now mostly a ruin.

Baldone health spa in the late 18th century

When Courland was incorporated into Russia formally in 1801, the head of this branch of the family (Georg Philipp, d. 1847) was given the title of Count of the Russian Empire. His son, Count Wilhelm Heinrich, born at Dünhof in 1800, made his name as head of the Imperial Division of War Topographers in the 1850s, then was promoted to the highest position back in Livonia, as Governor-General of the Baltic Provinces, based in Riga, from 1861 to 1864, and a member of the Imperial Council of State.

Count Wilhelm Heinrich von Lieven, Governor-General of the Baltic Provinces

But another line of the Courland branch of the von Lieven family rose even higher than the rank of count: the Princes Lieven.

In 1766, a major-general in the Russian army, Baron Otto Heinrich von Lieven, married Baroness Charlotte von Gaugreben. Her family were not originally Baltic Germans, but Westphalian nobles, but one branch (a Catholic branch) had emigrated eastwards to establish themselves in Russian service. Two years after she became a widow in 1781, Charlotte was appointed as governess of the daughters of Grand Duke Paul, son and heir of Empress Catherine II. Her charge was later expanded to include Paul’s younger sons, Grand Duke Nicolas and Grand Duke Michael. Her influence at the court grew as these royal children matured, and formed a bond between the two families that would last generations.

Charlotte, Princess Lieven

In 1794, Charlotte von Lieven was named a lady-in-waiting to Catherine the Great in her last years. In 1799, in the new reign of Emperor Paul I, she and her children were promoted to the rank of Count of the Russian Empire. After the death of Paul I in Spring 1801, the new Emperor (Alexander I) promoted her further, appointing her Mistress of the Household of his wife, Empress Elizabeth Alexeievna. Finally, in 1826, after her former pupil Nicolas had succeeded his brother as Emperor of Russia, she was given the highest honour, princely rank, which was extended to her children as well. She died in 1828 in her apartments in the Winter Palace in Saint Petersburg.

Catherine the Great had also provided the faithful Charlotte von Lieven the use of a grand estate back in Courland, Mesothen (Mežotne in Latvian). Located on a broad bend of the river Lielupe in southern Semigallia, due south of Riga (now near the border with Lithuania), this grand neoclassical building was completely rebuilt from 1797 when Paul I rewarded Charlotte for her past services to his children by granting ownership outright. He also gave her the estate of Tersa on the Volga in the Saratov District; and later she was given more lands in Russia itself, including Baki in the Kostroma district, also on the Volga but much further north, and still more estates back in Courland. By this point Mesothen was a grand palace (its old manor house now became the caretaker’s house), with extensive gardens. The family resided here until 1920, when the new Republic of Latvia nationalised most large estates in a sweeping agrarian reform movement. An agricultural school was established in the 1920s, which persisted in various forms until the 1990s, when it was transferred into the ownership of the state heritage bureau, and in 2001 was opened as a hotel,

Mesothen Palace in Courland

Princess Lieven had four sons and two daughters. Three of the sons married and founded separate lineages of this now Balto-Russian princely house. The eldest son, Carl Christoph, who in 1828 became the 2nd Prince Lieven (the Russians tended to delete the ‘von’), was at first a keen soldier. At 21 he was an aide-de-camp of General Potemkin, and by 1799 was a lieutenant-general and commander of the elite Preobrazhensky Regiment. After the turn of the century, he turned more towards religion and in particular evangelical pietism. He worked to develop the newly re-founded University of Dorpat (today’s Tartu, in Estonia), supporting the adoption of courses in medicine and the natural sciences in particular. Years later he was given an honorary seat in the Russian Academy of Sciences. But in terms of religion, he was one of the founders of the Russian Evangelical Bible Society and President of the Evangelical Lutheran General Consistory, from 1819 to 1821. But in 1826, along with his elevation to princely rank, he was recalled to imperial service in Saint Petersburg, with a seat on the Council of State and a role in the Supreme Criminal Court. In 1828 he was appointed Minister of Education, an interesting nod to his earlier work in the Baltic, but also to his mother’s role as educator of children of the imperial family. In 1833, Carl Christoph retired back to his estates in Courland. He died in 1844 having married twice, both times to daughters of the Baltic German nobility, and fathering five children, whose stories will be picked up below.

Karl, 2nd Prince Lieven

The 2nd Prince’s brother, Prince Christoph Heinrich, was a respected ambassador, first in Berlin then in London, and a participant at the famous Congress of Vienna, 1814-15. But it was his wife, the former Dorothea von Benckendorff, who left a bigger impression in history—in fact, she was one of the most well-known women of her century. The Benckendorffs were a baronial family from the Altmark in Brandenburg, who had moved to Riga in the mid-sixteenth century. Dorothea’s father was a Russian general and Imperial Governor of Livonia. Her mother was Senior Lady-in-Waiting to the Empress Maria Feodorovna (wife of Emperor Paul), and in 1800, the 17-year-old Dorothea was named one of her maids-of-honour. She soon married Christoph von Lieven, and in 1810 he was appointed Ambassador to Berlin, so she accompanied him there, then on to London in 1812. It was here that Princess Lieven (as she was known after 1826) thrived. She became a leader of London’s political and social world, a close friend and confidante to leading statesmen including Lord Castlereagh, Lord Grey, the Duke of Wellington and the Prince of Wales (the future George IV). She is reputed to have had more intimate relations with Lord Palmerston, and even with Metternich, but this may just be gossip. The truth was certainly that by the 1820s people were clamouring to get invitations to her salon or her balls (where she is said to have introduced the waltz to England, or at least of making this shockingly intimate dance respectable and fashionable). More than just a society hostess, Princess Lieven was considered almost as a second ambassador, and was known to be connected in some way to every diplomat and crowned head in Europe. In 1825 she acted as an informal interlocutor between Russia and Great Britain, conveying Alexander I’s thoughts about the growing conflict in the Mediterranean over Greek independence with the Foreign Secretary, George Canning, while they were holidaying at Brighton. She is also credited for getting her friend Palmerston appointed as Foreign Secretary in 1830; but this backfired when he quarrelled with Tsar Alexander in 1834 and the Prince and Princess Lieven were hastily recalled to Russia.

Prince Christoph Lieven, Russian Ambassador to Great Britain

Back at the Russian court, Prince Christoph became governor and tutor to the young Tsarevich Alexander, while Princess Dorothea took up a post as Senior Lady-in-Waiting to Empress Alexandra Feodorovna. But she soon grew tired of Russian life, far from the diplomatic and cultural centres of Western Europe where she had flourished, so she left for Paris—never seeing her husband again before he died in 1839 while on Grand Tour in Rome with the Tsarevich. In Paris, Princess Lieven once again became a social and political force, hosting a salon in her residence in the First Arrondissement, and making friends with key statesmen like François Guizot, Minister for Foreign Affairs for much of the 1840s (and briefly Prime Minister of France). She attempted to act as a mediator once more for Russia, this time with France over the growing conflict in Crimea (1853), but was unable to prevent the outbreak of war. She died in Paris in 1857, leaving behind a vast treasure for historians of diplomacy in the form of letters and diaries, much of which has been published, covering nearly half a century, from the 1810s to the 1850s.

Dorothea, Princess Lieven

The third son of the original Princess Lieven, Johann Georg, also good a good start, as companion to Grand Duke Alexander in his first military campaigns in 1796. He served in all of Russia’s campaigns in the Napoleonic Wars and rose through the ranks to retire in 1815 as a lieutenant-general. He returned to Courland where he purchased an old castle at Cremon (Krimulda in Latvian). This castle had been built by the Livonian Order in the 14th century, and was mostly destroyed in the wars of the early seventeenth century. It would become the seat of the junior branch of the family, to which we’ll return at the end.

Prince Johann, or Ivan Andreievich Lieven

The third generation of Lieven princes was headed by Prince Otto Andreas (also known as Andrei Karlovich), born in 1798. Unlike princely titles in Western Europe, Russian princely titles did not really favour the eldest son in the same way, and with all children being titled prince or princess, so although the genealogist in me wants to call him the ‘3rd Prince Lieven’, this isn’t really accurate. Instead, elder brothers often spent their careers tending the family estates in the countryside, as head of the entail, while younger brothers could forge careers at court or in the military. In this case, Prince Andrei did rise, after an early suspicious involvement with the liberal Decembrist Uprising of 1825 (questioned, but not charged), to the rank of major-general in the army and commander of the Uhlan regiment of the Life Guards, but did retire early and married a cousin (another Princess Charlotte Lieven), to begin producing the next generation of Lievens on their estates in Livonia.

the Russian version of the Lieven coat of arms

The most prominent Lieven prince of this generation, however, was indeed a younger brother, Alexander Friedrich, who started his military career auspiciously as aide-de-camp to the now quite close friend of the family, Tsar Nicolas I, in 1826. In 1844 he was appointed Governor of Taganrog, an important naval city on the Sea of Azov which the Romanov emperors often used as a summer residence. When he retired from active service in 1853, he was promoted to the rank of lieutenant-general and named a Senator of the Russian Empire.

Prince Alexander in turn had two prominent children: Prince Andrei Alexandrovich was Governor of the Moscow District, 1870, then a Councillor of State and Imperial Senator. In 1877 he was appointed Minister for Imperial State Properties, responsible for looking after the imperial estates all across Russia. In 1881 he retired to an estate at Spasskoye, near Moscow and devoted himself to the study of astronomy. Much later in life, a floundering Tsar Nicolas II once again turned to a member of this trusted family, and Prince Andrei was recalled to the State Council in 1910; he remained in government until his death in 1913. His descendants emigrated and founded a branch who emigrated to England and Canada.

Prince Andrei Alexandroch Lieven

Andrei’s sister Princess Helena (or Jelena) continued the family’s tradition of education, and made a name for herself as a pedagogue in Saint Petersburg where she was principal of the prestigious Smolny Institute for Noble Maidens from 1895 to her death in 1917 during the Revolution.

Princess Helena Lieven

The fourth and fifth heads of the Lieven family did not leave much of a mark on history: Prince George and his brother Prince Michael both died within a month of each other in the summer of 1909. The senior position thus passed to a cousin, Prince Alexander Nikolaievich (b. 1876), who lived not at Mesothen (which by this point had been given to a junior branch), but at Senten (Zentene), still in Courland but much further north near the coast, west of Riga. Purchased by this line in 1818, a new palace was constructed here in 1850. They also owned a grand manorhouse in southern Courland called Fockenhof (Bukaišu). When riots broke out following the Revolution of 1905, Fockenhof was destroyed and Prince Alexander emigrated to Germany, where he died in 1919. Following the Latvian agrarian reforms of 1920, his cousin, Prince Nikolai, was allowed to live on at Senten, but as a tenant; nevertheless the government established a sanatorium there and he was gradually pushed out. Zentene Manor now houses a local school.

Fockenhof before its destruction, 1905
Zentene today

Prince Alexander’s son, also called Nikolai, was born in Dresden in 1906. He had no children with his first wife, and in 1949 he married a second time, to a French noblewoman (noble twice over: born into the old house of Bridieu, and adopted by a great-uncle of the Chateaubriand family), who inherited a château in the Rhône valley, in the heart of the Beaujoalais wine region. Their son Prince Alexander (b. 1953) is the current head of the princely house of Lieven (the ‘8th Prince’), and proprietor of the wineries at the Château de Bellevue where one of their best-sellers is named for his mother, Princesse Lieven. They have three sons whose names retain their Russian heritage: Nicolas, Pierre and Dmitri.

Bellevue in southern France
fine wine!

While there were by now many, many members of the Lieven family, one other stands out in this senior branch. Prince Alexander Karl (b. 1860) served in the Russian Imperial Navy and made his name as a brave captain whose vessel broke through enemy lines in the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-05. He was promoted to admiral in 1911 and served as Chief of the Navy’s General Staff in 1912, but died in February 1914 just before the outbreak of war.

Prince Admiral Alexander Karl Lieven, Chief of the Naval Staff

Lastly, we come to the most junior branch of the princely Lievens, the descendants of Prince Johann Georg. In several ways, this became the most prominent branch of the family. Prince Johann’s son, Paul (b. 1821) became an important figure in politics in the Baltic provinces, and then one of the most senior members of the Imperial court in Saint Petersburg. In the 1850s he began to redevelop the castle at Cremon (Krimulda), in a region known as ‘Livonian Switzerland’. Perhaps adhering to this theme, he built two ‘Swiss chalets’ in its parkland that overlooked a romantic gorge of the Gauja river, which runs through this part of Livonia (northeast of Riga). When on a tour of the region, Tsar Alexander II heard of Cremon’s beauty and paid a special visit in 1862. Like the other properties in Latvia owned by this family, it was nationalised in 1920, and turned into a sanatorium. Today it is on the market for nearly 3 million euros.

Cremon (Krimulda)

The same year as the Tsar’s visit, Prince Paul was named Land Marshal of Vidzeme (the region in which Cremon was situated), and a few years later elected to the local Landrat, or parliament. With this platform he became a leader of the liberal party in the Baltics and worked to achieve freedom of religious expression in this part of the Russian Empire—recall that several members of this family were evangelicals. In fact, his wife, Princess Nathalie (born von der Pahlen, yet another of these Baltic German noble houses), was an avid adherent to the evangelical movement, and years later, as a widow, purchased a grand residence in Saint Petersburg (the former Demidov Palace), on fashionable Morskaya Street, where in the 1870s-90s she hosted famous Baptist preachers and convened great gatherings aimed at religious conversion. Sold in 1910 to the Italian Embassy, the building is now part of the Baltisky Bank.

Princess Nathalie Lieven
Lieven Palace in Saint Petersburg (better known as Demidov Palace)

Perhaps charmed by his visit to Cremon Castle in 1862, Tsar Alexander II named Prince Paul as one of his court chamberlains that same year, then in 1866 appointed him a Privy Councillor in 1870, and Master of Ceremonies of the Russian Court. This was a powerful position at court, as it controlled much of the Tsar’s activities and, crucially, access to the Tsar’s person.

Prince Paul Lieven, Grand Master of Ceremonies of the Russian Court

But Paul was not finished building up his estates in Livonia: in 1874, he acquired the ancient ruins of Bauske Castle (Bauska in Latvian), not far from the other family seat of Mesothen Palace in the south of the country, the part of Courland called Semigallia. The site has a long history: the tribal Semigallians built a hill fort here, and later the Livonian Order constructed a stone castle (circa 1450), with a central tower and a prison and several buildings for a garrison. Its purpose was to guard the southern frontier against the grand dukes of Lithuania. When the Livonian Order secularised and became the duchy of Courland for the Kettler family in the mid-16th century, Bauske became one of their main residences, and was used as a meeting place for the local estates. The duke of Courland modernised it in the 1590s, but just over a century later it was blown up by invading Russian forces in 1706. Prince Paul Lieven purchased the ruins and restored the ducal palace (leaving the older medieval fortifications as a romantic ruin). Today it is open for tourism.

Bauske Castle, Courland (now Latvia)

Prince Paul Lieven, Master of Ceremonies, liberal reformer, builder of palaces and gardens, died aged only 60 in 1881, leaving behind his widow Princess Nathalie, and several very young children. The eldest, Anatol, was only 9. He followed in his parents’ footsteps in politics and religion, and in 1900 became a member of the Courland Peasant Affairs Council, and in 1909 chairman of the Council of the Russian Evangelical Union. In 1903, he built a brand new Lieven residence, Pelzen Palace (Pelči) in the far west of Courland, in art nouveau style. Today it is a school.

Pelzen Palace

Prince Anatol served as a cavalry captain during World War I, then became a commander of a Russo-German battlegroup (the Liventsy) in the Latvian War of Independence, 1918-20. Though allied with the Russian ‘White’ armies fighting against the ‘Red’ armies of the Soviets, he also faced pressure to assist in a pro-Imperial Germany takeover of the new Latvian government, which he wouldn’t do. He also forbid his soldiers from fighting against an Estonian army that was seeking to expand that new nation’s territory from the north.

Prince Anatol Lieven

When the war ended and the Latvian Republic secured its independence, Prince Anatol’s estates were nationalised (as we’ve seen already), including the main estate, Mesothen, now called Mežotne in Latvian. The age of the Baltic German nobility had come to an end, but Anatol Lieven did not emigrate like many others. He obtained permission to keep part of the estate and converted it into a brick factory, which he ran successfully for many years until he died in 1937.

Anatol’s younger brother, another Prince Paul, was also a liberal reformer, and long before revolution or nationalisation, had already converted his estate (purchased in 1893), Smilten (Smiltene), in Vidzeme (not far from Cremon/Krimulda), into something productive for the general populace. Trained as an engineer, he developed roads around the estate and built its own short railway line, as well as a power station, a hospital and a sawmill. He divided up the estate into smaller rentable plots for local people. Yet unlike his brother, he did not stay in Latvia to participate in the agricultural reforms of the 1920s; he migrated to Germany in 1919, then to England, where he died in 1963.

Prince Paul in his motorcar
Smiltene manor today

Both Anatol and Paul left descendants, the former in Canada and the latter in England. Paul’s son Alexander Lieven, born in Rostock in northern Germany in 1919, grew up in England, and served as a Captain in the British Army in World War II, then worked in the Foreign Affairs office as a Russian specialist. In the 1960s-70s, he was Head of the Russian and East European Service for the BBC.

Finally, four of the five children of Alexander Lieven (who died in 1988) have all maintained their family’s notoriety, all in very different fields. The eldest, Elena, is a developmental psychologist at Manchester University and the Max Planck Institute in Leipzig. The youngest, Natalie, is a magistrate who in 2019 was appointed a Justice of the High Court of England and Wales, and Dame Commander of the British Empire. Brother Anatol is a prominent journalist and policy analyst specialist on counter-terrorism. While last but not least, is my colleague in the study of the history of monarchy and aristocracy, Professor Dominic Lieven, of Cambridge University, whose many books focus on, what else, Imperial Russia.

Prof. Dominic Lieven

Two Royal Favourites for the Price of One: George Villiers and George Villiers, the Dukes of Buckingham

It is rare for any aristocratic family to place one of its members so high in the court hierarchy as to be known as ‘the royal favourite’, but for one family to produce two in as many generations, and both with the same name—George Villiers, Duke of Buckingham—is really extraordinary.

George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham, by Rubens

Many aristocratic families spend decades rising to the top, and, once achieved, manage to stay there for generations. The Villiers family rose quickly, from provincial gentry to the top of the peerage, then proliferated into a number of different branches, all with titles, and then very nearly petered out altogether. There are only two dukes of Buckingham in the Villiers family, George I and George II. The first features in a new television drama “Mary and George” that portrays the very essence of becoming a royal favourite in early Stuart England, and a cheeky portrayal of the relationship between King James I and one of his greatest male favourites. For the second, a fun portrayal on the small screen can be found in BBC’s “Charles II: the Power and the Passion” from 2003.

There were other dukes of Buckingham. One of the mightiest families of the 15th century, the Staffords, were so titled between 1444 and 1521 when they were cut down by a jealous Henry VIII who feared their Plantagenet blood. Then after the Villiers dukes, the Sheffield family, prominent Yorkshire landowners, were dukes of Buckingham and Normanby from 1703 to 1735. Finally the title was re-created in 1822 for a family who were actually from Buckinghamshire, the Temples of Stowe (though with other inheritances they became the incredibly quintuple-barrelled Temple-Nugent-Brydges-Chandos-Grenville. Their title was extinguished in 1889, and it has not been revived.

Beyond the two Villiers dukes of Buckingham, there were other Villiers royal favourites: one of the most famous royal mistresses in British history, Lady Castlemaine, later Duchess of Cleveland, was born Barbara Villiers. Less well known was her cousin, Elizabeth Villiers, Countess of Orkney, a mistress of William III. Altogether, this is four royal favourites from one family! And there is a fifth…read on!

While the greatest prominence of the Villiers favourites, male and female, diminished by the end of the 17th century, the Villiers family did continue. Overall they obtained four earldoms—Anglesey, Grandison, Jersey and Clarendon—between 1623 and 1776, of which two (Jersey and Clarendon) continue to the present.

To start, the Villiers family appears in records going back to about 1230, as landowners in the area around Brooksby in Leicestershire, the rich agricultural heartland of England’s East Midlands. The claim, as for most English aristocrats, was to be from solidly Norman stock, and certainly ‘de Villiers’ does have a French sound to it (and in fact there are several French noble houses with surnames like Villers, de Ville, or Villars—the latter is a duke’s family, so will get their own blog post), and would mean simply a ‘town dweller’. But it is also possible the name comes from an old Anglo-Saxon word wyler, a trade name for ‘wheelmaker’ (similar to the name Wheeler), and early variants of this family’s name are indeed seen as Vyler. Regardless, they were a solid gentry family for several centuries in the county of Leicester, with a manor house at Brooksby (or Brokesby). The house that is there today was built in the early 17th century, when the family was moving up the social hierarchy. It was extended in the 1890s, and today houses an agricultural college run by the county.

Brooksby Hall, Leicestershire

Sir George Villiers (d. 1609) increased his family’s wealth through sheep farming. He served as High Sherriff of Leicestershire in 1591, and as Knight of the Shire for the county in Parliament, 1604-06. He married twice and had two families: the first wife was connected indirectly to the Zouche family, one of the more prominent noble houses of Leicestershire.

Sir George Villiers, of Brooksby

Sir George’s second, much younger wife, Mary Beaumont, was a member of the extended Beaumont clan, also prominent in Leicesterhire, but not the same Beaumonts who had governed the county as its earls back in the 12th century. The barons Beaumont came from France to England later, after the Norman Conquest, and one of them married a daughter of the Earl of Lancaster, a Plantagenet, meaning that their descendants had a drop of royal blood. Mary Beaumont Villiers, later Countess of Buckingham in her own right, is the bold character played by Julianne Moore in the new television show.

From Sir George’s first marriage came two sons, William and Edward, who would later give rise to the lines of Villiers baronets and three of the four earldoms. From the second, came three more sons, John, George and Christopher. As the television show demonstrates, it was this second son (actually the fourth overall) who would be the making of this family’s fortunes for the century to come.

Young George was placed at court in August 1614 as a Royal Cupbearer to the still fairly new king of England, James I (James VI of Scotland since the 1560s). Rivals to the King’s current favourite, Robert Carr, Earl of Somerset, saw an opportunity to unseat him by placing in the King’s entourage a young man of 21 who was by all accounts, extremely beautiful and also a pleasant conversationalist and skilled dancer. By 1615, he was a regular feature at court, danced in the court masques before the King, and was promoted to the rank of Gentleman of the Bedchamber. Only a year later he was appointed Master of the Horse, one of the most senior posts at court, and one with a lot of close access to the King as he accompanied him any time he went on procession or hunting. He was named Viscount Villiers in 1616, a Knight of the Garter, and Lord-Lieutenant of Buckinghamshire. Only a year later he was promoted again, as Earl of Buckingham, and again in 1618 as Marquess of Buckingham. A marquisate was still a fairly rare title in England, and James was surely reluctant to promote his favourite to a dukedom since there were at that time *no* dukes in England (Somerset and Norfolk had both been removed and would not be restored until later in the century). So it was a bit of a shock when the King announced in May 1623 that he was creating two dukedoms: one for his cousin (Ludovic Stuart, already Duke of Lennox in Scotland), and one for this favourite, the son of a provincial gentry sheep farmer. George was also named Lord Admiral of the Fleet, 1619, and by 1625, Lord Warden of Cinque Ports, a very lucrative office. His coffers were also enriched by his marriage to the daughter of the 6th Earl of Rutland (see the Manners family here), Lady Katherine, who was in her own right 18th Baroness de Ros, with a seat at Helmsley Castle, in North Yorkshire.

Katherine Manners, Duchess of Buckingham

Helmsley was a Norman castle, overlooking the river Rye, and guarded the southern entrance to the Yorkshire Moors. It was held by the Roos or Ros family until 1508, then the Manners until the 6th Earl died in 1632. His seat was at nearby Belvoir Castle, so George and Katherine made Helmsley their seat. Most of the military aspects of the castle were dismantled in the English Civil War of the 1640s, and the rest of it left to decay after a new country house was built next door by new owners in the 18th century.

the ruins of Helmsley Castle, Yorkshire

Meanwhile, George’s brothers were benefitting from his amazing rise. The eldest, Sir William, made a good marriage in 1614 to the daughter of Lord Saye and Sele of Oxfordshire (the same family that much later produced Ralph and Joseph Fiennes), and was given a hereditary baronetcy in 1619, with its seat at Brooksby. He was the Sheriff of Leicestershire and his line maintained the Villiers family’s local influence until its extinction in 1712. Second son Edward was given positions in the government, as Master of the Mint, 1617, and Comptroller of the Court of Wards, 1618. He was later ambassador to the Palatinate and Lord President of Munster, one of the four provinces of Ireland. He married a niece of Oliver, 1st Viscount Grandison who was Lord Deputy (or Viceroy) of Ireland, so their eldest son William inherited lands in Ireland, and succeeded as 2nd Viscount in 1630—this title was in the peerage of Ireland, so it didn’t give him a seat in the English parliament. We will return to him below. Interestingly, of these older half-siblings of the first Duke of Buckingham, Anne Villiers married Sir William Washington, the elder brother of Lawrence Washington, great-great-grandfather of General George Washington.

As for the children of Sir George Villiers’ second marriage, to Mary Beaumont, the eldest, John, was also given prominent positions in the household, as Groom of the Bedchamber and then Master of the Robes, 1616. He was also married to a prominent heiress, Frances Coke, daughter of the Lord Chief Justice, and in 1619 was created Viscount Purbeck (in part to make his new mother-in-law agree to the marriage), and Baron Villiers of Stoke (in Buckinghamshire). It was clear by 1620, however, that he was mentally ill or disabled, and the marriage soon broke down. Viscountess Purbeck was later convicted for adultery. There were no children from the marriage.

Younger brother Christopher (‘Kit’) was created 1st Earl of Anglesey and Baron Villiers of Daventry (in Northamptonshire), also in 1623. Like his brothers, he had been named a Gentleman of the Bedchamber, and took over the role of Master of the Robes from his unfit brother in 1620. Their sister Susan had long been married to William Feilding, another country gentleman, and both of them rose in the court hierarchy as well, created Earl and Countess of Denbigh in 1622. The Countess was soon appointed as a Lady of the Bedchamber to the new wife of King Charles I, Henrietta Maria, and would remain one of the Queen’s closest companions for the rest of her life, accompanying her into exile in France, and even converting to Catholicism (as indeed had done her mother, Mary Beaumont, back in 1620, but that’s another story).

Susan Villiers, Countess of Denbigh

Fetching Henrietta Maria to marry Charles I in 1625 was in fact one of the elements that made the 1st Duke of Buckingham’s name in history—and even in fiction, as his life crossed over into the stories of ‘The Three Musketeers’. By 1623, George was effectively ‘prime minister’ for James I, and, extraordinarily, continued as royal favourite under the new king, Charles I, who succeeded his father in March 1625. Buckingham had grown close to the young Prince of Wales when they travelled together to Spain to attempt to negotiate a marriage with an Infanta; instead they had made the acquaintance of young Princess Henriette-Marie of France when attending a ball in Paris en route to Spain. Their betrothal was announced in December 1624. In the coming years, Buckingham did involve himself frequently in French politics, at first aiding Louis XIII in his war against the Protestants of La Rochelle, then turning around and sending ships and supplies to defend them. He did not however, become the lover of Queen Anne and have to send d’Artagnan racing across northern France to replace her diamonds in order to avoid the menaces of the villain Cardinal Richelieu. In the Dumas book, Milady plots to assassinate the meddling Duke, but is of course foiled.

In reality, the English Parliament was growing increasingly fed up with the Duke of Buckingham’s mismanagement of the war to aid to the French Huguenots, and a botched attempt to capture the rich Spanish port of Cadiz. Parliament had twice attempted to impeach him, but King Charles had rescued him both times by dissolving Parliament. Public opinion was inflamed: the Duke was widely seen as a public enemy. In August 1628, he travelled to Portsmouth to organise another campaign to aid La Rochelle, but was stabbed to death at the Greyhound Inn by a disgruntled army officer.

the Duke of Buckingham as warrior and commander of the English navy (also Rubens)

The Duke’s widow Katherine continued to live with their three young children, Mary, George and Francis (born posthumously), at their very grand residence in London: York House. One of the series of large palatial residences on the Strand, with terraced gardens leading down to wharves and docks on the Thames, York House had originally been the London residence of the bishops of Norwich until it was given to the archbishops of York in 1556. After it was given by the King to George Villiers in the 1620s, the new Duke and Duchess of Buckingham embellished its interiors in the fashionable Italianate style of the early reign of Charles I, of which the only remains we can still see today are the very ornate archway to the Watergate the Duke had constructed on the river—now stranded in the middle of Embankment Gardens. This house remained the seat of the 2nd Duke of Buckingham until he sold it in 1672. It was subsequently dismantled, though street names remained to maintain the family’s presence in London, notably Villiers Street, now next to Charing Cross Station.

York House as depicted in the early 19th century
the water gate as it stands today

The 2nd Duke of Buckingham, the 2nd George, succeeded to his titles at the age of one. He is certainly one of my favourite people from English history in this period: a fighter, a scientist, a politician, a poet, a dandy and a libertine. He was sometimes King Charles II’s best friend and sometimes his worst enemy. His father having died, and his mother re-marrying and moving to Ireland when he was about 6, George and his brother Francis were taken in by the King and Queen, and raised in the royal nursery with princes Charles and James, only a few years younger.

George, 2nd Duke of Buckingham, and Lord Francis Villiers

As a teenager, George fought in the Royalist armies in the English Civil War, then went on tour abroad with his brother. When they returned in 1648, they again joined the fight, and Francis was killed in a skirmish near Kingston in Surrey. George then went into exile with the Prince of Wales in France and the Netherlands, and returned with him for his coronation as Charles II at Scone in Scotland in 1651, and led some of the troops south in the invasion of England. After this failed, he returned with the King to the Netherlands. Here they fell out, over money issues, George’s growing interest in low church Protestantism, and his flirtation with the King’s recently widowed sister, the Princess of Orange. He returned to England in 1657, and, rather strangely, married Mary Fairfax, the daughter of Lord Fairfax, the former commander of Parliamentarian troops and the man to whom his confiscated estates had been given several years before. It seems that George’s move towards low church politics, and Fairfax’s own move towards a reconciliation with the monarchy, met in the middle, and by 1659 both were working for the Restoration.

In 1660, Buckingham reconciled with Charles II when he arrived back in England, and was appointed Gentleman of the Bedchamber and Lord Lieutenant of West Riding of Yorkshire, where he and his wife would ultimately inherit the Fairfax properties, including Nun Appleton on the River Wharfe, south of York. Nun Appleton had been a priory from the 12th century, dissolved in the 1530s, and acquired by the Fairfaxes who built a new house in the 17th century. After Mary, Duchess of Buckingham’s death in 1704, the house was sold; replaced by a Georgian mansion, it passed through many hands and now sits decaying and empty—apparently its owner plans to restore it to the original 17th-century design, but is blocked by regulations protecting the later 18th and 19th-century alterations.

Nun Appleton in the 17th century
Nun Appleton more recently

https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/news/local-news/gallery/inside-yorkshire-stately-home-abandoned-19146862 [article from 2020]

Anyway, George now became part of Charles II’s ‘Merry Gang’ of drinkers and carousers at the Restoration court. Like his father, he was sent to Paris to participate in another marriage between a Stuart and a Bourbon, this time Henrietta Anne and Philippe, Duke of Orléans (Louis XIV’s brother). But as he had in The Hague, Buckingham seems to have overstepped the mark and flirted too openly with the Princess and was soon sent home. Also like his father, this made it into the Three Musketeers tales of Alexander Dumas (in the Vicomte de Bragelonne). Nevertheless, Buckingham remained close to the French king and a persistent advocate of a French alliance against the Dutch. This put him into opposition to the King’s chief minister, the Earl of Clarendon, who, by 1667, Buckingham was powerful enough to bring down and remove from power. Indeed, from 1667 to 1674, the Duke was now Charles II’s unofficial prime minister, or ‘minister-favourite’, and leader of a faction known as the CABAL—taking its name from its five main leaders, including its ‘arch’ in the middle, B for Buckingham. This clique is considered he kernel of Britain’s first formal political parties, and after its disintegration, one of Buckingham’s former protégés from his now vast Yorkshire patronage network, Lord Danby, would become the next great political leader (Thomas Osborne, later created Duke of Leeds).

arms of the 2nd Duke of Buckingham, with ducal coronet, and quarterings for Villiers (upper left), Ros (top centre) and others

But Buckingham was no great statesman. The only official post he held was Master of the Horse—as above, a position of intimacy and trust with the King—and his ties with absolutist France were increasingly uncomfortable, especially after the Secret Treaty of Dover of 1670 was revealed and seriously embarrassed the King. Despite his pro-French views, the Duke was also vehemently pro-toleration and supportive of the rights of non-conformists—this too put him at odds with the general mood of the populace and the Parliament, and again put the King in a difficult position. Matters were not helped by Buckingham’s personal life: like many noblemen of Charles II’s court, he drank and gambled and duelled, usually over a mistress. In 1668, he duelled with the Earl of Shrewsbury, who was mortally wounded—then installed the now widowed Countess of Shrewsbury as his mistress in his new grand suburban residence, at Cliveden. Cliveden House was built in 1666 on a clifftop (earlier spellings of the house are Cliffden) overlooking the River Thames in Buckinghamshire. It had replaced an older hunting lodge built in the 16th century and was a marvel of grand architecture, a tall pavilion over an arcaded terrace built by William Winde. After the Duke’s death, it was purchased by the Earl of Orkney (whose wife was also a Villers), and in the 18th century was leased to Frederick, Prince of Wales (son of George II), who made it one of his favoured residences. Cliveden burned down in 1795, and the estate lay dormant for some time until the house was rebuilt, on an even grander scale in 1824, then burned down again in 1849, and was rebuilt again in 1851 by the Duke of Sutherland. It then passed to the Duke of Westminster who sold it in 1893 to the Astors who made it one of the most fashionable spots for the beau monde in the early decades of the 20th century. Today the estate belongs to the National Trust, but the house itself is leased to a luxury hotel chain.

Cliveden in its original state (c1717)
Cliveden today

In January 1674, Charles II finally acquiesced to demands in Parliament that the Duke of Buckingham be removed from any positions of authority and influence. He was sent away, to live at his Yorkshire estates at Helmsley and Nun Appleton. He began to reform: he attended church, was attentive to his wife, and paid off his debts. Still he meddled in politics, leading a ‘country party’ that was forming in opposition to a more centralist faction in Parliament (the origins of the Whigs and the Tories), and even began making contact directly with Louis XIV over another possible alliance—until he was discovered and threatened with imprisonment in the Tower.

George Villiers, 2nd Duke of Buckingham, as an older man

Buckingham distanced himself from the Whigs by about 1680 (due to their insistence on exclusion of Catholics from government), and reconciled with his old friend the King before the latter died in 1685, and before his own death two years later. His wife the Duchess lived on until 1705, but they had no children; nor did his sister Mary, Duchess of Richmond, who also died in 1685. So the Villiers estates were dispersed.

Mary Fairfax, Duchess of Buckingham

But the age of the Villiers favourites was not quite finished. From 1660 to 1672, the other most dominant person in the life of King Charles II was his mistress Barbara Villiers Palmer, Lady Castlemaine. And following her dismissal, her first cousin Elizabeth Villiers rose to prominence—albeit much less overtly—as a favourite of Charles II’s nephew and (eventual) successor, William III.

Barbara Villiers was the only child of the 2nd Viscount Grandison (above). He died when she was only four, in a battle during the Civil War. The title and estates passed to his brothers, the 3rd and 4th viscounts (founders of later Villiers branches), and young Barbara was left with very little. She was described as one of the most beautiful young women of the age, but had few financial attractions. She did not attract a high-ranking suitor, and in 1659, in seeming desperation, she married a relative nobody, and a Catholic to boot: Roger Palmer, a landowner from the Welsh borders. Barbara and Roger both saw their fortunes tied to a restored monarchy, so went to the Low Countries to meet with the King in the months leading up to the Restoration in Spring 1660. That year he was elected as an MP, and she was selected as the King’s favourite. In 1661, Roger was created Earl of Castlemaine and Baron Limerick (in reference to her father’s Irish titles; and Castle Maine, in County Kerry), which was more mocking than an honour, since an Irish peerage brought no position in England, and the terms of the title’s creation specified that it would pass only to sons born from his marriage to Barbara, not any future wife—in other words, he was an official cuckold, and everyone knew it. The new Countess of Castlemaine was given a position as Lady of the Bedchamber to the new queen, Catherine of Braganza, a humiliation for a pious foreign queen newly arrived and with few friends at this quite anti-Catholic court.

there are many portraits of Barbara Villiers. This is my favourite

Roger and Barbara legally separated in 1662, in part to avoid his attempts to make claims on the children she was giving birth to. These children were at first called Palmer, but later the King formally recognised them and gave them the name FitzRoy (‘son of the king’). At times this was very confusing: the eldest son Charles was at first known as ‘Lord Limerick’ (Roger Palmer’s courtesy title), and was baptised as a Palmer in a Catholic ceremony, only to be re-baptised later as Charles FitzRoy in a Protestant ceremony. Eventually it was clear these children were royal bastards, and the King gave them increasingly grand titles—all three boys were created dukes: of Southampton and Grafton (both in 1675) and of Northumberland (in 1683). These Stuart dukedoms that descend from Charles II (as with the Duke of Saint Albans, written about previously), will have their own blog posts. Only one of these three ducal lineages founded by Barbara Villiers survives today (Grafton).

By the mid-1660s, Lady Castlemaine was a major figure at court, and with significant influence in government as well. In tandem with her Villiers cousin the 2nd Duke of Buckingham, she brought down the King’s old favourite, the Earl of Clarendon, in 1667. But it was Buckingham who then manoeuvred Nell Gwynne into place as the King’s favourite mistress in the following year, seeing his cousin now as a rival instead of an ally. The King granted Barbara financial privileges and several properties, including Nonsuch Palace, as well as the title Baroness Nonsuch.

Nonsuch Palace, as painted in the early 17th century

Nonsuch was a famous Tudor palace, built by Henry VIII in the 1530s amidst hunting grounds in Surrey, south of Hampton Court. Its name suggested that there was ‘no such place’ equal to it. In the 17th century it had been used as part of Queen Anne of Denmark’s jointure and as a hunting lodge for James I and Charles I, and finally as a residence for the Queen Mother, Henrietta Maria, during the Restoration. In a great act of cultural vandalism, Barbara ordered the palace’s dismantling in 1682, and its parts were sold to pay off her mounting debts. Nothing remains.

Barbara Villiers was also created Duchess of Cleveland in her own right in 1670, with the letters patent specifying it would pass to her eldest son, Charles FitzRoy. Cleveland took its name from the region of high peaks (cliffs or ‘cleves’) and dales in north Yorkshire. There had been an earl of Cleveland (Thomas, 4th Baron Wentworth), who was part of the clientele network of the 1st Duke of Buckingham, and his son a close companion of Charles II in exile. The Earl died in 1667 and perhaps the King wished to remember him and his earlier Villiers connections in re-using the title for Barbara in 1670.

The name was also given to her London house, which she acquired from Clarendon’s fall in 1667. Cleveland House, directly behind St. James’s Palace and overlooking Green Park in Westminster, had been built for the Earl of Berkshire (a Howard) in the 1620s, then was the residence of the Earl of Clarendon as First Minister in the 1660s. Barbara expanded and refaced it in the 1670s, but before she died, she sold it to the Egertons, later dukes of Bridgewater. Since then it has been called Bridgewater House, but the address is still Cleveland Row. It was rebuilt in the 1850s, then sold off after World War II—it was used for offices until the 1980s when it once again became a private residence.

Bridgewater House in the 1830s

By about 1672, it was clear that Charles II’s favourites were Nell Gwynne and the newly arrived Louise de Kérouaille. The Duchess of Cleveland lost her position as Lady of the Queen’s Bedchamber due to the Test Act of 1673, since she was a Catholic (having converted back in 1663), and the King sent her away from court. She lived in Paris, 1676-80, then was briefly reconciled with the King before he died in 1685. Her life after that was rather sad, with increasing penury and foolish romantic liaisons, culminating in a marriage of 1705 to Major-General Robert ‘Beau’ Fielding, whom she later had to prosecute for bigamy once she discovered he was already married. She lived her last years in a large brick house in the western London suburb of Chiswick—this ‘Cleveland House’ was later renamed Walpole House for its 18th-century owner, and hosted a prominent school in the 19th century, before being restored as a private house again in the 20th.

Walpole House in Chiswick

Barbara died in 1709. Her long forgotten husband, Roger Palmer, Earl of Castlemaine, had actually risen in favour after the death of Charles II, since, as a Catholic, he was esteemed by the new king, James II. He was named to the Privy Council in 1686, and sent as Ambassador to Rome. After James’ fall, of course, this brief prominence faded, and Castlemaine spent the rest of his life either as a Catholic suspect in the Tower of London, or on his estates on the Welsh borders where he died in 1705. The dukedom of Cleveland passed to Barbara’s son Charles, Duke of Southampton, and to his son, William FitzRoy, who died in 1774. The title was re-created in 1833 for his grand-nephew, William Vane, Earl of Darlington (and so continued until its extinction again in 1891).

Barbara, Duchess of Cleveland, as a clearly depressed older woman

As Barbara Villiers’ star was fading, her cousin Elizabeth’s was rising. Her father, Edward, was the youngest brother of the Viscount Grandison (Barbara’s father), and her mother was Lady Frances Howard, daughter of the Earl of Suffolk. Like all of the family, he was a staunch Royalist and went with Charles II into exile in 1649. During the Restoration, his wife was appointed governess to the King’s nieces, princesses Mary and Anne of York. So when Princess Mary was sent to the Netherlands in 1677 to wed her first cousin, William, Prince of Orange, she was accompanied by some of Sir Edward and Lady Frances Villiers’ daughters, including Elizabeth, to serve as her maids of honour in her court at The Hague. It is uncertain when (or even really if) Elizabeth became a mistress of Mary’s husband William, whose affairs with men were becoming fairly well known, especially his primary favourite, Hans Willem Bentinck (who, incidentally, married Elizabeth’s sister, Anne). When William and Mary became joint King and Queen of England, Scotland and Ireland, Elizabeth Villiers returned to England, and continued to act as a royal favourite—perhaps a ‘beard’ for the King’s relationship with Bentinck? It seems that, after Mary II died in December 1694, William was committed to ‘cleaning house’ to honour his late wife’s memory, and dismissed Elizabeth by rewarding her (a quite traditional way of signalling the end of a royal relationship): he granted her extensive lands in Ireland in 1695 and married her off to one of his military lieutenants, Lord George Hamilton (a younger son of the Duke of Hamilton); the following year they were created Earl and Countess of Orkney. This is the same Orkney who purchased the palatial Cliveden House (above), and so it was yet another Villiers who played grand hostess there in the early Hanoverian era of the 1710s-1720s. She died in 1733, leaving her estates to daughters.

possibly Elizabeth Villiers, possibly by Kneller

The Villiers legacy therefore was carried on by Elizabeth’s brother, Edward. He too was in King William’s favour, and was named Viscount Villiers in 1691, then Earl of Jersey in 1697. He was Master of the Horse to Queen Mary, then Lord Chamberlain to King William. He was sent as Ambassador to The Hague and Paris in the 1690s, crucially representing England at the treaty negotiations at Rijswijk in 1697. He was named one of the King’s secretaries of state in 1699, but didn’t survive long after the King’s death in 1702—Queen Anne dismissing him from all of his posts in 1704. Perhaps this last of the Stuarts had finally had enough of the Villiers family…

Edward Villiers, 1st Earl of Jersey

The Villiers family in the 18th century were thus represented by the last Viscount Grandison (John) who was created Earl Grandison in 1721 (still in the Irish peerage) and given a seat on the Irish Privy Council. When he died in 1766, this branch ended in the male line—the earldom of Grandison was re-created for his daughter and grandson (George Mason, who took the name Villiers in 1771), and the viscountcy passed to his cousin the 3rd Earl of Jersey. This 3rd Earl (William), had built a new county seat at Middleton Stoney, located in the rolling green hills just west of Bicester in Oxfordshire. Middleton Park remained the Jersey seat, rebuilt in the 1930s by the 9th Earl, until it was developed as apartments in the 1970s.

Middleton Stoney in the 1820s

Of subsequent earls of Jersey, the 5th Earl (d. 1859) stands out as a prominent Tory politician in the reigns of William IV and Victoria, as Lord Chamberlain in the 1830s and Master of the Horse in the 1840s (and briefly again in 1852). He added his wife’s mother’s surname, Child, to Villiers in 1819, as heiress of the vast wealth of the Child Bank, and their grand house, Osterley Park, in the western suburbs of London. The 6th Earl married a daughter of Prime Minister Robert Peel, but was only earl for 21 days, before he followed his father to the grave. The 7th Earl of Jersey was Governor of New South Wales in Australia (1890-93), while the 8th Earl re-trenched in the 1920s by selling the Child Bank. Today’s earl, the 10th, is William Child Villiers (b. 1976), whose family home is actually on the island of Jersey (Radier Manor). His heir, Viscount Villiers, is appropriately named called George.

As for the extant junior line, the line of earls of Clarendon (a seemingly ironic title, given the family’s concerted efforts to bring down the great Lord Clarendon in 1667), was founded by Thomas Villiers, second son of the 2nd Earl of Jersey. He was a diplomat, sent to Warsaw, Vienna and Berlin in the 1740s, then a Whig MP (in contrast to his mostly Tory family) in the 1750s-60s, and joining the Government as a member of the Privy Council and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster in the 1770s-80s. In 1752, he married Charlotte Capel, daughter of Jane Hyde, the heiress of Henry Hyde, 4th Earl of Clarendon. Thomas Villiers was thus created Baron Hyde (of Hindon, Wilts.) in 1756, and later Earl of Clarendon in 1776. He built a new family seat, The Grove, near Watford in Hertfordshire (which, like so many of these grand country houses, is now a luxury hotel).

Thomas Villiers, 1st Earl of Clarendon

Of the later earls of Clarendon, the 4th Earl (George Villiers, d. 1870), was the ‘Great Lord Clarendon’, a prominent diplomat and Liberal politician in the reign of Queen Victoria: three times Foreign Secretary, Lord Privy Seal, and like his grandfather the 1st Earl, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster. He also renewed some of his family’s old links with Ireland by serving as Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, 1847-52. In the 20th century, the 6th Earl of Clarendon was Governor-General of South Africa, 1931-37. Today’s 8th Earl (b. 1976) has a son, Edward, known as Lord Hyde.

There was one last royal favourite connected to the Villiers family: Frances Twysden (1753-1821). No stranger to scandal from the moment of her birth, she had been born posthumously to the Right Reverend Philip Twysden (from a Kent family), who, despite being Bishop of Raphoe in the Church of Ireland, was shot dead in 1752 while (allegedly) attempting to rob a stagecoach near London. Just over 17 years later, Frances married George Villiers, 4th Earl of Jersey (d. 1805), a Gentleman of the Bedchamber to King George III. In about 1793, Lady Jersey became the mistress of George, Prince of Wales; in 1794 she was appointed Lady in Waiting to the new Princess of Wales (Caroline of Brunswick), and her husband was subsequently appointed the Prince’s Master of the Horse, making them quite a power couple for—as it was anticipated—the reign soon to come. But George III, though he went mad, did not die until long after Lady Jersey had lost favour, in 1807, when she was dismissed as Lady of the Bedchamber. As fate would have it, there would be no great Villiers royal favourite for this particular royal (this time with the name George) when he became king in 1820.

Frances Villiers, Countess of Jersey

The Farnese: dukes of Parma, Piacenza and Castro

The names Farnese and Parma evoke a number of images from Italian and European history. The ‘Villa Farnese’ embodies the beauty and grace of the Renaissance palaces of the Roman countryside and of one of its chief patrons, the beautiful and graceful Giulia Farnese. The name Parma in contrast, beyond the most immediate associations we now have with ham—and rightly so—will remind English readers of one of the most famous speeches in English history, as the Spanish Armada approached the shores of England in 1588, and Elizabeth I rallied her troops at Tilbury with the cry: “…and think foul scorn that Parma or Spain, or any prince of Europe, should dare to invade the borders of my realm.” This ‘Parma’ was Alessandro Farnese, Duke of Parma, one of the great military leaders of the era.

Paul III appoints his son Duke of Parma, by Ricci (c. 1685)

The real founder of the family’s swift rise to the top of the social hierarchy of 16th-century Europe was Alessandro’s great-grandfather, and Giulia’s brother, another Alessandro Farnese, who became a cardinal in 1493, then in his mid-60s was elected pope (1534) and took the name Paul III. One of the great reforming popes, who launched the Catholic Reformation and the Council of Trent, the Farnese pope had initially been under the patronage of the infamous Borgia pope, Alexander VI—who was Giulia’s lover. But unlike Pope Alexander, Pope Paul was able to achieve something most papal families desired: a sovereign territory in which to permanently plant his family amongst the premier ruling dynasties of Italy.

The first of these semi-independent territories was the duchy of Castro, northwest of Rome in the borderlands between Lazio and Tuscany, created for his illegitimate son in 1537. Far grander was the duchy of Parma, across the Pennines in the province of Emilia, granted to the same son in 1545, and augmented with the neighbouring duchy of Piacenza. The Farnese family could now rival the other ducal families of northern Italy, the Medici, Gonzaga or Este, and they build grand residences in their capital cities to compete with these in genuinely princely splendour. They also constructed grand palaces in Rome and the Roman countryside to maintain their position in the hierarchy of the great aristocratic families of the Eternal City. Though they would eventually lose Castro in 1649, Parma and Piacenza continued to flourish as a small state, and the Farnese art collections grew to become one of the greatest in the world, until the dynasty itself died out in 1731, and its heiress took the inheritance to the Bourbons of Spain by her marriage to King Philip V. After 1748, a new Parma dynasty was born, Bourbon-Parma, which would rule Parma and Piacenza—aside from the major disruption of the Napoleonic era—until the unification of Italy began in 1859. The Farnese dynasty, as dukes and princes, only had a lifespan of about two hundred years, 1537 to 1731, but their legacy lives on in much of the architecture of Parma and Rome, and in the great Farnese art collections now housed primarily in Naples.

The Farnese family had its origins in the hilly lands to the north of Rome in the province of Latium (today’s Lazio) in the valley of the river Fiora which forms part of the boundary with Tuscany. This region features several almost perfectly circular lakes, the calderas of extinct volcanos, notably Lake Bolsena, on which one of the early Farnese residences, the Rocca Farnese in Capodimonte, beautifully sits. Most of the hills in this area are volcanic, and on the top of one of these tufa hillsides rose the castle and village of Farnetum, which gave its name to the Farnese family, sometime in the 10th century. It is suggested that the name comes from a local variety of oak tree known as the farnia. The town of Farnese remains a picturesque walled town. After the lands in Lazio were lost to the eponymous Farnese dynasty, the town and lordship of Farnese passed into the possession of the Chigi family (originally from Siena), who were created princes of Farnese (1658, for the nephew of the Chigi pope, Alexander VII), a title which they still hold today, though the property itself passed to the Torlonia princely family in the late 20th century. These princes will have their own separate blog post.

Capodimonte, the Rocca Farnese on the right (photo Sergio de Ferra)
the walled town of Farnese today (photo WikiRomaWiki)

The earliest ancestors of the family, who claimed, like most grand noble houses of northern Italy, to be descended from ancient Lombard warriors, were condottieri, soldiers for hire, and they made their mark mostly leading pro-Guelph (that is, pro-papal) forces in the 12th and 13th centuries. They were rewarded with papal fiefs in proximity to the village of Farnese, notably Canino and Cellere, which, like Capodimonte, also feature buildings that still bear the family name: the Rocca Farnesiana (in Cellere) and the Castelvecchio dei Farnesi (in Canino). In the hills outside Canino, they acquired a former Benedictine monastery overlooking the river Fiora, the Castello dell’Abbadia, with its treacherous bridge, the Ponte del Diavolo—the ‘Devil’s Bridge’. This castle served as one of the primary residences of the family after they acquired the fief in 1430. Canino was later given as a principality to Lucien Bonaparte, brother of Napoleon, who is buried in the town chapel. The line of Bonaparte princes of Canino and Musignano (a neighbouring village), continued into the 1920s.

Castelvecchio in Canino (foreground)
Rocca Farnesiana in Cellere
Castello dell’Abbadia and the ‘Devil’s Bridge’ (photo NikonZ711)

The most prominent early Farnese condottiero was Piero, who was employed as Captain-General of the Papal Armies, re-asserting Rome’s control over the city of Bologna in 1359, then Captain-General of Florence, leading its army to defeat the great rival Pisa in 1362. His nephew, also called Piero, was Captain-General of the Army of Siena, 1408, and waged a long-term vendetta with the rival noble family in this region, the Orsini. Two of his many sons founded the two main branches of the family, Castro and Latera, each with a duchy in the 16th century. We will return to the line of Latera below. The senior line would be founded by Ranuccio ‘il Vecchio’ on a castle (or castrum, castro) near Farnese and Canino, called Ischia di Castro.

Ischia di Castro

Ranuccio Farnese also acquired the lordship of Montalto (de Castro), which is on the seacoast, and enjoyed the privilege of exporting grain without paying the normal tax to the pope. He too was a condottiero, but was astute enough to accumulate levels of debt (years of back pay) from the papacy instead of cash or fiefs, so that by the 1430s-40s he was himself one of the bankrollers of the papacy (a trick the Medici similarly performed to perfection!). Many of the fiefs he did hold from the papacy were given time limits for repayment, and when the popes did not pay, they became Farnese assets outright. Ranuccio was appointed Captain-General of Papal Armies in 1435, and consolidated his family’s hold over this part of the province of Lazio. He also ended the long and bloody feud with the Orsini by marrying his son Gabriele to Isabella Orsini in 1442. When he died in 1450 he was buried on a family tomb on an island (Bisentina) in Lake Bolsena.

Ranuccio ‘il Vecchio’, painted later as part of the family history frescos
the church of Saints Giacomo & Cristoforo, on the island of Bisentina in Lake Bolsena

Ranuccio’s younger son, Pierluigi, had made a different marriage: to Giovanna Caetani, from one of the leading aristocratic families of Rome, more firmly linking the Farnese to Roman high politics. The eldest of his two sons, Angelo, continued in the family tradition of military service to the papacy, but died before he reached 30, in 1494. By this point, however, a new star had risen for the family, Giulia, ‘la Bella Farnese’. She had been sent by her mother to Rome to be brought into society by the Caetani family and in 1489 was married to another Orsini (Orsino Orsini to be exact). While the details are patchy, it seems that through her new mother-in-law, Adriana de Mila, a cousin of the Borgias, Giulia became acquainted with Cardinal Rodrigo Borgia, and in 1493, when he was elected pope as Alexander VI, she rose to great heights as his mistress, and he installed her in a palace near the Vatican, which she shared—perhaps uncomfortably?—with his daughter Lucrezia. She made sure that her brother, Alessandro, was favoured by the Borgia pope, and he was indeed made a cardinal, in 1493, at 25, and a few years later, Bishop of Montefiascone and Corneto, the local diocese near the Farnese properties in Lazio.

Giulia Farnese, with the Farnese unicorn

Cardinal Farnese was not of course universally praised for his means of securing high church office: he was called ‘the Borgia-in-law’, and much worse. Like a good Roman aristocratic cleric of his day, he took a mistress, Silvia Ruffini, from a Roman noble house, and had four children between 1500 and 1510. His patron Alexander VI died in 1503, but successive popes were unusually generous in legitimising the Cardinal’s children so they could inherit the Farnese lands—especially important since, by 1512, the senior branch founded by Gabriele had died out. The new pope, Julius II, was no fan of the Borgias (or their clients), so perhaps as a means of getting Alessandro away from Rome, he promoted him to the bishopric of Parma, 1509, thus initiating the family’s connections to that city.

Alessandro, Cardinal Farnese, painted by Raphael

The city of Parma had grown up around a crossroads, important since antiquity—and possibly derived its name in antiquity from palma, a circular shield used by local Etruscan warriors. The famous Via Aemilia ran straight through it, connecting east and west, while the Via Claudia ran north and south, connecting Lombardy and the broad Po valley to the Apennine mountain passes into Tuscany and Latium. In fact, the main medieval route taking merchants and pilgrims from France and northwest Europe down to Rome ran through Parma. When Charlemagne and his Frankish lords extended their rule into Italy, they had established a count in the city to guard this important crossroads, and this county of Parma remained (loosely) a part of the Holy Roman Empire, though it later gained a degree of autonomy under its local bishops. The magnificent Cathedral was built in this time (completed about 1100), followed by an even more spectacular Baptistry later in the century, which serves as an important marker of the transition between Romanesque and Gothic architectural styles.

Parma in the 16th century, looking south towards the Apenines
Parma’s medieval cathedral
the baptistry (photo Norbert Nagel)

In the 15th century, Parma lost its independence, and was incorporated into the territories of the Sforza rulers of Milan. By the end of that century it found itself in one of most contested zones of the Italian Wars, fought by French, Imperial/Spanish and Papal armies. Parma was annexed briefly to the Papal States in 1512, then occupied by the French until it was returned again to Papal rule in 1521. Cardinal Farnese’s reign as bishop was in the middle of all this. But by 1524 he was back in Rome, where he became Dean of the College of Cardinals, and in 1534, rather surprisingly, was elected pope, as Paul III. Many electors thought due to his age and infirmity, his papacy would be a short, and they would thus have time to prepare a proper campaign for his successor. But he lived, and thrived, for another fifteen years. He began a campaign of bold activities we now call the Catholic Reformation (or the ‘Counter-Reformation’) right away, for example revising rules of papal governance in 1536, excommunicating Henry VIII in 1538, and approving the founding of the Society of Jesus (the ‘Jesuits’) in1540. Paul III also launched one of the largest reform projects, the Council of Trent, in 1545.

Paul III and his grandsons, by Titian

But from the perspective of dynastic history, Paul III was not a reformer at all. Almost immediately upon becoming pope, he appointed his son, Pier Luigi, as commander of papal armies and Gonfalonier of the Church, and two of his grandsons, both teenagers, as cardinals: another Alessandro Farnese and Guido Ascanio Sforza. He even made a cardinal of his former mistress’s legitimate son (who was, many thought, actually his own son), Tiberio Crispo. But following in the footsteps of previous Renaissance popes, the Farnese pope wanted to create a significant territory that his family could rule as princes and pass on for generations. Pier Luigi, a warrior like his Farnese ancestors, had already made a name for himself—and not necessarily a good one, known for his cruelty and ruthlessness—fighting for Venice and for Emperor Charles V (including the famous sack of Rome in 1527). In 1534, he was given the marquisate of Novara, part of Charles V’s Duchy of Milan. In 1540, Pier Luigi sealed this Imperial alliance by marrying his son, Ottavio, to the Emperor’s illegitimate daughter, Margaret of Austria. Margaret was already the widow (though only 15) of Alessandro de Medici, first Duke of Florence, who had been murdered only three years before. She brought as a dowry the lands of Penna in the Abruzzo and estates she was given by her father in Naples. Pier Luigi tried to solidify this imperial relationship even further by offering his daughter Vittoria to the recently widowed Emperor himself, but Charles declined.

Pier Luigi Farnese, Duke of Castro, Duke of Parma and Piacenza

On the papal side, in 1538, Paul III created a new duchy for Pier Luigi, formed from the various Farnese properties in northern Lazio, and gave it the name Castro. It would reach from Lake Bolsena to the sea, and would be formally a vassal state of the papacy, but de facto an independent state. A brand new capital city was built, called Castro, not far from the old main Farnese towns of Ischia and Canino. The Pope also added the neighbouring duchy of Nepi, which had been initially created for Lucrezia Borgia in 1499. In 1540, he also gave his son the confiscated duchy of Camerino, on the other side of the Apennines near Ancona.

the Duchy of Castro, from a map of 1640 (north is to the left)
the city of Castro

Pope Paul also tried to balance his son’s pro-imperial leanings by sending Pier Luigi’s younger son, Orazio, to the court of François I in France. By the late 1540s it was understood that Orazio would marry the Dauphin’s illegitimate daughter, Diane de France, which he eventually did, with the proviso that he would be a ruling duke himself, not just a second son, by inheriting the Duchy of Castro.

The Pope decided that Orazio’s elder brother Ottavio would be compensated for Castro with something much grander: Parma. While the Emperor was busy dealing with Protestants north of the Alps, Paul III thought he would seize the moment and enfeoff his eldest son with the duchy of Parma, which, as seen above, had only fairly recently become papal territory. He added to it the neighbouring duchy of Piacenza, on the River Po. Like Parma, the city of Piacenza also had ancient roots, as the ‘pleasant place’ or Placentia in Latin. It too had been ruled by Milan in recent centuries, but was annexed to the Papal States in 1521. The gift of these duchies was done in 1545; in exchange, Pier Luigi agreed to give up Camerino and Nepi (and to cede Castro to Orazio). The new duke established himself in the ducal palace in Piacenza by 1546, with plans to build something more permanent in Parma. But he soon revealed himself to be a tyrant, imposing heavy taxes and curtailing the traditional independence of the local nobles and clergy. He swiftly made many enemies.

a map from the erly 19th century that shows Parma (and Piacenza) clearly, in yellow.

At first the Emperor approved of the creation of the twin duchies of Parma and Piacenza, since it would, after all, ultimately benefit his daughter Margaret, who would become a sovereign, not just the wife of a papal bastard. But by 1547, Charles V changed his mind, and thought Parma really ought to belong to the Duchy of Milan after all, so encouraged his governor there, Ferrante Gonzaga, to fan the flames of the unrest Pier Luigi was already creating in his duchies, and to back an assassination coordinated by representatives of the leading noble houses (Pallavicini, Landi and Anguissola). His body was hung outside a window of the palace in Piacenza.

Piacenza, Palazzo Farnese

This started the short War of Parma, 1551-1552, which did not play out as you might have expected. Paul III had initially made peace with Charles V by acquiescing to the loss of Parma and Piacenza in 1547. But his grandson Ottavio, did not, and retook the city by force—supposedly angering his grandfather so much he died of a heart attack in 1549. Ottavio now allied himself with his younger brother’s patron, his father-in-law the King of France (the former Dauphin, now King Henry II), since his natural enemy was the Emperor Charles V—who was of course Ottavio’s father-in-law. This is very confusing! This short war was fought between Henry II of France and Ottavio Farnese on one side, and Charles V and the new pope, Julius III on the other. In the end, Ottavio was restored to Parma and Piazenza (and also succeeded his brother Orazio as duke of Castro when he died suddenly, fighting in a French army in Flanders in 1553), and France became the chief ally and protector of Parma—which it remained (sometimes) for the next century and a half.

Ottavio Farnese, Duke of Parma, Piacenza and Castro

Before moving on firmly to the history of Parma and its dukes, we should stay in Lazio and look at properties—and two more cardinals. The eldest grandson of Pope Paul III, Alessandro, was made a cardinal when he was 14 in 1534. The younger brother Ranuccio was made cardinal at 15 in 1545, and though he held many benefices and administrative offices, and a lucrative commandery as a knight of Malta, he died at 35 before really making his mark.

the gorgeous portrait of young Ranuccio, wearing the cloak of a knight of Malta, by Titian

Alessandro, however, rose right away, first as Vice-Chancellor of the Church (an office he held for over 50 years), then from 1538 as his grandfather’s principal secretary. By the 1540s, he was conducting much of the business and political affairs of the papacy. At first he was also used to solidify the Farnese family ties with the Habsburgs, as Cardinal-Protector of the Holy Roman Empire and of Spain from 1541; in return, Charles V named him Archbishop of Monreale in Sicily. But he also had French interests, as Papal Legate to Avignon from 1541 to 1565 (and he had a French mistress, Claude de Beaune de Semblançay, a lady-in-waiting to Queen Catherine de Medici, and a half-French daughter, Clelia). He sided with his brother in the War of Parma, so lost several of his Imperial benefices, but became instead an important channel of communication between France and Rome (though here too he gradually lost out due to the growing influence in France of Cardinal Ippolito d’Este). His clout rose again in Rome in the 1560s-70s, and he was a serious candidate for the papal throne in the conclaves of 1566 and 1572. As a grand old man, he was Dean of the College of Cardinals, from 1580 until his death in 1589.

Alessandro, Cardinal Farnese

This second Cardinal Farnese’s main legacy are the buildings. He took over the residence in Rome his grandfather had built in the 1520s, the Palazzo Farnese, which he expanded in the 1530s, and laid out the Piazza Farnese. This is still regarded as one of the most beautiful squares in Rome, and, as is fitting for the long-term Franco-Farnese alliance, is now the seat of the French embassy. It was in the 17th century, the home of the huge Farnese art collection, but after the Farnese properties passed to the Bourbons, these were shipped to Naples, where they formed the collection of the new Capodimonte Museum.

Palazzo Farnese in Rome (the Embassy of France) (photo Myrabella)

Across the Tiber, in the more leafy suburb of Trastevere, the Farneses acquired a villa built earlier in the century by the wealthy Chighi banking family. This villa, famous for its Raphael frescos of ancient Greek myths, was renamed the Villa Farnesina. It later was the residence of the Bourbons of Naples when in Rome, but after the unification of Italy in the 1860s it became the residence of the Spanish ambassador. Now it belongs to the state and houses the Accademia dei Lincei.

Villa Farnesina in Rome (photo Jean-Pierre Dalbéra)

Also in Rome, Cardinal Alessandro built a summer house and gardens on the slopes of the Palatine Hill (the Farnese Gardens, built in the 1550s), with different spaces devoted to pleasure or to botanical research. He sponsored the building of the main Jesuit church in Rome, the Gesù (in the 1560s), and chose it as his burial place.

Farnese Gardens in Rome

All over these buildings, you can still see the ubiquitous Farnese lilies (or gigli), which conveniently aligned the family visually with its protector, France (and in inverted colours: blue lilies on gold instead of the French golden lilies on blue). The Farnese coat of arms was also augmented: the papal keys were added in 1545 (a right for any Gonfalonier of the Church), and in 1586, Ottavio’s son Alessandro would add a quartering for Austria-Burgundy, for his mother’s family.

the older Farnese arms, and a unicorn crest
the augmented Farnese arms

Every good Roman cardinal needs a country retreat, so Cardinal Alessandro Farnese rebuilt his grandfather’s villa in the Lazio, not far from his brother’s duchy of Castro. The Villa Farnese at Caprarola, with its famous pentagonal shape and circular courtyard, would become a model of the Roman country house and the showpiece for the family. One of the most famous rooms is the Sala dei Fasti Farnesiani (the ‘Room of Farnese Deeds’), which features a fresco commemorating Cardinal Alessandro’s efforts at bringing peace to Europe by coordinating a meeting between François I and Charles V in 1540. This palace too became part of the unified Italy after 1860, and was selected as the residence of the heir to the throne. Today the villa’s secondary building, the casino or summer house, is the country residence of the President of the Republic of Italy, while the main building houses a museum.

Villa Farnese at Caprarola in the 18th century
Villa Farnese today showing its unique shape (the Casino is about 500 m to the right)
the meeting of Charles V and Francis I, 1540, with Cardinal Farnese (to the Emperor’s left). Note the coats of arms on the canopy include the the eagle of the Empire, the lilies of France, and the Farnese gigli

By the mid-1550s, Ottavio Farnese, 2nd Duke of Parma and Piacenza, settled in to rule his new states. Despite violent beginnings, the next thirty years of his reign was fairly unremarkable. He was moderate and popular. He focused his attentions on creating a ducal capital in Parma, and left Piacenza to his widowed mother, Girolama Orsini, who had been a key asset during the Parma War, using her Roman family connections to smooth relations with the papacy, and governing Castro as regent while her youngest son Orazio was in France. The other most important woman in his life, his wife Margaret, soon departed and became a separate actor in the history of the dynasty: in 1559 she was named Governor-General of the Low Countries by her half-brother, Philip II of Spain, and lived in Brussels for the next eight years, where she tried, unsuccessfully, to keep a lid on the boiling resentment against Spanish rule in the Netherlands. When Philip sent the Duke of Alba to put down the unrest and gave him full powers that undermined those of Margaret of Parma (as Margaret of Austria was now known), she resigned, and retired to her property of L’Aquila in the Abruzzo (part of the Kingdom of Naples).

Margaret of Parma, Governor-General of the Netherlands

Meanwhile, Ottavio set up his residence in Parma in the old Bishop’s Palace—an austere building dating from the 11th century—while he oversaw the development of finer buildings worthy of a ruling dynasty. First he built the Palazzo del Giardino, across the river (also called Parma) from the centre of the city. Starting in about 1560, it was constructed on the site of an old Sforza fortress and surrounded, as its name suggests, by gardens and parklands. The Palazzo del Giardino would be enlarged in the 17th century and again in the 18th century, and its gardens would be developed by Bourbon dukes along French formal lines.

Parma, Palazzo del Giradino

Back across the river, closer to the old medieval core of the city, was a complex of buildings known as the Palazzo della Pilotta, which Ottavio developed in the 1580s, taking its name from the game of pelota, played by Spanish soldiers stationed there. The oldest building, on the river bank, was the Rocchetta, or keep, which was linked by a Corridore to some townhouses that served as the ducal court until a more grand palace was constructed in the next reign.

Palazzo della Pilotta in the 19th century
The Pilotta today, mostly destroyed in World War II (photo Sailko)

Duke Ottavio also patronised churches in Parma, notably the Shrine of Santa Maria della Steccata, named for the picket fence (steccata) which protected a miraculous image of the nursing Virgin from throngs of pilgrims. Here the Duke commissioned new interior frescos and constructed a crypt that would become the Farnese family sepulchre, and later that of the House of Bourbon-Parma (it remains so even today, with the most recent interment in 2010). I was annoyed last summer when I visited Parma and was unable to visit the crypt despite signage suggesting it was in fact open for tourists…

Santa Maria della Steccata, Parma (photo Witold Muratov)

Ottavio and Margaret had only one son, Alessandro, a surviving twin whose brother had lived only a few months in 1545. After Spain agreed to recognise the independence of Parma and Piacenza in 1555, Philip II required the presence of young Alessandro in Spain as a sort of hostage. So while Margaret of Parma was sent to Brussels, Alessandro was sent to Madrid to be raised alongside Philip’s son, Prince Carlos, and Philip’s illegitimate half-brother, Don Juan (all about the same age). Alexander, Prince of Parma, grew to be one of the greatest commanders of the age, and would eventually be sent to the Low Countries to continue in the struggle to retain the loyalty of the rebellious Dutch provinces. In 1565, his semi-royal status was confirmed by his marriage to Maria de Guimarães, daughter of Infante Duarte of Portugal (the youngest son of King Manuel). He commanded three vessels in the important victory over the Turks at Lepanto in 1571, then in 1577 was sent to the Low Countries with an army to support Don Juan, who had been appointed Governor-General the year before. But Don Juan died just a year later, in October 1578, and so Alessandro Farnese replaced him as military commander, while his mother was recalled from her peaceful retirement to act again as Governor-General. The partnership of mother and son proved to be unworkable, however, and she retired once more in 1582, leaving Alessandro as Governor-General himself. He was successful in winning over the southern Catholic nobles who proclaimed their loyalty to Spain in 1579—thus creating in essence the modern nation of Belgium—and became known for his successful sieges, most notably at Antwerp in 1584-85. His greatest fame to English readers, however, came in the following years.

Alessandro, Duke of Parma

In 1586, Alessandro Farnese succeeded as 3rd Duke of Parma and Piacenza. He entrusted these duchies to his teen-aged son Ranuccio—legally old enough to rule, but in need of adult guidance since both his mother and now his grandmother were dead—while he remained to command Spanish forces in the Low Countries. Parma defeated the English troops sent by Queen Elizabeth I to aid the Dutch, and in 1487 secured the port of Sluis in Zealand—ready for an invasion of England once the grand Armada arrived from Spain. Of course, as is well known, the ‘Protestant Wind’ blew the Armada out of the Channel, so no landing was possible. Still hoping to secure victory in the Low Countries, Parma found himself pulled away as Philip II ordered him to France in late 1589 to aid the Catholic League in their defence of the true faith from the usurping claimant king, Henry of Navarre. With Parma’s aid, they did prevent Navarre from taking Paris, and again in Spring 1592 the same for Rouen, but by this point the great commander was getting sick and was pulled back and forth between France and the Netherlands, where the armies of Maurice of Nassau were growing in strength every day. Journeying once more to France in December 1592, he weakened in the border town of Arras and died.

The new duke of Parma and Piacenza (and don’t forget, duke of Castro as well), Ranuccio I, now 23, would have a long and mostly successful reign. As a teenager there was a brief glimpse of a much grander future, for him and for the Farnese dynasty, as he was put forward in 1579 as a successor to the childless uncle of his late mother (she died in 1577), Henry, the Cardinal-King of Portugal. But Philip II of Spain had a strong claim too, and given Parma’s quite strong connections to Spain at this time, when King Henry died in 1580, Ranuccio’s claims were not pressed (though later generations did add the arms of Portugal to the Farnese coat of arms, see above).

Ranuccio I, Duke of Parma

Instead, Ranuccio initiated a fresh wave of building in Parma. He decided to turn the townhouses linked to the Palazzo della Pilotta into a proper ducal palace, which was completed in about 1620. The jewel at its centre was the Teatro Farnese, built in 1618, totally out of wood, with capacity for over 4,000 spectators, and what is considered one of the first permanent proscenium arches in the history of theatre. The rest of the palace complex included a ducal stable, a gallery for the display of the family’s growing art collection, and the Church of Saint Peter. In the eighteenth century, this magnificent palace complex would be augmented further with the addition of the Biblioteca Palatina by the Bourbons. Much of the Pilotta was destroyed by bombs in World War II, but the Theatre and the Library miraculously survived, and the complex now houses two major museums, one of fine art and the other archaeology. He also revitalised the University of Parma.

Teatro Farnese, Parma

Duke Ranuccio was also successful in curtailing the autonomy of some of the Duchy’s major feudal families, notably the Pallavicini and the Landi. From the Sanvitale family, he confiscated the estate at Colorno (in 1612), after a fairly brutal trial and public execution of its chatelaine, Barbara Sanseverino. The palace at Colorno, started by the Correggio family in the fourteenth century, became the chief summer residence of the Farnese dynasty, and would later be rebuilt by Duke Ranuccio II, employing one of the leading architects of the seventeenth century, Ferdinando Galli Bibiena.

Palazzo Colorno (photo Agnul)

Part of the impetus for this great ‘purge’ of 1612, was a reaction to a plot by which the Duke thought that several prominent nobles were conspiring against him, and in particular, encouraging his former mistress to practice witchcraft to ensure he had no male heir. In 1611, the spurned woman, Claudia Colla, was tried and burned at the stake. But it was true he had thus far no children from his wife, Margherita Aldobrandini, the niece of Pope Clement VIII, whom he married in 1600 (granted, she was only 11 when they married). In 1605, he took matters into his own hands and legitimated a son (from a different mistress), Ottavio (b. 1598), and began to raise him as if he were the heir to the duchies. But in 1610, Margherita did have a son, Alessandro, then another, Odoardo, in 1612. So Ottavio was removed from his father’s favour formally in 1618—he rebelled in 1621 and was imprisoned in the Rochetta for the rest of his life (two decades later). Duke Ranuccio hardly survived this rebellion and died in 1622.

His eldest son, Alessandro, was passed over as a deaf-mute, so the succession fell to ten-year-old Odoardo. He was at first guided as regent by his uncle, Odoardo, a cardinal since 1591. This latest Cardinal Farnese contributed to the family’s reputation for artistic refinement, by commissioning Carracci to paint frescos in his private camerino (study) at the Palazzo Farnese in Rome, and the famous Farnese Gallery ceiling, ‘the Loves of the Gods’ around the turn of the century.

the vault in the Galleria in the Palazzo Farnese, by Annibale Carracci
Cardinal Odoardo

Cardinal Odoardo died in 1626 and was replaced as regent by the young duke’s mother, Margherita Aldobrandini. For two years she ably kept these small states out of the growing conflict that would later be termed the Thirty Years War. When Odoardo came of age, however, he was brimming with enthusiasm for battle, and in 1633 directly challenged the might of the Spanish Habsburgs parked on his doorstep in Milan, by re-aligning his state with France. The neighbouring Italian prince, Francesco I d’Este, Duke of Modena, who only two years before had married Odoardo’s sister Maria Caterina, led a Spanish army to capture Piacenza and devastated the countryside. France, sadly, did not send help, and Odoardo was forced to sue for peace in 1637.

Odoardo, Duke of Parma and Piacenza

Duke Odoardo had spent heavily on raising troops, so pressed his already ravaged estates for more taxes. He also borrowed significant amounts from Roman bankers, and when these appealed to the pope (Urban VIII) for aid in getting re-payment, the Pope decided that this was a good opportunity to gain a duchy for his family, the Barberini, just as Paul III had done one hundred years before. He occupied the Duchy of Castro and declared the Farnese no longer vassals there. Odoardo and his ally the Grand Duke of Tuscany, Ferdinando II, whose sister he had married in 1628, were unable to defend these possessions in this ‘Castro War’, but by 1644 had made peace with the papacy, promising to pay the creditors. Castro was restored for now, but the Duke died soon after, in 1646, aged only 34. Once again a younger brother, another Cardinal Farnese (Francesco Maria), was called on to act as regent—but he too died young (at 27) in 1647.

Margherita de’ Medici, Regent of Parma

In a repeat of the previous generation, Duchess Margherita de’ Medici now became regent for her son Ranuccio II, but only for a year, as he came of age in 1648, and immediately provoked a rematch with the Papacy over Castro. Not only did he refuse to pay the debts as his father had promised, he also refused to recognise the newly appointed Bishop of Castro—and worse, was probably involved in that prelate’s murder in 1649. Not a pope to be trifled with, Innocent X again revoked the fief of Castro, sent in his troops, and razed the city of Castro. It was never rebuilt, and its diocese was even transferred elsewhere. The main branch of the Farnese were now un-rooted from their ancestral homeland.

But there did remain another branch of the Farnese family in Lazio, the dukes of Latera—see above. Their castle, the Palazzo Farnese in Latera, located near the western shores of Lake Bolsena, was an ancient medieval castle, enlarged in the 15th century once it became a ducal residence. A new building was built next to it in 1550, in a more elegant Renaissance style—then they were joined together in 1625. Today the complex has been subdivided into various residences but still dominates this hilltop town.

Latera (photo Marco Lodovichi)
Latera, Palazzo Farnese

I don’t know much about the earlier generations, from the founding of this branch in 1408, but they began making waves in the later decades of the 16th century. Mario I, 5th Duke of Latera (r. 1579-1619), was a soldier: he served under his distant cousin the Prince of Parma in the Low Countries, in the 1570s, then for the Emperor in Hungary; he was later instrumental in the Papal takeover of the Duchy of Ferrara from the Este family in 1598, and was named Captain-General of the Church in 1603. His older brother, Ferrante, was a churchman, and was appointed Bishop of Parma—an interesting dynastic cross-pollination—in 1573. The dynastic relationship was not enough however, and he clashed continually with the dukes and the local nobility in trying to extend greater Church authority over the city. The situation became so tense that the Pope intervened and sent Bishop Farnese away on long missions, first as Papal Legate to Bologna in 1591, then as Apostolic Nuncio to the Imperial court in Prague in 1597. Another notable member of the clergy at this point was Mario’s daughter, Isabella, who entered the Order of Poor Clares and took the name ‘Suor Francesca’. Her father built a new monastery for the Poor Clares in the village of Farnese (Santa Maria delle Grazie) in 1618, and she became its first abbess. She later founded monasteries all over Lazio and in the city of Rome itself, and when she died in 1651, was declared to be ‘venerable’ (a step below sainthood).

Mario, Duke of Latera, in the Church of Poor Clares
The Venerable Suor Francesca

Duke Mario had numerous sons, who succeeded as Duke of Latera in succession. The last of these was Girolamo, who was also a cleric when he became the last duke in 1662. He had been Apostolic Nuncio to the Swiss Cantons in 1639, then Governor of Rome in 1650 and Prefect of the Apostolic Palace and Governor of Castel Gandolfo (the papal country retreat) in 1655. Finally elevated to the cardinalate in 1657, he then succeeded as Duke of Latera and governed for six years before he died in 1668. With no heirs, the fief returned to the Papacy. There were now no Farnesi in Lazio at all.

Cardinal Girolamo Farnese, last Duke of Latera

Back in Parma, Ranuccio II had now settled in, after the 2nd Castro War, to a relatively long reign, from 1646 to 1694, which marked a new cultural high point for the Duchy—he patronised artists and musicians and brought to Parma many of the great treasures from the family’s residences in Rome. He tried to re-purchase the Duchy of Castro, and the Papacy extended the terms several times; but finally he gave up (by 1666), and focused more fully on Parma and Piacenza—he was a good ruler, re-developing the local economy after the Thirty Years War, and improving agriculture by draining wetlands near the Po. With the money he saved, Ranuccio purchased two more imperial fiefs—those of the Landi family, at Bardi and Compiano—to add to the duchy in 1682. He married three times, maintaining dynastic ties with his neighbours in Turin and Modena.

Ranuccio II, Duke of Parma and Piacenza

Duek Ranuccio II’s foreign policy was also balanced: his first younger brother, Alessandro, was destined for the Church (every Farnese generation needs a cardinal!), and the second, Orazio, was given a commission to lead Farnese troops in the service of Venice against the Ottomans. When Orazio died of a sickness on his journey home in 1656, Alessandro took his place, then was sent to Spain to try to revive the glorious career of their great-grandfather of the same name. The King of Spain repeatedly appointed him to high commands, as a general in the war against Portugal in 1664, then as Viceroy of Catalonia in 1676 to defend that province against French invasion, but in both cases he was soon withdrawn, having offended many of his officers and those back at court in Madrid by his extravagant and pompous lifestyle and his relationship with the prostitute Maria de Laó y Carillo, who lived with him as a wife for many years. Yet due to close dynastic connections he had with the Spanish king, and the many persuasive letters of his brother Ranuccio back in Parma, Alessandro finally achieved the family goal and was named Governor-General of the Netherlands in 1680. Here too his insistence on being treated as a royal highness and his lavish spending made him an embarrassment for the Spanish court, and he was once again dismissed, in 1682—much to his relief as armies of creditors closed in on his residence in Brussels. He returned to Madrid in 1687 where he was appointed a Gentleman of the Chamber, Councillor of State, Admiral of the Spanish Navy and Knight of the Golden Fleece…but he died just over a year later, leaving his massive debts to be paid by his brother and his illegitimate son Alessandro.

Alessando, Prince of Parma

Meanwhile, Ranuccio II feared the ongoing conflicts between Austria, France and Spain, which usually used the plains of northern Italy as their battleground, so he continued to solidify his links with the Habsburgs by arranging a marriage of his son Odoardo to Dorothea Sophia of the Palatinate, in 1690. She was incredibly well connected: as younger sister of the Holy Roman Empress, the Queen of Portugal, and the new Queen of Spain. A new heir for the dynasty, Prince Alessandro, was born in December 1691, but lived only until August 1693, and was soon followed to the grave by his father, the Hereditary Prince Odoardo, in September, and then by Duke Ranuccio II himself a year later in 1694. Only one daughter remained, Elisabetta, born in October 1692, who would later become one of the most famous women of the early eighteenth century as Isabel, Queen of Spain.

Dorothea Sophia, Countess Palatine of Neuburg, Duchess of Parma

When Ranuccio II died in 1694, his state was nearly bankrupt, so his second son, Francesco, took extreme measures as new Duke of Parma and Piacenza. He dismissed huge numbers of servants, musicians, jesters and dwarves, and stopped the practice of regular court spectacles and lavish banquets so enjoyed by his father. He also married his brother’s widow, Dorothea Sophia, so he wouldn’t have to return her sizeable dowry. She was of a much more sober (maybe we can say ‘Germanic’) temperament, so she worked closely with her husband to restore the Duchy’s finances. Together they did sponsor the arts, however, and in particular stressed learning, improving the University of Parma and founding a College of the Nobility which encouraged Parmesan noble sons to become useful servants of the state by studying law, languages or mathematics. When the War of the Spanish Succession broke out in 1702, Duke Francesco managed to keep his states neutral, though they were occupied by Austrian troops led by Prince Eugene of Savoy, and towards the end of the war he was forced to recognise that his duchies were now fiefs of the Empire, no longer vassals of the Papacy. Seeing that neither he nor his brother Antonio had sons, both Vienna and Rome hoped to incorporate Parma and Piacenza into their domains. But in 1714, Francesco and Dorothea Sophia played their one remaining trump card—in an effort to stave off absorption into the Austrian domains—and married off Princess Elisabetta to King Philip V of Spain, a Bourbon and thus a rival of Austria. She changed her name to the more Spanish Isabel and soon became a crucial part of Philip’s reign, as a strong-willed princess able to counteract his increasing depression and mental instability.

Francesco, Duke of Parma and Piacenza

In 1718, the Treaty of London was signed between Austria, Spain, Britain, France and the Dutch, who all recognised that Isabel Farnese was the heiress of Parma and Piacenza (and in fact of Tuscany too, via her Medici great-grandmother), with the assumption that these territories would be given to her eldest Bourbon son, the Infante Carlos of Spain.

Isabel Farnese, Queen of Spain, with her son Infante Carlos

In February 1727, Duke Francesco died and was succeeded by his brother Antonio, a prince of a very different character. Forbidden from living a life of parties and luxury by his austere brother and sister-in-law, he had lived for years at his country house, the Rocca di Sala, another of those country seats taken from the feudal nobility by Duke Ranuccio I back in 1612. The Sanvitale family had held the fief of Sala, a few miles southwest of Parma, since the mid-thirteenth century, and had built the Rocca as their residence in the fifteenth century (when their fief was elevated by the Duke of Milan into a county). In the seventeenth century it served as one of many hunting lodges for the Farnese family, and in 1723, Antonio decided to make it his seat, which he enlarged and renovated. As duke, he continued to reside there, reviving the more extravagant court of his father, with gambling and feasting late into the night, living openly with is mistress Countess Margherita Bori Giusti.

Antonio Farnese, Duke of Parma and Piacenza
the Rocca di Sala, Duke Antonio’s country seat

Duke Antonio’s first minister convinced him to marry, which he did in July 1727, to a local Este princess, Enrichetta, daughter of the Duke of Modena. But his health was terrible—morbidly obese, like his cousin Gian Gastone, the last Grand Duke of Tuscany—and there was little chance of a child. Yet his niece Queen Isabel, concerned for her son’s agreed inheritance, arranged with France and Spain in 1729 to permit the stationing of 6,000 Spanish troops in Parma to safeguard it from Austrian ambitions. Duke Antonio renounced the Emperor’s recent claims to suzerainty, which prompted an amassing of Imperial troops on the frontiers with Milan. When Antonio suddenly died in January 1731, Austrian troops swiftly moved in and convinced Duchess Enrichetta that she was pregnant, to forestall the claiming of the Duchy by the Infante Carlos of Spain. She reigned in Parma in the name of her unborn child, while the indomitable Dowager Duchess Dorothea Sophia pressed for her to be examined to determine if she was really pregnant. In September the fallacy was revealed, so Austria, humiliated, agreed to allow Carlos to move in—though he had to formally recognise his status as an Imperial vassal. The Dorothea Sophia was named regent, and Enrichetta was kept under house arrest until she, under force, returned the ducal crown jewels. Nine years later she remarried, a German prince from Hesse-Darmstadt, and she moved away.

Enrichetta d’Este, Duchess of Parma

The House of Farnese passed into history. Isabel Farnese, Queen of Spain, lived for many more years, surviving her husband Philip V by twenty years, and dying in retirement at the Palace of Aranjuez in 1766. Her son Carlos—now Carlo in Italian—became much more than just duke of Parma and Piacenza. Only a few years after taking up the reins in his Italian duchies, he marched south and easily ousted the Austrians from the kingdoms of Naples and Sicily and declared himself king. His younger brother, Infante Felipe, would later be installed as duke of Parma (1748), while he himself succeeded his older half-brothers as King of Spain, as Carlos III, in 1759. His descendants would continue Isabel Farnese’s line in Spain, but also established a separate line in Naples; his brother’s descendants continued to rule in Parma and Piacenza until they were overthrown during the Risorgimento in 1859. The Bourbon-Parma line continues to this day, as rulers of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (since 1964, though formally known as the House of Nassau-Weilburg), but also as extended members of the Dutch royal family (due to the marriage of Carlos Hugo, Duke of Parma, to Princess Irene of the Netherlands in 1964), and as Carlist pretenders to the Spanish throne. The Farnese family achieved what no other papal family had—not the Borgias, not the Barberinis—in securing an independent principality carved out of papal lands that endured for nearly 200 years.

Giglo Farnesi